HELP
Archive
E-mail Comments
Send to a Friend
<% printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%>Print Version
Friday, November 05, 2004

I DO WARN YOU [KJL]
some sleep will definitely be happening this weekend, and some living. But we'll be here in and out and back with full steam monday. See if you were a subscriber to NR on dead tree, you would have something to read in the meantime...

Posted at 07:34 PM

WORLD'S SMALLEST VIOLIN [Rod Dreher]
Check out href="http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=229379">this story about how Yasser Arafat wants to be buried in Jerusalem. In it, Palestinian big Saeb Erekat chastises those Israelis who have danced in the street anticipating the archterrorist's imminent demise: "I hope the Israeli public will show sensitivities. I've seen some Israelis dancing in the streets, hugging each other other yesterday," Erekat told CNN. "I think it's alien... I cannot describe my feelings. It's heartbreaking to see Israelis hugging and kissing in such circumstances." Oh, give me a big fat Twin Towers-size break! href="http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Movies/palestinians-celebrate-911.mpg">Ta ke a look at this.

Posted at 07:32 PM

BYRON IS ON HARDBALL TONIGHT (NOWISH) [KJL]

Posted at 07:14 PM

POTTY MOUTH KERRY [John J. Miller]
Remember the huge fuss media liberals kicked up over Dick Cheney cussing at Pat Leahy a few months back? They thought it was a huge, hairy deal--and a news story. Now we're reading all these post-election accounts of what Kerry was saying behind the scenes, including his apparent fondess for the F-word. But that, of course, wasn't news at the time.

Posted at 06:19 PM

KATHRYN, [Rich Lowry]
That Newsweek bit reads like it could have been written by Rob Long.

Posted at 05:53 PM

"KERRY WON" [KJL]
Bush literally can't win, as far as some on the Left are concerned.

Posted at 05:12 PM

WHY NO CHAIRMANSHIP FOR SPECTER? [KJL]
A good liittlew case was made--albeit inadvertently--in the Pittsburgh Post Gazette endorsement of Specter in October: "The best argument for his staying on is his seniority, which puts him in line to be the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. In that capacity, he would be in a position to block some of the ideologically extreme federal judges likely to be nominated by President Bush in a second term, some of them for the Supreme Court. Before the Post-Gazette editorial board, he promised that no extremists would be approved for the bench."

Posted at 05:08 PM

"CHAIRMAN SPECTER?" (HECK NO!) WHAT ELSE CAN YOU DO? [KJL]
Call and e-mail the White House. They need to be bombarded with your concerns as well. The Senate cannot surrender the judiciary to Arlen Specter. He cannot be chairman of the judiciary committee.

Posted at 04:52 PM

SOME WOMAN WHO ANSWERS THE PHONE [KJL]
in Saxby Chambliss's office has a huge fan club. The e-mails are piling in about her "graciousness." Also reported: wonderful southern accent and is funny. I think a few mail readers are smitten.

Posted at 04:40 PM

THAT IS ONE BILIOUS COLUMN FROM E.J. TODAY [Rich Lowry]
Too bad. It was guys like Dionne who should have been tapping the brakes on the Dems' self-destructive Bush hatred over the last two years, instead of cheering them on.

Posted at 04:32 PM

UH. IS SOMEONE PAYING ATTENTION TO NEW MEXICO? [KJL]
Where there's a Democratic will...? Sounds like incompetance may be afoot more than anything else.

Posted at 04:22 PM

THIS MAN COULD HAVE BEEN PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES [KJL]
From Newsweek:
The morning after the Feb. 3 primaries, which vaulted Kerry into a virtual-ly insurmountable lead, the candidate was fuming over his missing hairbrush. He and his aides were riding in a van on the way to a Time magazine cover-photo shoot. Nicholson had left the hairbrush behind. "Sir, I don't have it," he said, after rummaging in the bags. "Marvin, f---!" Kerry said. The press secretary, David Wade, offered his brush. "I'm not using Wade's brush," the long-faced senator pouted. "Marvin, f---, it's my Time photo shoot."

Nicholson was having a bad day. Breakfast had been late and rushed and not quite right for the senator. In the van, Kerry was working his cell phone and heard the beep signaling that the phone was running out of juice. "Marvin, charger," he said without turning around. "Sorry, I don't have it," said Nicholson, who was sitting in the rear of the van. Now Kerry turned around. "I'm running this campaign myself," he said, looking at Nicholson and the other aides. "I get myself breakfast. I get myself hairbrushes. I get myself my cell-phone charger. It's pretty amazing." In silent frustration, Nicholson helplessly punched the car seat.

Posted at 04:12 PM

MORE TV [KJL]
John J. Miller will be on CSPAN's Book TV tomorrow talking about Our Oldest Enemy tomorrow at 9:30 am EST. Details here.

Posted at 03:30 PM

TV [KJL ]
Kate O’Beirne will be on The World Over with Raymond Arroyo and Ray Flynn tonight at 8 pm EST, talking about the invasion of the theocons. (Note to those who need: That last part was a joke.)

Posted at 03:26 PM

RE: GRASSLEY [KJL]
Few seem to think that is going to happen--seems like a distraction. At the end of the day, they are going to figure out internally who is chairman. As long as it is not Specter.

Posted at 03:19 PM

CHRISTMAS BOOK SALE BEGINS! [Jack Fowler]
We are offering two great promotions for our critically acclaimed children’s books, which make perfect Christmas gifts. Special Offer #1 is that when you purchase one copy of Volume Two of The National Review Treasury of Classic Children’s Literature, you can get extra copies for only $15.00 each (that includes free postage and handling, plus a free copy of L. Frank Baum’s wonderful story, Queen Zixi of Ix).

Special Offer #2 is when you purchase one copy of Volume Two of The National Review Treasury of Classic Children’s Literature, and one copy of The National Review Treasury of Classic Bedtime Stories (the praised collection of Thornton Burgess’s marvelous animal tales--it’s perfect for beginning readers), we’ll send you a second copy of Volume Two--free--plus that free copy of Queen Zixi of Ix, all for only $59.90!

As I said, these books make great gifts--which, if you wish, we will mail to the fortunate giftee, at no charge, along with a handsome gift announcement card, containing any message you desire. Get them no, right here.

Posted at 03:14 PM

MR. COFFIN [KJL]
Yeah, don't try calling around here no more.

Posted at 02:28 PM

CLAMS -- THE OMBUDSMAN RULES [John Derbyshire]
I am going to register the following as a clam, just because I AM SICK AND TIRED OF HEARING IT.

[Voice of child, playing with neighbor child in the back yard] "Brian, you are a total dipwad. I'm Danny Derbyshire and I approved this message."

Posted at 02:18 PM

TRENT LOTT [KJL]
In conversation, more than one person has compared this Specter campaign to the end of Lott as judiciary chairman, for obvious reasons. As one Senate type put it to me (and as our editorial gets into): The Senate is a chummy place....but the senators cannot/will not really act unless "the outside world comes crashing down on the Senate." That is beginning to happen right now--I say that to those of you who are asking me if there is really any point to this. I'm told it is. I believe it is. I can't promise you the end product--because this is tough, and different than Lott (Lott's a more chummier guy than Specter for one, so he'd give in ways I can't yet see Specter giving in)--but I can tell you you are being heard--the right people are talking, are anxious. Keep at it, is my reccomendation.

Posted at 02:16 PM

DRAFT GRASSLEY [Jack Fowler]
Iowa state Rep. Dan Boddicker has launched a “Draft Grassley” drive to block Arlen Specter chairing the Judiciary Committee. But a Grassley aide says her boss, who has most seniority of panel members, “will be serving four more years as chairman of the Finance Committee." BTW, the trump card Specter holds in this game is his Labor/HHS Appropriations subcommittee chairmanship. Any Senator who helps ditch Specter as Judiciary chairman knows he will eat daily of the dish of revenge the spiteful Pennsylvania solon will serve (“Sorry Chuck, but there’s just not enough money for that Des Moines hospital project …”).

Posted at 02:13 PM

I GOTTA IDEA [Shannen Coffin]
Let's all call Kathryn Lopez and tell her what a great job she is doing leading the charge today. Her number is (212) . . . now wait, where'd I put that?

Posted at 02:06 PM

NO, WE'RE NOT THE EXTREMISTS, YOU ARE, SENATOR SPECTER [KJL]
A campaign letter from Arlen Specter blasting the likes of many of you as "extremists." A lot of it is exactly what you would expect from Arlen Specter. But I especially enjoy this line: "I don't think the Republican Party should be blackmailed by any special interest group." He is refering to pro-lifers wanting pro-life candidates. But...uh...Arlen Specter as chairman of the judiciary commitee would be...the Republican party blackmailed by a special interest group (be it the Arlen Specter ego dream machine or the abortion lobby, which, the NYtimes tells us today is delighted and relieved by the spectre of a Specter chairmanship).

Posted at 01:59 PM

ANNAN V. ALLAWI [Rich Lowry]
The UN chief is apparently in favor of maintaining Fallujah as a terrorist stronghold:

“UNITED NATIONS — U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan has warned leaders of the United States, Britain and Iraq that another full-scale assault on the rebel-held city of Falluoja would further alienate Iraqis and disrupt elections planned for January.

Annan's warning, contained in a letter sent Sunday, has angered some officials here.

'This is an issue for the government of Iraq,' said British Ambassador Emyr Jones Parry. 'It's easy for those not in Iraq to underestimate the overwhelming concern the Iraqis have for security. There cannot be an area as big as Fallouja which is allowed to be a base for terrorism."

Some diplomats said Iraqi interim Prime Minister Iyad Allawi was 'furious' when he received the letter. Iraq's new U.N. ambassador immediately sought to meet with Annan to argue that the U.N. was interfering. Allawi recently criticized Annan for not doing enough to help Iraq prepare for elections. The world body's officials say Iraq is not secure enough for more U.N. workers to help organize the nationwide vote….”

Posted at 01:56 PM

20 REASONS NOT TO PUT YOUR PICTURE ON THE INTERNET [Jonah Goldberg ]
here ya go. Nothing graphic or work-jeopardizing.

Posted at 01:40 PM

ME = MIA + CNN [Jonah Goldberg]

I went to the eye doctor. He put drops in my eyes. I can barely read the screen. That's why I've been absent.

Doing CNN around 3:30-3:45, not sure exact time.

Will also be on Inside Politics Sunday this, uh, sunday.


Posted at 01:36 PM

NICE CHANGE [Shannen Coffin]
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New U.S. jobs soared at the sharpest rate in seven months in October, the government reported on Friday, helped by a surge in construction activity as hurricane-battered areas in the Southeast were rebuilt.
ME: Isn't it nice to have an economic report released without John Kerry saying that he can do better?

Posted at 01:31 PM

RE: AL HUNT, WRONG AGAIN [Peter Robinson]
To reprise Al Hunt in yesterday morning’s Wall Street Journal (see posting below): After his 1984 re-election, Hunt claims, President Reagan “could have claimed a mandate for more of the same; he didn’t.”

From President Reagan’s press conference the day after that 1984 re-election (emphases mine):
Q: Clearly, you won a tremendous personal victory last night. But given the fact that the Republicans lost two seats in the Senate and that you didn't win as many seats in the House as you lost in the 1982 elections, how much of a mandate can the Republicans claim for next year?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I feel that the people of this country made it very plain that they approved what we've been doing. And we're going to continue what we've been doing and, if need be, we'll take our case to the people. But we have the same number of Senators that we had in 1981 when we got this program passed. And there's a possibility -- I know that there are some seats still to be decided in the House -- but there's a possibility of as many as 17, and that's more than have happened in elections of this kind -- mid- or second-term elections -- for Presidents in the past.

Q: Are you claiming a mandate then, sir?
THE PRESIDENT: I'm claiming that I think the people made it very plain that they approved of what we're doing….And that's what we're going to continue to do.
Thanks to Corner reader Thom Nykamp, and to the University of Texas, on whose website Thom found the transcript—and where anyone, including Al Hunt, may read it online.

Posted at 01:29 PM

LOCAL OFFICES, TOO [KJL]
An e-mail:
Kyl's not getting enough phone calls. his office in tucson said i was the first today. can you remind everyone to call the local offices, too? i've had a tough time getting through to some washington offices, but got a friendly "hi, thanks for calling," from nearly every local office i've called. specter must, must go.

Posted at 01:22 PM

A WORD (WELL OR A FEW HUNDRED) [KJL]
It’s near-impossible to get through to any office on the Hill. Good work. Keep at it. You’re getting the word out, and, may be bucking up senators who, as that Miller piece reminds us, are no fans of Specter themselves. Make sure people continue to send emails and faxes through the weekend.

I’ve said this before and it bears repeating. I cannot remember the last time we encouraged people to make phonecalls and send emails and faxes. I personally don’t do it out of empathy for the guy who has to answer the phone.

But this is vital. Again, we won the election. The American people gave the conservative agenda, such that it is, a vote of confidence. And now, with a 55-seat majority in the Senate, we’re going to be held hostage to the Left’s agenda anyway? I don’t think so. As John mentions re: Dewing and in that archive piece, Republican senators cannot be looking forward to that. Bill Frist, no doubt presidential wannabe, can’t be looking forward to that. Rick Santorum, who has one heck of a reelection fight ahead of him in 2006, cannot be looking forward to that. So let every Republican member know an Arlen Specter chairmanship would be, frankly, detrimental to the country.

And, again, I refer you to our editorial today and John Miller’s “America’s worst senator” piece as reference.

Posted at 01:19 PM

SCOTT SPEICHER FOUND? [KJL]
His remains? A reminder of what Saddam was...

Posted at 01:16 PM

DEWINE AND MOAN [John J. Miller]
One senator who has an opportunity to burnish his conservative credentials in Spectergate is Ohio's Mike DeWine, a Republican member of the Judiciary Committee who is not a reliable conservative vote on all things. He is exactly the kind of senator who has to worry about a GOP primary challenge from his right -- say, from a figure such as Ken Blackwell. DeWine is up for re-election in 2006, so now is not too soon for him to demonstrate conservative leadership and say he doesn't want Specter chairing the Judiciary Committee.

Posted at 01:08 PM

MY SHAME [KJL]
I wish I had noted before an e-mailer did: "The 'clam' person shows much nerve in criticizing your word usage, given that he or she used "subject-line" as a verb. "

Posted at 12:46 PM

STOP SPECTER: THE MOVEMENT GROWS [KJL]
http://www.notspecter.com/

Posted at 12:40 PM

CHAIRMAN SPECTER: MAKING THE WINNERS THE LOSERS [KJL]
Check this out from the New York Times today: Sheryl Gay Stolberg contrasts "beleaguered" abortion-rights advocates with angry abortion opponents: "Abortion rights advocates, feeling beleaguered after Senator John Kerry's loss to Mr. Bush, said they were encouraged by Mr. Specter's remarks. 'Welcome back, Senator Specter,' said Elizabeth Cavendish, interim president of Naral Pro-Choice America, in a reference to what she views as the senator's recent efforts to distance himself from abortion rights. She called his remarks 'an important statement to the president that he should not interpret the election results as a mandate to take away fundamental freedoms.'"

So...the Left loses the election, but wins anyway. As I said yesterday, this election is not over. Put an end to this Specter-as-chairman business.

Posted at 12:33 PM

SPECTER & TORT REFORM [KJL]
He is an abortion-rights absolutist, a dogged advocate of racial preferences, a bitter foe of tort reform, a firm friend of the International Criminal Court — the list is long. When Citizens Against Government Waste recently listed Specter in its "Pig Book" as one of the Senate's most profligate spenders, he shot back: "If they left me out, I'd be worried." In 1995, Specter briefly ran for president and pursued the unique strategy of attacking the base of his own party: His announcement speech lobbed a grenade at "the intolerant Right." After pressing this theme for several months, one poll showed him attracting support from a grand total of 1 percent of Republicans.
Shouldn't every supporter of tort reform be livid this man will be head of the judiciary committee? AND DOESN'T NEED TO BE CHAIRMAN...and he shouldn't be...and he can't be. Shouldn't "the business community" be insisting Specter cannot be chairman of the judiciary committee?

Posted at 12:15 PM

NEXT WEEK’S NR CRUISE – YES THERE’S SPACE!COME PARTY WITH US! [Jack Fowler]
We’ve received dozens of calls these last two days from folks who at the 11th hour and 59th minute (better late than never!) want to sign up for the National Review 2004 Post-Election Cruise. Here’s the story: this is a “fluid” situation, and Holland America Line’s will likely have a stateroom or two available. So yes, you can (probably) join us. BUT … you MUST go to www.nationalreviewcruise-carib.com and fill out the application and submit it. No application, no go, and the longer you wait, the worse your odds. Next step: Call our The Cruise Authority, at 1-800-707-1634. Ask for Darrin or Howard or Joanne, tell them you’ve submitted and application, and they’ll take it from there.

Posted at 11:57 AM

YOU'RE FIRED! K-LO'S SHAME. [KJL]
(Not Arlen--YET.)

An e-mail, which, I can't argue with in the least (and is my favorite of the day, before noon):
Yikes. Here I am, a new subscriber and ardent fan since Election Day, and you subject-line a post "You go, girl"?

Your apologies are not enough. You say it "just sounds cliched." Again, I must say, yikes.

In the sitcom business, we call that a clam. No one knows where the term originates, several people claim "clam" as their own, but the term describes any phrase which has had all traces of humor or wit sucked out by constant and careless use. "Houston, we have a problem." "Is that your final answer?" "Who are you are what have you done with Kathryn?"

Clams can also be references that have lost what little zing they might have once had. Viagra. Gandhi. White House interns. Milli Vanilli. (You can see that sitcom writers are a rigorous bunch.)

Using a clam is beneath you. Don't make me say, "You are the weakest link. Goodbye." (Which I believe broke the record for instantaneous clam status, becoming unfunny before it was ever funny.)

Posted at 11:52 AM

ANOTHER SPECTER STORY [Rich Lowry]
From an old Hill hand:

“This isn't directly related to judges, but it gives even more insight into Specter's modus operandi and his cozyness with even the left-most members of the Senate.

At some point during the Appropriations battles in 1995 and 1996, there was a conference committee to hash out a bill -- I think it was Energy and Water, but it might have been Labor-Health. Anyway, this was when Republicans (led by Bob Livingston, of course) actually WERE cutting spending and eliminating waste. The negotiations had been going on and on, as they often do, but eventually, after many hours, a rough consensus seemed to be in the offing. I watched as Tom Harkin, of all people, pulled Specter aside and they started whispering to each other, with Harkin pointing to his watch. After a minute or so, Specter nodded, smiled, patted Harkin on the back, and returned to the table as Harkin left the room to go to some other meeting.

A few minutes later, just as things seemed to be about to wrap up, Specter spoke up. He said there was one project he objected to being removed from the bill -- note, this was when virtually ALL earmarks were being disallowed -- and that he absolutely refused to agree to the bill without that project being included. As the conference committees at the time had bare GOP majorities, Specter's opposition would kill the agreement. Of course, the project for which he was going to bat was some piece of rancid, purely local, pork for Harkin. The Republicans were incredulous at Specter's stance, but he had them over a barrel. It had taken so long to work out the agreement, and the agreement was so tenuous, with so many tough, tough cuts in it, that any more delay might have made the whole thing unravel.

Specter calmly said, in effect (obviously I con't remember the exact words, so these quotation marks are to be taken as approximations): 'Boys, look, I've gotta go; I've got a commitment I've gotta attend to. You guys figure this out amongst yourselves, and maybe we'll meet again next week.....'

I forget who the GOP House subcommittee chair was, but he obviously felt he had no choice. Everybody caved right then and there (remember, this was after many many many hours and many tough choices, and time was of the essence because of how things were playing out in the press), and Harkin -- Tom Harkin, fergoshsakes!!! -- got his pork, virtually the only piece of pure pork in the whole bill, without even being in the room, at the behest of Arlen Specter.

Specter is a disaster, and if Frist and Co. won't act on their own to deny him the Judiciary chairmanship, President Bush should call Frist in and ORDER him to deny Specter the chairmanship.”

Posted at 11:49 AM

WHAT ARE THE ODDS [KJL]
that Wolf Blitzer asks Cliff about his newfound expertise when he's on CNN at 12:30?

Posted at 11:40 AM

THE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE [Jonathan H. Adler]
In seeking to ensure a Judiciary Committee that is more friendly to President Bush's nominees, I would argue conservatives should pay attention to the party balance on the committee.A 55-44 Senate majority is ample justification for shifting the committee balance from 10-9 to 11-8. If there is a contested nomination, this change could be more important than having a different Chairman. If Senator Specter were to vote against a nominee, that nominee would fail in committee no matter who is Chairman. Yet if the committee were 11-8, such a defection would not stop committee approval of a contested nominee.

Posted at 11:37 AM

RE: SPECTER & THE UNICORN [Jonathan H. Adler]
While I am no fan of Senator Specter, I do not think it is reasonable to attack him for zealously representing his clients as a private attorney. Lawyers have a professional and ethical obligation to provide such representation within the limits of the relevant legal rules and codes, and Specter should not be criticized for that any more than any of Bush's judicial nominees should have been criticized for some of their work for various clients. David Rivkin and Lee Casey made this point in Policy Review two years back, and it is a point worth remembering.

Posted at 11:24 AM

WHISKY GULCH [Cliff May]
Enough with elections, judges, stem cell research, etc.

It’s time to pause for some serious controversy: In response to the recent thread about scotch/bourbon and branch water (as a remedy for Election Day jitters, among other things), Kathryn received this email: “Could you please pass on to Cliff May that water should never-- AND I MEAN NEVER-- be added to good booze. In order to properly savour the complex flavours of fine alcohol it must be taken neat, sipped slowly, and washed thoroughly over the palate. The mere thought gives me Goosebumps.

Good alcohol is one of God's great gifts to man and should be treated with a degree of reverence verging on the sacramental. As a final suggestion I might add that Mr. May, when next imbibing, should stick his nose deep into the rock- or balloon-glass containing his neat whiskey and inhale deeply, if he does this just once he will never again pollute fine bourbon with water. In short save the water for the rotgut.

Of course, I am assuming that you, Ms. Lopez, did not add water to your Chianti, a truly wonderful (group of) wine(s); and if you did, ignore this note as you and Cliffy are beyond hope.

Great coverage on all things political, thank you.

Sincerely Cas Balicki Coquitlam, B.C.

Now, I’m a modest guy, not beyond criticism or correction (as I believe Kathryn will attest). But I had thought I knew what I was talking about when I published here in The Corner -- for all the world to see -- the assertion that a little branch water “opens” the whisky (the right way to describe scotch) or whiskey (if we’re speaking of bourbon and several other dark, alcoholic beverages).

But Cas Balicki had a very authoritative tone, which troubled me. So I did what any good reporter would do. I addressed an expert. I asked the question of my old friend Frank Coleman, formerly a top aide to Sen. Al D’Amato (and if that doesn’t teach one about drinking, what would?), now a senior vice president of the Distilled Spirits Council.

Frank’s response: “Depending on age and proof, a small measure (as little as a teaspoon) of spring or distilled water (never tap) will open up the flavor and nose of spirits. This is particularly true of high-proof products such as single barrel and barrel-proof bourbons and scotches. Bourbons actual increase in proof with age in the barrel; scotches decrease (due to climactic differences). Most master distillers in Kentucky and master blenders in Scotland taste (nose) with water, often at much higher dilution levels than at which one would normally drink. This is particularly true when blending numerous malts in higher quality blended scotch. Again, the alcohol level in products such as Booker's (at 126 proof and higher) will burn your olfactory sense. Most 80 to 86 proof spirits, excepting very old scotches and cognacs, have already been watered down by the distiller. But a splash will definitely open it up much in the same way as decanting a 25-30 proof claret.”

So, in his expert opinion, adding a small quantity of branch water to scotch or bourbon is more akin to decanting a claret than it is to diluting Chianti--the slander that has been alleged.

My guess is we have not heard the last of this controversy. To which I say: Bring it on. (I’m particularly hoping Rob Long will weigh in again.)

Posted at 11:21 AM

DOES JONAH DO ANYTHING THESE DAYS BESIDES READ SLATE? [Shannen Coffin]
Oh, and beat up on the MTV population, too? Perhaps we should all move over there to find him.

Posted at 11:15 AM

NOT TO BE MISSED [Meghan Clyne, NR Associate Editor]
From the New York Times yesterday, on the Kerry-concession process:
For much of Tuesday, campaign workers exuded confidence after surveys of voters leaving the polls showed Mr. Kerry with an edge over Mr. Bush. But as the night wore on, the real results told a different story. The critical moment came at 12:41 a.m. Wednesday, when, shortly after Florida had been painted red for Mr. Bush, Fox News declared that Ohio--and, very likely, the presidency--was in Republican hands. Howard Wolfson, a strategist, burst into the "boiler room" in Washington where the brain trust was huddled and said, "we have 30 seconds" to stop the other networks from following suit. The campaign's pollster, Mark Mellman, and the renowned organizer Michael Whouley quickly dialed ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC--and all but the last refrained from calling the race through the night. Then Mr. Wolfson banged out a simple, two-line statement expressing confidence that Mr. Kerry would win Ohio once the remaining ballots were counted.
So the Times has documented that ABC, CBS, and CNN are the willing instruments of the Democrats, happy to manipulate their own coverage at the party’s behest. Nothing we didn’t know already; but damning evidence, from a source that can hardly be dismissed as a VRWC organ.

Posted at 11:13 AM

FRIST HAS MUCH TO LOSE [KJL]
if Specter is chairman of the judiciary committee: A smart e-mail:
I think contacting the members of the Judiciary committee is a wise suggestion. However, I would refrain from discouraging people from contacting Frist. He has already begun to run for President. Social conservatives pushed the president over the finish line this week. It would seem that Frist is the senator over whom we currently have the most leverage. I don't think he would want to alienate the conservative base out of the gate. It would doom him, and he would certainly be the fall guy if there is a problem. Frist needs this resolved favorably for the base as much as anyone does.
I add, too, this is not just about the "base." This is about giving nominees a fair hearing as much as it is about making sure we, the seeming majority, don't get blocked out of our own majority.

Arlen Specter as chairman would leave a smirk on Daschle's face. We want that wiped off.

Posted at 10:57 AM

ADVICE FOR SMILEY [John Derbyshire]
Alex: I can't find the reference, but I am pretty sure it was Johnson who gave the following advice to writers: "Write a few pages, then read them over. When you come to a passage that seems to you to be particularly fine, STRIKE IT OUT!"

Posted at 10:53 AM

SMILEY [Jonah Goldberg]

So many emails about here. I can't/won't post that many because she really does speak for herself better than we can do it for her. But here's a good/common point:

I do not read Slate, it's good someone does and can point to the odd, random article worth reading.

For me the best part of Smiley's effort is when she denounces the
Gadarene swine ... er ... Red State Voters (see Belmont for more
on that notion) for their Manichean worldview, while at the same time
insisting that the nation has been divided into the Land of Light and
the Domain of Darkness.

The irony of that comes pretty close to exceeding my Required Daily
Allowance of irony, frankly.


Posted at 10:48 AM

"BORKING SPECTER" [KJL]
"The ultimate revenge," says Laura Ingraham. Do reread that Miller piece after the editorial and get motivated.

Posted at 10:45 AM

BLOGGERS & THE ELECTION [KJL]
From Peggy Noonan: "God bless the pajama-clad yeomen of America. "

Posted at 10:42 AM

SMILEY [Alex Rose]
I feel so embarrassed for that Jane Un-Smiley in Slate. A well-known journalist once told me, when you're angry about something, bang out your primal-scream screed, but then go for a walk and delete what you've written on your return. Then start again, this time in a cool and collected manner. Jane, obviously, was never given this advice, which is why she's made a fool of herself.

Still, pretty funny for the rest of us.

Posted at 10:32 AM

BARNBURNER JOBS REPORT [NRO Financial Editors]
A whopping 337,000 new payroll jobs were added in October -- twice the forecast. This the biggest payroll jobs gain since March. The unemployment rate, however, rises to 5.5 percent. Bonds dipped on the news (with traders expecting another Fed rate hike at the next meeting). Outstanding news, overall.

Posted at 10:17 AM

MORE ABOUT SPECTER [John J. Miller]
When I wrote about Specter for NR, my editors gave me a lot of space for the article--but sections nonetheless were cut. This is typical in journalism, of course. A couple of paragraphs in my original version described how Specter served as defense attorney for a well-known accused murderer, Ira Einhorn. Specter had the man's bail reduced. Einhorn promptly fled the country and was only recently brought to justice. (I'll give you one guess as to where he was hiding. If you want a hint, go here.) Last spring, I wrote a full piece on the Specter-Einhorn connection for NRO here.

Posted at 10:14 AM

YOU GO, GIRL! [KJL]
Laura Ingraham is hitting the Specter chairmanship hard.

This can be done...This will be done. Specter cannot be chairman. Not after Tuesday's victory.

(I hate that subject line...just sounds cliched...but you get the idea.)

Posted at 10:12 AM

JOY UNCONFINED [John Derbyshire]
A reader's cup overfloweth: "Derb---Not only am I a conservative but a Red Sox fan too. Two terrific Tuesdays and Wednesdays in a row! Next week will be so boring."

Posted at 09:56 AM

POINTS TO PONDER [John Derbyshire]
"It is the biggest vote ever cast for a conservative in the history of the world." ---Charles Moore in yesterday's _Daily Telegraph_ (London).

Posted at 09:52 AM

REMEMBER BORK [KJL]
there is so, so much in that Miller piece you want to read right now. And don't forget this, particularly relevant:
Specter's biggest impact probably has come on the Judiciary Committee. That makes sense, because he was a prominent lawyer before arriving in Washington. In addition to his work on the Warren Commission, he was twice elected district attorney in Philadelphia, where he earned a tough-on-crime reputation. On the Judiciary Committee, he has been tough on Republican judicial nominees. In 1986, Ronald Reagan selected Jeff Sessions of Alabama for the federal bench, but Specter joined his Democratic colleagues in defeating the nomination — it was only the second time the Judiciary Committee had turned down a nominee since the FDR era. Attorney general Ed Meese called it "an appalling surrender to the politics of ideology." Sessions didn't vanish from public life; in 1996, he was elected to the Senate. Now he sits with Specter on the Judiciary Committee. The two men don't talk about what passed between them 17 years ago, but Specter admits he made a mistake: "I've gotten to know him. I regret my vote."

Specter doesn't regret a more famous vote that took place the following year, on the Supreme Court nomination of Robert Bork. This was a watershed moment in Washington politics, when left-wing histrionics began to play a leading role in judicial confirmations — and the term "borking" was born. Bork had an impeccable record as a law professor and judge, but the debate over his nomination was dominated by the fevered rhetoric of his enemies, who said that confirming him would condemn women to back-alley abortions and blacks to segregated lunch counters. Fresh from his first re-election a few months earlier, Specter couldn't make up his mind about what to do. He questioned Bork for hours in his private chambers and at public hearings. In the end, he decided to vote against confirmation. "He called and said that he couldn't be sure about me," says Bork.

"I've never known what he meant by that." Specter's announcement doomed the nomination. As Bork lobbyist Tom Korologos put it at the time: "Specter hit the game-winning RBI." Conservatives, of course, resent that he was batting for the wrong team.

Posted at 09:49 AM

SPECTRE OF SPECTER [John J. Miller]
For those who need a refresher, my NRODT article on Arlen Specter as the worst Republican senator may be read here.

Posted at 09:46 AM

WASHINGTON NATIONALS [John J. Miller]
That's what D.C.'s new baseball team probably will be called, according to the Washington Times. There's a plan to announce something within the next two weeks because league officials want merchandise available for Christmas shopping.

Posted at 09:03 AM

NOT SO SMILEY [John J. Miller]
Jonah: That Jane Smiley tirade at Slate is hysterical--in every sense of the word. My favorite lines: "The election results reflect the decision of the right wing to cultivate and exploit ignorance in the citizenry. ... Ignorance and bloodlust have a long tradition in the United States, especially in the red states. ... The error that progressives have consistently committed over the years is to underestimate the vitality of ignorance in America. ... The reason the Democrats have lost five of the last seven presidential elections is simple: A generation ago, the big capitalists, who have no morals, as we know, decided to make use of the religious right in their class war against the middle class and against the regulations that were protecting those whom they considered to be their rightful prey—workers and consumers."

And it goes on and on and on. The only reason Slate published it is because Jane Smiley is a semi-well-known novelist. (I read one of her books once, called Duplicate Keys. It was okay, but nothing special.) Publishing these musings on the election is a form of celebrity journalism for left-wing intellectuals--Smiley's opinions aren't valued because she has said anything worthwhile, but because of who she is. If someone unknown to the Slate crowd didn't know had written the exact same essay, it wouldn't see the light of day.

Posted at 08:49 AM

OH. NO. [KJL]
Raj, freshly fired from The Apprentice, tells Katie he is going to get into public policy next because the world needs a moderate conservative voice. Goodness knows what that means besides he's writing a book.

If I knew he read The Corner, I'd be nicer.

Posted at 08:44 AM

COURIC WATCH [KJL]
She's in brown today. So is Matt. Next stage of liberal post-election grief?

Posted at 08:22 AM

A BUSY MAN [John Derbyshire]
People Jacques Chirac has time to call on: Yasser Arafat.

People Jacques Chirac does not have time to call on: Iyad Allawi.

That http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2004512444,00.html pretty much says it all about Jacques Chirac.

Posted at 07:48 AM

EASY "SPECTER-NO" REFERENCE [KJL]
Here are the numbers for Senate Republicans on the Judiciary Committee. If you want to take action on making sure Specter is not judiciary chairman, call your Republican senators. If you do not have a Republican senator, call Republicans on the Judicary Committee. They are:

Hatch (202) 224-5251
Grassley (202)224.3744
Kyl (202) 224-4521
DeWine (202) 224-2315
Sessions (202) 224-4124
Graham (202) 224-5972
Craig 202/224-2752
Chambliss (202) 224-3521
Cornyn 202-224-2934

Get your senator's phone number/e-mail from the directory at www.senate.gov.

Again, no need to bombard Frist. Every Republican senator votes on the leadership. Every Republican needs to hear that Americans do not want Arlen Specter determining who can and who cannot sit on the Supreme Court.

And remember, this is time-sensitive. I've been told Republicans could caucus on this as early as next week. And then, friends, we're stuck.

Posted at 07:46 AM

AHHHHHHH....NOT A PARODY [Jonah Goldberg ]

If you've been waiting for one writer to combine all of the sandpounding stupidity and visceral hatred of the left's reaction to "red America" this may be what you're looking for.


Posted at 07:39 AM

IT WAS THE SCHOOLS FAULT! [Jonah Goldberg]

Just giving Airpower guy some grief. From him:

Jonah,

Re: strafing an elementary school.

Well, THAT would be a spirited debrief.

A couple of things:
-having a school 3.5 miles from a military firing range doesn't strike me as
the wisest zoning plan, and

-night range rides are challenging enough for guys who fly regularly, much
less Guardsmen who may not do this as often.

A nighttime bomb/strafe pass is disorienting enough as it is...sit in a
chair in a dark room, put a bag over your head, lean over one arm of the
chair, then roll out and stand up while staying bent 90 degrees at the
waist. That's about what it feels like to roll in on even a shallow pass in
the dark. Note: do this alone. Otherwise, Cosmo and the Fair Jessica might
start wondering about you...

This was a goof, obviously, but if he only fired 25 rounds, with a Vulcan
cannon, that was a really short burst, which leads me to believe he probably
thought something was wrong as soon as he pulled the trigger. Also, the
press reports said the bullets were made of lead. Um, I don't think
so--steel more'n likely.

Anyway, night ops can be really squirrelly even if you're current/proficient
and night range rides involve a lot of unnatural actions...thank God it was
only 20mm and that it happened on Wednesday, not Tuesday. Otherwise, I would not be surprised it being characterized as another attempt by Karl Rove to
intimidate Pennsylvania voters.

Cheers,
Instapilot


Posted at 07:17 AM

GREAT NEWS! [Jonah Goldberg]
Arafat is still clinging to life! There's still time for Bob Woodward to secretly sneak in there and interview him without anyone noticing!

Posted at 07:14 AM

U.S. LIBERALS HAVE OPTIONS [KJL]
There are Canadian women willing to marry them.

Posted at 06:26 AM

ANOTHER LIBERAL IN BLACK [KJL]
Democrats , Vote or Die style, register people to vote on street corners and they are engaging Americans, doing the patriotic thing or whatever. Republicans register people and sell them on their ideas and it is some kind of sinister Rovian plot. Or so is my quick read of E. J. Dionne today. And, it is a sad day for America. The mourning Dionne takes insppiration from John Edwards's bizarre, angry concession. (Memo to John Edwards: You lost the primaries, remember? It wasn't all about you.)

Posted at 06:18 AM

TODAY [KJL]
If it weren't for Arlen Specter, I'd be advocating today be a day to play hooky, in celebration of electoral victory. The way to commemorate? SLEEP...zzzzz....

Posted at 05:47 AM

Looking
for a story?
Click here