|
![]() |
|
|
THE BBC [Andrew Stuttaford] The ‘objectivity’ of the BBC has been a joke for years, but it’s taken its ludicrous coverage of the Iraq war to bring this to a wider audience. Josh Chafetz has more. For more on how the BBC’s TV tax works, check in with Big Brother here. Posted at 08:07 PM ARNOLD IN TROUBLE? [Andrew Stuttaford] According to at least one poll, Bustamante is now ahead of Schwarzenegger in the California race. Blogger Calblog reckons that this may even overstate Arnold’s support, as, judging by some recent developments, the Terminator seems intent on alienating the G.O.P. base. Who’s to blame? Calblog has a theory: “Since Shriver assumed a central role, the campaign ... has allowed Warren Buffet and Rob Lowe to associate themselves with the campaign. Now I would expect the Republican operatives in the campaign to know that Republicans dislike Lowe and Buffet. These are things that Republicans just know. No one has to tell us or teach us. It's almost assumed… “ Looking at the campaign from the outside, it is, of course, impossible to know who is responsible for this fiasco. The damage caused by the Rob Lowe appointment (which is just a nod to Hollywood orthodoxy) shouldn't be overstated but the arrival of Buffett looks like a major blunder. The tax-loving, faux populist sage of Omaha is as bad an economist as he is good an investor. He should have no part - ever – to play in any supposedly Republican campaign, liberal, moderate or conservative. Posted at 08:02 PM HUGO DRAX [Andrew Stuttaford] A number of readers have written to say that Brit villain Hugo Drax was, in fact, um, French. Well, certainly that’s true of the actor who played him, but Drax (who sported a knighthood) was, I thought, British. Any clues? Posted at 07:32 PM CANADIAN CONSERVATIVE NEEDS HELP [Rod Dreher] Kathy Shaidle up in Toronto blogs a link to David Brooks's Atlantic essay saying that diversity is something we all pretend to like, but nobody really practices. It's against human nature, Brooks points out; people tend to want to live and work around people like themselves. Kathy asks: "Can Brooks, or anybody, tell me where that brainy conservative 'elsewhere' is at? Cause I really wanna head over there..." Somebody go to Kathy's pretty great blog and see if you can help her. Posted at 07:19 PM 'THE CHILDREN' [Andrew Stuttaford] An obviously nauseating individual by the name of Michael Martin is planning to introduce a smoking ban in Ireland's pubs, bars and restaurants. His job description? 'Minister for health and children' proving once again the truth of these two rules: Rule 1: When someone talks about 'the children' watch out for your wallet. Rule 2: When someone talks about 'the children' watch out for your freedoms. Gratifyingly, however, Mr. Martin is encountering opposition from an unexpected source. Ireland's environment minister, Martin Cullen, has (the Financial Times reports) denounced the plan as "American political correctness." Mr. Cullen is, the Financial Times notes, a heavy smoker. Splendid. If there must be environment ministers this is the sort of thing they should be doing - fighting to preserve the atmosphere (if not exactly the air) in a good smoky pub. Posted at 12:54 PM IDI AMIN DEAD IN SAUDI ARABIA [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Posted at 11:15 AM Friday, August 15, 2003 BRITISH VILLAINS [Andrew Stuttaford] Apologies for reverting to this topic, but one reader’s contribution was too good not to pass on: "Deliverance redneck villain: "Squeal like a pig, boy!" Hugo Drax [archetypical British villain]: "James Bond. You reappear with the tedious inevitability of an unloved season."” Posted at 10:15 PM FALSE MEMORY (2) [Andrew Stuttaford] We’re often hearing about the phenomenon of ‘ostalgie’, nostalgia for East Germany. Here’s a cure. Posted at 09:55 PM FALSE MEMORY WATCH [Andrew Stuttaford] A seance is, by definition, a gathering of the credulous, but that, it seems, may not be how the participants remember it. Posted at 09:50 PM SMALLEST VIOLIN? OR NOT! [Kathryn Jean Lopez] I'm getting a lot of these emails. Do note the end: K-Lo, Posted at 09:19 PM HOORAY [Andrew Stuttaford] Sign outside a local bar (Second Avenue, NYC): "Hooray! The lights are back. The bar is open. The air is on." Posted at 07:50 PM BUFFETTING WINDS [Steve Hayward] So Warren Buffett thinks it is wrong that he pays $16,000 a year in property taxes on his $500,000 Omaha house, but only about $5000 a year on his $2 million California home. The obvious point here is that he is massively overtaxed in Nebraska. More to the point, if he bought his California home today, he would pay $20,000 in property taxes, and because housing turnover is so rapid in California (property tax assessments are set on sales price in CA), not that many people are in Buffett's position of having an old assessment (though I am one of them, with a home that has been in the family for over 40 years--under Prop. 13, you inherit your parent's property tax basis when property passes between generations). The favorite liberal solution for this is a "split roll" property tax, i.e., commercial and business property would be taxed at a higher rate than residential property. There is some element of fairness to this, because there is less turnover in commercial property than residential property. However, just as the corporate tax burden is borne by consumers and not corporations, commercial tennants (especially those with net leases) will bear the cost of any property tax increase--that is, businesses will pay the tax. Just what California business needs--more taxes. One little wrinkle in this is that even Tom McClintock has said he might be open to a split roll tax. But he said this more for political than economic purposes; the business communiti in California, especially big business, has been notably feeble in recent election cycles, if not outright supporting Davis and the liberals. A number of conservatives have started to say, as I've heard Kate O'Bierne and others say through the years, "big business is not out friend," and why should we keep defending their interests if they won't? So as bad as Buffett is, this may be a trial balloon that could play out in a number of interesting ways. (P.S.--A liberal-sponsored split roll property tax initiative failed on the ballot several years ago.) Now back to the beach. Posted at 06:21 PM E-MAILING NRO [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Things in our grand city are still out: So if you are trying to reach NRO/The Corner/me please email nroklo@aol.com--any “nationalreview.com” address right now will get you nowhere. Sorry to repeat, if you’ve heard this before, but there is reason to! Posted at 06:07 PM CANADIANS DENY CAUSING BLACKOUT [Jim Boulet] Via the < a HREF="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63592-2003Aug15.html">Washington Post: Canadians cried "don't blame us" as the search for the cause of the massive blackout resulted in finger-pointing across the border. ... Canadians were defensive at earlier suggestions from New York City officials that the problem had started with Canada. "They always want to blame someone else, now don't they," Jean Macklin, a toy store owner, said a bit archly. "Canadians aren't doing too well with Americans this year," mused Rebecca Eckler, 30. "We have SARS, we opposed the war, and now we've blown out their lights." Posted at 06:06 PM POWER [Kevin Cherry] Came back about twenty minutes ago. I'm amazed that in the year 2003 it can take almost a full day to restore power. The people on the radio are accusing Pataki of "playing the blame game"--but quite frankly, I think he's right: This is unacceptable, and I want to know why it happened. I'm still not sure there wasn't some monkey business along the way. Even if not, it shows how we're still totally vulnerable to anything--freakish acts of nature/coincidence as well as malicious evil-doers. Posted at 02:47 PM ARNOLD, DEMOCRAT REPUBLICAN [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Rob Lowe may join his campaign? Posted at 02:34 PM ARIANNA RESPONDS [Rod Dreher] Here's the e-mail response Arianna Huffington is sending to people who write to complain about her not paying much in the way of taxes: Thank you for your recent e-mail expressing concern about my tax returns. Posted at 02:31 PM RE: A LITTLE PERSPECTIVE [Rod Dreher] Glad you made it to a Maronite parish, Peter. I love the Maronites. You were surrounded by Lebanese because the Maronites *are* Lebanese Catholics. And that probably wasn't Greek you were hearing; it was Aramaic, the language spoken by Jesus. How's that for perspective? Posted at 02:25 PM OUCH [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Posted at 02:03 PM DEFENDING "OLD WOMAN" BLOOMBERG [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Martin Seiff, stuck in the tri-state area, is nicer to Bloomberg. Posted at 01:55 PM TRADER READER RE: BLOOMBERG [Kathryn Jean Lopez] An e-mail, live from Wall Street Does anyone else find it offensive that Mayor Bloomberg rang the opening bell on the NYSE today to show that everything was "OK"? Posted at 01:47 PM THE LEFT'S DAY IN THE SUN, OUR DAY IN THE HEAT [Kathryn Jean Lopez] More from Chris Horner: Revealing the long-standing nature of their prescription -- tell starving people they ought to consider dieting: Posted at 01:42 PM GEORGE SHULZ [Kathryn Jean Lopez] signs up with Arnold. Posted at 01:17 PM THE BLACKOUT: A WONKY READ, PREDICTION, WARNING [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Christopher Horner from the Competitive Enterprise Institute e-mails: My take on the political issue arising from yesterday/today is that yes, pressure will build for "an energy bill." Pressure should instead build for an an energy bill doing what Pres. Bush proposed; that is, Bush should be able to demand a good bill from conference and quickly in Sept. Instead, already the assumption is that the opponents of building out our energy infrastructute will turn this incident on its head through their own guile and the admin.'s refusal to fight for principle over "checking the box for each campaign promise" (mindset of "get me 'a bill'"). Ds with the help of liberal Rs will play into this and indeed demand "a bill!" asap, while illogically and cyncially holding firm to their anti-energy provisions (the windmill mandate of anywhere from 10-20%, global warming titles, etc.), claiming that R insistence on jettisoning this junk is holding back enactment. Guess who blinks. Clever, if typical. Posted at 01:16 PM I WISH [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Jonah were around for this odd U.S.-Canada blame game. (Or was it Ohio?) Posted at 01:07 PM A LITTLE PERSPECTIVE (13 CENTURIES'S WORTH, THAT IS) [Peter Robinson] Last night here at the hotel--to my astonishment, my publisher is putting me up for a couple of nights at the Four Seasons in Beverly Hills--beautiful people, all dressed almost entirely in black, buzzing about Arnold, "the industry," and youth, youth, youth. (A friend in his late twenties is breaking into the music industry. He told me he passes himself off as 24--and then he added only half-jokingly that if I ever tried my hand at screenwriting I'd need to dye my hair, get a little Botox injected into my forehead, and drop a full decade from age.) It was all kind of a wild high. This morning at church--today is a holy day of obligation for us Catholics, and at St. Peter's, a church of the Maronite Rite--a little band of old Arabs, most of whom seemed to have come from Lebanon (the church displayed the Lebanese flag next to that of the United States), chanting the sacred mysteries in a combination of English, Arabic, and Greek. It was 13 centuries ago that the Christian Middle East was overwhelmed by Islam, but despite all those hundreds of years of hardship and all the brutalities of the twentieth century itself, there they were, this little group of the faithful, tucked away in Beverly Hills, keeping alive their faith. It sobered this boy up. Posted at 12:44 PM PAYCUT OR NO PAYCUT? [Nick Schulz] One Corner reader says I'm not correct about the troop paycut. He points me to this article which says: Pentagon officials met Thursday with reporters to "put to rest" a "burgeoning rumor" that the defense department is planning to reduce compensation for those serving in Iraq and Afghanistan. "That is not true. We are not going to reduce their compensation," said David Chu, under secretary of defense for personnel and readiness.But apparently Chu doesn’t realize he’s in Rumsfeld’s Pentagon, an operation that puts a premium on clarity: “There is an open issue about how we're going to do that which depends on exactly how the conference report in the Congress comes out on some technical allowance issues…Got that? Posted at 12:19 PM MUCH BETTER LIGHTING IN SANTA MONICA [Kathryn Jean Lopez] The president was much more the leader on message to the press just now. Paraphrasing: This did not come as a complete surprise to me--we have an old system. Homeland security has closed a lot of response gaps, now we gotta get the electricity system working. Americans rose to the occassion. Thompson, Ridge, and the troops were at work all night. Etc. Evidently he's making more formal remarks in a few. (Update: news report on his remarks.) Posted at 12:12 PM SEE YOU IN PASADENA? [Peter Robinson] On September 11 I'll be at the Reagan Library, but the final event on my book tour until then will take place tonight in Pasadena. At 7.00 Pacific Time, I'll speak about How Ronald Reagan Changed My Life at Vroman's Bookstore, a marvelous old Pasadena landmark. Vroman's is located at 695 East Colorado Boulevard, and the telephone number is (626) 792-5320. Corner readers, by all means march right up and introduce yourselves. And to those of you who attended events earlier in this book tour, my thanks. It was a high pleasure to meet you. Posted at 11:57 AM ROLLING BLACKOUTS [Kathryn Jean Lopez] It looks like some of us at our home sites and other locations may be off this afternoon...so if there is some Corner silence, you know the deal. It's that non-story, right? :-) Posted at 11:49 AM BROOKHISER ON MIKE BLOOMBERG [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Via carrier pigeon: Mayor Bloomberg is just terrible. He sounds like a fussy little old woman. Not even one from New York. Posted at 11:29 AM THE REAL LEFTY TAKE [Tim Graham] The Bushies failed to make loans for grid improvement, according to Rep. Sam Farr (D-Calif.), or so says the Bush-hating BuzzFlash site. Posted at 11:27 AM COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATIVES? [Nick Schulz] The troops in Iraq and Afghanistan are about to see their pay get cut: Unless Congress and President Bush take quick action when Congress returns after Labor Day, the uniformed Americans in Iraq and the 9,000 in Afghanistan will lose a pay increase approved last April of $75 a month in "imminent danger pay" and $150 a month in "family separation allowances."Meanwhile, according to Cato’s Chris Edwards and Tad DeHaven, the administration “requests that Congress increase funding on social programs with trite names, such as Parent Drug Corps, Compassion Capital Fund, and Steps to a Healthier US.” Posted at 11:06 AM AHEAD FOR JUDGE MOORE [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Trouble from the Alabama supreme court, reports Southern Appeal. Ironically, though, this all could get Bill Pryor through the Senate. Read here. Posted at 11:01 AM WHITE HOUSE ON ENERGY, PRE-BLACKOUT [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Debatably bad impromptu press conferences aside: "The report we issued last month presented more than 100 recommendations covering virtually the entire range of concerns that face the American people. One of the concerns, obviously, is the aging power grid and the growing problem that we have in getting electricity from the power plant to the light switch. It's clear that we must upgrade and expand the power grid. If we put more connections in place, we'll go a long way towards avoiding future blackouts. Another broad aim is to increase energy supplies from diverse sources; from oil and gas, renewables, coal, hydro and nuclear. This is the kind of balanced approach we think is essential if we're going to meet the country's energy needs down the road and take care of many of our other concerns, especially with respect to the environment." -- Vice President Dick Cheney, U.S. Energy Association Efficiency Forum Washington, D.C. June 13, 2001 via Posted at 10:55 AM TRANSGENDER DIVORCE [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Posted at 10:51 AM "BEHIND THE BENEFITS OF CIVILISATION" [Nick Schulz] The notion that a blackout affecting 50 million people is not a major story is absurd, and not just because I almost drowned last night in my own sweat thanks to a bedroom lacking air conditioning. Either way, maybe this blackout will prove a blessing in disguise. It’s teaching us a valuable lesson in what we should and should not expect out of public policy. For example, lately we’ve heard a lot about the need to move to a hydrogen economy and more renewable sources of energy like wind or solar. All of the Democratic candidates for president are calling for renewables targets or austerity measures designed to monkey with our modern technological and industrial resource base. In The Revolt of the Masses, Jose Ortega y Gasset captured their mindset perfectly: As they do not see, behind the benefits of civilisation, marvels of invention and construction which can only be maintained by great effort and foresight, they imagine that their role is limited to demanding these benefits peremptorily, as if they were natural rights.Maybe the blackout will prompt folks like Sens. Joe Lieberman and John Kerry -- or their comrade in arms in green causes Sen. John McCain -- to pause and register a moment of appreciation for a delicate technological infrastructure that didn’t just magically happen. And to realize overhauling it with the heavy and indiscreet hand of the state might not be the easiest or wisest thing in the world to do. Posted at 10:48 AM OUTAGE IS ANTI-GORE [Kathryn Jean Lopez] It was a Bush administration plot to stop electric cars! Posted at 10:44 AM HERE'S A TEST [Rod Dreher] For liberals who can't discern a difference between Islamic fundamentalists and fundamentalist or otherwise conservative Christians, I propose a simple test. Imagine that you are boarding an airplane. You discover that the pilots are recent graduates of Bob Jones University. Do you proceed with boarding? Now suppose that you learn that the pilots are recent graduates of a Pakistani madrassah (Islamic school). Do you get on the plane now? Why or why not? Posted at 10:35 AM RICK BROOKHISER REPORTS IN [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Rick is in the dark in lower Manhattan still. But, always resourceful, still managed to check in with us. He was listening to a radio and heard a CBC reporter on the air from Toronto. His thoughts on the blackout? Posted at 10:24 AM TV LOVES A CIRCUS [Tim Graham] For Calif. recall junkies, I recommend my mini-study from yesterday. Tuesday morning, CBS "Early Show" co-host Harry Smith invited on three of the silliest candidates – former child actor Gary Coleman, an inexperienced businessman with the name Robert “Butch” Dole, and Georgy Russell, who sells thong underwear from her campaign Web site with her campaign logo on it. He asked Russell: “Do you think anybody is taking your candidacy seriously?” But CBS is taking her more seriously than Republican establishment candidates like Tom McClintock and Bill Simon, who have not been invited. (The Early Show has also interviewed Arnold Schwarzenegger and Arianna Huffington.) But while "The Early Show" promotes the silly candidates, it punishes the serious ones. A look at their 2002 campaign coverage from January 1 through Election Day revealed: Number of candidates for Governor interviewed: ZERO. Number of candidates for U.S. Senate interviewed: ZERO. Number of candidates for the U.S. House interviewed: ONE. Katherine Harris, who was mostly asked about her 2000 fame and received only one question about her House race. Oh, but the CBS morning show has interviewed a Senate candidate this year: Jerry Springer. They’re not alone. ABC’s Good Morning America also flunked this test, interviewing no House, Senate, or gubernatorial candidates before the 2002 election. But both ABC’s and CBS’s morning shows interviewed a married couple in Kansas who ran against each other in a local judge’s race – both before the election and after (the wife lost to her husband, the incumbent). Posted at 10:17 AM LIEBERMAN PLAYS HARD TO GET WITH IOWA [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Posted at 10:13 AM GETTING ADVICE FROM THE IRAQ STREETS [Kathryn Jean Lopez] about blackouts. Posted at 10:06 AM POOR NICK KRISTOF [Rod Dreher] The New York Times columnist perceives a religious revival in the land, but despairs because it's not of the mainline Protestant/liberal Catholic kind. Poor Nick Kristof. He perceives that the country is undergoing a spiritual revival, but he despairs that it's not of the mainline Protestant-liberal Catholic kind. He's afraid those of us who actually believe in the historical Christian faith will turn into Talibaptists. It never fails to amaze me how otherwise intelligent, sophisticated and worldly people fail to perceive the vast qualitative gulf between conservative Christians and Islamofascists. Posted at 10:00 AM P.S. [Kathryn Jean Lopez] This is a good photo though. Looks like he should have sounded. (That's it. That's the end. You can chill a little with the hate mail.) Posted at 09:58 AM DHS [Kathryn Jean Lopez] I'll stop now, but Instapundit noted last night that there was nothing on the Homeland Security website about the outage. And guess what? Still there's nothing as of 9:54 A.M. And, as Instapundit notes, the worst part is that I'm sure close to know one cares--who thought about Tom Ridge when the lights went out in Times Square? Posted at 09:53 AM BUFFETT HINTS AT RAISING TAXES [Kathryn Jean Lopez] That sound you heard was more Republicans moving away from the Schwarzenegger camp. Posted at 09:45 AM THE ENERGY SEC'T [Kathryn Jean Lopez] It turns out he's in the Netherlands. Posted at 09:15 AM BILL PRYOR RE JUDGE MOORE [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Although I believe the Ten Commandments are the cornerstone of our legal heritage and that they can be displayed constitutionally as they are in the U. S. Supreme Court building, I will not violate nor assist any person in the violation of this injunction. As Attorney General, I have a duty to obey all orders of courts even when I disagree with those orders. In this controversy, I will strive to uphold the rule of law. We have a government of laws, not of men. I will exercise any authority provided to me, under Alabama law, to bring the State into compliance with the injunction of the federal court, unless and until the Supreme Court of the United States rules in favor of Chief Justice Moore.via Southern Appeal. Posted at 07:40 AM TEN COMMANDMENTS STAND [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Defying a court order, Alabama Judge Roy Moore is not removing the Ten Commandments from his courthouse. Posted at 07:39 AM BLACKOUT BIAS [Tim Graham] For those who find the NY blackout the most fascinating story of the month, "scourge of the liberal media" Brent Baker has already summed up the night's weirdness in his Cyber Alert: 1) A bit past 6:30pm EDT, less than three hours into the blackout in some parts of the Northeast, CBS's Dan Rather wanted to know if "any serious thought" had been given to canceling Bush's appearance a few hours later at a San Diego fundraiser, "given the fact that so many millions of people are going through this in the Northeast?" When Bush spoke about the blackout, CBS stuck with "Amazing Race 4." Posted at 07:32 AM NRO TODAY [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Predictably, I guess, we’re taking Mike Bloomberg’s advice (a first and last!) and taking a blackout day. Actually, as it happens, we posted some extras right before the lights went out yesterday, so you can get your Friday dose of Victor Davis Hanson, plus novelist Nidra Poller on the French Laci and Scott Peterson, James Bowman on why the Left hates the Bush flight-suit toy so darn much (I do need to get myself one of those!), and more. Make sure you read Thursday’s lineup, too: Ledeen, O’Sullivan, and more, all must-reads. Those of us with power will be in The Corner today, so check in now and again if you have yours. Posted at 07:09 AM NYC WITHOUT LIGHTS [Kathryn Jean Lopez] NYPost photo gallery. (I just posted that to annoy people not affected by the blackout--kidding). Posted at 07:00 AM AMAZING HOW THEY ALWAYS GET ISRAEL IN THEIR SIGHTS [Kathryn Jean Lopez] From an offshoot of the U.N. human-rights commission: condemnation if Israeli's (survival-motivated) marriage law. Naturally coming from nations like Saudi Arabia. (Ask Pat Roush about their marriage-related laws!) Posted at 06:54 AM WITCHY IN THE CORNER? [Kathryn Jean Lopez] A number of readers think I needed air conditioning when I wrote that "not Bush's finest hour" post. Here's one: "Wow! K Lo... Seems like you are feeling a bit testy tonight, eh? Must be the blackout affected you adversely. Take a deep breath. It really isn't all the Prez's fault." Goodness, I certainly didn't say the blackout was his fault (has Howard Dean, though?). But the public face of the White House did leave something to be desired last night. Among other things, as Robert suggested in the wee hours, people are going to be asking security questions for a long time about this (both legitimately and non), and at the very least the guy who is supposed to make sure the president's lighting (he looked years older, didn't help matters) is decent at a press event on the road should get a stern talking to by the political folks. At the least. Posted at 06:38 AM SAUDI DIPLOMAT [Kathryn Jean Lopez] has been expelled from the U.K. Posted at 06:19 AM MEANWHILE, SOMEWHERE OUT WEST [Peter Robinson] The lights throughout the Northeast suddenly go black, and what's the first thought of your faithful correspondent in California? At last, an event big enough to bump Arnold Schwarzenegger to second place on the evening news. Posted at 02:40 AM THIS IS A BIG STORY [Robert A. George] K-Lo, the reader who dismissed the coverage as overkill can go hide in dark cave -- or just walk through midtown Manhattan right now (2:05 a.m. EST, as I write). He moans, "Sometimes it seems like people in the NE think the world turns around them. Pardon me if the rest of us decline to agree." Oh, yeah? Well, in case you didn't notice the blackout also hit the Midwest and Canada too. This was the biggest blackout in history -- and just because the cause wasn't terrorism (how confident should we be on THAT score? Until there is an official inquiry, we don't know that there couldn't have been some computer hacking that might have caused this) doesn't mean that the event doesn't have many implications from a "homeland security" perspective. Posted at 02:20 AM DIDN'T HAVE TO HAPPEN [Kathryn Jean Lopez] The Wall Street Journal: "The breadth of the energy disruption suggests that some major rethinking deserves to be done about the vulnerability of America's power grid. If an accident can shut down an entire U.S. region for half a day, imagine what well-planned sabotage could do. The U.S. has grown complacent as the memory of California's blackouts in 2000 has faded. But especially in the Northeast, the U.S. is still operating on an energy supply and with a load-sharing grid that has very little room for error." Posted at 01:22 AM RE: THE BLACKOUT [Michael Graham] I had to do nearly three hours of "it's an energy crisis!" radio Thursday in Richmond--utterly untouched by the blackout. It was one of those strange media moments where clearly the national story was the surge on the Northeastern energy grid, and yet it had absolutely no impact on any of my listeners. Our microwaves and TV sets were working just fine, thank you. It was a reminder to us Red Staters of just how much our media diet is controlled by the people who live in NYC and LA. For example, look at the volume of coverage for the CA recall. Yes, the recall issue has some reach, but for the vast majority of Americans, this is a story about California that literally has no connection to their lives. But Hollywood is in California and CNN has a bureau there and so I, Joe Shmoe American, am forced to listen to the political theorizing of Gallagher and Gary Coleman. What a great reminder the northeastern grid story is of the difference between reality and what appears on my cable news channel. Posted at 12:02 AM ARE DEMOCRATS MORE PRINCIPLES THAN DEMOCRATS? [Michael Graham] "To understand the conservatives' dilemma, consider the situation turned on its head. If Democrats suddenly had a presidential candidate who led President Bush in every poll, they'd be bursting with enthusiasm. If that candidate turned out to be pro-life, pro-gun, and anti-gay rights, they'd be hard pressed not to abandon him or her in an instant." So writes Mark Sandalow in the San Francisco Chronicle. Is he right? Would Democrats reject a "Schwarzenegger Democrat?" who was a shoo-in? And if so, doesn't that show Republicans to be less principled as a party? I am a "big tent" guy most of the time, but shouldn't there be a line somewhere that is not crossable inside a political movement? After all, there's a name for Republicans like pro-abortion, pro-gun-control, pro-homosexual adoption Arnold Schwarzenegger: They're called Democrats. Posted at 12:00 AM Thursday, August 14, 2003 ENOUGH WITH NEW YORK, ETC. THEY SAY [Kathryn Jean Lopez] A little backlash from some readers: You ask where was the current energy sec? Do you think he might have been a little busy coping w/ the current crisis? Posted at 11:08 PM MISS YOU GUYS [Rod Dreher] Everybody here in Dallas said to me this afternoon, "I bet you're glad you're not in New York today." Well, yeah. But my wife and I admitted to each other tonight that there was a part of us that wishes we were back home in Brooklyn. You just don't want to be away in a time of danger. I got all emotional watching people walking across the Brooklyn Bridge, en masse, on TV this afternoon. Call me crazy and sentimental, but I feel guilty being here, with my lights and TV and computer and air conditioning, and not there with the people and the city I love so much. Posted at 10:21 PM WEIRD [Kathryn Jean Lopez] The Associated Press spins the president tonight much better than I do! Posted at 10:16 PM NOT BUSH'S FINEST HOUR? [Kathryn Jean Lopez] The president seemed hugely distracted during his little press conference a little earlier, during a disturbing shutdown of the northeast--hours after it started. A look at the Drudge report would have given Americans more information. If you have Fox on now, you see him at a campaign fundraiser in California (well lit, thank you very much). If you switched on CNN earlier, you got former energy secretary Bill Richardson (who seems to be everywhere) and Hillary Clinton. Where exactly is the current energy secretary, Spencer Abraham? Really not a good public face from the White House during this. Americans with power left wondering why they are listening to the governor of New Mexico explaining U.S. energy to them (Richardson), disturbed by a president who looks like he was caught by surprise and unprepared. (As parts of NYC started getting power back, they got Bush on CNN joking at the fundraiser after a replay of his terrible press conference.) No matter how much money is raised tonight, you know the folks with the reelection campaign are not smiling. Posted at 09:50 PM RE: GET OVER IT [Kathryn Jean Lopez] That is so Midwestern, Wisconsin boy. Posted at 09:26 PM GET OVER IT. [Tim Graham] Those of us who are not affected can't believe Koppel is still carrying the ABC network with this Eastern-centric story. I'm sticking with football! Posted at 09:23 PM (SOME OF THE) LIGHTS BACK ON! [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Didn't even get dark....and Bill O'Reilly is on. It's like nothing ever happened. (KLo needs sleep.) Where are my Corner colleagues? Surely the first thing you think of when the lights get on.... Posted at 08:16 PM FOLKS... [Kathryn Jean Lopez] ...we've definitely got some technical problems now!!!! (Um, Jonah, we picked a perfect time to move part of NRO to Alaska.) K-Lo's battery use is going to be rationed here, so excuse some of the silence here. (And if you have power ONLY email me at nroklo@aol.com--I'm buying stock in AOL if it continues to come through for me!) Posted at 05:13 PM BIN LADEN OF SOUTHEAST ASIA CAUGHT [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Posted at 02:58 PM DEBATE DATE SET [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Posted at 02:53 PM DOES HE RUN THE MASS. SCHOOL SYSTEM? [Michael Graham] One of my life-long pet peeves is the American insistence that every clod who stumbles out of high school with a B average be sent on to a taxpayer-subsidized college career. This policy drives up the costs of higher ed for students who really want an education, half the kids drop out anyway (but keep their costly student loans) and the value of every college degree drops by a significant percentage. Now comes news of a high school teacher who wants to force all seniors to apply to college, whether or not they want to go. "More options are better than less options," said Anthony Massaro, the principal of South Plainfield (NJ) High School. They certainly are, Mr. Massaro. They're even better than "fewer" options. Does anyone know if New Jersey has a basic English requirement like the one in Massachusetts? Posted at 02:35 PM RE: THE GREATEST BRITON [John Derbyshire] I am trying to stifle my disappointment, Kathryn. But, selfish considerations apart, where on those lists is Benny Hill? Posted at 02:12 PM THE GREATEST BRITON [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Where's O'Sullivan, Stuttaford & Derb? Posted at 01:58 PM REGIME CHANGE IN THE KINGDOM [Kathryn Jean Lopez] This is from a Telegraph editorial today on the British Airways decision to halt flights to Saudi Arabia: ….The recent release of British nationals, who say they were tortured into confessing bomb attacks in the kingdom, has highlighted the fact that the Saudi authorities still have not confronted the threat posed by al-Qa'eda. Their attitude is at best ambiguous, at worst duplicitous. Posted at 01:47 PM FRANKEN AND FOX [Tim Graham] Derb, I wonder if there isn't some element of calculation underneath the obvious silliness of the lawsuit against Franken. Stoking Fox controversies against liberal authors might help the network keep its conservative audience watching? Or, a more political plan: getting maximum exposure for Al Franken, whose political work is so overwrought, it can't help but highlight the off-putting aspects of the angry left... Posted at 01:32 PM ARNOLD THE MODERATE? [Michael Graham] The San Francisco Chronicle reports that Warren Buffett's support for a Governor Schwarzenegger underscores Arnold's "stated position as a moderate Republican." Sorry, but Ah-Nold told the WaPo last week that he's "very liberal" on social issues. In fact, that Post STILL called him a "moderate Republican" in the same article. What's it going to take for the journalistas on the ground to use the phrase "liberal Republican" on Schwarzenegger? I just did a Google search and the good news is that the phrase does appear. But it's almost always in a conservative's column or a quote from a right-wing source. The dailies still stick with "moderate Republican Schwarzenneger today re-affirmed his support for homosexual adoption and gun control..." Liberal Republicans do exist: Riordan, Giuliani, Bloomberg (OK, he's a COMMIE, but still...). What's the problem with accurately using the label on Ah-nold? Posted at 01:00 PM RALPH PETERS ON EUROPE [Randy Barnett] There is a very hard edged op-ed in today's New York Post by Ralph Peters in the difference between Europe and the U.S. It is called, "Europe: Worlds Apart," Here is how it begins: LIFE may not be predictable, but Europeans are. If we criticize them publicly, they splutter, outraged that we don't recognize their perfection. They can dish it out abundantly, but continental Europeans can no more take criticism than their welfare armies could have taken Baghdad. Posted at 12:52 PM HMMM (2) [Andrew Stuttaford] From a February 2001 interview with Arianna Huffington in the Boston Globe: "I advocate tithing, giving 10 percent of one's income, for those who can afford it, to poverty-fighting specifically...I give 10 percent of my gross income to poverty-fighting." From the LA TImes today: "Huffington's tax form lists $46,763 in contributions to charity in 2002. Those were not deductible because she had no taxable income. The contributions include payments to three prominent private schools on Los Angeles' Westside — the Archer School, Crossroads and New Roads. They also include payments of $6,675 to the Church of the Movement of Spiritual Inner Awareness and a related foundation. The church, founded by John-Roger, describes itself as designed to "teach Soul Transcendence, which is becoming aware of yourself as a Soul and as one with God, not as a theory but as a living reality."" Posted at 12:51 PM POT PRAISES KETTLE [Andrew Stuttaford] In a report published this morning Reuters refers to the BBC's " gold-plated reputation." Posted at 12:44 PM HMMM [Andrew Stuttaford] Arianna on 'corporate tax cheats'. Posted at 12:41 PM BRIBING KIDS IN SCHOOL [Michael Graham] The Chicago school system's plan to bribe kids to attend school is objectional in so many ways: it teaches kids that normal behavior brings extraordinary reward; it pressures students who don't care about school to sit in class and annoy those who actually want to learn; and the motive is nothing more than getting more cash into the school system by pumping up attendance numbers. But the single most objectional element in this story is the Chicago School CEO's claim that he was merely trying to "incent improvement." Incent? INCENT? Oh, please, no! Not another noun/verb bastardizing disaster. I'm going to effort a formal public objection immediately. Posted at 12:37 PM OUTRAGED! [Michael Graham] I've checked out the Nigerian Email Conference and passed the web address to my associates and we're outraged! We had our "Selling Male Enhancement Products on the 'Net!" Seminar scheduled for that weekend since last year. Thanks, Rod. Posted at 11:48 AM HUMORLESS [Rod Dreher] A Corner reader thought the satirical link I posted the other day about the 3rd Annual Nigerian E-Mail Conference was funny, and sent it to a friend. The Cornerite reports this morning: "Got back a highbrow response - unfunny, insensitive, borderline hate crime - very uncharacteristic of my friend. Turns out the healthcare giant he works for has startred monitoring employees e-mail, even as programmers jobs are being outsourced to India. Connection? who knows - but the conclusion they are -supposed- to draw is pretty obvious. He still works there." Posted at 10:54 AM RUN ON THIS! [Michael Graham] Arianna the Red, yesterday: "Vowing to end corporate tax breaks, independent gubernatorial candidate Arianna Huffington said Wednesday that taxes on business properties should be increased and other business-friendly tax loopholes closed to help stem the red ink in California's budget." Arianna the Red, today: "TV commentator and author Arianna Huffington, who launched her campaign for governor with criticism of "fat cats" who fail to shoulder a fair share of taxes, paid no individual state income tax and just $771 in federal taxes during the last two years, her tax returns show." Her defense is that she lost so much money as a writer and self-promoting media harpy that it overcame the income she earns as the ex-wife of a multimillionaire. Well, there's an argument designed to inspire voter confidence in your fiscal policy. "Hey, California, I know how to dodge these bills--let's all start losing money!" Posted at 10:46 AM AUGUST CORNER ENTERER [Kathryn Jean Lopez] You’ll be seeing some Michael Graham, radio talk-show host and author--no stranger to NRO readers--in The Corner these dog days. No relation to Tim, by the way. Posted at 10:42 AM THE ULTIMATE SPAM EMAIL [John Derbyshire] As part of my customary morning procrastination, putting off doing any useful work for as long as possible, I have been trying to devise the ultimate spam e-mail. Something like David Frost's ultimate London tabloid headline (which, if memory serves, was: "SEX-CHANGE VICAR IN MERCY DASH TO PALACE CORGIS"). It needs to involve (a) printer ink cartridges, (b) enhancement of bust and/or important male body parts, (c) sensationally low mortgage deals, and (d) a business proposal from the nephew of an African statesman. It's harder than it looks, though, and I hereby throw it open as a competition to readers who are as averse as I am to working before lunch. The winner will be posted in The Corner. (Though please say whether you want your name shown or not. Some employers are so-o-o persnickety about people doing this kind of thing in company time.) Posted at 10:40 AM RUSH HOUR CHAT [Tim Graham] Larry Flynt, late into the Sean Hannity radio show yesterday, talking about Gray Davis: "He looks like he was embalmed." Posted at 10:35 AM RE: GAY UNIONS POLL [John Derbyshire] Stanley: This recent astonishing turn in the polls illustrates something I have long been arguing: that homosexuals are better off when people don't think about them too much. I believe previous polls included a large cohort of people who just preferred not to think about homosexuality at all, and who gave un-thought-out answers, or default "correct" answers. When you force the issue on people's attention, though, as the news media have been doing this past few weeks, that don't-really-want-to-think-about-it cohort breaks much more negative than positive. Posted at 10:34 AM THE POLL [Stanley Kurtz] Tim, what struck me most about the Post’s poll (and what provoked the bogus attempt at a refutation) is the fact that support for civil unions has dropped by a full 12 percentage points since May, just before the Supreme Court’s Lawrence decision. This is important for several reasons. First, it shows that Vermont-style civil unions, which include all the benefits of marriage but lack only the name, are not becoming a compromise alternative to full gay marriage. The 12-point drop also says something about the volatile nature of public opinion on this subject. I think many Americans are internally divided on the issue of homosexuality. They approve of our generally increased social tolerance for homosexuality, yet also worry that civil unions and gay marriage will undermine the institution of marriage. Once gay marriage became a realistic prospect, many of these Americans were willing to own up to their opposition to this change in the institution. Many may earlier have been giving pollsters politically correct answers, out of embarrassment. But Justice Scalia’s dissent in Lawrence, and the emerging public debate on this subject, have helped to reassure people that it’s alright to oppose gay marriage. We saw the other day that even in Canada there has been a five percent shift against gay marriage. The public there is now evenly divided. I’ve said it before, but I’ll say it again. It is just plain wrong for conservatives to throw in the towel on this issue because of a belief that we cannot win. We can win. More than most, this is an issue on which a simple belief in the rightness of our position, along with the confidence that others see it our way, are the keys to victory. Posted at 10:00 AM FOX LAWSUIT [John Derbyshire] Look: Bill O'Reilly, with all his numerous faults (PLEASE do not e-mail in to enumerate them) is a Good Thing. Al Franken is a hysterical, delusional, America-hating, buck-toothed lefty dork. OK? BUT this lawsuit Fox has launched against Franken's publisher (apparently at O'Reilly's instigation) stinks, and should be laughed out of court, and then laughed at some more in the public forum. The Author's Guild has a website on which they are listing famous books that could be prosecuted on similar grounds. Give it up, Bill. Posted at 09:42 AM THE HUTTON ENQUIRY [Kathryn Jean Lopez] This looks like it should be at the start of a PBS mystery show (Jos made a related allusion yesterday). Posted at 09:15 AM GAY UNIONS BOMB [Tim Graham] The Washington Post leads today with a poll of 1,003 Americans demonstrating that 60 percent disapprove of the Episcopal Church's decision to allow its bishops to bless committed homosexual relationships. They also found 58 percent oppose "civil unions," giving gay couples some of the same legal rights as married couples. And yet all the Democrats rush to represent the 37 percent minority. The most unintentionally funny paragraph of the story is this one, in an attempt to rebut the poll: "Other surveys have found, however, that some opponents of same-sex unions would tolerate extending marriage rights to gay and lesbian couples. A recent survey by the Human Rights Campaign found that 33 percent supported granting civil marriage licenses to gay and lesbian couples 'as long as churches do not have to recognize or perform these marriages.' An additional 17 percent would accept extending those rights to gay couples but 'do not support it.' Nearly half, 47 percent, said they were opposed." What makes this funny to me is that when we appeared together on CNBC, HRC leader Elizabeth Birch acted dumbfounded when I said majorities oppose what proponents call gay marriage. "What poll is that?" she demanded. By my math, even HRC's qualification-stuffed poll shows that 64 percent do not support it, and that's from a lobbying group for gay moral equivalence! Don't count on the media finding a "mainstream" and an "extreme" on this issue... Posted at 08:09 AM TED WILLIAMS [Andrew Stuttaford] Unlike poor Ted (for now), it seems like this controversy will never die. Posted at 07:56 AM YIKES: REPUBLICANS HAVING FUN? [Kathryn Jean Lopez] From the Onion: Republicans Introduce Economic Equality Bill For Fun Of Shooting It Down Posted at 01:10 AM HAMAS JR. [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Amazing these kinds of pictures don't clear things for those who don't get it. Posted at 01:02 AM HOCKEY TRANSENDENCE-CANADIAN-STYLE [Rich Lowry] Posted at 12:10 AM RUBICON CROSSED [Andrew Stuttaford] Here’s a comment from a reader who (judging by my e-mails) is far from alone in this opinion: “This is all going to go badly. Davis and California should have to live with each other; the recall is going to let the real villains off the hook and the people of California will continue on their merry spendthrift way.” I understand the point, but it’s too late to make it. Like it or not, there is going to be a recall vote. If Gray survives, he will still be a lousy governor, but he would be a politically strengthened lousy governor. No-one should wish that on California. Posted at 12:01 AM JUST SHOWING UP [Andrew Stuttaford] Arnold Schwarzenegger: "There comes a point when the people must demand more of our elected officials than just showing up." The response from one Texan (suffering through the spectacle of his elected representatives holed up in New Mexico and Oklahoma). “Oh, dare to dream.” Posted at 12:00 AM Wednesday, August 13, 2003 THE "BIG" ARREST: WHAT'S THE DEAL? [Kathryn Jean Lopez] ABC is reporting this SAM arrest is not as big a deal as it is being made out to be. Here's some of what our man Jim Robbins [DID YOU READ HIM ON NORTH KOREA AND JOHN BOLTON TODAY--YOU SHOULD] has to say about it: "I had wondered what the big deal was myself, I figured there was something that wasn't being reported. It could be that this was an attempt to get information on other people, or maybe the Russians were trying to show how cooperative they are. Hard to believe we just did it to look like we were doing something because there are so many untold stories that could be told that are much more dramatic and interesting. If the public is left with the impression that our intelligence and law-enforcement personnel are dropping the ball, or that this event reflects the full magnitude of the ongoing threat, it will hurt the war effort. I wish the administration would tell more of the true success stories, but I also understand the need for secrecy." Posted at 11:20 PM BALLOT BABBLE IN CALIFORNIA [Jim Boulet Jr. ] The ballots for California's October 7th recall election must be printed in seven languages: Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Spanish, Tagalog, and Vietnamese. Los Angeles County's punch card ballots can carry only 48 candidate names per card, meaning English-speaking voters must be given three ballots apiece in order to accommodate the 135 certified candidates running for governor. All this potential for confusion means long lines on Election Day for California voters. Will Gray Davis voters prove themselves more willing to patiently endure the chaos? Quite possibly, given they only have just one candidate to support in any language. Posted at 10:56 PM SIMPLE FIXES? [Nick Schulz] CNN carries a Reuter story today with the intriguing headline: “Simple fixes could bring water to millions.” ”Kenya is a water-scarce country, but I believe that with efficient management of our water resources we can use the available water resources for the benefit of everybody and to cover all our needs," Karua said in an interview. She said rebuilding Nairobi's crumbling water infrastructure with leaking pipes would cost over $80 billion, but much also needed to be done to eradicate corruption and misuse. "In Nairobi around 40 percent of the water is unaccounted for," Karua said.Putting aside the question of how it is that 40% of a country’s water goes “unaccounted for, ”according to CNN, “simple fixes” cost $80 billion. Even Ted Turner might choke on that bill. Maybe the headline should be “Endemic Graft Dooms Millions in Africa: Solutions Far in the Future.” Posted at 07:39 PM THE NEXUS [Nick Schulz] Important NY Times piece today, with excellent reporting, on Islamic militants in Iraq. ”Iraq is the nexus where many issues are coming together — Islam versus democracy, the West versus the axis of evil, Arab nationalism versus some different types of political culture," said Barham Saleh, the prime minister of this Kurdish-controlled part of northern Iraq. "If the Americans succeed here, this will be a monumental blow to everything the terrorists stand for."Democratic candidates for president who were against the Iraq war but don’t want to appear Dovish argue that Iraq was a mistake because it is a distraction from the war on terror. So how do they respond then to Saleh’s point? Posted at 07:38 PM MR. ARBUTHNOT REPLIES [John Derbyshire] Kathryn: "Where is the iron hand?" Inside the velvet glove, surely. That, at any rate, is what Mr. Arbuthnot would say. Posted at 07:29 PM HERB BROOKS, RIP [Rich Lowry] Anybody who watched those games in 1980 (and is not a Communist) is in his debt for perhaps the most transcendently perfect sports experience, ever. Posted at 07:24 PM A COMPASSIONATE CONSERVATIVE PRESIDENT IN ACTION! [Kathryn Jean Lopez] "[Schwarzenegger] would be a good governor, as would others running for governor of California." Posted at 07:17 PM PALEO TO THE MAX [Rick Brookhiser] This would be the same E. Michael Jones who thinks Freud took psychoanalysis from the Bavarian Illuminati. Posted at 04:43 PM OH BOY(S)! [Kathryn Jean Lopez] It looks like I have surrendered The Corner here. Where is the control? Where is the Iron Hand? Posted at 04:30 PM MESSAGES [John Derbyshire] Kathryn: May I please make use of The Corner for a couple of coded messages? I promise not to do this often. (1) Lady Di: You ROCK! In inches as well as centimeters!! THANK YOU!!! (2) Edgewood, MD: Boris & I went for walkies this morning with Grand Arse and Little Nixon. Thank you so much for this. Posted at 04:29 PM DID HE CHANGE YOUR LIFE, TOO? [Peter Robinson] It never occurred to me that this would happen, but the title of my book, How Ronald Reagan Changed My Life, has prompted lots of people to write to let me know how Ronald Reagan changed *their* lives. The stories are all wonderful-when I was on his radio show just yesterday morning, for example, Kirby Wilbur told me that he and his wife met while they were both working on Reagan's 1980 New Hampshire primary campaign-but some of the stories are particularly powerful. From a reader of The Corner: My 11-month old son is named D____ Ronald G____ [first and last names deleted to respect the writer's privacy]. He is named after you-know-whom (being Jewish, his first name was reserved for his grandpa) at my Soviet-born wife's insistence. You see, she was a young girl in the Soviet Union who listened on the Voice of America to the "Evil Empire" speech with her family huddled around a radio. She remembers her parents crying because finally the West understood. Her Dad was a dissident playwright who eventually joined the Moldovan "Freedom Parliament" where he signed Moldova's Declaration of Independence from the USSR. He quit politics immediately and has been editor of a pro-democracy newspaper, when not writing his plays. These are the people who understand that Ronald Reagan was a gift to all mankind, they know that their freedom today is a result of his courage yesterday. In the 1940s and 50's, until he died, my wife's grandpa used to listen to the VoA and BBC hoping that the "Americans will come back and drive these Russians out". Thanks to Mr. Reagan his unknown great-grandson was born in liberty. I guess I'm saying, there are millions of lives that Mr. Reagan changed and you are blessed for having known him.Ronald Reagan, a gift to all mankind. If anyone else has a story, send an email right along-and put "Gipper" in the subject line. I figure I'll keep all the emails I receive, print them out, and give them to the Reagan Library. Posted at 04:18 PM RE: BUFFETT [Andrew Stuttaford] That would be Tax enthusiast Warren Buffett. Schwarzenegger stumbles? Posted at 04:15 PM TONY BLANKLEY NAILS IT [Rich Lowry] Posted at 04:08 PM CREDIBLE THREATS? SERIOUS THREATS? IN SAUDI ARABIA? [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Nah! Posted at 04:07 PM RE: CRINGE [Kathryn Jean Lopez] What the heck would possess you to say that at a Catholic college commencement? A college commencement period, but then a religious one, to boot. If she said that on The View, that's one thing, but...oy. Posted at 04:05 PM CONTRASTS & HISTORY [Dave Kopel] Today is the anniversary of the 1927 birthday of Cuban tyrant Fidel Castro. It is also the anniversary of the 1961 beginning of the construction of the Berlin Wall. The Berlin Wall now lies in history's ash heap of discarded lies, and the people of the defunct "Democratic Republic" of Germany are free. One day, Castro and his thieving, murderous regime will also lie in ashes, and the "Republic of Cuba" will become a real republic. In the meantime, shame on every American who has paid obeisance to the Havana despot; such Americans are enemies of freedom, as were their wicked predecessors who worshipped Stalin, Mao, and Ho. Posted at 04:01 PM WARREN BUFFETT [Kathryn Jean Lopez] has signed on to Arnold's campaign. Posted at 04:00 PM MARIA'S ALSO IN THE WARROOM [Kathryn Jean Lopez] according to the LA Times. Posted at 03:58 PM CRINGE, TIM, CRINGE [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Though, it's slightly better than Bob Dole talking about the big V. Posted at 03:55 PM MARIA LOOKING LIKE TIPPER [Tim Graham] In Time's profile on Mrs. Fragrant Arnie, Deputy Washington Bureau Chief Matt Cooper began with the saucy stuff: "Five years ago, when she gave the commencement speech at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Mass., Maria Shriver relied on the usual bromides. 'Gotta have laughter.' 'Pinpoint your passion.' 'Be willing to fail.' But then she turned to the subject of sex, and brought the Catholic graduates to their feet. 'Forgive me, Mommy,' she said, and went on to argue that womankind's great contribution to civilization is 'awesome creative sex'. She later wrote a book outlining her philosophy of life, in which she felt compelled to reveal, 'There's no Viagra within a 50-mile radius of our house.'" Posted at 03:53 PM BET HE DIDN'T ORDER THE FREEDOM FRIES EITHER [Kathryn Jean Lopez] John Kerry gets in trouble over his lunch. Posted at 03:50 PM COSMO [Kathryn Jean Lopez] must be having a bad time on vacation, and is using his voodoo dolls again. The only explanation for all the weird things happenign here, keeping us from posting more to The Corner lately. (How's that for an excuse?) Posted at 03:44 PM FILM SCHOOL RUINED BY THE LEFT [Rod Dreher] Here's a terrific article that appeared last month as a cover story in the Los Angeles Times magazine. The author sent his daughter to film school, and couldn't figure out why she was failing her film theory tests. Then he looked at one of them, and found the questions to be filled with Marxist gobbledygook. He set out to find out what has happened to film schools, and discovered that Marxist deconstructionist academics had colonized them, and were killing the study and appreciation of moviemaking. All props to Roger Ebert, who remarks in the story: "Film theory has nothing to do with film. Students presumably hope to find out something about film, and all they will find out is an occult and arcane language designed only for the purpose of excluding those who have not mastered it and giving academic rewards to those who have. No one with any literacy, taste or intelligence would want to teach these courses, so the bona fide definition of people teaching them are people who are incapable of teaching anything else." Posted at 03:39 PM LOOKING BAD [Andrew Stuttaford] The BBC, again. Posted at 03:38 PM VICIOUS SLUR [Andrew Stuttaford] This is not funny, not funny at all. Link (to their eternal shame) via Reason. Posted at 03:37 PM "THE CHILDREN," CTD. [Andrew Stuttaford] Rule 1: When someone talks about 'the children' watch out for your wallet. Rule 2: When someone talks about 'the children' watch out for your freedoms. Here's an example of Rule 2 from Texas. In September, 1999 Jesus Castillo sold a copy of an 'adults only' comic book to an undercover cop who clearly had nothing better to do with his time. The cop was an adult and the comic book was stocked in an adult section of the store. 'Demon Beast Invasion: The Fallen' may or may not have had its artistic or other merits (part of its plot included women having sex with, um, trees), but that apparently did not worry the prosecuting attorney. He "didn't care what kind of testimony [was] out there" because the store was across from an elementary school and "comic books, traditionally...are for kids" and that, apparently, was that.
A dumb jury agreed and now, apparently, so has the Supreme Court. Ridiculous. Posted at 03:34 PM PALEOCON CRACK UP [Rod Dreher] I've just seen a long, very strange article by E. Michael Jones, which he's published in the new issue of his magazine Culture Wars. Jones got himself disinvited from speaking at a conference scheduled for this fall, and sponsored by Touchstone Magazine, with which I am editorially affiliated. The apparent cause of the withdrawn invitation was a recent issue of Culture Wars that carried article after article obsessing over the Jews and their malign influence. It was revolting stuff, and though I had no part in the decision, I am glad the Touchstone editorial board disassociated itself from such a nasty character as Jones. Well, Jones has now decided that I had everything to do with what's happened to him, and so does National Review. In the paranoid screed he's just written, Jones says NR was created as a CIA front to destroy "competing conservatisms." In January 2002, alleges Jones, William F. Buckley decided that he needed to punish the Pope for being against war on Iraq, so he (WFB) had me start writing articles critical of the Catholic Church over the sex abuse scandal, which broke that month. Jones goes on to say that I "helped create" the priest-pederasty scandal, which apparently does not exist in reality. Jones goes on a lengthy and truly loony personal attack on me and my family, badly misstates Catholic doctrine in an attempt to tie me to the repugnant pro-abortion Catholic Frances Kissling, and interestingly, condemns me for taking career advice from a Jew. He doesn't quit until he's assaulted others, including (you knew this was coming) the notorious David Frum. I commend Jones' pitiful bleat of an article to your attention as yet another sign that some of paleoconservatism's leading lights are losing their minds to Jew-obsessed paranoi | ||||||