You may have noticed it's pledge week here at National Review Online. I have tried very hard to come up with a way to ask you for help. I am immensely proud of National Review Online; immensely proud of what it has done and what it means to some of the most impressive readers on the web and the planet. I'm grateful for the support you guys have provided in the past. I'm also grateful to the bosses at NR for allowing me to be part of all this. Unfortunately, I'm terrible at asking for money just look at my history of asking for raises! I don't know if you realize it or not, but National Review magazine, like all great magazines about ideas (and some less than great ones) has lost money pretty much for its entire existence. Such is the nature of the beast. But William F. Buckley and his merry band understood that defending, among other things, the free-market system required ignoring the profit motive. I know, it's a bitter irony for all of us. It is a testament to the forward thinking and commitment to principle of NR's leaders that they understood the necessity of extending that money-losing principle to Internet. As Richard Weaver noted in his book, Ideas Have Consequences, ideas have consequences. NR understood that taking our ideas to the web was imperative, even if it required deficit spending. It was the right decision and nobody regrets it. But NRO has been up and running now for some four years and we still lose money. When you add that to the awful setbacks the magazine (and many others) faced with the downturn in the economy over the last couple of years, you can begin to see not only how important NRO is to the magazine's mission but also the kinds of sacrifices the magazine has made to keep NRO up and running. Our expenses aren't a rounding error in Rupert Murdoch's empire, for example. Things aren't dire, but they are definitely difficult and direness is certainly a possibility in these next few years. That's why I need to ask you for money. Unfortunately, I don't how. Below are some of the outtakes from my failed attempts at working up a successful plea. NATIONAL
REVIEW ONLINE APPEAL. TAKE ONE: NATIONAL
REVIEW ONLINE APPEAL: TAKE TWO Whenever we beg for money, I get more than a few e-mails from angry readers comparing us to National Public Radio. "How can you complain about their pledge drives when you do the same thing?" This is what We Who Pretend To Understand Philosophy call a "category error." We are not National Public Radio. Yes, we share the word "National" and several vowels and consonants. But beyond that, the similarities start to breakdown. They are a radio station. We are a web magazine. Most people listen to NPR while driving on their way to or home from work. Most people read NRO at work. If you try to read NRO while driving, you will smash into something with your car. Meanwhile, if you try to listen to NPR at work, under the new Patriot Act your name will be submitted to the Justice Department for review. NPR suckles at the teat of the Leviathan State. National Review suckles at, well, your teat . Okay, that's disgusting. Scratch this approach. NATIONAL
REVIEW ONLINE PLEDGE APPEAL: TAKE THREE. NATIONAL
REVIEW ONLINE PLEDGE APEAL: TAKE FOUR. Kathryn Lopez: That's right Jonah. Who can forget such highlights from the last season as Victor Davis Hanson's knee-slappers: "A Funny Sort of Empire" and "Doom, Doom and More Doom." Goldberg: That's right Kathryn. Plus: Because of support from readers like you [speaking to camera], we can afford to send our correspondents all around the globe. What other website has scored interviews with General Pervez Musharraf and Kim Jong-Il. Lopez: That's right Jonah. But we couldn't do this alone. We need the help of our readers. Readers like John from Cincinnati who who who will throw a brick through National Review's window if we treat them like the cud-chewing mindless automatons who write checks to PBS! I can't read this. Goldberg: Oh come on K-Lo, get with the program. It's not a big deal. Lopez: Easy for you to say! You don't work for a living. All you do is lie around on the couch all day and talk about your dog! I've got to put a frickin' magazine together! Goldberg: Nurse! You promised me that Lopez's medication would last until we were done! If she bites me again, you're gonna be back handing out tetracycline to Jerry Springer supporters and Bill Clinton's interns. NATIONAL
REVIEW ONLINE PLEDGE APPEAL: TAKE FIVE |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|||
|
http://www.nationalreview.com/goldberg/goldberg061703.asp
|
||||