HELP
Archive
E-mail Comments
Send to a Friend
<% printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%>Print Version
Saturday, March 20, 2004

SHE ONLY WANTED MORE TIME TO STUDY... [KJL]
But isn't News of the World that checkout-line "Hillary Cheats on Bill with a Martian" paper?

Posted at 10:58 PM

NOT ZAWAHIRI, [KJL (now posting from a cyberbar)]
but 100 Qaeda detained.

Posted at 10:55 PM

GITMO PAYS [KJL]
(Ok, now I'm really turning it off.)

Posted at 10:52 PM

LONG COMMERCIAL FRIVOLITY POST [KJL ]
An e-mail:
As a long-time reader of That Happy Corner on NRO, I've often thought about writing to say how much I appreciate and enjoy you, Jonah, Derb and the rest of the Gang. However, I've never wanted to bother you with another e-mail (I'm sure your box is always overflowing) -- until now.

I cannot let pass all these accolades for Diet Coke. I have never been able to drink coffee for caffeination, but I also draw the line at Diet Coke. I am confident that REAL conservatives drink Diet Pepsi! I will drink almost any cold caffeinated beverage; though I prefer Diet Pepsi, I also willingly guzzle Diet Mountain Dew, Diet RC Cola, and Diet Dr Pepper (take that, Mr. Stuttaford!) -- but I refuse Diet Coke. I'll suffer through a caffeine-fasting headache before I'll choke down that swill.

I am sure that the Diet Pepsi/Diet Coke divide is as wide as Red States/Blue States, and Diet Pepsi is for The Good Guys in Red. (Though I will concede that regular Coke's movie-theater commercials with the NASCAR drivers is thoroughly Red State.)

I therefore make the following offer: if you could endorse Diet Pepsi in The Corner, I will carry out my long-intended, never-completed resolve to subscribe to NR. (You might, for example, see if someone could talk about Diet Pepsi going best with Marmite or haggis, sort of like red with meat, white with fish . . . .)
ME: I have no idea if it goes well with Marmite or haggis, but Diet Pepsi is a-okey with me. I actually have no real preference--they both seem to do the job, unless the day is especially ugly (and Diet Mountain Dew works as well--especially in the case that brings in any subscribers.

And, now, go ahead and subscribe, thank you very much!

And, don't worry, I'm turning the computer off now.

Posted at 10:43 PM

TOOMEY@PENN STATE [KJL ]
An undergrad reports: "Last night I went to fundraising event here in State College, PA for Pat Toomey. To hear him speak, it feels like you’re listening to a conservative John Edwards. He’s youthful, energetic, and highly intelligent. He makes you excited he’s running. And considering how far his campaign has come and how he’s closing in on Specter every week, you can only get more excited. He also spoke with myself and four other students from Penn State and encouraged our Republican friends to register to vote and send in their absentee ballots. We all came away in awe of how personable he is. He’s nothin’ but a stand-up guy."

Posted at 10:29 PM

FALLING ON THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL [KJL]
Many e-mails about Bob Moran's piece and Kerry falling. Many mention the Bush Segway incident. I will give the benefit of the doubt--I'm assuming there's no actual photo of the Kerry fall, or someone would have published it. Right?

Another reader mentions this, which is tangentally related, and, well, it's Saturday night:
Do you remember while campaigning Bush had a incident with a dump truck while jogging and a member of his security detail was hurt? The archived story is here, ....

''Governor Bush is in good condition and good spirits and hopes that Agent Hughey has not sustained any serious injuries,'' she said.

A witness, Ernest Bedford, 50, a pipeline inspector for the city who was working nearby, said he didn't hear any brakes squeal, just ''a big, loud bang.''

Bedford said he saw Bush in the clear but ''the other guy was reaching his hand up out of the debris.''

Bush used Hughey's cellular telephone to call DPS officials at the Governor's Mansion, and they called 911, Ms. Edwards said. ''The governor stayed with Roscoe until he was in the ambulance,'' she said.

I realize the conditions are not exactly the same, but Bush's immediate reaction was to tend to his security detail remaining by his side till EMT's took him to the hospital. Additionally, I could find no reporting of Bush berating the dump truck driver for almost accidently mowing right into him had he not jumped out of the way or boasting later that he doesn't fall while jogging . Kerry's reaction to his silly spill was to ensure there were no photo's taken by the accompanying photographer, then to blame the SS agent. Bush's incident was certainly a window into his character and I suspect the Kerry's is too. Why elect Kerry president when already thinks and acts like he is a king.

Posted at 09:48 PM

ISLAMOPHOBIA? [Andrew Stuttaford]
The UK’s Muslim News is reporting that Atlanta Plus, a feminist organization, is campaigning to have Muslim countries that don’t send female athletes barred from the Olympics for, effectively, ‘gender apartheid’ (South Africa was banned for years). The newspaper, of course, is predictably outraged, and, needless to say, descends into familiar ideological slime with suggestions of, wait for it, “cultural imperialism,” “racism” and “islamophobia.” That’s the usual nonsense, of course, but it’s revealing as an example of the way that many Muslim activists often try to suppress any critical discussion of their religion as a ‘phobia.’ The truth ought to be perfectly obvious to anyone not deafened by the rhetoric of fanatic 'imams': the thuggish way in which a number of Islamic countries treat women as second-class citizens is a disgrace, and the West should say so. Often.

Posted at 06:57 PM

CROOKS WITH A CAUSE [Andrew Stuttaford]

Members of the reliably worthless European ‘parliament’ like nothing better than mocking America’s ‘Enron capitalism,’ but what do these crusaders for honesty do when they are asked to vote on the EU’s Commission’s accounts, accounts so tawdry that they have been rejected by Brussels’ own auditors?

Yup, they approve them.

Part of the reason, of course, is that the EU parliament, a cesspit notorious for graft, greed and cronyism, is in no position to face much scrutiny of the way that it manages its own affairs, but part of the reason too is the fanatic belief of so many MEPs in ‘Europe’.

Blogger Terrance Coyle takes up the story:

“When I interviewed Diemut Theato MEP, Chairman of [the parliament’s budgetary] Committee, on this subject she put it in a nutshell for me. "European Parliamentarians have a duty to Europe, not just to their electors", if they attack the Commission they undermine the project, and that will never ever do.”


Posted at 06:53 PM

POLICE STATE? [Andrew Stuttaford]

The EU’s bureaucracy has never been very tolerant of dissent, but even by Brussels standards, the arrest of a leading investigative journalist (he was held for ten hours without access to a lawyer, something that’s normal in Belgium, apparently) is something of a low point.

The EU 'constitution' (much more likely to be forced through, incidentally, in the wake of the change of government in Spain) is filled with highminded boilerplate, but the plight of Hans-Martin Tillak shows what this misbegotten 'Union' really stands for.


Posted at 06:31 PM

ARMAGEDDON WATCH [Andrew Stuttaford]
So you’ll know when the end is nigh.

Posted at 06:30 PM

INNOCENTS ABROAD? [Andrew Stuttaford]
It seems not.

Posted at 04:09 PM

CRETINS [Andrew Stuttaford]

Here’s a charming little party being hosted today by Al-Muhajiroun, an Islamic extremist group based in the UK:

“This Saturday's LIVE talk on Paltalk will discuss one of the greatest forgotten obligations in Islaam - Hating false religions. Allaah (swt) orders the believers to hate all other religions, way of lives, creeds, doctrines and beliefs that contradict with Islaam, and one cannot be Muslim without to declare animosity and hatred towards kufr, bid'ah, shirk and nifaaq (Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, Sikhism, Buddhism, Democracy, Freedom etc.).”

That’s just something to remember the next time that you read that the British police are cracking down on ‘hate speech’. This sort of event, presumably, does not count.


Posted at 04:06 PM

RE: KERRY ON THE SLOPES [KJL]
Here's the AP coverage.

Posted at 10:00 AM

WHERE'S THE PHOTO? [KJL]
Robert Moran makes an interesting media-bias point re: Kerry on the slopes.

Posted at 09:58 AM

TAIWAN VOTES "NO" ON CHINA REFERENDUMS [John Derbyshire]

Posted at 09:51 AM

RE: LOWRY'S SCHIP COMEUPANCE [John Derbyshire]
You readers want me to correct my boss on a point of math? My **boss**?

Oh, yeah. Just as soon as I get through this detailed analysis of why William F. Buckley has got the passive subjunctive all wrong...

Posted at 09:13 AM

WINNER [KJL]
Taiwan's president survives a bullet and a reelection.

Posted at 09:11 AM

HEATHER HAS TWO MARRIED MOMMIES [Tim Graham]
Human Events caught something I should have in my Washington Post. The daily "Kids Post" feature in the Style section recently reported on kids of gay parents and their desire for what proponents call "gay marriage."

Posted at 08:58 AM

JOHNNY MAC VS. ZELL [Tim Graham]
Times Watch finds that while John McCain gets front-page huzzahs for suggesting Kerry isn't weak on defense, when Democratic Sen. Zell Miller openly endorsed Bush, the New York Times didn't notice in its pages for three weeks, and then downplayed it as "bewildering" party betrayal.

Posted at 08:57 AM

RUN, DON'T WALK [Michael Graham]
Go see "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind." I can't remember (no pun intended) the last movie I saw that was this good. It's amazing

Posted at 08:55 AM

Friday, March 19, 2004

KERRY ON KERRY: RECKLESS AND IRRESPONSIBLE [Rich Lowry]
This is from "Face the Nation" on September 14, 2003:

Sen. KERRY: I think we need--I think we need to roll back the top end of the Bush tax cut.

McMANUS: If that amendment does not pass, will you then vote against the $87 billion?

Sen. KERRY: I don't think any United States senator is going to abandon our troops and recklessly leave Iraq to--to whatever follows as a result of simply cutting and running. That's irresponsible. What is responsible is for the administration to do this properly now. And I am laying out the way in which the administration could unite the American people, could bring other countries to the table, and I think could give the American people a sense that they're on the right track. There's a way to do this properly. But I don't think anyone in the Congress is going to not give our troops ammunition, not give our troops the ability to be able to defend themselves. We're not going to cut and run and not do the job.

Look, we could--we could do this job over a period of time at greater loss, at greater risk, and with much loss around the world with respect to the United States. The question is will we do this the best way possible so that we do the best to protect our troops and the best to advance the safety and security of the United States?

SCHIEFFER: Senator, let me...

Sen. KERRY: My plan will do that.

Posted at 07:18 PM

RE: WHAT RIGHT? [Jonah Goldberg]
Thanks for all the emails about Supreme Court cases affirming the right to marry. I knew about those. I was trying to speak from first principles. I'm going back to sleep now. I only got about an hour and a half of shut-eye last night. Also: rereading that post I mispoke about something else (I'm really on a roll). I wrote:
"I certainly agree with you that the plain meaning of the Constitution is silent on the question. But at the same time I sincerely doubt many heterosexual readers would feel that their basic rights were being infringed upon if the state told them they couldn't marry the woman or man of their choosing."
That "would" should be a "would not."

Posted at 06:07 PM

TRADE AND JOBS [Ramesh Ponnuru]
Brink Lindsey has produced an extremely sober and sensible primer on the subject. Let me mention one question that he (reasonably) does not go into, but on which his analysis reinforces my prejudice. Liberal and conservative free traders--I'm thinking specifically of Gene Sperling and George Will here--have suggested that workers who lose their jobs, or presumably see their wages go down, as a result of free trade should get either financial compensation or job training from the federal government. Let's assume that the federal government can isolate those workers who have been adversely affected by trade, as opposed to domestic competition, technological change, and other factors. Why exactly is a person who lost his job to domestic competition less entitled to our help than one who lost it to foreign trade?

Posted at 05:46 PM

"THE CIVILIZED WORLD IS AT WAR" [KJL]
President Bush's anniversary speech today should be read.

Posted at 05:12 PM

KERRY ON THE SLOPES [Steve Hayward]
There is so much wrong with the stories of Kerry on the slopes that I can hardly contain myself, starting with the spectacle of a 60 year old guy SNOWBOARDING, a sport for outlaw kids in baggy pants. When I tried it out about ten years ago (I've been a regular two-board skier since I was 7), two teen-age chicks went by me and my brother and said, "Hey, look, there's two OLD guys trying it!"

And I was always taught that if you didn't take some falls on skis, you weren't trying very hard to get better at it. So when Kerry says, "I never fall," all kinds of alarm bells about character and other things go off.

And my how Sun Valley has gone to hell, having to put up with the likes of Kerry. I learned to ski in Sun Valley in the mid-1960s, when it was mainly a Republican hangout. Now Blaine County, Idaho, is, s as the NY Times story noted, the one outpost of blue in red-state Idaho. It has been "Hamptonized,' as the saying goes. In the old days, there were no private homes--just two large hotels where everybody stayed, including the Bobby Kennedys. One night Bobby Kennedy and clan barged the nice steak house in the then-little village, walked up to the head waitress and tried to pull a DYKWIA, saying he had a reservation for 12. This restaurant didn't take reservations, however; we had been waiting about an hour for a table in the lounge, in earshot of the whole thing. The head waitress informed Bobby that he would have to wait 60 minutes for a table, whereupon he wheeled around and left. At which point, everyone in the lounge, led by my dad, gave the head waitress a great cheer and round of applause. In later years I used to note that Ted Kennedy was usually the subject of glares when he turned up at Sun Valley.

As I say, the good old days.

Posted at 05:07 PM

PENTAGON STEM CELL RESEARCH [Andrew Stuttaford]
You ask why, Kathryn. Well, this movie gives one clue. Be afraid.

Posted at 05:04 PM

RE: THE STEM-CELL STUDY [KJL]
And here is a clarification to the Reuters story. (What did I tell you?)

Posted at 04:43 PM

RE: PENTAGON-SWEDE ESC STUDY [KJL]
A source familiar with the situation tells me that "they made absolutely sure that the stem cell lines in question were created before August 9, 2001, so the lines are so-called 'Bush approved' lines, which can be legally funded by the federal government. The lines in question are on the NIH registry.” Why the Pentagon is involved in this at all, though, remains a mystery, however.

Posted at 04:40 PM

MORE ON GOOD BOOKS RE: A BAD WAR [Peter Robinson]
Really and truly, this happy Corner must have the best-informed readers on the face of the planet. Late last night, I posted a question about good books on Vietnam, and when I checked my inbox at lunchtime today I found more than sixty replies. (Not to mention, of course, the postings below by Andrew Suttaford, Mac Owens, and Ramesh Ponnuru.)

Now, I confess that I haven’t had time to read all sixty of those emails (the more so since the server here at Hoover seems to be acting up today, making the reading of email move very, very, very slowly), but I have hopped from one to another, getting a feel for the traffic. One book came up again and again: America in Vietnam, by Gunther Lewy. Lewy’s book was recommended by a reader who teaches at a military academy; received high praise from Kirby Wilbur, the genial, witty, and widely-read host of the conservative talk radio show in Seattle; and was the object of this encomium from historian (and frequent NRO contributor) Steve Hayward: “By far and away the best Vietnam book, and I have read probably two dozen or more.”

Other books our readers recommend:
Vietnam, the Necessary War: A Reinterpretation of America’s Most Disastrous Military Conflict by Michael Lind

A Better War: The Unexamined Victories and Final Tragedy of America’s Last War in Vietnam by Lewis Sorley

A Grand Delusion: America’s Descent into Vietnam by Robert Mann

The 25-Year War: America’s Military Role in Vietnam by Bruce Palmer
The Corner: If our readers can’t answer it, the question ain’t worth asking.

Posted at 04:33 PM

AND [Ramesh Ponnuru]
One more I forgot: The Irony of Vietnam by Leslie Gelb and Richard Betts.

Posted at 04:14 PM

VIETNAM BOOKS [Ramesh Ponnuru]
that I've found helpful include: No More Vietnams by Richard Nixon (really); White House Years and Years of Upheaval by Kissinger; America in Vietnam by Guenter Lewy; On Strategy by Harry Summers; and Tet! by Don Oberdorfer.

Posted at 04:05 PM

RE: CURSE-OUT [KJL]
A lot of emails like this in the in-box:
I'm asking myself what I would say to a man who has pledged to lay down his life for me, to take a bullet for me, if he accidentally knocks me down on a ski slope *while* trying his best to protect me.

I think that I say: "Don't worry about it. You're doing your job. I appreciate it."

And to onlookers: "Got tangled up with my guardian angels up there and went down. We need more practice at this."

But: "I don't fall. That blankety-blank knocked me down"?

Posted at 04:05 PM

PENTAGON-FUNDED SWEDISH EMBRYONIC-STEM-CELL STUDY [KJL]
This raise all sorts of questions. Why would we be funding an embryonic-stem-cell study? Why would the Pentagon be funding it? Why would we be funding a Swedish study?...But then, before I go on, I must rememeber that one can rarely trust a wire story on bioethics-type issues...

Posted at 03:59 PM

RE: FLOSSING [John Derbyshire]
Hey, thanks for the plug, Rich. As Straggler fans know, all human life is there. In 1,000 words about teeth you get Shakespeare, Nabokov, Orwell of course, Sir Isaac Newton, two members of the Royal Family, and an Anglican Bishop. We don't sell you short at National Review.

Posted at 03:55 PM

WHERE WAS THE STATE DEPARTMENT? [Mark Krikorian]
Another reason to regret that Colorado Gov. Bill Owens isn't running for Senate -- he's the only executive-branch official at any level of government I've yet heard of who has pushed back against Mexico's blatant interference in our internal affairs. Mexico's recently replaced consul in Denver gave an href="http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36~53~2024669,00.html">interview published yesterday blaming Owens for having her recalled because of her involvement in the campaign to extend in-state tuition to illegal aliens, among other outrages. The governor denies any involvement, but it looks like he's just being diplomatic, as it were.

Posted at 03:53 PM

SAM HUNTINGTON, CALL YOUR OFFICE [Mark Krikorian]
I'm happy to be corrected by alert Corner readers, but I don't recall the Italian government a century ago providing the New York schools with foreign-language textbooks, or the Tsar's government credentialing teachers in Russia headed for the U.S. But this is what the Mexican consulate is doing in L.A. Then, New York's schools never had nearly three-quarters of their student body coming from a single foreign-language group.

Posted at 03:38 PM

GREENCARD SOLDIERS [This Nicaraguan non-citizen soldier deserted his unit rather than return to the "oil-driven war" in Iraq, and has now teamed up with "this war is evil" pacifists and is claiming to be a conscientious objector.

This tells us nothing universal about green-card soldiers, but it at least serves to deflate the more hyperbolic claims that they're more American than we are.

Posted at 03:36 PM

RE: DIET COKE [Mark Krikorian]
Kathryn, feel free to tell the suits that I provide my staff with all the free Diet Coke they can drink. Of course, I have only eight people working for me.

Posted at 03:34 PM

RE: VIETNAM BOOKS [Mac Owens]
Most of my suggestions about Vietnam books focus on the military aspects of the war. However, I was remiss in not mentioning Norman Podhoretz’s splendid Why We Were in Vietnam, which does an especially good job of explaining the morality of the decision to undertake the enterprise. Indeed, for most interested readers, this is the place to start. Then a reader might look at Guenter Lewy’s America in Vietnam, upon which I relied heavily in my critiques of Kerry.

Posted at 03:28 PM

RE: DONKEY LEFT THE BARN [John Derbyshire]
Rich: Just so. And many settled Hispanics dislike unrestrained and illegal immigration for just the natural reasons of self-interest you point out. One outstanding example was Hispanic culture hero Cesar Chavez, a third generation American. Chavez's United Farm Workers union was very active in helping the INS catch illegal Mexican workers, and I believe Chavez offered the INS his own union members as manpower to help patrol the border!

Posted at 03:24 PM

RE: LIKABLE GUY [Jed Babbin]
Jonah, notice the language the Times used to describe the flow of attacks coming and going from Camp Kerry. See how they all seem to be coming at him, but barely going out from him?

"His getaway came at a particularly rough time for the senator, the expected Democratic presidential nominee. For more than a week, he has had to defend himself from an onslaught of attacks by President Bush and millions of dollars in negative advertising, while taking criticism for calling Republicans 'crooked' and 'lying' and claiming to have the support of leaders whom he has not named."

Posted at 03:19 PM

MS. BROWN'S TOUGH QUESTIONS [Tim Graham]
Get a load of how NBC's Katie stand-in, Campbell Brown, began her interview with Howard Dean this morning:

"You more than any other candidate on during the Democratic nomination fight made the war a central issue for all Democrats in this campaign, your opposition to the war. And Dr. Rice just came on and said, we're making progress, we didn't underestimate that we were going to face these kind of problems, that has got to be infuriating for you."

Campbell did NOT ask Dean about this gaffe: "The president was the one who dragged our troops to Iraq, which apparently has been a factor in the death of 200 Spaniards over the weekend."

Posted at 03:18 PM

FLOSSING [Rich Lowry]
I promise you, if you are lax with your flossing, you won't be after reading John Derb's delightful dentristy-themed "Straggler" column in the new issue of NR.

Posted at 03:16 PM

HANNITY & COLMES [Rich Lowry]
I'm scheduled to be on tonight around 9:40 p.m.

Posted at 03:15 PM

DONKEY LEFT THE BARN [Rich Lowry]
The Journal had an immigration editorial yesterday (no link, I believe). It read in part: “At 36 million and counting, there are so many Americans of Hispanic heritage already in the U.S. that even if we stopped immigration cold today, their share of the electorate would rise, and rapidly. That donkey has left the barn. And that’s bad news for any party that lets itself be perceived as hostile to migration among Hispanics..." What the Journal is acknowledging is a dynamic that NR and John O’Sullivan have long warned about—high levels of immigration would make it politically impossible, as a matter of pure demographics, to restrain immigration. Now the Journal tells us that NR was right all along. A couple of other things. The Journal says, "The point isn't that Republicans need to play identity politics the way Democrats do. Hispanic voters will settle for being treated like other Americans, but they will punish politicians who appear to be actively hostile to their efforts to get ahead.” OK, fair enough. But how does continued mass Hispanic immigration help an individual Hispanic “get ahead”? If he’s low-skilled, doesn’t it actually work against his individual economic interest, by potentially depressing his wages? High-level immigration seems to do more to help Hispanics as a collective class by increasing their political and social clout, in other words its helps basically as a matter of identity politics. Finally, the Journal says of Hispanic voting patterns, “Especially as they vote for the first time, Hispanics are persuadable.” I may be wrong but I have always had the impression that new Hispanic immigrants, who are generally poor and obviously not well-assimilated, tend to vote Democratic. And that Hispanics tend to vote GOP only as they become wealthier and are in the country longer. But the Journal makes it sound as if it is a great boon to the Republican cause to have new Hispanic immigrants in the voting booths.

Posted at 03:11 PM

MY SCHIP COMEUPANCE [Rich Lowry]
Thanks to those readers who have pointed this out. I did indeed misread Franken in the way descirbed below--and did it in a very snotty way. I duly stand corrected. While we're involved in counting issues, please count me as redfaced!
E-mail:

Rich,

I'm a regular NRO reader and NRODT subscriber. However, as much as it pains me to say it, I think Franken's phrasing of the SCHIP income limits is actually more correct than yours. 200% above the poverty line is in fact 3 times the poverty line (It is the poverty line level plus an additional 2 times that level). 200% of the poverty level is 2 times the poverty line level (i.e., 100% above the poverty level). When Franken says it was limited to families below 200% of the poverty line, he is saying that the families had income less than twice the poverty level. You seem to be reading this to mean 200% below the poverty line which would imply families with income one-third of the poverty level (or an in fact negative income depending upon interpretation). This is just my reading...perhaps math whiz John Derbyshire can authoritatively resolve this.

Regardless, this is largely a semantic argument. You have him nailed otherwise. Keep up the good work.

Posted at 03:09 PM

MODEST PROPOSAL [Andrew Stuttaford]
I've been thinking some more about that law banning smoking in front of 'the children'. If the solons of Port Orange really insist on curbing this supposed threat to their youth, why not simply make it illegal for 'the children' to go outside apart, of course, from excursions to school and, in the interest of keeping the always entertaining obesity 'crisis' bubbling away at maximum intensity, McDonald's? Such a measure would also have the added advantage of cutting crime, noise, public skateboarding and irritation at the mall. Hey, it might even be fair: there may well be fewer children in Port Orange than there are smokers. Keep the tykes inside!

Posted at 02:44 PM

RUMSFELD! [Andrew Stuttaford]
Undisclosed location disclosed.

Posted at 02:40 PM

NEVER DISAPPOINTS [KJL]
"Terrorism didn't exist in Iraq before," Dominique de Villepin said.

Posted at 02:27 PM

WHAT A LIKABLE GUY [Jonah Goldberg]

Kerry curses out one of his secret service agents on the slopes because men like John Kerry don't fall down:


The image-conscious candidate and his aides prevailed upon reporters and photographers to let him have a first run down the mountain solo, except for two agents and Marvin Nicholson, his omnipresent right-hand man.

His next trip down, a reporter and a camera crew were allowed to follow along on skis — just in time to see Mr. Kerry taken out by one of the Secret Service men, who had inadvertently moved into his path, sending him into the snow.

When asked about the mishap a moment later, he said sharply, "I don't fall down," then used an expletive to describe the agent who "knocked me over."

The incident occurred near the summit. No one was hurt, and Mr. Kerry came careering down the mountain moments later, a look of intensity on his face, his lanky frame bent low to the ground.


Posted at 02:05 PM

TERMS OF ENDEARMENT [John Derbyshire]
A reader chides me for having used the word "Congressperson" in my recent column. He recommends Jerry Pournelle's usage: "Congresscritter."

Posted at 01:22 PM

MORE DIALECTOLOGY [John Derbyshire]
A curious reader asks: "Mr. Derbyshire---Is it just that people in different parts of China pronounce words differently? Or are there differences of grammar too?"

Yes, there are differences of grammar. Stepping aside to let someone precede him through a door, for instance, a Beijinger would say: "Ni xian qu" --- literally: "You first go." A Cantonese person, however, would say: "Lei heui sin" --- literally: "You go first." Same words, different order (and of course different pronunciation).

Actual words are often different, too. Cantonese has words that just don't exist in Mandarin, even if you "map" the pronunciation. (In these cases, when writing, a Cantonese person will generally use some Mandarin synonym, though there are a few written characters peculiar to Cantonese that you see in newspaper cartoons and so on.) In other cases, a dialect will use a word that fell out of favor in Mandarin 1,000 years or more ago. The common Cantonese verb for "to like," for example, is "jung-yi." Nobody says this in Mandarin, not even in a Mandarin pronunciation, though it shows up in the Confucian classics. The Mandarin verb is "xi-huan." You can say that with a Cantonese pronunciation ("hei-fun") and will be understood... but the Cantonese prefer "jung-yi." Generally speaking, the southern dialects are more conservative than the northern ones. North China suffered much more historical "churning" --barbarian invasions and so on -- so the language changed more up there. Ancient poems still rhyme in Cantonese, but much less often in Mandarin.

One of the best general-interest books on the Chinese language is SOUND AND SYMBOL IN CHINESE by the great Swedish Sinologist Bernhard Karlgren. Now deeply out of print, unfortunately.

Posted at 01:20 PM

BOOK ON VIETNAM [Mac Owens]
Re Peter’s query on The Corner about a good book on Vietnam: I recommend “A Better War” by Lewis Sorley. It confirms my own belief that we were getting the upper hand by 1969. I have a bumper sticker that says, “I don’t know what happened. When I left, we were winning.” I also like Peter Braestrup’s “Big Story” on the media in Vietnam. And don’t miss Hal Moore’s “We Were Soldiers Once…and Young” on the Ia Drang battles of Nov. 1965, the first big fight between the US Army and the PAVN. Several years ago, I did a review essay of Vietnam books for Joint Forces Quarterly. This is available online for those who might be interested.

Posted at 01:00 PM

SEE THE RUSH VIDEO [Tim Graham]
I can now announce that last night's biggest "DisHonor Awards" surprise -- an in-person speech by Rush Limbaugh that had the audience in a frenzy -- can now be watched at www.mrc.org.

Posted at 12:40 PM

BEYOND PARODY [Andrew Stuttaford]
A dimwit city council has just passed a law banning outdoor smoking in front of, you guessed it, "the children."

Posted at 12:36 PM

DIET COKE [Andrew Stuttaford]
Kathryn, I'm sure you will agree that no breakfast is complete without the first (of many) Diet Cokes of the day - nectar of the gods. The new lime flavor is also delicious. That said, let's not forget Red Bull, an essential supplement for more difficult mornings.

Posted at 12:29 PM

TAIWAN MARKET WATCH [John Derbyshire]
Courtesy of Larry Henry again, here is the Taiwan stock-market watch. Note -- it's all in Chinese. "Looks like it's mixed," says Larry. Yep.

Posted at 12:19 PM

LET ME SAY THIS ABOUT THAT [John Derbyshire]
A reader has e-mailed in to tell me that Texan and Bostonian **ARE** separate languages.

Posted at 12:17 PM

TAIWAN SHOOTING -- A POSSIBLE MOTIVE [John Derbyshire]
Another possible motive for the shooting of Taiwan's president and vice-president is gambling. The election looks close. Gambling -- both legal and illegal -- is very big business. Someone might be trying to swing the odds....

Posted at 12:06 PM

TAIWAN SHOOTING AND THE MARKETS [John Derbyshire]
Lawrence Henry, whom many stock-watching Corner readers will know, very kindly sent in the following: "Derb---I own the stock of AU Optronics, maker of LCDs and flat-panel displays for some big industry computer operations, a Taiwan company. I checked anxiously this morning for any pre-market selloff, and there was none. AUO is now down 50 cents (off $19 open, and a gain of $1.25 yesterday), and seems stable after the first (usually wild) opening hour of trade. It's a growth stock, and I would have expected it to get hit seriously if there were any real market worries about Taiwan or its election.---Larry"

Posted at 12:04 PM

DERB'S DIALECTOLOGY CORRECTED [John Derbyshire]
"Dear Mr. Derbyshire--A slight correction: Tai Yu [the common spoken language opf Taiwan] is a slightly mutated version of Xiamen (City) dialect not Fujian dialect. As you may know, the other main dialect of Fujian Province is Fuzhou, which is a completely different dialect and incomprehensible to speakers of the min nan dialects of which Tai Yu is one."

Got that? "Dialect" is not a very happy usage in the Chinese context. It brings to an American mind something like the difference between Texas speech and Bostonian. These dialects are much farther apart than that, more like separate languages. (The whole issue confused by the fact that WRITTEN Chinese, being non-alphabetic, can be used to represent all of them.)

Posted at 11:50 AM

COLUMBIA’S UAE CHAIR [Rachel Z. Friedman (NR Associate Editor)]
Last Friday Columbia University finally released the list of donors to its Edward Said Chair, held by Rashid Khalidi (also director of Columbia’s Middle East Institute). Among the donors is the United Arab Emirates, a nation that appears to have an interest in paying American universities to do its ideological bidding. Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahayan, the UAE’s unelected president since 1971, is also a backer of Georgetown's Center for Contemporary Arab Studies and the source of a $2.5 million gift to the Harvard Divinity School. Harvard froze that money in August--after the source of the gift became public along with the anti-American, anti-Semitic venom coming from Zayed’s now-defunct think tank--and is still in deliberations over whether to give it back. Columbia, after keeping its list secret for months, couched the release in a puff-piece about Said in the Columbia Record, the print-only newspaper of the Office of Public Affairs, according to a source. Daniel Pipes’s Campus Watch has issued a press release with the full list of donors here. With enough pressure from students, alumni, and the media, Columbia too might be brought to think again about keeping the UAE’s problematic gift--but getting it to go even that far won’t be easy.

Posted at 11:48 AM

CORNER ARCHIVES [KJL]
A year ago today.

Posted at 11:44 AM

HOYA LIBERATION DAY [KJL]
Vic Matus on madness totally off my radar screen.

Posted at 11:35 AM

WHAT RIGHT? [Jonah Goldberg]
Michael - Frankly I don't know if marriage is a constitutional right as we currently define such things. I certainly agree with you that the plain meaning of the Constitution is silent on the question. But at the same time I sincerely doubt many heterosexual readers would feel that their basic rights were being infringed upon if the state told them they couldn't marry the woman or man of their choosing. I certainly agree, and have argued many times, that something can not only be wrong and immoral but it can be fully criminal without being unconstitutional. My problem with Rhea County policy is not so much their desire to ban civil unions or marriages but with the stated view that gays can be legally banned from living in the town. I sincerely doubt that there are a lot of gays who want to live there. But I think Sullivan is right to be offended by such a law. Whether Sullivan's comparsion to a similar law banning Jews holds water or not is a subject for another time. But even if the comparison is unpersuasive (religion is protected in the Constitution after all) that doesn't mean I don't think the basic point has merit. Banning gays is different than refusing to recognize gay marriage.

Posted at 11:34 AM

"WILL HE OR WON'T HE?" [KJL]
I do wish Sullivan would save time and come out for Kerry now. In just amatter of time he will come up with the rationalizations, but it's taking him painfully long to get on with it. I'm betting all Kerry will have to do is say that he's against terrorism.

Posted at 11:28 AM

FIELDING MICHAEL'S QUESTION [KJL]
Even though you asked it of Jonah: No, National Review does not believe that there is a constitutional right to marry, still less that there is a constitutional right to marry anyone who wants to marry you. Andrew Sullivan is making a cheap debater's point. He's claiming that our willingness to amend the Constitution to keep the courts from reading same-sex marriage into the Constitution means that we think that it really is there. Obviously that's not true, and this sort of argument should be beneath him. But since he has never taken conservative arguments about the proper role of the courts seriously before, I guess there's no reason to start now. And I guess that wanting Sullivan to make more consistent, fair-minded arguments makes me a "paleocon" (or whatever his swear word du jour is).

Posted at 11:21 AM

TAIWAN PRESIDENT & V-P SHOT [John Derbyshire]
Still no clue who did this, or for what reason. Both President Chen and V-P Lu are OK, conscious and not in serious danger.

The thing everyone wonders is: Were the ChiComs behind this? We have, of course, no real clue yet. The fact that the shooting was rather incompetently done suggests an amateur, and Taiwan politics is plenty fractious -- you may recall occasional TV clips of fist-fights on the floor of Parliament. Certainly the ChiComs hate Chen for his past history of pro-independence statements (somewhat muted since he's been in office). But nothing can be said for sure yet.

We had a Taiwanese house guest the week before last. She told us that independence sentiment gets stronger all the time. There is now even a movement to drop Mandarin as the official language of Taiwan, and switch to "Tai-yu," the dialect that most Taiwanese people speak among themselves most of the time. (It's a slightly mutated form of the mainland's Fujian dialect, incomprehensible to Mandarin-speakers.) This is a very odd thing, as trade and even cultural links between Taiwan and the mainland are opening up at the same time. Perhaps this tells us something interesting about globalization: that people become more fiercely protective of their local identity even as the world becomes more economically interdependent. Or perhaps it's just that the more Taiwan people see of the mainland and its ruling party, the more they like their own democratic arrangements.

Posted at 11:10 AM

84 NATIONS [KJL]
"will defeat...terrrorism." President Bush is giving his one-year anniversary speech now, from the White House.

Posted at 11:03 AM

WHERE FNCERS GIVE [KJL]
Run Fox News as an employer through www.tray.com, a la the Tim Graham link on the NYTimes. Here's what shows up, though, no doubt, there are others who didn't fill in their employers exactly as "fox news." Interesting, the first person on the list gave to Dean (though the rest definitely did NOT).
Burkholder, Amy 7/22/2003 $250.00 New York, NY 10021 Fox News Channel/SR Producer -[Contribution] DEAN FOR AMERICA

Feldman, Suzanne Mrs. 6/26/2003 $2,000.00 Santa Monica, CA 90402 Fox News Channel/Sales Executive -[Contribution] BUSH-CHENEY '04 INC

Jenkins, Griffin Mr. 6/30/2003 $2,000.00 Washington, DC 20007 Fox News/Producer -[Contribution] BUSH-CHENEY '04 INC

SOLIVAN, BERT A 7/21/2003 $240.00 GUTTENBERG, NJ 07093 FOX NEWS CHANNEL -[Contribution] NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE

SOLIVAN, BERT A 11/18/2003 $240.00 GUTTENBERG, NJ 07093 FOX NEWS CHANNEL -[Contribution] NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE

Posted at 10:26 AM

POLES [KJL]
are not leaving Iraq.

Posted at 10:13 AM

SOCCER VERSE [John Derbyshire]
Fair dinkum, the soccer debate has another side too. They are of course totally wrong, but they deserve to be heard:

"Mr. Derbyshire---As a conservative soccer writer, I beg to differ with you about the 'communist' nature of soccer (football). I wrote the following in 1995:



"IT'S ONLY A GAME



"Soccer is a game aesthetic.

"Its energy, potential, comes to life when it's kinetic,

"And discipline refines the otherwise frenetic.





"The game is all anticipation.

"When done with style, it's syncopation.

"You swing the ball from left to right.

"You see the space and see what might,

"Become, with skill, a sweet delight.





"A trophy stands for those who've won.

"But after all is said and done,

"It's how you strove and what's inside

"That gives the team a lifelong pride.

"There is a certain individual pride in optimizing one's potential, doing very well against others who are similarly performing well. It is an essential of good sport. Bill Russell describes it in a book he wrote many years ago. Soccer is an exceptionally fitting vehicle for this Maslovian pursuit."

Grantland Rice would be proud of you, Sir.

Posted at 10:07 AM

QUICK QUESTION FOR JONAH RE MARRIAGE [Michael Graham]
Andrew says that "the right to marry is a basic constitutional right that no government can or should deny under the Constitution as it stands. Interestingly, so does National Review. Otherwise, they would not be so keen to amend the constitution to prevent such equal protection from ever taking place."

Is he right? Jonah, do you believe there is a constitutional right to marry? Is there an amendment that I missed? I just did a word search on the Constitution and "marriage" didn't turn up anywhere.

I don't believe there's a constitutional right to marriage anymore than there is a constitutional right to divorce. What I do believe is that the Constitution is silent (other than in indirect ways, such as the "full faith and credit" clause) and, therefore, these laws are left to the states. Which is why there are no-fault divorces in some states and 14-year-olds marrying without parental permission in others.

So I go back to my point on Rhea County, TN's ban on homosexual behavior: I think the law is repulsive and idiotic (and I live in Virginia!), but that doesn't answer the question of whether they have the right to pass such laws. I assume that Rep. Barney Frank and other supporters of San Francisco's mayor support Rhea County's decision. Is it against the ruling of the US Supreme Court? So what--same-sex marriage is clearly a direct violation of California and New York law. If these matters should be left to local governments, then how did Rhea County get to be the bad guys? Other than the fact that they're Neanderthals.

Posted at 09:54 AM

EURO DIPLOS ON EURO, ON KERRY [KJL ]
An American in Rome e-mailed earlier in the week:
I attended an embassy party last night. Speaking to European diplomats, you get a gist of two things:

1) They are terrified that the Spanish elections, and subsequent announcement of a pull-out of Iraq will lead to terrorist attacks around election dates in Europe - and they are terrified that it will, like Spain, lead to appeasement votes.

2) John Kerry does not have any fans over here. Although most of the diplomats hate Bush, and hate the Iraq intervention, the following quotes were used "You just can't take him seriously"; "He's sort of a joke, isn't he?"; "Can anyone actually believe anything he says?" Most diplomats seriously doubt any member of their governments have had any contacts with him or his campaign.

Posted at 09:47 AM

POP CULTURE IS FILTH [KJL]
is here, fyi

Posted at 09:39 AM

SIX BOMB THREATS AGAINST DC SCHOOLS [KJL]
are being reported by CNN and others. Officials have put DC public schools in "lockdown" and are doing "sweeps"

Posted at 09:33 AM

NRO, POWERED BY DIET COKE [KJL]
This writer clearly doesn't care if NRO exists or not--perish the thought. Let's just say a lot certain NR staff salaries are blown on Diet Coke every day. Efforts to obtain a grant that would subsidize caffeine-drinking habits have so far failed.

Posted at 09:27 AM

DAVID FRUM [KJL]
will be on Bill Maher's show again tonight.

Posted at 08:54 AM

GIRL SCOUTS [KJL]
I've been remiss in noting the latest controversy, involving Texas Girl Scouts involvement with Planned Parenthood. (Here's the Girl Scouts piece I did a few years ago.) if any of you have any similar recent experiences with the Scouts to relay, please do. No offense to the likes of Susan Konig, who is part of one of the cool troops, the GSUSA is nowhere near as cool as the Boy Scouts.

Posted at 08:52 AM

POWELL IN BAGHDAD [KJL]
Robert Alt blogs.

Posted at 08:46 AM

CLAREMONT PROF [KJL]
fakes a "hate crime."

Posted at 08:16 AM

VIETNAM BOOK [Andrew Stuttaford]
Peter, it doesn't have the wider perspective your correspondent might want, but 'A Bright Shining Lie' by Neil Sheehan is an informative and tremendous read.

Posted at 08:10 AM

THE YEAR THAT WASN’T [Michael Graham ]
One year ago today, a number of things did not happen that are worth noting.

No Islamic terrorist--not Osama bin Laden, Ayman Zawahiri or Mullah Omar--was able to flee to Iraq and escape the reach of international justice.

One year ago today, Libya did not get a signal that it could continue its illegal weapons program without consequence.

One year ago today, terrorists in the West Bank were not mailed a $50,000 check after blowing up a pizza parlor filled with families.

One year ago today, an Iraqi scientist did not get an additional million-dollar payment from Saddam’s oil money to continue working on plans for a medium-range missile.

One year ago today, no boats filled with parts for those missiles set sail from North Korea. No weapons, chemicals, or night-vision goggles from France or Russia arrived that day, either.

One year ago today, the Dom Perignon did not flow in Paris celebrating the likely success of the $100 billion oil deal France had with Saddam Hussein.

One year ago today, no left-leaning British politicians picked up a check from Baghdad.

And no 16-year-old girls were picked up by Uday Hussein’s henchmen one year ago today. Soldiers were too busy stockpiling weapons to re-stock Uday’s rape rooms.

One year ago today--and for the first time in more than a decade--American troops stationed in Saudi Arabia didn’t have to worry about the designs of the Iraqi Army. For the first time in 30 years, the world’s oil supply was no longer threatened by Saddam Hussein.

One year ago today, there were no successful terrorist attacks on U.S. soil. Or on an American embassy, ship or military barracks. That was 365 days ago…and counting.

One year ago today, there was still a brutal dictator governing Iraq, one who had spent his life sponsoring terror, training and harboring terrorists, and using terror against neighbors, his citizens and his enemies abroad.

But on this day, one year ago, did he have any hope of continuing his war of terror?

He did not.

Posted at 08:05 AM

RE: RHEA COUNTY [KJL]
The nuts have dropped their plan.

Posted at 08:03 AM

ANDREW DODGES, I CLARIFY [Jonah Goldberg ]

I was wrong about something big in my post yesterday about Andrew Sullivan and Federalism. I wrote about the Rhea County anti-gay initiatives: "If you read Andrew Sullivan today, he makes it sounds as if he thinks this measure is completely illegitimate even though it seems its actual intent is to ban gay marriages in their county."

This is entirely my fault and I was wrong. Andrew is right to think that the Rhea County measure is totally illegitimate. Okay maybe not illegitimate in the strict meaning of the word in that illegitimate basically means illegal and it has always been my position that sodomy laws and the like may be wrong but that doesn't mean they're unconstitutional. Regardless, Rhea County's "crime against nature" law is wrong and stupid. My mistake was in conflating two different efforts while reading too quickly and while trying to do too many things at once. In my defense I did post an email very shortly afterwards which corrected me on this point, which Andrew probably missed.

That said, despite Andrew's comment that I'm being gob-smackingly obtuse, he's being sand-poundingly obstreperous. My main criticism stands. Not just on Rhea County but on all measures he considers to be "anti-gay" Andrew invokes the rhetoric of anti-Federalism and moral absolutism. Andrew ignores my point about his use of the word "pogrom" to describe what Virginia is doing. He didn't use that word about Rhea County. He used it about the legislature of Virginia. As readers know I'm a fan of Sullivan's but it seems impossible to ignore the fact that on matters gay, he's grown less tolerant of those who disagree with him and more willing to use Manichean rhetoric in which all of those who disagree with him to his right are purely dark and evil forces: "right wing fanatics," "theocons" "religious zealots," and, of course, "bigots." Having been in the middle of the road on this stuff for a while now -- with the the tire marks on my back from some social conservatives to prove it -- I find this truly dismaying. Merits aside, Andrew increasingly tends to argue his worldview with the same totalitarianism of the very people he so clearly despises. He may not be all the way there yet, but no one can doubt which way the trend lines point.


Posted at 07:36 AM

PENNSYLVANIA "YOU'RE FIRED" OPPORTUNITY [KJL]
From a Keystone State e-mailer last night:
I'm pretty sure this isn't what the Senator had in mind, but I'm a Pennsylvania Democrat who he's convinced to switch parties. For years I've remained a registered Democrat because I hoped that I could help pull the party back toward rationality by supporting moderate candidates. My fellow Democrats generally disappoint me by nominating a leftist, so I invariably end up voting Republican in the general election. I nearly re-registered as a Republican in '00, but by the time the Pennsylvania primary was held the presidential nomination was already decided, so I didn't bother.

This year I've been considering making the switch because I agree with most of what Toomey stands for, but have held off because I find him a bit too conservative on some issues. Your Corner post this morning made up my mind for me. Senator Specter's habit of frequently voting like a liberal Democrat is bad enough, openly courting their support is going way too far. Thanks to his bi-partisan outreach program, the ranks of Toomey voters have just grown by 1.

Posted at 07:06 AM

POWELL IN IRAQ [KJL]
Colin Powell is in Baghdad, now at a press conference with Paul Bremer. A group of journalists just staged a walkout in the name of two journalists killed in Iraq. As Powell pointed out, that's nothing they could have done a year ago. (Think CNN kissing the feet of Baghdad Bob, for one.)

Posted at 06:51 AM

DINNER WITH JONAH [Tim Graham]
Mrs. Graham found Jonah to be her favorite MRC "award" presenter last night. Alas, she isn't much of a Web surfer (it's usually contained to finding links of Tahitian travel sites and sending e-mails titled "HINT HINT"), so she hadn't been exposed to the G-File sense of humor. There were many funny lines most of you missed. I laughed hardest after one CBS commentary compared Limbaugh to Hitler. Jonah deadpanned: "Yeah, she's qualified to be spell-checker at an M&M factory."

Posted at 06:43 AM

MARCH 18, 2004 [KJL]
From a regular reader/emailer serviceman in Baghdad:
Things have been getting a bit interesting over here for the last few days. I had dinner with a few members of the Spanish contingent here in Baghdad and they were not at all pleased with their new Prime Minister's directive to pull out. They realized that the only way to fight terrorism is to find the terrorists where they live and kill them, but they were also concerned that their government had already alienated the French and the Germans by joining the coalition and now the government was going to alienate the U.S. It was a very interesting discussion. None of the ones at the table wanted to leave and realized that what we're doing here is important for not only the future of this country, but also could demonstrate that democracy can succeed in this region.

I went to one of the local markets looking around at what the locals are trying to sell. It's heartbreaking because the instant you walk in you're accosted by children trying to sell you pirated DVDs or packets of money with Saddam's picture on it. The DVDs are $5 and the money is usually $1/package. The problem is that the instant you show any interest in purchasing from them 10 more kids come out of the woodwork. Then the adults peek out from their booths to see who's buying. Don't know whether the kids were associated with the booths or were selling on their own, but I just pulled out some singles and gave them to the kids. I wish the security situation here would get better soon so that companies could set up operations here and start to employ people. All in good time I guess.

Well I hope all is well back at NRO World HQ and tell Mr. Derbyshire that I'm going to order one of the "Pop Culture is Filth" shirts and use it on my runs here.

Posted at 05:08 AM

THE MOST MISPRONOUNCED WORDS [KJL]

Posted at 05:02 AM

TAIWAN'S PRES & VP SHOT [KJL]
on eve of election. neither wound is life threatening.

Posted at 04:23 AM

Thursday, March 18, 2004

RE: SULLIVAN [Jonah Goldberg]
I'm not even going to read it until morning because I just got back from the MRC dinner and I still have to finish my London Times column. That goes for any of the hate-mail -- I haven't already opened -- which has come in response to Andrew's remarks.

Posted at 11:35 PM

MR. SULLIVAN [KJL]
Has some words for Mr. Goldberg and KJL, and blogger Justin Katz has a good response.

Posted at 11:05 PM

LOOKING FOR A GOOD BOOK ON A BAD WAR [Peter Robinson ]
From a reader:
“I have caused my somewhat liberal (but turning conservative) wife to now have some doubts about the “conventional” wisdom of Vietnam – “unjust war”, blah blah…

“Can you recommend a good book about our Vietnam saga?”
I’m stumped. The Best and the Brightest is probably still the finest portrait of the main figures in the war—LBJ, McNamara, Taylor, Westmoreland, and all the rest—but it assumes the war was a fiasco. A balanced treatment? A book that shows the fundamentally good American intentions? That demonstrates the way in which the war achieved a kind of holding action, creating the opportunity for Thailand, Taiwan, and other Asian nations to develop their economies and attain political stability? I’m unable to name nary a one.



Derb? Jonah? Anyone?

Posted at 10:56 PM

ABSOLUTE BALLS [Peter Robinson]
Just received an email from Thomas Madden, the historian of the Crusades at St. Louis University, who brings to my attention a new movie about the Crusades that has created a brouhaha in Britain. To be released next year, the movie is being directed by Ridley Scott and will include Orlando Bloom, Jeremy Irons, and Liam Neeson. And—the important bit—it will portray the Crusaders as crude, ignorant, and bloodthirsty, while making Saladin, the Muslim leader, into a hero.

From the London Telegraph:
Jonathan Riley-Smith, who is Dixie Professor of Ecclesiastical History at Cambridge University, said the plot was "complete and utter nonsense". He said that it relied on the romanticised view of the Crusades propagated by Sir Walter Scott in his book The Talisman, published in 1825 and now discredited by academics.

"It sounds absolute balls. It's rubbish. It's not historically accurate at all. They refer to The Talisman, which depicts the Muslims as sophisticated and civilised, and the Crusaders are all brutes and barbarians. It has nothing to do with reality."
(Read the complete article here.) Mel Gibson, call your lawyer. You need to buy up the rights to Louis IX and Richard the Lionheart—fast.

Posted at 10:34 PM

SUPREME CONDESCENSION [Peter Robinson]
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has denied the Sierra Club's ridiculous motion that he recuse himself in the Club's case against Vice President Cheney. To wit:

"The question, simply put, is whether someone who thought I could decide this case impartially despite my friendship with the Vice President would reasonably believe that I cannot decide it impartially because I went hunting with that friend and accepted an invitation to fly there with him on a Government plane. If it is reasonable to think that a Supreme Court Justice can be bought so cheap, the Nation is in deeper trouble than I had imagined."

If you'd like to treat yourself to an extended piece of writing that's in composed of equal parts of wit, erudition, and entirely justified condescension, read Scalia's whole decision here.

Posted at 10:22 PM

WEDGE ISSUES [KJL]
I know the Dems always call gay marriage a "wedge issue," as Tim Graham has well noted here. But the chairman of the DNC tonight went in front of a sold-out crowd at Catholic University tonight--which every Catholic parish in America collects money for annually--and voluntarily called partial-birth abortion a "wedge issue," along with gay marriage. That helps make things black and white for Catholic voters and politicians--good bishops--leaders--should help make such things clear.

Posted at 08:55 PM

MCAULIFFE AT CUA [KJL]
Almost one year to the day after the start of the war on Iraq (now liberated): “I don’t think we are safer off today.”

Posted at 08:18 PM

TOO KERRY [KJL]
Trying to stop more of the thugs and anti-Semites of the world from revealing their love for John Kerry, the Kerry campaign has now said: "It is simply not appropriate for any foreign leader to endorse a candidate in America's presidential election."

Posted at 08:04 PM

VAN HOLLEN'S OPUS [Michael Graham]
One of the topics on my radio show today was the decision of 90 Democrats (OK, 89 and one Socialist)to vote "no" on the resolution praising our troops and declaring the world is safer thanks to the removal of Saddam. I casually mentioned that, if the GOP wanted the Democrats to cross over, they just needed to add the phrase "PS--Bush Sucks."

I meant it as a joke. Then I read the website of Maryland Democrat Chris Van Hollen explaining his "no" vote and offering a resolution he could have supported. It can best be summed up as "Bush Sucks, and So Did His Dad. Oh, and Reagan Sucked, Too." Instead of praising anyone, the Van Hollen amendment is an openly-partisan attack, listing the same old liberal complaints re: American foreign policy.

What makes Van Hollen's amendment so hilarious is that the Democrats' complain about the original resolution is that it's too political, so they respond with a tract straight out of Kerry campaign HQ.

Upon re-reading, make that DEAN campaign HQ...

Posted at 07:45 PM

THE ANTIWAR MIND [Rick Brookhiser]
Overheard in a store in New Paltz, New York (yes, that New Paltz). A man with a chin beard, purple sweater and an Australian or lower-class English accent, ordering shellfish: "Spain is taking its troops home. We're serving paella." Two hundred Crusaders died--is he serving lamb couscous?

NB: He was driving an old Volvo station wagon, one of the ugliest vehicles on the road. Matched his chin beard.

Posted at 07:41 PM

AND WHAT ABOUT RUTH BADER GINSBERG? [KJL]
People who think Antonin Scalia shouldn't duck hunt in the presence of the vice president ought to consider Ruth Bader Ginsberg's actual ideological ties to the National Organization for Women. How about the National Right to Life Committee or someone calling for her to recuse herself from all abortion or gender or "reproductive-rights" cases?

Posted at 06:41 PM

“RAID” ON BREMER FRENCH HOME [KJL]
Around 15 members of the left-wing Basque nationalist movement Abertzaleen Batasuna (AB) clambered over the gates and let off fireworks and firecrackers during a 20-minute raid on [Paul Bremer’s summer home].

"We wanted to symbolize the war the United States imposed on the Iraqi people," said a spokesman for the group who did not want to be identified.

"We wanted to carry out this operation on the holiday home of Paul Bremer because this is where he comes to forget the war in Iraq, and we want to remind him that when he comes here to rest, the bombs continue to fall on the Iraqi people."
Jim Geraghty e-mails: I kept waiting for the last line to be "Bremer promptly ordered a response in the style of the Iraqi "resistance" the protestors support, and detonated a car bomb outside the Basque group's headquarters, killing 12."

Posted at 06:35 PM

J.J. JACKSON DIES [KJL]
If you were a charter MTV watcher, you know who he was.

Posted at 06:30 PM

AMTRAK'S SCHEDULE [KJL]
My new official "train guy" explains the no 11-pm train out of Union Station: (Sorry if I'm the only one vaguely interested in this thread):
There's no 11:00 for several reasons. One is there isn't enough equipment because our rail system has been undercapitalized for decades. Amtrak has position its equipment for the morning rush, where the greatest demand is northward in the morning, so sending an extra train out of Washington late at night cuts into that capacity.

There's also the need to cover a reasonable amount of the operating costs. There may be lots of people who want to take a train out of DC at 11:00, but they wouldn't be using it every day. As a result, daily ridership would be low, and conservatives would scream that the train should be cut. Those earlier trains do better for ridership because they're getting a good chunk of the Philly-New York market (the 9:00 is out of 30th St at 11, and into Penn at 12:25 am) as well as travel out of Washington.

Your 10:00 is scheduled to accommodate overnight travel to Boston (a great way to go), and there's a 3:00 because Amtrak has (and has had for a long time) the contract to haul mail between Northeast Corridor cities. That mail contract (which Amtrak wins in competitive bidding) is quite profitable.

Posted at 06:06 PM

RE: THE CHIEF DEFECT OF PETER KING [John Derbyshire]
While agreeing with my remarks about Rep. Peter King, a reader is puzzled by the subject line. It's an allusion to the magnificent Hilaire Belloc.

Posted at 05:08 PM

TRUMPED--THE RACE CARD [KJL]
Omarosa, fired from the Apprentice, may get more buzz off the show than the Donald. Among the clearest non-team-players on the show, she's claiming racism (as she did on the show). And, according to the previous link, the ex-Clinton admin official will be seen on Hardball or some other talking-head show doing political commentary soon.

Posted at 05:05 PM

THIS IS FOR DERB [KJL]
Australia is outlawing swords.

Posted at 04:55 PM

BARN BURNERS [John Derbyshire]
A reader advises me of a short story titled "The Barn Burner" by Wm. Faulkner, and recommends it: "Like all great literature, it touches on something universal. I have seen many 'barn burners' in my life, and am ashamed to admit that at times I have found a bit of him in myself as well."

I have made a couple of attempts to read Faulkner, but didn't get very far on either. Time for another try, perhaps.

Posted at 04:44 PM

IS POLAND NEXT? [John Derbyshire]
From reader Dave Skorka (who gave permission to use his name): "Mr. Derbyshire---I admit I'm also a little concerned about Poland possibly leaving the coalition. I'm a member of a Polish reenacting group, and we have some folks from Poland participate in our Yahoo chatroom. My understanding from them (admittedly anecdotal, but I never see anything about Poland on the news) is that the Polish government joined the war effort over the objections of most of the people, much like the British and Spanish governments.

"So I think the Polish President is probably doing a little public relations damage control with this announcement. They were scheduled to come out mid-2005, and he's just telling his people 'No, it's not a quagmire, in fact we might be ahead of schedule and come home early.'

"The earlier Bush-lied comment, though, I find a little harder to explain. Perhaps it is just meat for the public, empty words, something to calm and reassure the electorate ('I feel your betrayal') while Polish forces remain on the job in Iraq. Maybe the Kwasniewski saw Aznar's government fall and is buying the media line that it was because of Iraq, not 11-3, and is making noises to head-off that kind of opposition. I hope so, anyway. I am fiercely proud of my Polish heritage, and would feel a bit stung if Poland pulled out."

So would I. Other issues apart, it would put the kibosh on Rummy's "Old Europe, New Europe" argument, which I rather like.

Posted at 04:39 PM

SAY GOODBYE TO THURSDAY [Jonah Goldberg ]
Check out who your neighbors donated to.

Posted at 04:18 PM

INFIELD FLY RULE [John Derbyshire]
I have got it. Thanks to all. I HAVE GOT

Posted at 04:10 PM

RE: FIRED [John Derbyshire]
....Or did you mean that I am, actually, fired? Pls clarify.

Posted at 04:05 PM

SEUSS & TRUMP [Jonah Goldberg]

From a reader:

On Seuss and appeasement: He may have some guts himself in the '40s, but read "The Butter Battle Book" from his twilight years where he presents the struggle between American freedom and Communist tyranny as really no different than what side of bread one chooses to butter.

On Trump and the Apprentice: The show never would have worked with a Bill
Gates or a Warren Buffet. We needed Donald Trump's slo-mo strut set to the
bass riff from the O'Jays. That smug demeanor, that coon-skin cap trembling
in any breeze, that toughguy New Yawk accent heaping praise on himself every
episode. It all makes the show.

Best,
John


Posted at 04:01 PM

RE: FIRED [John Derbyshire]
Sounds like a bit of lefty oh-the-poor-suffering-masses historical revisionism to me, Jonah.

In my home county (Northamptonshire) there was a much better-established tradition of farm laborers who got dismissed from their jobs, usually for drunkenness, setting fire to the offending farmer's barn by way of revenge.

A large wooden barn full of hay was a much more tempting target for a disgruntled employee than a brick-built laborer's hovel was for a disgruntled employer. And where would the farmer put the replacement employee, anyway? The work had to be done by someone.

Posted at 04:00 PM

OFFSIDE [Andrew Stuttaford]
I don't think that I'm going to take seriously any criticism of the way that the offside rule interferes with the flow of play from devotees of American 'football', a game that stops as soon as it starts.

Posted at 03:50 PM

WHAT? IS IT A SLOW NEWS DAY? [Michael Graham]
Here's an actual headline up at Foxnews.com right now:
CLOSE, BUT NOT CLOSE ENOUGH 100-foot-wide asteroid to have near-miss with Earth today
OK, so when it comes to massive asteroids approaching the Earth, how close would be "close enough" for Fox News?

Posted at 03:43 PM

TRADEMARKS [Jonah Goldberg]
I call dibs on "Are you going to eat the rest of that?"

Posted at 03:40 PM

"YOU'RE FIRED" -- DERB? [Jonah Goldberg]

From a reader:

Jonah,

I have heard that the origin of the term “fired” came from the English landowner’s tendency to burn the hovels of tenant farmers when their services were no longer desired.

Maybe Derb will know more about that.


Posted at 03:38 PM

POLAND NEXT? [John Derbyshire]
Here's more from the Polish president.

Posted at 03:38 PM

RE DOC SEUSS [Jonah Goldberg]

From a reader:

Hi Jonah,

Perhaps if more of Dr Seuss' cartoons like that got out, Hollywood will revile him and stop making horrible movies out of good stories.


Posted at 03:37 PM

ONE OF KERRY'S FOREIGN LEADERS [KJL]
Former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad has endorsed John Kerry. Remember him? "The Jews rule this world by proxy . . . They survived 2,000 years of pogroms not by hitting back, but by thinking. They invented and successfully promoted socialism, communism, human rights, and democracy so that persecuting them would appear to be wrong, so they may enjoy equal rights with others. With these they have now gained control of the most powerful countries, and they, this tiny community, have become a world power."

The Bush campaign "Bring Em On" strategy re: foreign-leader endorsements seems just right.

Posted at 03:31 PM

RE: YOU'RE FIRED [KJL]
He does say it well. Maybe I could trademark "You're banned!" As in Stuttaford, was that another post in Klingon? "You're banned!"

Posted at 03:26 PM

THE OFFSIDE RULE -- A COMMIE PLOT [John Derbyshire]
"Mr. Derbyshire---I know you have indicated that you did not wish to hear an explanation of the off-sides rule in soccer. But I must share this as the off-sides call completely flummoxed me when I attended my sons' soccer games (excuse me) matches. But after much discussion with referees (after the matches) and coaches, I now understand.

"Off-sides is called whenever the offense (the team in control of the ball) uses its speed, dexterity, or cunning to gain advantage over the defense. As soon as this occurs, the whistle blows, off-sides is gravely intoned, the ball is taken away (from the team that has just accomplished what you try to do in all other sports), and given to the other side.

"My oldest son, who still enjoys playing soccer, still gets mad at me when I call soccer a communist game but it is. First, you have off-sides, which is simply wealth redistribution: you take from the successful and give to the less able. Next, if the referees are successful and the game ends in a tie because no one could gain enough advantage to score, you end the game with a shoot-out. Remaining ancestors of the kulaks would understand this only too well."

I am not the least bit surprised, Sir. My own theory, aired in the pages of National Review a few years ago, is that "the game [i.e. soccer] was brought into the world by Satan to drive the human race mad."

Posted at 03:21 PM

NAFTA -- A READER DISSENTS [John Derbyshire]
"Mr. Derbyshire---I love your columns, and pretty much agree with most of your latest one. However, I can point out something good to come from NAFTA. It may not have done much for Mexico, or the U.S. at large, but it has been a Godsend for Texas. When I was a child in the 1970's the Texas economy was entirely dependent on oil. Our fortunes rose and fell with OPEC. You would not believe the change in Texas in just the last decade. My sister owns a ranch and meat company. Half of her live cattle sales go to Mexico. My father works in a plant that packages wheat flour for export. Their biggest customers are in Mexico. Even my job relies on trade. Texas is booming for a lot of reasons including business friendly policies and low taxes. But NAFTA is very important to us as well."

Posted at 03:17 PM

DR. SEUSS ON APPEASEMENT [Jonah Goldberg ]
Who woulda thunk it was possible to like him more? Check these out.

Posted at