 |
 |
|
November
15, 2002 12:55
p.m.
Where Will the Dems Go?
Life
with Ms. Pelosi.
|
 |
hat are the
Democrats supposed to do?
Well, they have begun by electing Nancy Pelosi as their in-house leader.
She has everywhere been classified as a member of the left wing of her
party, and she smiles bravely and a little condescendingly when she hears
this said of her at interviews (Is it true, Ms. Pelosi, that your hero
as a girl was Leon Trotsky? If such a question were asked, she would laugh,
and temporize.) What does she think of the Democrats now prepared to vote
for the Homeland Security Bill? Didn't she oppose it? "Well
yes, that's part of the legislative process. Political initiatives move
from stage to stage. And there are compromises, and that sort of thing."
But much time has
been spent, though not much thought given, to the question of where the
Democratic party is going. It has to go somewhere. It can't too easily
move to the right, because to the right is the GOP. It follows that it
should move left or perhaps dissolve, making way for a fresh party.
Wedded to what? Compulsory abortions?
Some of what has been written about the implications of last Election
Day is raillery, a matter of having fun with the returns and with the
media, babysitters of American liberalism.
Still, some of those who speak out make concrete proposals. One such was
Democratic senator from Georgia, Zell Miller. Hear what he proposes
(in the Wall Street Journal) if you want to look at the awful depths
of Democratic vacuity, A.D. 2002.
Sen. Miller's first
suggestion is: "Why couldn't our party push for a national lottery
with the proceeds going to help pay the cost of college for deserving
students in America?"
Put that down as the Fifth Freedom. If Sen. Miller goes on that subject
with a speech in the Senate, he should back it up with references given
to the absence of available help for deserving students in America. And
then lotteries, of course, are a form of regressive financing. It's poor
people who end up suffering most from lottery sales. Perhaps the GOP could
steal this proposal, in pursuit of its war on the poor?
Sen. Miller goes on: "Why couldn't our party push to restructure
the sacrosanct Head Start program into a universal pre-kindergarten program,
with more emphasis on learning instead of just day care?" Anybody
want to run for president on that plank?
And then, "Why couldn't we Democrats push to spread the massive government
bureaucracy now concentrated in Washington, D.C., out around the whole
nation, saving money and bringing jobs to America at the same time?"
As I live and breathe, Senator, what are we going to do, then, about the
unemployed in Washington, D.C.? Set up another lottery?
The reflections of
Mark Steyn in the (British) Spectator are in another spirit. The
Democrats, he says, need new voices, and it isn't easy to find these,
pace Ms. Pelosi, inside the party. "In recent years, both
parties have so gerrymandered the House districts that they're essentially
one big incumbent-protection racket." As for the Senate, "the
wiliest party operatives haven't figured out a way to redraw state lines
to their advantage."
Should the Democrats move in the direction of the partisans of the late
Senator Wellstone? Yet the demonstration at the memorial service in Minneapolis,
"posterity will record as the 'defining moment' of the campaign .
. . at which fist-pumping mourners hissed Republican senators and deranged
activists publicly demanded that these alleged GOP friends of Paul demonstrate
their loyalty by renouncing their parties and campaigning for his posthumous
victory.
"To those watching at home," Mr. Steyn, who lives in New Hampshire,
recorded, "it looked like hidden-camera footage from inside a particularly
insane cult. It's a commonplace, especially in Britain, to hear the 'religious
Right' referred to as a bunch of weirdoes who are an embarrassment to
the Republican party. Well, the Minnesota memorial gave us the religious
Left: they don't believe in God, they believe in politics; the Democratic
party is their church, Wellstone their latest martyr, and the campaign
a crusade. They couldn't have been any freakier if they'd been speaking
in tongues."
That is one man's view of what would happen if the Democrats went left.
But meanwhile, we can all sit down and see what Ms. Pelosi recommends.
|
 |
|
 |