
In 2007, Barack Obama spoke to the Detroit Economic Club as a presidential candidate and bluntly told Detroit’s automakers that they were building the wrong cars. Two years later, as president of the United States and chairman of bankrupt General Motors and Chrysler, Obama got his chance to build the cars he wants. He hailed GM’s salvation as a chance to produce the electric “car of the future,” the plug-in electric Chevy Volt. And he gave Chrysler to Fiat on the condition that they would bring the tiny, 40 mpg Fiat 500 to America.
Two years later, how are the Obamacars selling?
“The little biscotti are not selling as well as Fiat North America . . . had planned. The 500 will probably finish out the year with sales in the low 20,000s, well short of management’s 50,000-unit prediction, apparently made at a blind-drunk Christmas party,” writesthe Wall Street’ Journal’s Dan Neill. Actually, those sales figures were the dreams of a sober, green zealot in the White House.
Ironically, Chrysler’s post-bailout resurgence has come thanks to Jeeps as Fiat has learned that Americans love what Obama hates (and ridiculed that 2007 Detroit audience for): SUVs.
And Chevy Volt sales?
“General Motors predicted it would sell 10,000 Chevrolet Volt automobiles by the end of the year,” reports Neil Munro at The Daily Caller, “but it is only on track to sell roughly 6,000 of these plug-in hybrids.” In 2009 supporters were predicting 120,000 would be sold in 2012.
But even the 6,000 figure is worse than it appears, because many are being bought by the government itself.
“On Dec. 7, for example, New York City announced it had bought 50 Volts,” reports Munro. “In November, the city of DeLand, Florida announced it was using part of a $1.2 million federal grant to buy five of the autos.” This in addition to the 100 Volts Obama himself announced the feds would purchase this May.
When Obama isn’t buying the cars directly, he’s buying them through stimulus grants to utilities.
“A total of 64 Volts were purchased by a coalition of 28 utility companies,” continues Munro. “The purchase is funded with $30 million from Obama’s . . . American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.” In addition, Obama is leaning on his corporate crony friends — like the head of his Jobs Council, GE’s Jeffrey Immelt — to buy Volts. GE — itself the recipient of millions in taxpayer stimulus dollars – will purchase roughly 3,000 Volts per year through 2015.
And so on. Indeed, Obama has promised that by 2015 all federal vehicle purchases will be alternative-fuel cars like the Volt — on the way to replacing the entire 600,000 federal fleet.
Mark Modica of the National Legal and Policy Center tells the Caller that these government and corporate purchases of Volts dull GM claims that it is selling most of its autos to ordinary consumers. ‘Considering that only about 5,000 of these things have sold, even if only. . . 1,000 have gone to townships and General Electric, you’re talking 20 percent” of sales, he notes.
Even private Volt buyers are using taxpayer money. Volt customers — a not-very-99 Percent demographic making upwards of $200,000 a year (ex.: Michigan senator Carl Levin) — receive a $7,500 federal subsidy with their purchase.
Obamacars are selling alright — and you, dear taxpayer, are the buyer.
The U.S. government as the sole customer of 600,000 examples of a class of vehicles whose entry-level model already costs $45,000? We should shudder to think. Can a $1 million+ Dept. of Defense style cost-plus design be far behind?
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe $7500 federal subsidy is illegal. The Volt is just a hybrid, it should be getting the $2500 hybrid rebate, not the $7500 full electric rebate.
GM lied about the nature of the Volt in order to secure the $7500 rebate, it wasn't until independent car magazines got to test drive it that we learned the truth. Yet, we're still paying $7500 in taxpayer money for these hybrids.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseI'm looking at a chart of year over year US oil production from a approximate high of 9 million barrels of oil in 1980 to about 5 million barrels of oil today. Another chart would show the rising price of gas year over year during the same period. Appears we are extracting a lot of oil now from the Canadian oil sands and deep deep under the ocean as most of the easy accessible oil is gone. Producing oil from such places as Canadian oil sands must produce vast amounts of green house gases as it would appear to be terribly inefficient. The US with it's addiction to cheap oil and gas will need to switch to alternatives at some point in order to survive. It seems the sooner the US can switch from using diesel in big trucks to LNG and cars can be electrified it would save some of this oil for things that are needed such as producing plastics etc... I think any sane person would have their pants scared off of them if they could figure the implications of no energy plan in the US except drill baby drill? If interested in the facts just search for year over year oil production.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseTwo years ago, Delaware built a new rest stop on I-95, complete with charging stations.
I go by there regularly, and you can see the whole area with the charging stations from the highway. I've never yet seen a single one in use.
Reply to this commentLinkReport AbuseThe conservative attack on the US auto industry will be their Waterloo. With each ill-informed article, it becomes increasingly obvious that you want America to fail in order for the enrichment of a few wealthy special interest groups. Your failed ideology has see its last days.
Reply to this commentLinkReport Abuse