November
21, 2002, 9:00 a.m. The
Tower Medals
The war on terror deserves its own medal.
he
unveiling of the
new design for 7 World Trade Center, a 750-foot glass-and-steel office
tower that bears a mild resemblance to the 110-story buildings that collapsed
on 9/11 and took its 47-story predecessor down eight hours later, is an
important milestone in the ongoing national recovery from the opening
act in the war on terror. The event brought to mind an idea I wrote about
last December. I appended one
of my articles on the need to deal swiftly with Iraq no less
(time flies) with the following paragraph:
I have always admired
the fact the Victoria Cross was originally manufactured from metal taken
from Russian artillery pieces captured during the Crimean War, from
which the decoration originated. In that spirit I would like to propose
something similar - that all campaign medallions awarded for service
during the War on Terror be cast from metal from the World Trade Center
towers. Currently the salvaged beams are being cut up and sold for scrap
in Asia. One long beam would supply enough metal for thousands of medals.
And I think it would make the decorations that much more meaningful
to the men and women who earn them, as well as let the survivors know
that a small piece of the buildings in which their loved ones perished
has been put to a noble use.
I got a lot of e-mail
on that suggestion, far more than on the article itself. The idea struck
a chord. Most readers appreciated its simplicity, and the special sort
of symbolism, the physical linkage of event to event, of place to place.
It is comparable to the U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt loosing its first
sorties against Afghanistan while flying the flag the three firemen raised
in the rubble of the World Trade Towers, or Marines seizing the Kandahar
airport and unfurling another Ground Zero flag, covered
with the names of the fallen and messages from survivors. ("They
took 23 good cops. Pay back time.") These moments merge events with
power and elegance. Crafting medals from the debris of the buildings destroyed
by our enemies and let's also include the Pentagon would
ennoble the awards in a manner that reaches beyond the valorous service
they recognize. A medal struck from tower beams would be more than an
acknowledgment; it would be a tangible connection, an unduplicatable fusion
of time, space, and memory.
To date, no campaign
medal has been authorized for Operation Enduring Freedom (which includes
actions in Afghanistan, the Philippines, and elsewhere in the global war
on terror). As far as I have been able to find out, the matter is not
even being discussed. The National
Defense Service Medal has been authorized for those on active duty,
and the Southwest
Asia Service Medal could well be given the Afghan War vets. Nevertheless,
it would be incredible if Enduring Freedom did not receive distinct recognition.
Last summer Canada devised a medal for its contribution to the war on
terror, Operation Apollo. The design came under fire for not differentiating
sufficiently between those who served in combat and those who were in
support positions. Nevertheless, the Canadians honored their troops. Around
the same time, Australia announced that there would be no separate medal
but only a badge for Afghanistan service yet, this may change after
the Bali bombing.
Debates over medals
can be contentious. Every possible issue is raised, from the device on
the medal to the color of the ribbon, its placement in order of precedence,
and of course, whether it is even warranted. One would not like to see
ribbons awarded for everything our troops do it is not our tradition
to load up the fruit salad until our uniforms look like a Soviet marshal's.
In fact, before 1900 there were hardly any commendations available
they were seen as European inventions unsuited to our democratic republic.
But since then our thinking has clearly evolved on the issue, and it is
hard to see why our current war would not qualify for special recognition.
After all, even
Kosovo did.
Senator Daniel Inouye
(D., Ha.) raised the issue at a March 6, 2002 hearing before the Senate
Appropriations Committee. He stated, "I have yet to see a ribbon.
In all wars, if you went to Korea, there was a
Korean ribbon, a
Vietnam ribbon. I have not seen one for this conflict, nor have I
heard of any unit receiving a unit citation. I see enough on CNN and other
news media suggesting the heroics of our men, but somehow they are not
recognized. I think it is very important that due recognition be
made, not just by word but by awards and declarations. And, similarly,
I think these awards and decorations would have a salutary impact, not
on the GIs but among the people their parents, their brothers and
sisters. They want to know that their loved ones are involved and doing
their gung-ho work." The senator, a
World War II Medal of Honor winner, knows something of the importance
of recognizing service to the country. Medals
for heroism have, of course, been awarded in this war, but the prospective
campaign ribbon to which Senator Inouye referred has yet to be approved.
As the last steel
beams are broken down and shipped to Asia for purposes mundane, would
it be too much to ask that one or two be set aside for this purpose before
the opportunity eludes us? And who can take the action necessary to encourage
the Defense Department to authorize creation of the medals? Are any members
of Congress at all concerned, apart from Senator Inouye? Could the commander
in chief motivate this effort by Executive Order, and bring a sense of
reverence to what could otherwise be a stuffy bureaucratic process? Surely
too much is at stake to let this matter escape us. What veteran of this
conflict, years hence, would not look with special thoughtfulness at such
an award, knowing its hallowed provenance? And who would not bring it
forth to show to generations now unborn, to let them feel its weight in
their young hands, to tell the story of the fateful day, to renew the
pride in service well performed, and to remember?
James
S. Robbins is a national-security analyst & NRO contributor.