HELP
Archive
E-mail Comments
Send to a Friend
<% printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%>Print Version
Wednesday, November 10, 2004

MORALITY [Jonah Goldberg]

A less interesting email in response to same column:

You don't know what you're doing. If you aren't concerned about the way Bush is attempting to break down the barrier between church and state in order to propagate his own sectarian evangelical BS, you're missing a few screws. The core of his neoevangelical crowd is about an intolerant as any group in America. As a Jewish American you ought to be embarrassed to be defending these medieval lunatics. You're evidently a gambling man. You know these people have nothing to do with your own beliefs. They just happen to overlap -- in a few key areas -- for now. You're playing with fire. And I promise you you'll get nice and toasted one day if you keep it up. Just keep defending these loopy freaks. It will catch up to you. p.s. I assume you know what I mean. If not, do the research. And take off the painted-over goggles for God's sake. You've got to figure out who your true friends are.

Posted at 08:58 PM

SCOPES [Jonah Goldberg]

Now that's an interesting email, in response to Monday's G-File:

Dear Mr. Goldberg, We must rescue Bryan in the Scopes trial from all the lies arising from that work of fiction--Inherit The Wind. Bryan won fair and square, i.e., he outsmarted Darrow, and in a way that should make all us right wingers proud. The evidence is in the actual court transcript.

Bryan went back and read Darrow's summation in the Leopold-Loeb
trial. Darrow pleaded for their lives by suggesting that the University of
Chicago was partially to blame by exposing the poor lads to library shelves
of books by NIETZSCHE! His teachings were swallowed by the boys and drove
them to murder poor Bobby Franks. Well, Bryan argued, in few of that
argument, why couldn't the state of Tennessee elect to protect younger
children from the dehumanizing teaching that men are descended from apes,
and therefore liberated from Bible morality. Bryan was not against
evolution as a capitalist tool, but as an instrument of Godless
amorality. AND he beat Darrow fair and square with Darrow's own words!


Posted at 08:52 PM

SCOTS WHA HAE [John Derbyshire]
"Tell me, Sir, is anything worn under the kilt?"

"No, Ma'am, everything's just as good as new!"

Posted at 05:17 PM

WATCH [KJL]
Barbara Comstock on Crossfire nowish.

Posted at 04:44 PM

PSA [KJL]
Did you catch the new Derb radio?

Posted at 04:41 PM

THE PROBLEM WITH GONZALES [Roger Clegg]
The problem with Al Gonzales as AG is his failure to oppose racial preferences. He played a critical role in watering down the administration’s briefs in the University of Michigan cases, and generally has the reputation for being a squish on this issue. The Dems will try to extract promises during the hearings that he will continue this lackluster record; Republicans should push him to mend his ways. Specter will join the Dems.

Posted at 04:37 PM

RE: AG AS AG [Andy McCarthy]
Mark and Ramesh's point about the scuffing Al Gonzales will endure as AG is especially well taken this year. As we've been pointing out for a while now, the most important provisions of the Patriot Act are due to sunset on December 31, 2005. The first priority for any new AG has to be getting them extended in the beginning of Congress's next term. The civil liberties lobby is gearing up for the mother of all battles, and the already existing congressional opposition to Patriot is not limited to Democrats. This will not be an easy year.

Posted at 04:04 PM

AG AS AG [Mark R. Levin]
I agree with Ramesh. As AG, Gonzales will gain more enemies than friends, and will be labeled controversial no matter what he does or how well he does it. Much easier to influence his policy decisions at Justice than on the Supreme Court.

Posted at 03:51 PM

AND HAVING THE FIRST [Ramesh Ponnuru]
Hispanic AG is a mild plus for the president and the GOP.

Posted at 03:36 PM

AG GONZALES [Ramesh Ponnuru]
I'm inclined to support him. He will, as Shannen says, basically be a good soldier there, and administration policy is set on most things that might inspire conservative worries about him. I think the "torture memos" get raised during confirmation but do not sink him. And I think that Gonzales is now out for the Supreme Court, not only this year but for all time. Modern AGs get scuffed up in politics, and especially will get scuffed up in this administration. My guess is that Gonzales gets confirmed by the Senate--for the last time.

Posted at 03:33 PM

SPECTER: THE LATEST [KJL]
CNN just reported that Specter wants to meet behind closed doors with judiciary-committee republicans to explain what he meant in that interview and clear the air.

So, again, you know who needs to keep hearing that Specter is not the guy you want calling the shots re: the future of the courts. (Here, the Republican Judiciary Committee contacts: names and directory.)

Posted at 03:24 PM

SPECTER: JUST ONE MORE [KJL]
From CQ Today: "If Specter cannot gain the support of his colleagues during the post-election session of the 108th Congress that begins Nov. 16, he may be unable to weather several more weeks of attacks."

Posted at 02:46 PM

FROM THE FALLUJAH FRONT [KJL]
The brother of a serviceman over in Fallujah right now passes this e-mail from his brother along:
Hello from Camp Fallujah!

I thought I would write to everyone so that the only information you get isn't from the Communist News Network. For security reasons, they shut down the internet for a while and they still have the phone center closed so I can't call for awhile. When I get an opportunity, I will phone some of you and let you know in person that I am OK.

Much of this is excerpted from a letter I wrote to [name deleted] earlier. If you get a chance, please give her a call. The appliances have been rebelling as usual. It seems that whenever I deploy a major appliance decides to act up. I am not sure why. I don't think that the appliances were abused or had any sort of developmental problems. But for some reason, they get together, draw lots and one decides to have a major meltdown. I think we will have to be like Woody Allen and have a meeting of all the appliances to lay down the law. Anyway, the dryer decided to overheat and without [name deleted] noticing that something smelled funny we might have had a major fire.

As you can imagine we have been quite busy. If you look at the news it is generally pretty accurate about casualties from what I can tell. The ER docs and surgeons have been extremely busy in the last 2 days. I have been helping [name deleted], the ER doc with doing triage and managing pt flow as I don't have that many patients. I did see several in the last couple of days and business is starting to pick up, but I anticipate that my real busy time will be after all this latest battle is over. I did see an interesting pt with multiple concussions today and have admitted him to the ward to observe so I am contributing to the cause. ....

As you can imagine, life here is quite intense recently. There is a lot of outgoing artillery fire and the fight is moving closer to us as it progresses. You shouldn't worry though because we are well protected and there are multiple perimeters around us.

I don't know whether I have told you this before, but there are a lot of former interns who rotated with me here. They are both physician assistant students and battalion surgeons. It is kind of fun to see them and rewarding to work again as a team.

Today, I took a shower, changed underwear, socks and uniform and feel like a new man. As I was walking from the shower trailers today, I had a little laugh to myself about the pervasiveness of Disney in our lives. I was humming the song from Beauty and the Beast, "I'll be human again. I'll be human again."

Casualty flow has been pretty steady today. Not like yesterday, but still some significant stuff to deal with. My two roommates are the two general surgeons and they are really nice guys. I feel kind of bad that they are up most of the night sometimes while I get to sleep through the night and have regular hours. Even so, in a short time my time will come and they will be goofing off so we will see how that goes.

I have two psychologists working here. [Name deleted] is from San Diego and he is fairly newly licensed. [Name deleted] is from Okinawa and she is still doing post-doc hours. They are very good and I enjoy working with them. I have been trying to get out and be more integrated with the medical staff and I think this will pay off later on. We have three psych techs. They are each characters in their own right. All of them have a ready supply of quotes from movies to fit the occasion. I feel my age when I have no clue what they are referring to. This is a pretty good crew and when we get time, I hope to impart a little of my experience to them. It will be interesting to see what happens when this recent push is over.

Today, we had a rather touching moment. November 10th is the Marine Corps Birthday. Around mid-morning there was the sound of bagpipes in the triage area. A Marine in cammies, flak and kevlar played amazing grace and the Marines hymn. It wasn't the best bagpipe playing I've heard, but it was fitting. We all stood at attention. When he was finished we applauded and then went back to work. The corpsmen painted a large piece of plywood red and then lettered in gold, "Happy 229th Birthday Marines." It is a great bunch of folks here.

I have to say that on a day like today, the Marine Corps Birthday, I have never been more proud to be a Navy Medical Officer. We are doing the most important thing that we can do, which is to provide the best possible treatment for our Marines, soldiers and sailors who have been wounded in battle. It is pretty amazing that anyone who makes it to us alive has survived. Anyway, I just want you all to realize that our guys are doing a great job.

I am hoping the demolition will be complete soon and they can get started on building the new Fallujah Walmart.

Semper Fi guys,

Posted at 02:40 PM

BANNED IN BELGIUM [Andrew Stuttaford]
The Derb has already had plenty to say about the decision of Belgium's supreme court effectively to ban the country's largest political party under 'anti-racism' laws, but it's also well worth noting that one of the leaflets used to justify the ban was (according to the Daily Telegraph) a pamphlet written by a Turkish-born women denouncing female genital mutilation in Islamic countries.

It's also well worth asking whether Belgium (a country that sent 'observers' to the US elections) is, in any real sense of the word, a democracy. It doesn't seem so. And if that's case, what is it doing in the EU, an organization that likes to boast that it is a club of democracies.

Time, I reckon, to throw Brussels out of Brussels.


Posted at 02:30 PM

FOX [Rich Lowry]
FYI--scheduled to be on sometime after 2:30 pm.

Posted at 02:30 PM

STOP THE PRESSES [Stanley Kurtz]
Finally, an honest and timely admission by a major press spokesman of just how biased its presidential campaign coverage has been. This is a real breakthrough. Let’s be honest. Maybe we conservatives have been wrong about the liberal media being a bunch of bizarrely out-of-touch unreconstructed McGovernites left over from the sixties.

Posted at 02:22 PM

SPECTER: ASHCROFT [KJL]
John Ashcroft for the next Supreme Court appointment? I don't think so-don't think he'd want to for one, but I may be wrong. But someone should ask Specter if he'd have a problem with that.

Posted at 02:16 PM

SPECTER: LITTLE BIT OF AN APOLOGY [KJL ]
I don't mean to obsess about this. But Arlen Specter is not the guy you want leading your troops. We all know that. And now is the time--the really only practical time--to say it.

If you're tired of this, btw, I do not plan on another 900 words in here about it again. I'm done. You're safe.

Posted at 02:16 PM

SPECTER: I LIKE THIS E-MAIL [KJL ]
As always, thank you so much for all that you do. I couldn't find an email addy for McCarthy so I just thought I'd pass the kudos along to you. The article he wrote on Roe/Specter today was STELLAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I've been saying the same thing ever since I read Bork's first book much to the consternation of my Con Law prof. in undergraduate school. The clear distinction on original intent and the whole "living Consitutiton" notion supported by Specter and the Libs.

Posted at 02:13 PM

SPECTER: HOW GOES THE FIGHT? [KJL]
There was some good press for the anti-Specter-as-chairman-side yesterday. When I check in with people they really don't know what to say, because it is still all moving. Which means you talking to the Senate is helping. Bottom line: Does Specter become chairman? Let's say: It's still plausible he's not. Seems to me, keep going as long as there is some sense out there of plausibility. And so what happens if he becomes chairman? He is chastened. Maybe he has to commit to something real-like filibuster reform. Great. You've done your job. Questionable whether Judiciary committee members would have-they had a real shot at getting a chairman with the right temperament.

Posted at 02:05 PM

SPECTER: SANTORUM [KJL ]
Another side note: I'm hearing a lot of understandable conservative grief aimed at Rick Santorum--but not all of it is completely fair right now. Listen, I was a Toomey gal. We were a Toomey mag. I hated when Bush campaigned with Specter, and when Santorum did. But life goes on. A couple of things at this point: a) Santorum doesn't have a heck of a lot of public freedom on Specter. Same state. Same party. You know this all. He already campaigned for him. Member of the leadership. Etc. But b) if a few someones on the Judiciary Committee take leadership on this, and get Specter to step aside (and there is no reasonable reason seniority has to rule), something tells me Santorum would not be heartbroken. (I think it helps Santorum in his reelection bid not to have Specter there, reminding conservatives of his primary support.) That said, Santorum is not on the Judiciary Committee, so he's not the one to be focusing on, pressure wise. Mike Dewine. Lindsay Graham. Jon Kyl. Jeff Sessions. Saxby Chambliss. Larry Craig. Orrin Hatch, …Republicans on the Judiciary Committee. (Did I mention? Call Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee. See here. for contacts.) These are the men to buck up right now. I'm told it is still helpful.

Posted at 02:05 PM

SPECTER: WHILE YOU WERE READING SPECTER'S WSJ OP-ED TODAY [KJL ]
I was reading his 1994 "Why Supreme Court nominees must answer the questions" op-ed in the Washington Times. If Hugh Hewitt wants to return to pre-Bork times, Specter's not the man to lead that fight. Read here. I also submit to you this 1988 Washington Post piece. Specter quoted as saying that Bork committee proceedings "’have established the important precedent of the Senate's right to reject' a nominee soley on the basis of his judicial philosophy."

Posted at 01:54 PM

SPECTER: NEAS [KJL ]
Ralph needs, has an agenda (no crime) and will say what he will with or without us playing into his hands (reality), as Hugh Hewitt thinks we are. You might like to know, btw, that in '87, Neas said of Specter at the Bork hearings: "Senator Specter's questioning that constituted the single best performance by a public official I have ever seen."

Posted at 01:54 PM

BLEG [Jonah Goldberg]

Who can be the first to email me a PDF or other electronic version of a Time magazine article from March 13, 1972 by Melvin Maddocks titled "The New Cult of Madness"?

Winner receives a coveted National Review no-prize and thanks in the Corner.


Posted at 01:51 PM

SPECTER: NUMBERS & DEMS [KJL ]
And another note about numbers: There are some reasonable Dems up for reelection soon (Ben Nelson comes to mind). I trust him a heck of a lot more than I do lame-duck, we-know-his-record Specter.

Posted at 01:48 PM

SPECTER: NUMBERS [KJL]
Yes, Arlen Specter has an R next to his name. Rs Mean staff and chairmanships. Yes. But you know what? Not everyday can we argue, when it comes to Congress, on principle-it's often not practical-because it is often way too late. Right now it is not too late. And Republican hands are not completely tied right now. Specter may have made some kind of promise in exchange for Bush campaigning for him. But you know what? He broke that deal the morning after the election when he talked out of turn before becoming chairman.

And the more Specter talks, the worse, it seems to me, he often makes it. And while he uses Clarence Thomas as an example, he has since (since the confirmation hearings) voiced his regret for his Thomas support (see his memoirs, and John Miller's piece)-and was real lukewarm re a possible Thomas for chief justice on Hannity's radio show the other day.

Do I think Chafee and Specter and Snowe will never cooperate again if Specter is chairman? I'm not going to advocate doing the wrong thing because of what Chafee might think. Snowe's no lame duck, so I doubt it. Chafee-let him go. (Though he said yesterday he won't, for what it is worth.) And, if Specter leaves the party, I'm not shedding tears.

Posted at 01:46 PM

SPECTER: HH [KJL ]
A few additional Specter thoughts. (Bear with me a few posts.) Does Hugh Hewitt (he has another post up; and note-who I like a lot (and whose radio show I do every week since forever, it seems [think we're about to hit the two-year mark]-but it would get boring if we all always agreed, right?) think if conservatives shut up about Arlen Specter now, the Dems (Patrick Leahy, Ralph Neas and Nan Aron) will play nicer later? Come on. They won't. They wouldn't if we smiled and took a Specter chairmanship without the fight. They have as much at stake in the courts as we do, and they know it is their only way to further their agenda on some key issues. Opponents of a Specter chairmanship aren't playing into any Dems hand. They were there all along. And they were moving increasingly leftward without us.

Posted at 01:43 PM

NPR [Shannen Coffin]
For those of you who really have nothing better to do than waste an hour listening to me being tag teamed by the bleating left, the NPR program I did this morning on John Ashcroft is available here.

Posted at 01:20 PM

IT'S OFFICIAL [Jonah Goldberg]

It is Gonzales. And Tim, as for that Stephanopolous thing, I think the way to parse Steph's meaning in the first part -- as close to forced out as possible in this administration -- is thus "Ashcroft wasn't forced out but he should have been."

As for Ashcroft being essentially white, isn't the more damning implication that Stephanopolous thinks there's something essentially Hispanic or African-American? Isn't that a racial stereotype? Same point as yours, but no liberal cares about stereotyping "angry white males."


Posted at 01:16 PM

ANYONE CARE TO PARSE? [Tim Graham]
George Stephanopoulos discussed the Ashcroft succession this morning (leaning heavily on how he was "as close to forced out as you can get in this administration," which somehow forgets Paul O'Neill ). George ended with this odd sentence about potential AGs Larry Thompson or Al Gonzales: "I think even that kind of a cosmetic change, having the first African-American or the first Hispanic Attorney General, would suggest a change in tone." Is there something inexplicably "white" about Ashcroft's tone?

Posted at 12:51 PM

AG GONZALEZ? [Shannen Coffin]
If it is Gonzales, there is not likely to be a big swing in the agenda. He will support the President 100%, which is important in these uncertain times. And DoJ will go about its business of prosecuting the war on terrorism to the best of its ability. And the President's agenda on social issues -- fostering marriage, protecting the unborn -- will be continued. Look for a continued vigorous defense of the Partial Birth Abortion ban. The ship will stay on course.

Posted at 12:32 PM

VOLUNTEERS? [Jonah Goldberg ]
This guy wants to fight a Bush supporter.

Posted at 12:27 PM

ASHCROFT [Jonah Goldberg]

From a reader:

Ashcroft is from my home town, Springfield, Mo. He is a square and a dork but is also a real stand up guy. He is the guy, of course, who got beat by the dead Mel Carnahan. In that race, Ashcroft refused to campaign after Mel died. that bit of gallantry almost surely cost Ashcroft the race.

I have grown to admire Ashcroft over the years. He has been stoically steadfast in his defense of America. He has been treated so unfairly and yet he never complained, he just kept doing his job. He is a quiet hero.


Posted at 12:23 PM

A GREAT BOOK FOR LITTLE KIDS [Jack Fowler]
Last years we published a big, beautiful book that is wonderful for kids ages 3 to 9. It’s The National Review Treasury of Classic Bedtime Stories, which collects 10 of Thornton Burgess’s revered adventures (wholesome, instructive, exciting, and charmingly illustrated by the great Harrison Cady) starring a host of colorful woodland critters, including Reddy Fox, Chatterer the Red Squirrel, Johnny Chuck, and dozens more. Ideal for beginning readers (first- through third-graders) – Burgess has a simple and beautiful style that even a seven-year-old can master, comprehend, and enjoy – this book is also perfect nighttime reading for littler ones. Each of the 10 adventures is divided into 24 chapters – reading two or three each night after the kiddies are tucked in is a sweet prelude to sweet dreams (and time well spent between a parent and a child). This Christmas, you can give the kids some ridiculous toy that is forgotten in five minutes or broken in ten, or a book that will have a lifetime of meaning. Order your copies of The National Review Treasury of Classic Bedtime Stories (and our other fine children’s titles) here.

Posted at 12:08 PM

FOR THE RECORD [Jonah Goldberg]
Re that post about Yglesias, I certainly do agree with the larger and even the smaller points that the Cold War held the GOP together. I simply reject the notion that there was anything like a "spectacular collapse" of the Republican coalition or the underlying conservative movement after the Berlin Wall fell.

Posted at 12:01 PM

"HOSTAGE SLAUGHTERHOUSES" [Jonah Goldberg ]
Found in Fallujah.

Posted at 11:45 AM

THE ARSENAL OF DEMOCRACY [Jonah Goldberg ]
An inventory.

Posted at 11:40 AM

AG GONZALES [John J. Miller]
If Bush nominates Al Gonzales to succeed Ashcroft, then it must mean he won't nominate Gonzales to the Supreme Court, at least not in the near term. Conservatives, of course, have been worried about Gonzales heading for the Supreme Court because he's a cipher on so many issues--they know that there's almost no way he'd be denied the position, and they would support him without knowing exactly what they were supporting.

Posted at 11:40 AM

HUH? [Jonah Goldberg]

Matt Ygelsias has a generally sensible and wise post about the need for Democrats to come to grips with the reality of the war on terror. But he also writes this:

"When the Cold War ended, the Republican coalition collapsed rather spectacularly, and Bill Clinton was swept into office with a historically low share of the popular vote. With national security back on the agenda, even the collapse of Ralph Nader's support wasn't enough to give the Democrats a majority."

How did the Republican coalition collapse spectacularly? Bush I lost in a squeaker largely because Ross Perot was in the race as a fiscal conservative. Bill Clinton ran as a moderate, pro-death penalty, anti-welfare candidate in 1992 who often ran to the right of Bush on foreign policy (remember "butchers of Beijing" and all that?). Of course, he was more than a little dishonest in his campaign because when he got in office he tried to govern from the left -- gays in the military, Hillarycare etc. When he did this, that "collapsed" Republican coalition retook the House and the Senate. Bill Clinton then tacked to the right on domestic policy signing on to a Republican Budget and a Republican Welfare reform bill. Clinton ran in 1996 against a decent man but a terrible candidate. Nevertheless Clinton championed small-bore issues which were largely culturally conservative and certainly small-c conservative (school uniforms, the V-chip, seat belts on busses). In his second term he did almost nothing of historical note except diddle an intern and lie under oath about it and go to war without UN approval (something anti-Iraq war liberals saluted at the time). In 1998, Congressional Republicans had a setback because of impeachment, but they didn't lose the House. Meanwhile, 2000, 2002 and 2004 were all very good years for the GOP.Of course, '02 and '04 were post 9/11 but throughout the 1990s the GOP increased its control of state legislatures, state houses and the Congress. So again, I ask, what exactly was this spectacular collapse Yglesias is talking about?


Posted at 11:35 AM

GONZALES [Jonah Goldberg ]

The next AG?


Posted at 11:18 AM

FOX YESTERDAY [KJL]
The mention--including a screenshot--included the descriptor: "daily reading in many conservative circles."

Posted at 10:46 AM

BREAKING NEWS... [Jonah Goldberg]
Al Jazeera -- Until now, most observers have suspected that the long drama around Yassir Arafat's death has centered around confusion about how to handle the transfer of power in an already divided Palestinian community. But sources close to the scene confirm that there is another concern. Apparently, even the Great and All-Powerful Allah has been unable to recruit even a fraction of Chairman Arafat's promised 72 virigins. Apparently word has come from on-high to keep Mr. Arafat on a respirator for as long as possible while every measure is taken to find willing virgins for the symbol of Palestinian nationalism.

Posted at 10:40 AM

A VOICE FROM THE REPUBLIC OF NICE [John Derbyshire]
"Dear Mr. Derbyshire---Here's the thing [Proceeds to quote from my Tuesday column]: 'The wreckers loose in our own society are stronger, more confident, and more numerous. It is those wreckers that most concern me: the arrogant judges, the academic deconstructors, the teacher-union multiculturalists, the media guilt-mongers, the love-the-world pacifists, the criminal-lovers and family-breakers, the inventors of bogus rights and destroyers of cherished traditions, the haters of normality and scoffers at restraint, the enterprise-destroying litigators and pain-feelers.'

"Here's the question: With this kind of rhetoric, can you be surprised that the nation finds itself divided? Do you actively seek such divisions? Would you stand up and say these things in public or only hurl them onto the web? As a member of, I guess, one or two of the groups you list above, I do not object to your right to express whatever it is that you think you are expressing. However, I find your tone aggressive and threatening. Is this your intent? To bait? To offend? To rile up? If not, I think you ought to be more careful. If so, I think you ought to be more careful still."

Fiddlesticks. Of course the nation is divided. There are major disagreements on major issues. There always have been: in 19th-century elections, they fought on the streets. Division, spirited argument, angry rhetoric, insult and abuse, are the very stuff of our democracy. What my reader, and the regrettably large number of people who think like him, wants is for no-one ever to feel offended by anything said in the public sphere. He wants this to be, in Florence King's great phrase, "The Republic of Nice." Personally, I can't imagine anything more horrible. (I suspect that what he *actually* wants is for no *liberal* ever to be offended...)

The answers to his questions, in order, are: No, no, yes, yes (aggressive) but no (threatening), yes, yes.

Note, by the way, the threatening tone in his last sentence. The overall cast of mind of these types is: "You must be nice, gentle, accommodating, sympathetic, understanding, non-combative, inoffensive... OR ELSE WE WILL SMASH YOU TO PIECES!" There is nobody more bloodthirsty than a pacifist.

Posted at 10:38 AM

ZELL VS. MODO [KJL]
From Page Six.

Posted at 10:29 AM

ORTHODOX JEWS [Jonah Goldberg ]

As I mentioned in today's USA Today piece, Bush picked up an enormous number of votes from Orthodox Jews on election day. Orthodox Jews have been trending more conservative, politically for a while (as Peter Beinart noted in this interesting op-ed before the election). But, even so, few could have predicted this much of a gain. Figures on what Bush got in 2000 vary -- from as low as 29% to as high as 40% (and remember Lieberman was on the Democratic ticket). In 2004 Bush got 69% of the Orthodox Jewish vote, which apparently helped Bush in certain areas of Ohio and Florida.

From what I hear, one person who deserves an enormous amount of the credit for these gains is my very old friend Tevi Troy. A policy guru on the campaign and before that in the White House, Tevi also worked tirelessly reaching out to the Jewish community as a liaison. Bush's victory has many and morre obvious authors of course (Though wouldn't it be fun to watch the reaction in certain quarters -- Middle Eastern, Liberal Jewish, paleo-whatever -- if Bush's margin were attributable to the Jewish vote?). But this is an important trend -- Orthodox Jews are only about 10% of the Jewish population, but they are the fastest-growing segment because they have so many kids -- and Troy played an enormously important part in accelerating that trend.

Update: Ahem, the trend I was referring to here wasn't the increase in the Orthodox population, but in its Republican vote. Though Tev is a good family man.


Posted at 10:28 AM

DUDES [KJL]
Apologies. Little goof had Bill McGurn as the author of the post about today's Bill McGurn NYPost column. It was Jack Fowler who wrote it (now fixed).

Posted at 10:23 AM

DUDE... [KJL]
...maybe all my posts should be about Arlen Specter.

(Don't say it. I know what you just said.)

Posted at 10:20 AM

DUDE... [Jonah Goldberg]
Maybe all of my posts should begin with "dude" today?

Posted at 10:13 AM

"DUDE, GIVE ME THE SNIPER RIFLE. I CAN TAKE THEM OUT - I'M FROM ALABAMA." [Jonah Goldberg ]

American soldiers looking for payback. I'm not sure the author intended this to be wholly flattering, but this is the sort of attitude I think many of us want for the tip of the foremost spear in the arsenal of democracy.


Posted at 10:07 AM

AFTER THE PARADE . . . [Mark Krikorian ]
As Derbyshire wrote on Tuesday, after the parade comes the man with the shovel to clean up after the horses. Well, today's papers are full of post-parade offal, in the form of the administration's new pledge to push for a guestworker/amnesty program. The president has met with John McCain about jump-starting the amnesty process in Congress and sent Colin Powell to buck Mexico with amnesty talk. What is the White House thinking? It is the height of irresponsibility to jeopardize the unique opportunity to reform the tax system and/or Social Security by wasting valuable political capital on this fool's errand.

Posted at 10:06 AM

"DUDE, THIS IS COOL" [Jonah Goldberg ]

That's what lot's of boys (and I'm sure a quite few girls) said this morning when they saw this story in today's Washington Post about the scramjet. Here's the opener:

HAMPTON, Va. -- They call it a "scramjet," an engine so blindingly fast that it could carry an airplane from San Francisco to Washington, D.C., in about 20 minutes -- or even quicker. So fast it could put satellites in space. So fast it could drop a cruise missile on an enemy target, almost like shooting a rifle.

Next week, NASA plans to break the aircraft speed record for the second time in 7 1/2 months by flying its rocket-assisted X-43A scramjet craft 110,000 feet above the Pacific Ocean at speeds close to Mach 10 -- about 7,200 mph, or 10 times the speed of sound.


Posted at 10:00 AM

USAT BTW [Jonah Goldberg ]

I have a piece in USA Today, uh, today.


Posted at 09:40 AM

JOINT OPERATIONS & MY PRICE [KJL]
Jonah's military guy (not a Marine) reminds that there is more to the world than the Marines (a little competitive, are we?) and more to the current Fallujah effort. He also gets to the heart of how the Marines wooed me.

Posted at 09:37 AM

RE: HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MARINES (AND THANKS!) [Jack Fowler]
Our good friend and NR’s former Washington Bureau Chief Bill McGurn launches his new weekly New York Post column today with a great piece on what it means to be a Leatherneck, and the proud mom of one who’s made the ultimate sacrifice.

Posted at 09:23 AM

COMEBACK KID [John J. Miller]
Maybe he's not going to quit anytime soon: Working from home, Chief Justice Rehnquist has authored one of the Supreme Court's first rulings of its current term.

Posted at 09:11 AM

ASHCROFT [Shannen Coffin]
I'm doing an appearance on a nationally syndicated NPR show, the Connection, this morning between 11am and noon to discuss John Aschroft's legacy. Somehow I don't expect a friendly audience. I'm told NRO's David Rivkin will be phoning in from a beach in the Bahamas or somewhere spectacular. The show is not available in all markets, but click here to see if you can listen in.

Posted at 09:11 AM

STILL COUNTING [John J. Miller]
They're still counting votes in Washington state's governor's race. Yesterday, Republican Dino Rossi moved into the lead, but there are a still a lot of ballots left to go and many of them come from Democratic areas. Seattle Times story here.

Posted at 09:08 AM

NEAR MISS [John J. Miller]
Charles Duelfer -- of Duelfer Report fame -- was almost killed in Iraq yesterday.

Posted at 09:05 AM

RE: OUR HERO [Rick Brookhiser]
So, who is worse, the honest atheist who supports freedom, or the double-talking Catholic who doesn't?

Posted at 09:02 AM

YOU MUST REMEMBER THIS [John Derbyshire]
Here is a poem read to the Dutch nation at Theo van Gogh's memorial service. It was written by a Dutch Resistance fighter during the Nazi occupation:

All of us who've gathered here
The living, the dead
The stretch which parts us is small
Jointly summoned we have been
Before the court
Remember the loved one lying here
Brother, brethren or father
But give your eyes a wider view
Behold the land and people jointly
Hear this word:
Before the court we stand together
To elect either good or bad
A people which to tyranny consents
Will lose more than life and land
Then light relents

Posted at 08:59 AM

"CULTURE WARS" [Stanley Kurtz]
Debra Saunders makes a good point. Tony Blankley takes it a step further.

Posted at 08:52 AM

SPECTER ON ROBERTSON [John J. Miller]
Just did a quick Nexis search on what Arlen Specter has said about Pat Robertson over the years, in the New York Times. Here are two highlights, both from 1995, when Specter was running for the GOP presidential nomination and bashing religious conservatives at every opportunity.

From Specter's speech announcing his candidacy (which K-Lo linked to earlier): "When Pat Robertson says there is no constitutional doctrine of separation of church and state, I say he is wrong."

Specter quoted in a Frank Rich column: "There is a continuum from Pat Buchanan's 'holy war' to Pat Robertson's saying there's no separation of church and state, to Ralph Reed saying pro-choice candidates can't be on the Republican ticket, to Randall Terry saying 'let a wave of hatred wash over you,' to the guy at Robertson's law school who says murdering an abortion doctor is justifiable homicide, to the guys who are pulling the triggers."

This second comment is astonishing. There's "a continuum" between opposing a pro-abortion candidate and "the guys who are pulling the triggers" on abortionists? There's a good Latin term for this kind of nonsense: reductio ad absurdum.

Posted at 08:29 AM

ASHCROFT [Jonah Goldberg ]

I've been pretty silent about all the resignation stuff all week because I was under a gag-order from the Fair Jessica (Note to new readers: TFJ is my bride (who I started wooing through the G-File) and she was an aide and speechwriter for the AG since before 9/11).

Anyway, Jessica's pretty bad about keeping me in the loop about this sort of thing. During the early days after 9/11 she was really mum about all the cool stuff going on. The underground complexes, secret spy satellites, James Bond-like technology, the secret army of US-trained ninjas and all of the other stuff she refused to confirm or deny existed as I imagined them. But I did know a bit earlier than the press that Ashcroft was resigning. I'm probably going to write a syndicated column about the guy. But in short I really do think he did a heroic job as AG and that while he may never be the official spokesman for Club Med Cancun, he's a decent man who did a hard job extremely well and got unfairly vilified for it by an entire political class more interested in scoring cheap points than in discussing the facts -- or improving our security.

As for The Fair Jessica, I guess she'll be out of work come January. I don't want any of you mega-billionaire corporate CEOs or top-tier politicians, desperately in search of speechwriters or ghostwriters to worry about it. National Review pays us more than enough to keep our baby in burlap with enough left over for bus fare to the soup kitchen.


Posted at 08:23 AM

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, MARINES (AND THANKS!) [KJL]
W. Thomas Smith Jr. e-mails to remind me:
[Today is]the 229th birthday of the finest fighting force on the planet... and America's force of choice in the battle for Fallujah.

Anyway, on November 10, 1775, the Continental Congress met and passed the following resolution - in secret - thus establishing an American Marine Corps (based on the Royal Marine Corps model):

Resolved: That two battalions of Marines be raised consisting of one colonel, two lieutenant colonels, two majors & other officers as usual in other regiments, that they consist of an equal number of privates with other battalions; that particular care be taken that no person be appointed to office or enlisted into said battalions, but such as are good seamen, or so acquainted with maritime affairs as to be able to serve to advantage by sea, when required. That they be enlisted and commissioned for and during the present war between Great Britain and the colonies, unless dismissed by order of Congress. That they be distinguished by the names of the first & second battalions of American Marines, and that they be considered a part of the number, which the Continental Army before Boston is ordered to consist of. Semper Fi

Posted at 08:05 AM

RE: ASHCROFT [KJL]
or check out one of the file photos the AP grabs for its wires.

Posted at 08:02 AM

AND JANET RENO WAS...A MODERATE? [Tim Graham]
Sadly, Cliff is right. Consider the AP story on Ashcroft resigning, paragraphs 3 and 4:
The gospel-singing son of a minister, Ashcroft is a fierce conservative who doesn't drink, smoke or dance. His detractors said he gave religion too prominent a role at the Justice Department — including optional prayer meetings with staff before each work day. He has also been a willing lightning rod for critics who said his policies for thwarting terrorists infringed on the rights of innocent people.

Posted at 08:00 AM

RE: SPECTER OP-ED [KJL]
I'm knee-deep in editing and things at the moment, or I'd have jumped in here earlier re: Specter. Just some quick thoughts before getting back to behind-the-scenes crashville.

As I said earlier in the week in here: I think Specter is too easily allowed off the hook with the phrase "litmus test." Has he, in his Senate career, supported judges who happen to be pro-life, sure. Of course. No one is debating that. But has he, nonetheless, made promises that more than suggest he'll be the behind-the-scenes not-that-extremist/you’re-not-getting-that-nominee-through-my-committee chairman calling shots in a White House negotiating session? Of course. Making this about the words "litmus test" makes it way too easy for Specter, in my humble opinion.

Side note #2: Specter’s victim defense doesn't cut it either, in my opinion. Ironically, that Rush quote in the op-ed was related to a reference to The Corner Rush made last Thursday, when I had a momentary bout of giving Specter the benefit of the doubt. But, we have since seen the transcript of what Specter said to reporters after reelection, and this was not a case of misreporting/media bias.

See Ramesh's defense of the AP reporter, too & his response to Hugh Hewitt yesterday if you haven't by the way.)

Yet another side note: Kinda worth this effort just to see Arlen Specter have to cite Rush, Fox, and Pat Robertson in his defense.

The Left has been getting a lot of use out of Robertson of late. (Remember his supposed there-will-be-no-casualties-in-Iraq conversation with the president?) For Specter, Robertson is an "extremist"--he's been using him for fundraising and in speeches (his presidential-primary hat-in-the-ring speech, for one).

Now he can use him to save his you know what. (Chairmanship. Chairmanship. That's all I meant.)

I ramble...back to trying to avoid more widespread rambling...that's in no way meant to be a full response to Specter today...just initial associated thoughts while reading it (and doing other things, truth be told).

Posted at 06:14 AM

BAD VIBES [John J. Miller]
Another person who appears not to have read my new book has posted a negative review of it on Amazon.com. Here's what our friend from Madison, Wisc., says about Our Oldest Enemy: A History of America's Disastrous Relationship with France:

"The EU is morally superior to the United States, and the United States is backward compared to the rest of the '1st' world, PERIOD."

Posted at 06:03 AM

SPECTER OP-ED [John J. Miller]
Say this much about Arlen Specter: He takes threats to his political future very seriously. (The reason Pat Toomey nearly beat him in the primary certainly was not because Specter was caught napping.) The senator's campaign to salvage his chance to head the Senate Judiciary Committee continues today with a Wall Street Journal op-ed. "The current controversy was artificially created by incorrect reporting," he writes. "I never 'warned' the president on anything--and especially not that I'd block pro-life nominees."

Posted at 05:57 AM

EVANS FOR GUV? [John J. Miller]
Don Evans is said to have an interest in running for governor of Texas.

Posted at 05:40 AM

ASHCROFT FOR PRESIDENT? [John J. Miller]
He ran for the GOP nomination it in the 2000 cycle, but dropped out early--earlier than was necessary, it seemed at the time. I watched it all very closely, because an article on candidate Ashcroft was one of the first things I wrote for NRODT after joining the magazine in 1998. I have no inside information here, so this is just raw speculation. He is a very ambitious man. He is currently 63 years old and was hospitalized for pancreatitis earlier this year.

Posted at 05:37 AM

SLASHER [John J. Miller]
Perhaps somebody else noticed this earlier, but it only came to my attention this morning: One of the suspects arrested by Milwaukee police in connection to slashing the tires on 20 cars and vans rented by the Republican Party is the son of a newly elected Democratic congresswoman.

Posted at 05:17 AM

THE WEATHER? [Rich Lowry]
I'm at USC for another round of debate with David Corn. We debated last night and are debating again tonight--hundreds of freshmen (of radically varying levels of alertness) are required to attend for their writing class. Anyway, I had what must have been a Southern California moment when I got here. I was having trouble getting a dial-up connection in my room. A guy came up to try to help. He couldn't figure it out and said it might be the weather making it hard to get through. The weather? I could understand that if there were a monsoon, or a thunderstorm, or even a mild breeze outside. But it wasn't even raining! It was just cloudy! But I guess out here that constitutes inclement weather.

Posted at 12:56 AM

ASHCROFT [Cliff May]
I was on both BBC radio and BBC TV tonight, talking about the resignation of Attorney General John Ashcroft.

The radio interview wasn’t too bad.

But the TV interviewer essentially took the position that perhaps Mr. May is correct to claim that there has not been a single terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11, and maybe John Ashcroft had something to do with that (or it could be an odd coincidence, hard to say, sticky wicket and all that), and maybe it’s true, as you assert, Mr. May, that violent crime is down to a 30-year low.

But, Mr. May, it’s also true, is it not, sir, that John Ashcroft has been known to conduct prayer breakfasts?

Yes, yes, yes! I confess! It’s true! It’s all true!

Oh, the scandal! The horror! The shame!

Posted at 12:32 AM

Looking
for a story?
Click here