Google+
Close

Turning Their Backs on Progress



Text  



St. Louis — Last week at Washington University’s (and my son’s) graduation ceremony, one of the Midwest’s most prestigious universities honored one of its city’s most prominent citizens — a man whose company has developed technologies that have transformed agriculture and fed millions while making cropland more environmentally sustainable.

But when Chancellor Mark Wrighton called the name of former Monsanto CEO Richard Mahoney to receive his honorary degree, some 100 “green” student activists and alumni stood up and turned their backs in protest.

That Mahoney — who spearheaded the development of game-changing, genetically-modified crops — is a controversial figure says a lot about the American Left today.

Our colleges school students about the importance of getting involved — of solving the problems of hunger and poverty in the world. That is what Mahoney and his fleet of engineers have dedicated their lives to. Since 1960, the St. Louis company has led a productivity revolution that has more than doubled crop yields without increasing the area of land used. This revolution defied the Apocalyptic claims of the Left (before global warming, greens were obsessed with famine) that the world would run out of food by the end of the 20th century.

“If farmers were still producing food at 1960 levels of productivity, agriculture would have had to expand from 38 percent of the earth’s land to 82 percent to feed the world’s current population,” reports Ronald Bailey of Reason magazine. ” This enormous increase in yields is the result of applying more artificial fertilizers, breeding higher yielding crops, a wider use of pesticides and herbicides, and expanding irrigation. More recently, advances in modern biotechnology have also contributed to boosting yields.”

Mahoney is one of the giants of this technological feat. From corn to wheat, his company developed crops that proved resistant to disease and drought — increasing crop yields at the same time they needed fewer pesticides in order to thrive.

These advances steadily increased crop yields in the U.S. (even as production has leveled off in hysterically anti-biotech Europe), but created a boon in developing countries where help was needed most. For example, “biotech insect resistant cotton varieties have boosted the yields for India’s cotton farmers by 45 to 63 percent,” reports Bailey. “Similarly, biotech insect resistant corn varieties increased yields (or prevented losses) by 24 percent in the Philippines.”

For this, Mahoney gets booed? His industry’s breakthroughs are as misreported as they are significant.

Read more at The MichiganView.com here.



Text  


Subscribe to National Review