T-DAY [KJL] Readers--who have just done it--point out you can order the Turkey Day W for a Thanksgiving centerpiece, but time is limited (one reader said EST tonight, I'm not 100 percent certain)... Posted at 07:13 PM SPECTER'S ENEMIES LIST [KJL] I know you'll be shocked to know some of your NR friends are on it (and, NR). Courtesy of politicspa. Posted at 06:58 PM OPERATION POPCORN [KJL] Take a soldier to the movies. Posted at 06:56 PM HARRY REID [KJL] hearts Scalia for CJ of SCOTUS? Posted at 06:53 PM MIDDLEBURY [Charles Murray] I wonder if the story about the leftist stranglehold in universities is similar to the story about incompetent public schools: we inveigh against the mass (as indeed I do), but the one we happen to know personally isn't all that bad. In my case, I was recently talking to my daughter, a sophomore at Middlebury, about her course in political philosophy. She's now two months into it, and she remarked that she still doesn't have any idea what her professor's politics are. That's not easy for someone teaching political philosophy. In fact, I'm not sure I could pull off that trick for two months myself. And then there was the convocation for her freshman class last year, when Middlebury's President told his incoming students that true diversity in a college isn't measured by skin color, but by the richness and range of intellectual perspectives. That was pretty cool too. So that I'm not misunderstood, I agree that leftist domination in universities is real in the social sciences and humanities, and it is often a problem. We may, however, underestimate the prevalence of professors who act in good faith to keep their politics from spilling over into their classrooms. So I'm sharing some good news to go along with the bad. Posted at 06:49 PM ANOTHER SERIOUS ISSUE [KJL] A reader e-mails: I think it's time that NRO came out on the most important question facing Americans next week. That is, of course -- Cranberry Sauce: Can-shaped or Fresh?I confess to being ashamed of my answer. Posted at 06:43 PM KEEP LOOKING FOR VOTES! [KJL] John Kerry sent out an e-mail to supporters this afternoon that said, among other things, "Regardless of the outcome of this election, once all the votes are counted -- and they will be counted -- we will continue to challenge this administration. This is not a time for Democrats to retreat and accommodate extremists on critical principles -- it is a time to stand firm." Posted at 06:40 PM AL HUNT [KJL] is leaving the WSJ for Bloomberg Posted at 06:37 PM A MORE MANLY [KJL] timewaster. (Also, much more dorky. No princesses here--no offense to princesses, one or two of them must moonlight as dorks.) Posted at 06:34 PM CORRECTION [KJL] Loyola is not in Philly, of course. LaSalle is. Posted at 06:31 PM SORRY [KJL] for the delay in posting. Some computer issues K-Lo is having. Will be better...must be better... Posted at 06:21 PM CHAMBER OF SECRETS (2) [Andrew Stuttaford] French EU Commissioner Barrot's secret? Here is the answer, courtesy of EU Observer. "EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Nigel Farage, a British eurosceptic MEP, caused a furore in the European Parliament on Thursday (18 November) by launching a strong attack on the French Commissioner, Jacques Barrot. Mr Farage, who belongs to the UK Independence Party, said that Mr Barrot should not be allowed to be a commissioner alleging he received an eight month suspended sentence in 2000 for a funding scandal involving his political party...under French law no reference is allowed to be made to the case in public after Mr Barrot came under a presidential amnesty" Hmmm, Interesting (and seemingly backed up by the story linked to here). And who was president of France in 2000? Why, it was Jacques Chirac. Posted at 02:15 PM YEAH... [KJL] ...maybe that time waster works best for the women in the room. Posted at 02:15 PM TIME WASTER [KJL] The K-Lo version of a Jonah tradition. Posted at 02:12 PM TALKING TURKEY [KJL] A regular Corner contributor just told me he has already in his possession the hottest toy of the political season. I want my W./Turkey doll. Who wouldn't? It can be ordered through the NR Book Service. Posted at 01:55 PM CHAMBER OF SECRETS [Andrew Stuttaford] A key aspect of any democratic parliament is the ability of its members to speak openly in its chamber, free from threat of prosecution or other litigation. That's not, apparently, true in the thieves' cabal better known as the EU Parliament. According to the Daily Telegraph, the leader of the (admittedly highly eccentric) UK Independence Party is now in trouble for revealing - in the course of a debate - certain aspects of the record of the new EU Commissioner from France. Of course, there can be some valid reasons for secrecy (principally relating to security) even under parliamentary privilege, but it's still alarming to note that the parliament's president (he's a bit like the speaker) has now ordered the UKIP MEP to retract the remarks under threat of "legal consequences". The demand for 'retraction' seems to suggest that national security was not the problem. So what was? The Daily Telegraph is uncharacteristically cagey. Does anyone out there know? Posted at 01:40 PM ENEMIES [John J. Miller] Our Oldest Enemy is also our newest enemy -- check out this K.I.A. report from Iraq. Posted at 01:32 PM THE UN PUTS THE BOOT IN [Andrew Stuttaford] The organization may be corrupt, malign and useless, but is it too much to expect that the UN will not set out actively to wreck Afghanistan's new democracy? It seems that it is.. Read this report from the Independent and consider its implications: "So alarmed is the UN [by increased opium production in Afghanistan] that it is suggesting a remedy more radical than any that has been put forward before - bringing in US and British forces to fight a drugs war similar to the war on terror. It wants them to destroy farmers' crops on a massive scale before they can be harvested." If there is anything more guaranteed to alienate the locals than that particular bone-headed suggestion, I can't think what it is. As to the wider point, it is only the 'war on drugs' that makes possible the super profits that make opium such a valuable currency for terrorists and other criminals. War against terror or war against drugs? You can't fight both, and I think that I know which one matters most. Posted at 01:25 PM THIS WE BELIEVE [Ramesh Ponnuru] Leon Wieseltier, the literary editor of the New Republic, thinks that in the aftermath of the election liberalism is being caricatured, and condescended to. His apparent remedy is to indulge in some caricaturing of his own: "Perhaps the most odious feature of contemporary conservatism is its equation of success with virtue. In the realm of economics, this long ago resulted in the strange belief in the moral superiority of the wealthy, a vulgar Calvinism according to which money is a proof of merit and riches are a mark of righteousness. . . . It is not the triumphalism of the Republicans that is so distasteful. . . , it is the sanctimony; and this is owed to a further refinement of the Republican worldview, according to which moral values are finally religious values. . . . The good are with God, the bad are without God. And since winners are good and losers are bad, it follows that the winners are with God and the losers are without God. What clarity!" Well, I don't know about you, but Wieseltier has described my views perfectly. It's like the man has a window into my soul! And there's more: "Moreover, the 'faith' that is being praised as the road to political salvation, the Bush ideal of religion, is a zealous ignorance, a complacent renunciation of proof and evidence and logic and argument, as if the techniques of reason were merely liberal tools." All of us conservatives know we can't hold a candle to the reasoning powers of the New Republic. We also know that the most odious feature of contemporary liberalism is, of course, Leon Wieseltier. Posted at 01:17 PM MARINE [Michael Ledeen] I got a lot of anguished emails about Machiavelli and the British soldier who had the chance to kill Hitler in the First World War. I suppose it's hard for people to deal with Machiavelli out of context, and I should have written more, so I apologize for laziness. My point--Machiavelli's point, actually--is that real decisions in real life are almost never easy, and those called upon to make those tough decisions have to be willing to "enter into evil." Sometimes by doing that--as briefly as possible, he implores us--means doing things we know to be morally wrong. I gave the Hitler example because Machiavelli knows, as every grownup thoughtful person knows, that it is also possible to do the morally right thing, and by so doing, we unleash great evil. Life is tough. And the abstract moralists are not a very good guide for leaders, at least not all the time. Obviously I was trying to get people to think more deeply about the Marine in Fallujah. And along those lines, I urge everyone to look at the wonderful remarks by "Baldilocks" on her excellent blog. She reminds us--and many of my correspondents got this wrong--that the Marine did not shoot a PRISONER. He shot an enemy combatant. And his own experience had shown how dangerous such persons were, even--maybe especially--those who appeared severely wounded. Posted at 01:12 PM RE: PHILLY [KJL] Residents are assuring me it's just good advertising to suburban commuters. Here's one e-mail: Would that it were true. Those billboards are advertising to the suburbanites who commute to or through Philly. Most middle-class families (and anyone else uninterested in politics based on race or high taxes) have left Philly in the last decade. (I believe Philly is the only city of America's ten largest to have lost population over that period.) What is left is lots of Democrats, including a huge academic community (UPenn, Villanova, Temple, St. Joseph's, Loyola). Posted at 01:07 PM RE CAMPUS BIAS [Cliff May] From the far left all the way to the center left, commentators are arguing that President Bush should appoint Cabinet members who disagree with him, who don’t share his vision, who aren’t eager to implement his agenda. (For example, David Gergen has an op-ed in today’s New York Times on “the promise and the peril of a cabinet speaking in unison.”) So why is it that these same commentators are not demanding ideological diversity on the campuses? Why don’t they want some young professors who will tell the superannuated hippies and old New Leftists that their vision is wrong, and their agenda outmoded, foolish and destructive? And how about the MSM? Wouldn’t it be nice to have a few editors and producers who disagreed with the weltanschauung of Dan Rather, Peter Jennings, et al? Posted at 01:03 PM THE RIGHT’S PHILLY PRESENCE [KJL ] Have you’all noticed all the conservative billboards in Philadelphia? I was barely paying attention on Amtrak and found three Laura Ingrahams and one Bill Bennett. And, I’m sure I missed some. Arlen Specter aside, maybe NRO should just set up shop in Philly. The roadways certainly give the impression of right-wing brotherly love, most recent elections aside. Posted at 12:38 PM HAVE TURKEY WITH W [KJL] You know I want one. (Seriously, I now need some for next week.) Posted at 11:59 AM SPEAKING OF RALPH NEAS [KJL] Here's his press release re NARAL's Nancy: NEAS LAUDS KEENAN APPOINTMENT TOAnd the word "abortion" appears where...? Posted at 11:58 AM HELPING WOUNDED IRAQ-WAR VETS [KJL] From Fayettville Observer (NC): Hurt Troops Need Clothes, ToiletriesFurther details here Posted at 11:54 AM MICHAEL MOORE HATES AMERICA [KJL] Is on DVD. Read Andrew Leigh’s review of it here. Buy the DVD here. See the site here. See special military price here. Posted at 11:42 AM HMMM [KJL] An e-mail: I must protest. It is not enough that certain, select NROniks get to go off to a Caribbean Cruise. They now also debase themselves by taunting Kathryn in the Corner! The horror! The absolute depravity!ME: Don't flood Lowry (though man, the lineup is starting to tempt me). Just sign up for the NR 50th Anniversary British Isles cruise! Do you really have something better going on this summer? It's got its own pretty tempting lineup. Posted at 11:39 AM "PENTAGRAM" [KJL] Rod, this makes that graffiti story a tad funnier. Posted at 11:34 AM MARINE'S WIFE & UNBORN CHILD [KJL] fight for their lives after senseless shooting in Pennsylvania. Posted at 11:30 AM BAD SCENE [Stanley Kurtz] What can we say about the findings of the studies cited by Tierney? The bottom line is that a bad situation is getting very much worse. Massive imbalance is rapidly becoming near total monopoly. The University of Chicago, so important to conservatives, may be lagging at the rear of this trend, but it’s being dragged along nonetheless, as we’ve seen. I see no easy solution here. The elimination of tenure at least has to be considered. While meant to protect and encourage free discussion, tenure has instead allowed a determined ideological cadre to purge its opponents and take control of the academy. I’m not saying I favor eliminating tenure. But I think it’s time to debate the issue. As the Tierney article points out, David Horowitz and others are pushing for legislative reform via an “Academic Bill of Rights.” I have been supporting HR 3077, a bill that would reform federal subsidies to area studies. Carefully tailored legislative remedies will help. But in the end, nothing big can change until the academy decides to reform itself. Yet the emerging total monopoly of the left looks to make real reform impossible. That leaves only the creation of new colleges (like Ave Maria) or other alternative institutions that offer programs for college students–think tanks for students, so to speak. Perhaps the best solution would be more small programs within universities that are congenial to conservatives–on the model of the Robert George’s Madison program at Princeton. But leftist faculties will do all they can to prevent the emergence of even such small programs. For now, we have to keep exposing the shameful truth about bias in the academy, while hoping that new ideas or new institutions will arise to solve the problem. As the studies show, bad as it is, this situation is getting worse. But at least we’ve now got empirical proof of what every honest person should have known all along. Posted at 11:04 AM BIASED CAMPUS [Stanley Kurtz] Got to NYT very late yesterday, where I finally found John Tierney’s article on bias in the academy. This piece announces the publication of several empirical studies of faculty bias (which I know was briefly mentioned in The Corner, but is worth highlighting). Here are some key excerpts: “...a national survey of more than 1,000 academics, shows that Democratic professors outnumber Republicans by at least seven to one in the humanities and social sciences. That ratio is more than twice as lopsided as it was three decades ago, and it seems quite likely to keep increasing, because younger faculty members are more consistently Democratic than the ones nearing retirement.” A study of voter registration records at two major universities “which included professors from the hard sciences, engineering and professional schools as well as the humanities and social sciences, also found the ratio especially lopsided among the younger professors of assistant or associate rank: 183 Democrats versus 6 Republicans.” These stats are important. But the pathetic rationalizations for this bias by the liberal professors interviewed by Tierney are almost as interesting as the numbers. The conservative profs get the last laugh in this piece, though. Thanks goodness for John Tierney. One item especially caught my attention. The ratio of Democratic to Republican professors ranged from 3 to 1 among economists to 30 to 1 among anthropologists. I’m an anthropologist, and I am not in the least surprised. Posted at 11:01 AM JUST 35 (OR SO) SHOPPING DAYS TILL CHRISTMAS [Jack Fowler] It's hard to figure what day or time it is here on balmy Caribbean. But I do know that Santa is prepping to crowbar himself down the chimney. What will he bring to that special youngster in your life? Another idiotic toy that is broken in five minutes? Or some videogame featuring a busty virtual chick ripping the heart out of a street punk? Hey, how about this as an option: get them a great book -- of the world's best children's literature? You know, the kind of gift that will last (and influence!) a lifetime, and that needs no joystick or battery, and that kills no brain cells? We have a number of special offers for our acclaimed children's titles, one of which is that when you buy one copy of Volume Two of The National Review Treasury of Classic Children's Literature (an absolutely super book) you can get additional copies for half price -- and we pay for (U.S. Postal) shipping, and we send along a FREE copy of L. Frank Baum's classic Queen Zixi of Ix (bottoms up Daniel!). If your kids or grandkids don't have these books, you're shortchanging them something terrible. So get on the stick before Saint Nick is airborne -- you can order these great books here. Merry Cruisemas! Posted at 10:56 AM THAT OL' DEBBIL RUMSFELD [Rod Dreher] A reader in the Carolinas writes: Yesterday, local radio news reported on some [politically motivated (?)] vandalism against a Baptist church. The sheriff deputy quoted in the report said, "We think this is the work of juveniles because of the spray-painted satanic words and Pentagons." Posted at 10:47 AM NPR'S PRO-INSURGENT PR [Tim Graham] The Media Research Center's man in Milwaukee notes National Public Radio is demonstrating a classic weakness on the front of "peace" -- offering free propaganda time to supporters of the Iraqi insurgency, entertaining without question the idea that America is a ruthless predator. On the November 17 All Things Considered, they did a story suggesting that one could be for both "peace" and the Iraqi insurgents. Reporter Emily Harris profiled Fallujah resident Mohammed Abdullah, who claims U.S. troops are committing "the new genocide" in his city. The report centers on how Abdullah was invited to Rome, in Harris's words, as "a representative of a human-rights-and-democracy organization." She concludes by humanizing Abdullah laughing in a phone conversation with his family, taking video pictures of birds on the piazza with the same camera "he's used to record ruined houses and dead bodies after U.S. bombings in Fallujah." It's amazingly one-sided, with no need for an American rebuttal. PS: If you try to listen to the story, note that NPR.org forces you to see and hear an ad for Starbucks. At least something about this report will upset liberals. Posted at 10:44 AM SOHO SOUTH [Rick Brookhiser] City Desk has taken itself to a new city. While my NR colleagues are on the bounding main, I wanted a place where George W. Bush and John Kerry were only rumors, and where Alexander Hamilton was unknown. Buenos Aires fit the bill. My hotel (the Faena) is a blend of belle epoque and post modern--mirrors, velvet, armoires with feet, armrests with swan heads, sommeliers with shaved heads. Beef is the food of choice here--vegans would be very unhappy here. Mayor Bloomberg will be unhappy to know that people can smoke. If I can, I will link to a picture of restaurant decorated with white unicorn heads. Posted at 10:41 AM IS THERE A RIGHT TO CHOOSE [KJL] to be beaten? Posted at 10:35 AM RE: NARAL [KJL] And, uh, front page of the WashPost? Oh, yeah, I guess that is right. Since she and Ralph Neas will be facing off with the titan Senate Judiciary chair on judges... Posted at 10:32 AM NANCY NARAL [Tim Graham] Washington Post reporter Evelyn Nieves (a known liberal quantity) profiles Nancy Keenan -- Montana Democrat, lapsed Catholic, and D.C. lobbyist for People for the American Way --in her new role as the leader of NARAL Pro-Choice America. Nieves can't seem to locate a liberal label anywhere. There are four references to "conservatives," including an unwieldy use of "the antiabortion conservative religious right" (as opposed to the liberal religiious right?) but apparently NARAL-PCA is just about "reproductive rights for women," not lifestyle liberalism. Aside from the labeling disparity, and the light talk of Keenan being considered for excommunication, the weirdest part is the reporter's biased assumption that "Polls have shown that a majority of Americans favor keeping abortion legal," but then how do pro-life conservatives keep getting elected? A more accurate report would say polls show a majority of Americans support abortion remaining legal in some form, but a majority of Americans also support more restrictions on abortion. A less biased reporter would allow someone to note that NARAL-PCA fights any and all abortion restrictions, including partial-birth abortion, including Laci and Conner's Law, including the notion that infants mistakenly born alive in an abortion have rights. That would seem to imply the label they never use: "pro-abortion." Posted at 10:29 AM ANNAN OUTTA THERE? [KJL] Evidently there is a no-confidence vote in the works at the United Nations. Posted at 10:23 AM TERRIBLE STORY--ON SO MANY LEVELS [KJL] From California: A teenager shoots his pregnant girlfriend when she goes to have an abortion. The girl is now paralyzed. He is convicted of aasult with a deadly weapon--of the girlfriend. The prosecutors did not seek a charge against the baby he killed in the process because the girl wanted the baby dead. Posted at 10:10 AM “UNACCEPTABLE” [KJL ] Nancy Pelosi, among other Dems yesterday, say that it is “unacceptable” (I'm looking at yesterday's Roll Call still) to allow and indicted congressman serve in a leadership position. Did they feel that way about a certain Democratic president not so long ago? Posted at 10:06 AM GET ME AN INTERN NOW [KJL] I need to erase anything nice I've ever said about the Derb. Though, geez, I'm about ready to sign up for the British cruise (which is something, considering, I don't leave 215 Lexington Avenue. Posted at 09:53 AM DE PROFUNDIS [John Derbyshire] This is Derb reporting from somewhere in the Caribbean. We NR staffers assigned to the cruise are working our tails off here, holding panel discussions, bonding with readers and fans, keeping the flag of conservatism flying in foreign seas. It's gruelling -- hard work, hard work, to quote someone or other -- but we can handle it. Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Wheeeeeeeee! (Yeah, sorry, Kathryn -- it took me 6 days to figure out how to send e-mail from here. *Really* tricky internet setup on this ship. Ha ha ha ha ha ha!) Posted at 09:50 AM DELAY [KJL ] I think I disagree with John Podhoretz this morning. I do agree with him a bit: that it all looks bad, and that's how people are seeing it, as my normal-people focus grouping overwhelming shows. The Tom DeLay rule change sounds terrible. To people hearing about it on the evening news last night, it sounded like the GOP is trying to protect a criminal. But, the new rule makes sense, it seems to me. As Roll Call explained it yesterday, “Under the new Republican guidelines, if a leader or chairman is indicted on a felony charge, the Steering Committee must meet within 30 days and make a recommendation to the full Conference on whether the lawmaker should be removed from his position.” That protects against partisan witch hunts in courts to oust the like of a DeLay (who a Texas District Attorney wants to do in, seemingly obviously). Perhaps that’s the way the rule should have been written when it was born, in Rostenkwski days. But I don’t get all upset at rules changing. (Like seniority and the Jud Cmte, but we won’t go there.) And, odds are, criminals aren’t going to stay in leadership positions. Besides the weight of the world weighing in on the House if they tried to keep an obvious felon in leadership, the new rule, as Roll Call noted, “requires a leader or chairman who has been convicted of a felony to immediately step down, a provision that did not exist in the previous rules.” Posted at 09:39 AM "IT IS NOT ALL DEATH AND DESTRUCTION" [KJL] Iraq reality check: The Chaldean archbishop of Kirkuk criticized Western media "misinformation" about his country and insisted that Iraqis are looking forward to elections "because they will be useful for national unity." Posted at 08:48 AM SPAIN [KJL] re-arrests an al Jazeera reporter for al Qaeda ties. Posted at 08:46 AM SPECTER [KJL] was just kidding. Posted at 08:41 AM REJECT THE KYOTOIST WRECKERS [Andrew Stuttaford] Despite Russia's recent decision to sign up to Kyoto (a decision only taken as a result of EU bullying and bribery) Putin's economic adviser, Andrei Illarionov, does not seem altogether impressed by Al Gore's favourite treaty: "The Kyoto protocol requires a supranational bureaucratic monster in charge of rationing emissions and, therefore, economic activities. The Kyotoist system of quota allocation, mandatory restrictions and harsh penalties will be a sort of international Gosplan, a system to rival the former Soviet Union's. The majority of humankind does not accept this system, despite claims of worldwide support. Even with Russia's ratification, 75 per cent of the world's CO2 is emitted by, 68 per cent of the world's GDP is produced in, and 89 per cent of the world's population live in countries that are not handcuffed by Kyoto's restrictions. Like fascism and communism, Kyotoism is an attack on basic human freedoms behind a smokescreen of propaganda. Like those ideologies of human hatred, it will be exposed and defeated." Wise words, and the welcome arrival of a splendid, if vaguely Bolshevik-sounding, new insult: "Kyotoism." A noun, and an adjective ("Kyotoist"), to savour. Thanks, Andrei! Posted at 08:21 AM REVIEWER REVIEWED [John J. Miller] It seems that within a few hours of every TV appearance I make on behalf of Our Oldest Enemy, some nitwit posts a "customer review" on Amazon.com in which he expresses dismay that anybody would even think to criticize France. These "reviewers" aren't always so honest as this one -- who at least says he hasn't read the book -- but they are usually about this ignorant: "I must admit outright that I have not read this book, but have watched an interview with the author about the book and his beliefs about France. Being a history major in college I am outraged at his dimissal of France as an enemy and his manipulations of the facts about history. It seems strange that France has been such an enemy over the years since we have never been to war against them..." This is one thing people who don't want to like my book love to say: We've never been to war with France. Well, that's just not true. There was, for instance, the Quasi War -- America's first war following the ratification of the Constitution. Also, American GIs battled the soldiers of Vichy France in North Africa. And there were constant threats of war, during the Napoloenic era, during Andrew Jackson's presidency, and during the Civil War period. I could go on and on and on about this. And if you want to learn about it, for crying out loud read the book! Posted at 08:08 AM HAVING A GREAT TIME, WISH YOU WERE HERE [Jack Fowler] Excrutiatingly busy/rewarding/fun day yesterday on the Zuiderdam. Seminars starring Bernard Lewis, VDH, Jay, Jonah, John Hillen, John O'Sullivan, Michelle Malkin, Dinesh D'Souza (in same room at same time with Ramesh Ponnuru , so the conspiracy theory that they're the same person is kaput) -- the crowd OD'ed on brilliance. Then a screening of the forthcoming Walden Media film, I Am David, more about which when I return to NYC, but suffice it to say the NR masses loved it. Not too long later, up pool-side there was a smoker. Geez Loueeze, I can't take much more -- life's not supposed to be this fun! Oh yeah -- on top of all this we're being flooded with orders for the next trip to the British Isles in July '05; go to www.nrcruise.com to find out more about that looming humdinger. Later, landlubbers. Posted at 07:54 AM DELAY ACCUSER GETS SLAPPED [KJL] House Ethics Committee rebukes Chris Bell. Posted at 05:53 AM I'M. SO. CONFUSED. [KJL] Al Qaeda in Iraq? But how? I thought there was no connection....oh, I forgot, we brought them all there. Posted at 05:38 AM |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|||
|
http://www.nationalreview.com/thecorner/04_11_19_corner-archive.asp
|
||||