Google+

Tags: Jeff Landry

2012’s Last Campaign Is Resolved



Text  



Over the weekend, the final congressional race of 2012 was resolved: Representative Charles Boustany Jr. was reelected, defeating Representative Jeff Landry, 61 percent to 39 percent, in a runoff.

The AP summarizes:

The district design favored Boustany, a traditional Republican candidate allied with House Speaker John Boehner. Landry, a freshman congressman, was the tea party favorite, but he was unable to build enough grassroots support to oust Boustany.

Pearson Cross, chairman of the political science department at the University of Louisiana-Lafayette, said Boustany was the “de-facto incumbent” throughout the race.

“Most voters in the district have voted for Charles Boustany, think he’s done a good job, are comfortable with him,” Cross said.

Tags: SuperPACs , Jeff Landry

One Last House Race, One More Bit of Campaign Spending



Text  



According to Federal Election Commission data, outside groups have spent more than $1.3 million . . . since Election Day.

Almost all of that is in the runoff election in Louisiana between two incumbent GOP House members who were redistricted into the same district: Charles Boustany and Jeff Landry.

Freedomworks for America spent $656,779.94 on door hangers, direct mail, signs, and online ads in support of Landry and opposition to Boustany; meanwhile the Conservative Strikeforce PAC spent nearly $50,000 on voter mail and get-out-the-vote calls in favor of Boustany.

The total sum of all expenditures filed with the FEC for this cycle is more than $2.8 billion, in 110,180 total expenditures.

UPDATE: From the good folks at Red Racing Horses: “Five days before the final House race of 2012, an IVR poll of 600 likely voters in Louisiana’s third district shows Rep. Charles Boustany (R-Lafayette) with a commanding lead of 51-33 over fellow Rep. Jeff Landry (R-New Iberia), with 16 percent undecided. The survey was conducted November 27-29 by PMI Inc. of Marianna, Fla., with survey design and data analysis by Red Racing Horses. The poll has a margin of error of +/- 5 percent.”

Tags: Charles Boustany , FreedomWorks , Jeff Landry

The Last House Race of 2012 and the First One of 2013



Text  



The Morning Jolt returns from its holiday hiatus, with a look at two House races — one not quite resolved, another coming soon in 2013 . . .

So, What Fun Can We Have With Chicago’s Upcoming Special House Election?

Moe Lane has a crazy idea for the upcoming special House election in Illinois, where Jesse Jackson Jr. has resigned, after increasingly bizarre behavior, a long disappearance from the public eye, and an announcement that he was on medical leave earlier this year for treatment of bipolar disorder.

Hold on, hear me out. Let’s jump back for a second to 2009. You might remember that in 2009 Rahm Emanuel resigned his House seat (IL-05) in order to bungle being White House Chief of Staff. Well, that caused a special election to trigger, and at the time I took the position that hey, how’s about trying to, maybe, I don’t know: win it? . . . And I was told, quietly but firmly, no. Folks didn’t like the candidate, didn’t like the idea of spending the money, didn’t want to contest the seat. And that’s fine; but here’s the thing. The Democrat who won (Mike Quigley) the primary was cordially hated by the rest of the Illinois Combine, and the general election he beat Rosanna Pulido, 30.6K to 10.6K. Two years later, Quigley’s opponent David Ratowitz got 38.9 K votes in the 2010 general election. Didn’t matter then, because Quigley got 108.3K votes . . . but it shows that there were in fact enough potential Republican voters in the IL-05 to win a low-turnout special election, if sufficiently motivated.

Now, let’s look at IL-02. In the last election Jackson got 181K votes to Brian Woodworth’s 67.4K. But Jesse Jackson’s quitting in, frankly, disgrace: and there’s going to be a vicious internal Democratic fight for his seat; and it’s a special election, which means low turnout. If the GOP does nothing, none of that will matter. If the GOP decides to make the Democrats work for the seat . . . it still may not matter. But . . . then again, it might. We won’t know until we actually try. What we do know is that doing nothing doesn’t work*.

All of which leads up to the observation that if anybody reading this has a clever plan about how to boost turnout in traditionally unfriendly districts, then there’s going to be a Republican campaign in Illinois in the very near future that is probably going to want to hear from you.

You can check out the oh-so-precise district lines here.

Jazz Shaw appears game, and already talking tactics:

So how do you do it? The first thing to settle on is what you don’t do. You don’t dump a ton of money into an air war that gets the Democrats noticing that there’s a race going on. What you do instead is bring back a very old, but mostly forgotten idea which we used to great effect in 2010: Precinct Captains. Invest the available resources in identifying one solid Republican in each and every precinct. Get them the data from pouring through registration stats to identify every single Republican and potential independent in the few miles around their house. Help them round up a few friends and quietly begin going door to door explaining the situation. Save your money for the final week before the special election and then hit a direct mail bomb targeting only the people on those lists.

The message is fairly simple. “Hey. There’s an election on Tuesday, and for the first time in living memory you’ve got a chance to have your voice heard. All you have to do is show up, because the liberals aren’t going to. Hell, we’ll even come give you a ride.”

Would it work, even in such a dismally conservative-poor area? You won’t know unless you try. But if it did, it would send shock waves across the country and be used as a model for the next cycle, demonstrating that 21st century election science is a game that both parties can play, not just Team Obama.

The schedule is coming together:

Cook County Clerk David Orr said Wednesday that he hopes to hold a primary election in February to replace Jesse Jackson Jr.’s seat in Congress.

Jackson announced his resignation mere weeks after handily winning re-election.

Most of the precincts included in the 2nd Congressional District already have a special election February 26, and all precincts have general elections planned for April 9. Chicago is the only place in Illinois not already holding a primary election in February; those Chicago precincts would be the only added cost.

And at this early point, it looks like the Democrats will probably have a messy primary:

Since Jackson announced on Wednesday that he was leaving office after 17 years for mental-health reasons, the local media have cited a number of sources saying they want to represent Illinois’ Second District. They include his wife, Chicago Alderman Sandi Jackson; his brother, John Jackson; and former US Rep. Debbie Halvorson, who lost to Congressman Jackson in the March Democratic primary.

Other names include Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle, Illinois State Sen. Toi Hutchinson, and Sam Adams, an Illinois attorney who led former Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s defense team.

Some Democrats see a danger in so many would-be members of congressman. “My fear is that there is going to be so many wannabes blinded by ambition . . . that we could find a tea party” candidate winning, said Rep. Bobby Rush, who represents Illinois’ First District, hours after Jackson’s resignation.

Both Jackson’s brother and wife are both thinking of running for his suddenly-vacated congressional office? Boy, and you thought there was tension at your Thanksgiving table.

Election 2012, Not Quite Over Everywhere . . .

There’s one more House race to be resolved, down in Louisiana, pitting two incumbent House Republicans against each other: Charles Boustany and Jeff Landry. If you feel like the GOP needs to be pushed in a particular direction after the 2012 general election, here’s the first chance to weigh in:

But in a field of five candidates, neither incumbent mustered more than 50 percent of the vote, which is required to claim an outright win.

In Louisiana’s open primary system, all candidates for an office appear on the same ballot, regardless of party.

Boustany, of Lafayette, drew 45 percent of the vote and Landry, from New Iberia, drew 30 percent, according to unofficial results from the Louisiana secretary of state.

Democratic challenger Ron Richard peeled off almost 22 percent of the vote, and two other candidates finished with less than 4 percent combined.

Boustany, considered a moderate Republican, raised $3 million for the campaign, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, almost 50 percent more than Landry, who had support from the Tea Party movement for smaller government. But endorsements from conservative political groups including FreedomWorks, Citizens United, Tea Party Nation and the Family Research Council strengthened Landry’s run.

Tags: SuperPACs , Chicago , Jeff Landry , Jesse Jackson Jr.

Obama’s Invitations to Hear His Familiar Arguments



Text  



There’s grim economic news and of course, more on Weiner in the Morning Jolt, but also . . .

He Really Is Getting Predictable

Whenever Obama gives a speech, you feel you like you know half of it before the teleprompter even gets warmed up, right?

“Let me be clear.” “As I have said many times before . . .” “Some say we must [unserious idea on the right that almost no one is really proposing]. Others say we must [equally unserious idea that only the most unhinged lefties want]. But I reject this false choice, and say we must . . .” “I have seen examples of [phenomenon he’s talking about] in my own life, where only in this country could the son of a Kenyan immigrant rise . . .”

I’m noticing that “the stakes are too high” quite often.

So if you’re invited to the White House, decorum and tradition would compel you to attend, even though you could probably print out an Obama speech bingo card and get BINGO within the first four minutes. But it appears the patience of one freshman House Republican is wearing thin: “’I have respectfully declined the president’s invitation to the White House today,’ Rep. Jeff Landry (La.) said in a statement. ‘I don’t intend to spend my morning being lectured to by a president whose failed policies have put our children and grandchildren in a huge burden of debt.’ Landry is skipping a White House meeting with the entire GOP House caucus. Obama will meet with House Democrats on Thursday. Landry said he would not sit down with Obama to negotiate on a deficit reduction compromise until Obama produces his own budget plan. ‘Until the president produces a responsible deficit reduction plan, I’m not going to the White House to negotiate with myself. Our conference has put out for months where we would start the process,’ Landry continued.”

Pat Austin at And So It Goes in Shreveport gives Landry two thumbs up, declaring, “ If Landry continues to stick by his guns like this, he’ll do well in my book.”

Landry appears to have created a fan in Doug Ross: “As Darren ‘Wall Street’ Bettencourt said of ‘The Transporter,’ “Hmmm, I like him.” This is one GOP freshman with stones and, for that, we salute you, Congressman. That is what you call speaking truth to power.”

Landry won’t hear any criticism from Moe Lane: “Worse, Landry would have been tediously lectured to . . . although I must admit that President Obama is a bit of an expert on debt. After all, he’s had plenty of recent hands-on experience in creating it.”

Lest you fear Landry missed any surprises, Jake Tapper of ABC News assures us . . . nope. “As the dozens of members of the House Republican Conference left the White House where they’d spoken with President Obama about the deficit and job creation, Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga., had a one-word review of the mood in the meeting.

“Frosty is the word,” Gingrey said. [Eric] Cantor also criticized Democrats’ “Medi-scare” attacks, saying that the charges that the GOP is taking medicine from grandma to pad the pockets of the rich isn’t helpful. He urged the president to continue the cooperation from December — when the Bush tax cuts were extended — to not “raise taxes on families, small businesses and investors.” The president added that he is all for a reduction of demagoguery, an issue he understands since he is the ‘job killing, death panel, probably-wasn’t-born-here president.’”

But of course. Obama really does associate everyone who disagrees with him with Birthers, doesn’t he? You notice the wind went out of the Birther’s sails the moment Obama, you know, actually put out the long-form certificate. Yet there he is, griping with Eric Cantor as if he’s the guy who published Jerome Corsi’s book.

Tags: Barack Obama , Eric Cantor , Jeff Landry

Wrapping Up Saturday’s Primaries



Text  



Saturday was Primary Day in two states.

West Virginia held its primaries for its special senatorial election; there were no surprises. Gov. Joe Manchin is the Democratic nominee, and John Raese is the GOP senatorial nominee.

Louisiana was a bit more interesting. There had been some rumblings that the scandals in Sen. David Vitter’s past would leave room for a serious primary challenge, and retired State Supreme Court Judge Chet Traylor took a shot. On Saturday, it wasn’t even close; Vitter won 88 percent.

Turnout was low on both sides, but there were actually more votes on the Democratic side, where Rep. Charlie Melancon won.

In Melancon’s seat, a big GOP pickup opportunity, most of the buzz had surrounded Ret. Gen. Hunt Downer. But on primary day, Jeff Landry came oh-so-close to avoiding a runoff, winning just under 50 percent. Their tooth-and-nail fight will continue; the runoff is set for October 2, leaving one month until the general election. The winner takes on Democrat Ravi Sangisetti.

Tags: Charlie Melancon , Chet Taylor , David Vitter , Hunt Downer , Jeff Landry , Joe Manchin , John Raese

Subscribe to National Review