HELP
E-mail Author
Send to a Friend
<% dim printurl printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%> Print Version
May 17, 2002, 9:30 a.m.
Airing Pearl
Reaction to CBS’s decision to air the Daniel Pearl hostage video.

Compiled by Kathryn Jean Lopez

hould TV networks be airing the Daniel Pearl tape? Was CBS wrong to air portions of the tape? Those are a couple of hot questions NRO asked a group of Middle East and media experts. Here are their responses.

Victor Davis Hanson
NRO contributing editor & author of Carnage and Culture

The airing by CBS of even small portions of the last filmed moments of Daniel Pearl's life as he was tortured and beheaded — now part of a "recruitment" tape for Islamic terrorists — was obscene. Such sensationalism is more fitting for al-Jazeera than for a supposedly professional and liberal iconic institution. And this broadcast — not of a death on the battlefield, but a preliminary to a staged execution — only gives enemies of the West encouragement in their cynical interpretation of us as commercial, crass, and superficial, and, in a way, brings us down to their primordial level. We can learn nothing new that we did not know previously by airing the tape; its broadcast only aids the medieval terror of al Qaeda, which we already knew well enough from the grotesque sights on Sept. 11. This very wrong decision is only more evidence that our elite media does not have a clue about the deadly and depraved nature of our enemies, and the seriousness of the war we are in — or the need in such troubled times to respect rules of common decency and concern for the feelings of the bereaved family. What is next is anyone's guess — but let us hope that CBS is not anywhere near future tapes of suicide bombings and executions that our enemies will no doubt produce.



  
Aaron Mannes
Washington-based writer & Middle East analyst

In defending the decision to air the Daniel Pearl video, Dan Rather stated: "CBS News brought you this report because… the video illustrates how far an enemy will go to spread its message of hate for the United States."

This is a good argument. Americans have not yet grasped the depth and breadth of the horrible, violent madness that has taken hold in so much of the Muslim world.

However, offending Pearl's family was cruel and avoidable. The Pearl video may be the most grisly example, but there is no shortage of other horrifying material from the Muslim world. Talk shows on al-Jazeera and its many imitators are forums for hatred and vitriol. Sermons exhorting the faithful to slaughter are broadcast on radio and television throughout the Middle East. The 1994 video Jihad in America documents such sermons being given in the United States.

Arab periodicals publish grotesque political cartoons and deranged conspiracy theories. Since 1998 the Middle East Media Research Institute has been translating the print and electronic media of the Arab world.

There is a real story in all of this and CBS did us a disservice by distracting us from it with an unnecessary controversy.

William McGowan
Author of Coloring the News

In defending CBS's decision to air portions of the Daniel Pearl execution video — the most graphic scenes left out — some First Amendment lawyers have said that CBS had the "right" to do what it did and that the government was wrong to ask the network not to air it. While all journalists should be sensitive to the free-speech issues here, this is more a question of journalistic taste and journalistic necessity, and just as much a matter of aiding and abetting the Islamic propaganda machine while attempting to report on it. Although the sensitivities of Pearl's family should not be the sole grounds for airing or not airing anything connected to this story, Marianne Pearl is right when she says that CBS's decision to air the tape "perpetuates propaganda and sensationalizes tragedy."

Airing the video was first and foremost a violation of basic journalistic taste and a violation of Daniel Pearl's basic human dignity. Remember that what Pearl was forced to say about being Jewish, and about the wrongs associated with America's "unconditional" support for Israel was the product of being tortured and terrorized in the most brutal of circumstances, psychologically, if not yet physically.

I also think showing the video was journalistically unnecessary. If the point of the piece was "For Americans to see the impact of the propaganda war being waged against them," as Dan Rather intoned, a strong verbal description of what Pearl was forced to say, coupled with a still photo and perhaps some reaction shots of young Saudi men who are, purportedly, the targets of such propaganda, would suffice. Showing Pearl making the coerced statements, as opposed to reporting the substance of what he said, was exploitative and sensational and actually had little in news value.

Not to be minimized here is the fact that in airing the Pearl video CBS crossed the line from reporting on the Islamic propaganda campaign to facilitating it. Talk about "bounce." If I were the al Qaeda's minister of propaganda, I would certainly be glad about the whole thing, just as Somalia warlord Muhammad Husain Aideed was doubtless ecstatic after American networks aired shots of the dead Army Ranger being dragged through the dusty streets of Mogadishu in 1993.

Finally, one wonders about the intellectual and moral depth of those who were in on the decision. According to a news report, CBS Evening News producer Bob Murphy said that "When I saw the tape, I said to myself, 'These people are doing terrible and dangerous things that could affect me and my family.'" To which I ask: He's only getting this now!? Where has he been for the last eight months and why would it take something like Pearl's execution to wake him up to this evil so late in the game, especially since he is based in New York, where we are only now finishing the cleanup effort associated with the biggest mass murder in American history?

Rich Noyes
Director of media analysis, Media Research Center

The Media Research Center is not a big fan of Dan Rather's CBS Evening News, but their story on the terrorists' propaganda war against the U.S. — which included excerpts from the Pearl tape — was darn good journalism about an aspect of this war which demands more coverage. CBS showed that America's enemies are using this reprehensible snuff film to lure new recruits to their evil cause, and that's something we need to remember even as the Chomskys of the world claim that the U.S. is the real bad guy.

That said, CBS's decision to censor the tape's anti-American message — a good decision — meant that the chosen excerpts — Pearl saying his name, and saying that he and his parents are Jewish — added quite little to the premise of the "propaganda war" story. Thus, still images from the video might have been a better choice to avoid unduly upsetting Pearl's family. And the anti-U.S. propaganda war has many fronts besides this one — CBS needs to make it a regular beat or else it will appear as if they really did seize on the Pearl tape as a one-time ratings ploy.

James Phillips
Heritage

I believe that CBS made a grave error when it aired the Pearl murder tape. Not only did it inflict additional suffering on the Pearl family, but CBS allowed itself to be used as a megaphone for the terrorists who abducted Pearl. By aiding and abetting Pearl's murderers, CBS has made it more likely that other terrorists in the future will kidnap and execute journalists or other symbolic hostages in order to broadcast their message to the widest possible audience. By broadcasting the tape, CBS has raised the potential value of murdering American hostages to a wide variety of terrorist groups or disturbed individuals who may be prone to be copycats. The tape may help CBS boost its viewer ratings, but it had little news value. The details of Pearl's death were already widely known. But by broadcasting the grisly tape, CBS has helped Pearl's killers to disseminate a recruiting poster for their bloodthirsty movement.

Jim Robbins
NRO contributing editor

How far has CBS sunk?

In February the Pakistani government stated that the video of Pearl being murdered was too gruesome for public release. "It was discussed at the most senior level whether to release this video to television channels," a Pakistani official said, "but finally it was decided that even foreign television channels would not be able to show such gruesome scenes."

Former CBS co-anchor Connie Chung saw the video around the same time. When asked about the segment showing Pearl's murder, she said, "I will not describe [the violent scenes] out of respect to Daniel Pearl and his family."

On May 12, the shock website posted a request for the video, noting that there were some fakes out there. "[I]f anyone of you guys has the real footage, send it in! You'll get $$$ in return." So I'm guessing CBS is around that level, but first we'd have to know how much $$$ the network paid for the tape. If more than ogrish, they win the prize.

At CBS New York headquarters there is a plaque in honor of CBS newsman Edward R. Murrow bearing the inscription, "He set standards of excellence that remain unsurpassed." Ain't it the truth!

Daniel Pipes
Director of the Middle East Forum & New York Post columnist (visit DanielPipes.org)

It is outrageous that CBS would go against the Pearl family's wishes and broadcast the tape — but it's also oh-so-typical of the major media. That said, broadcasting the tape is probably salutary, for it brings graphically home just who the barbarians are that killed this fine young journalist and who threaten all of us Americans.

Looking
for a story?
Click here