 |
|
September
10, 2003, 9:25 a.m.
Laughing
in Auschwitz, the Jewess Barbie, the evil Hannity, &c.
|
 |
n Monday's
Impromptus, I wrote of an extraordinary event: Three Israeli F-15
jets circled Auschwitz last week. Those jets were piloted by descendants
of Holocaust survivors. They were paying tribute to the murdered. As the
jets flew over, 200 Israeli soldiers on the ground at Birkenau
a part of the camp stood at attention. One can hardly think of
a more meaningful, more moving event.
But, for inane reasons,
some at the Auschwitz Museum complained. They said the flyover was a "demonstration
of Israeli military might" at "a place of silence." I retorted,
Damn right it was a display of Israeli military might and what
could be more appropriate? Moreover, why should Auschwitz be a place of
silence? Wasn't silence sort of a problem in the first place?
Forgive the repetition,
but this is all leading up to something. I received a note from Jeff Jacoby,
which I share with you now (with the author's permission, of course).
Jacoby for those who don't know him is the award-winning
columnist for the Boston Globe.
He writes, "As
the son of a Holocaust survivor my father was the only member of
his family to leave Auschwitz alive I am particularly involved
in this question of silence in the face of Hitler's genocide. I thought
you might like to see the last few paragraphs of a speech I gave for Yom
Hashoa, the annual Holocaust remembrance day. They describe something
that occurred during a visit I paid to Auschwitz in my father's company
a few years ago."
Here are those paragraphs:
When we were in
Auschwitz in the huge section called Birkenau, the part of the
camp where the trains pulled in, where the selection took place, where
the gas was my dad and I saw a large group of Israeli students.
They had come on some kind of school program, and as we walked along
a path near the crematoria, these Israeli kids overtook us. Like school
groups everywhere, they were loud and boisterous, joking and laughing
with each other.
I can't tell you
how offended I was. "Shut up!" I wanted to tell them. "Have
some decency! You're in Auschwitz. This is the biggest Jewish graveyard
on earth. Don't you realize how many people were murdered here? How
many Jews died just for being Jews? You're laughing here? In Auschwitz?"
And then, suddenly,
I had a change of heart. And I said to my father: "Who do you think
would be more appalled to know that all these Jewish kids are running
around and laughing in this place your mother? Or Adolf Eichmann?
Who would be more revolted? Who would feel more defeated?"
On Yom Hashoa,
we remember. We cry. We swear "never again." But we can also
take heart. The most powerful nation in Europe set out to annihilate
us. It drew upon every resource and tool at its command. It stopped
at nothing. And yet Jewish children still laugh and play. Even in Birkenau,
you can hear the laughter of Jewish children. We are still here, "am
Yisrael chai" Jews living Jewish lives, as we always have,
as we always must.
Not bad, huh?
You have perhaps heard by now that the Saudi government has banned Barbie
dolls (the story is here).
Why? Oh, come on, don't pretend you don't know! Because Barbie is Jewish,
silly! The Saudi government has denounced Barbie as "The Jewish Doll,"
and she absolutely taboo.
Funny, but Barbie's
creators probably thought they were making the perfect American WASP.
And, all the while, they had . . . a Hebrewess! How embarrassing!
Now that the Saudis
have gone on a jihad against Barbie, can we all agree even the
big businessmen and the academics among us that that regime is
very, very, very bad?
On Monday night, I had the immense privilege of seeing A. M. Rosenthal,
the great journalist (former executive editor of the New York Times).
I thanked him for writing about China for not forgetting about
it. He shrugged, in his usual way, and said, "How can I?"
His most recent column
is here,
and I offer you an excerpt. As my regular readers know, all of this resonates
loudly with me:
In the past year
or so, I have written virtually every column about . . . deprivations
as they exist in countries ruled by tyrannies. Those governments seize
our attention by making war against their neighbors or against those
of their people who deviate in any way on any subject . . .
And yet I feel
laggard, because I know that for months I have had to ignore some countries
where vicious violations of human rights bring nausea to the foreigners
who know about them and blood or death to those who cannot escape the
torture . . . I salve myself sometimes by the fact that since I write
only one column a week, I have to vary the subjects. Sometimes, I tell
myself that I am a newspaperman, and newspapermen have to write about
the juiciest story of the day. Right?
Wrong unless it suits the columnist's mind and conscience. Otherwise,
ignore the friend who warns that people won't read you if you write
another human-rights column about brutal countries and their brutal
affairs. But I have never heard from readers who are annoyed by learning
about the sufferings of other people, no matter how often I write about
them. And if I ever do get such letters, I will throw them in the garbage
can.
I remember that
during the first Clinton administration, a high official visited my
office. I said I had an important question. "Human rights again,
I suppose," he said with the sneeriest of sneers.
"You bet your
sweet whatever," I answered, and then asked my question. I can't
remember what it was, but I will never forget the official's contempt
for the subject of human rights.
So this column
is a visit to Communist China, which strikes me as having the nicest,
hardest-working people in the world and the most vicious of governments.
Abe will never quit.
Gary Coleman, as you know, is one of the gang running for governor of
California. He is "the other Arnold" not Schwarzenegger,
but the former child actor who played Arnold Jackson/Drummond on the TV
sitcom Diff'rent Strokes.
During an appearance
on Fox News, he was asked by Sean Hannity who the vice president of the
United States was. He couldn't answer. Later, Charlie LeDuff of the New
York Times asked him about this: "Hannity is evil," Coleman
said! "He didn't ask Schwarzenegger that."
Well, well. If I
were Coleman, I wouldn't feel too bad. Chances are, Dick Cheney can't
name a single character on Diff'rent Strokes which is a
greater indictment of a person's Americanism.
I'll tell you something
else funny about that LeDuff piece. He wrote, "To many Californians,
the prospect [of a fringe candidate's going to Sacramento] is simultaneously
repulsive and engrossing, something like watching a Woody Allen love scene."
Sort of amazing they
allowed that in the Times!
Consider: John Kerry "announced his candidacy . . . in a place called
Patriot's Point in South Carolina, in front of the USS Yorktown,
and surrounded by Vietnam veterans." (I'm quoting from a Dan Henninger
column.) If a Republican did that, we'd hear cries of jingo, jingo, jingo!
But with liberal Democrats, it's different, you know?
The other day, I reviewed the latest CD of David Daniels, the superstar
countertenor (a shocking phrase to write but Daniels has brought
it into being, over the last several years). The album contains one of
the most repulsive songs ever written and I don't say that lightly.
I'm referring to "So Pretty," the Bernstein song whose lyrics
were penned by Comden & Green. This is a Vietnam-era protest song,
premiered by Barbra Streisand at a "Broadway for Peace" concert.
The song is so devoid of understanding and hateful in its implications
that I can barely stand to type the words, but here you are:
We were learning
in our school today
All about a country far away,
Full of lovely temples painted gold,
Modern cities, jungles ages old.
And the people are so pretty there,
Shining smiles, and shiny eyes and hair . . .
Then I had to ask my teacher why
War was making all those people die.
They're so pretty, so pretty.
Then my teacher said, and took my hand,
"They must die for peace, you understand."
But they're so pretty, so pretty.
I don't understand.
Odd, but Bernstein,
Comden, and Green didn't seem to care much for Vietnamese people
whether pretty or not after 1975, when they descended into their
real hell. And the Vietnamese who perished in the South China Sea, trying
to flee the Communist victors, and the Vietnamese who were tortured and
killed in the concentration camps were they perhaps pretty as well?
And how about Cuban, North Korean, and Chinese people? Are they not pretty
too?
Etc., etc., etc.
Which brings us to Kathy Boudin, the popular Brinks murderess who has
now been sprung from prison. She and her gang killed three people, and
planned on killing many more. But hey: They were progressives,
doing it for the people, man. The friends who arranged to house
Boudin after her release hung a "Welcome Home" sign, featuring
the symbol of peace. Yep, that was the Weathermen and all those other
idealists: lovers of peace. Tell it to the families of Waverly Brown,
Edward O'Grady, and Peter Paige.
A major homie of mine writes, "Saw an interesting quote from the
coach of the Grambling football team the other day. He is trying to entice
Maurice Clarett of OSU to go to Grambling. When asked if he had concerns
about Clarett, he said the following: 'A lot of people would like to have
Maurice Clarett. I don't think a headache comes with the kid. He didn't
shoot nobody. They didn't arrest him for drugs. He didn't rape nobody.
Ain't no problem with the kid.' The coach is right on the facts, but he
sets the bar for behavior pretty low, doesn't he?"
I'll say!
Jhumpa Lahiri is a very hot writer, but she is full of left-liberal pieties,
which she ought to be called on. Why not here on good ol' NRO? Lahiri,
an Indian-American, says, "A true Indian doesn't accept me as an
Indian and a true American doesn't accept me as an American." Far
be it from me to speak for another person's experience, but . . . allow
me: Baloney. Baloney, I say. Concerning the second part of her neat little
statement, baloney. I, for one, certainly accept her as an American
in part because what could be more American (latterly) than ethnic
whining and self-pity?
I was reading obits the other day, and was drawn to that of Moe Biller,
the old labor warrior the postal boss who died at 87. I
would see him on Crossfire during the '80s, and it was like watching
a perfect specimen of a (nearly) defunct type. The obit remarked that
Biller's actions "defied injunctions and laws barring strikes by
federal employees." Do you love that "defied"?! I'm going
to remember that the next time I break a law: I didn't break it; I defied
it! Luckily, Reagan cut loose those PATCO-niks when they "defied"
the law.
I also noticed the
obituary of Charlotte Selver, a "sensory awareness" guru who
died at 102. What I found most remarkable was that "she is survived
by her third husband" whom she married four years ago.
Last Saturday, three justices of the Supreme Court Kennedy, Ginsburg,
and Breyer made their operatic debuts in Washington. They participated
in Die Fledermaus, as guests in the party scene. I regard this
as perfect because this is the part of the opera (operetta, really) where
the score and libretto don't rule, and the performers can depart as they
wish virtually making it up as they go along. So the justices found
a living opera, evolving.
I'm not sure I can explain why, but I dearly love this, and I hope you
do, too. The actor Dennis Hopper (Easy Rider, etc.) told Ramp
magazine, "I drank all the time. I'd reach for a beer first thing
in the morning. I'd drink all day. They used to ask me in interviews,
'What about all the drugs, cocaine, and marijuana?' And I'd say, 'Well,
I just do them to cover up the fact that I'm an alcoholic.'"
Somehow priceless.
One of the funniest things I have ever read. Again, hard to articulate
. . .
By the way, have you subscribed to the online
version of National Review yet? It's mighty handy for those
who like their magazines online: fast, complete.
A reader wrote me,
"I just subscribed to your digital edition. I let my print run expire
because, as a die-hard lefty, I couldn't justify the expense, merely to
read more about the alleged wonders of George W. Bush. But I salute NR's
digital initiative. Hey, it saves trees, and you know we lefties love
trees, so you roped me back in
"
Nice!
In a couple of previous columns, I purveyed some funny, real-life headlines.
Readers have contributed more (and I think we'll call it a day). I warn
you: This may get a little blue! (Hubba, hubba.)
"Dear Jay: My
mother was from a small town in Texas named Call. My father was
young minister when they married. The headline read: 'Preacher Weds Call
Girl.'"
"Jay, I have
'Manly Man Marries Fertile Woman' beat: I live in High Point, North Carolina,
Furniture Capital of the World. A favorite saying down here and
it is entirely based in geographical fact is that High Point is
halfway between Horneytown and Climax. The map doesn't lie."
"Jay, in Illinois
there is Normal, home of Illinois State University and a Mitsubishi plant
famous for sexual harassment. And there is Oblong, home to not much famous.
But just about everyone in Illinois knows about this famous headline:
'Normal Man Marries Oblong Woman.'"
"Jay, I'll try
to do my bit. In the late '50s (somewhere in there), the University of
Minnesota football team the Golden Gophers had a QB named
Bobby Cox. At one point he was injured. The Minneapolis Tribune
ran a story under the headline, 'Gophers to Play Saturday with Cox Out.'
Didn't catch the ensuing attendance figure."
"Mr. Nordlinger,
I grew up in a small town in the Oklahoma panhandle, practically on the
Kansas line. This small town, Tyrone, is on U.S. Highway 54, exactly halfway
between Liberal, Kansas, and Hooker, Oklahoma. I can only imagine the
wedding headlines if a man from Liberal married a woman from Hooker."
Finally, "Jay,
if you look at a map of Pennsylvania you'll notice that New Holland is
halfway between Blueball and Intercourse."
Okay.
|