Get FREE NRO Newsletters

 

June 11 Issue  |  Subscribe  |  Renew

Close

New on NRO . . .

Planet Gore

The hot blog.


Print   |  Text
 

Biden: Same Ol’ Market-Socialist Obama

The White House has spun President Obama’s State of the Union as a tactical pro-business move to the center. Wary Republicans listened to his rhetoric Tuesday night and pledged to trust but verify. And analysts pointed to the speech’s inherent contradictions.

“None of us can predict with certainty what the next big industry will be, or where the new jobs will come from. Our free enterprise system is what drives innovation,” he said. Was this the new, pro-capitalist Obama who embraced free markets?

Or was this the same ol’ market-socialist Obama? “We’ve begun to reinvent our energy policy. We’ll fund the Apollo Projects of our time. With more research and incentives, we can break our dependence on oil with biofuels, and become the first country to have 1 million electric vehicles on the road by 2015,” he droned later in the same speech.

Who is the 2011 Obama? Pro-Big Government or pro-market?

Today, on a post-SOTU national tour stop in Indiana, Vice President Biden answered empathically: Big Government.

“By 2015, we will be the first nation in the world to have a million advanced-technology vehicles on the road. A million,” Biden said after his tour of a government-subsidized battery-assembly plant.

None of us can predict with certainty what the next big industry will be? Oh, yes we will, Biden told the Detroit News embracing Obama’s long-stated goal of forcing the production of 1 million electric cars. “We decided [sic] why should they be made anywhere else but in the United States. Tell me why?”

“We’re going to reshape what Americans drive,” Biden said. “In turn we’re going to reshape America itself.”

Reshaping the auto. Reshaping health care. Reshaping America into Euro-socialism. So much for change you can believe in.

New on Planet Gore. . .


COMMENTS   1

EXPAND  

   01/27/11 08:40

The SOTU speech was a two-faced pose on business, markets, spending, energy, the environment, and government. He skipped over foreign policy.

Someone (Bolton?) once wrote a piece for the WSJ explaining how what Ahmadinejad actually said in a UN speech was something quite different than the words reflected on the surface. Someone needs to do that for this speech, because it was a deceit.

Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse

Add a Comment

Already Registered? Log In Here.


The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


* Designates a required field.
© National Review Online 2012
All Rights Reserved.
Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital

Gift Subscriptions
NR / Print
NR / Digital
NR Apps
iPhone/iPad
Android

NRO Apps
iPhone
Support Us
Donate
Media Kit
Contact