|
![]() |
|
|
CRANBERRIES! [KJL] No...this is not another pop-music post. But i've got more than a few recipes, will share some tomorrow/Monday. Meanwhile, what's the best wine to go with Turkey? (I'm always amazed at the experts who read NRO--I'm sure there must be wine experts...) Posted at 11:46 PM FOR ONE WHO GAVE ALL [Jim Robbins] MSNBC's web site has a picture of a dead US soldier, gunned down entering a room during urban combat in Iraq. The soldier is lying in a large pool of his own blood. It is a very disturbing image. Army policy states that such pictures may not be used when the soldier is identifiable, out of respect for the family, as well as the soldier. One can't make out the features very well, but it took me about a minute looking at casualty reports on DefenseLink to find out who had been killed in that circumstance on that day. I know the Army is receiving complaints about MSNBC's actions but because the network is exploiting a loophole in the policy, the Army can't do much about it. Sources at the Pentagon say it is up to market forces to make the network see reason and take down this offensive image. I already wrote my letter to MSNBC -- let's help them understand the error of their ways. Posted at 11:27 PM SO, WHAT'S THE BUZZ? [KJL] The Passion can't possibly be disses by the Oscars...right? Posted at 10:01 PM HOW SILLY WOULD IT BE TO ASK [KJL] "Where is Duran Duran?" (Rich thinking: she really wanted to ask about Falco.) But seriously, "Imagine" just had to make the top 3, right? Posted at 09:53 PM EVEN MY DOG HATES BUSH? [Tim Graham] Have you heard the latest humor from the New York Times? The election may be over, and the results may be sinking in. Reporter Robin Finn bucked up liberal readers with a profile of Manhattan politician Christine Quinn: "The family dog, Sadie, a mutt with two doting human mommies and no daddy, wears her political heart on her sleeve: a Kerry bandanna and a button that reads, cheekily, 'I Pee on Bushes.' Who says partisan politics has to be humorless? Or confined to people?" Posted at 09:51 PM HARRY REID AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD [Tim Graham] With all the media talk that new Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid is pro-life, note that Planned Parenthood is accentuating the positive: "Reid is the lead Democratic sponsor of the Equity in Prescription Insurance and Contraceptive Coverage Act (EPICC) and the Putting Prevention First Act (PPFA). If passed, both bills would increase access to contraception and education that improve the lives of women and children." PPFA is also noting what could be the new Christmas sensation in Australia: the "first spray-on contraceptive." But when can you buy the Ban Roll-On version? Posted at 09:48 PM CLINTON DOUBLE ENTENDRE WATCH [Tim Graham] NPR's coverage of the Clinton library opening was predictably one-sided, featuring soundbites from Leon Panetta, Stan Greenberg, South Carolina Democratic boss Dick Harpootlian, Clinton-loving Washington Post reporter John F. Harris, and liberal historian Robert Dallek. But the laugh track failed to kick in when Dallek said "Bill Clinton could become the measuring rod by which the Democrats make a comeback." Posted at 09:46 PM WHOLE LOTTA BLOGGING GOING ON [KJL] Here's more NR Cruise blogging. And this one promises photos, so check again. And just got ahead an treat yourself to this summer's National Review Cruise. Posted at 09:42 PM AM I WEIRD? [KJL] (Ok, dumb question.) I actually have something specific in mind, though. I'm a lot more interested in Bush saving his Secret Service agent than the Pacers-Pistons brawl. (That said, I totally appreciate how out of line the players were going in the stands, especially.) Posted at 09:32 PM AND DON’T FORGET HOW HUMBLE KIM IS [Cliff May] Press reports that North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il's portrait was removed are “a groundless fabrication," said Ri Gyong-son, an official of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). “General Kim Jong-il is the fate of the Korean people and the DPRK's socialism; it is unimaginable that the DPRK people and army can separate their fates from Kim Jong-Il," he said. "It is nothing but a stupid and ridiculous act, just like trying to remove the sun from the sky. The adoration for the leader originated from people's life; it will never change." Posted at 09:29 PM PETER KIRSANOW, TONIGHT [KJL] He's on CSPAN tonight at 9:15p.m. and 12:15 a.m. (EST) The Ashbrook Lecture on Racial Rebellion: The End of the Victim/Grievance Movement Posted at 09:15 PM RE MIDDLEBURY [Cliff May] Charles, I’ll give you odds that your daughter’s professor, whose political leanings remain veiled, is a closet conservative. Were he on the Left, he wouldn’t need to play his politics close to the vest. I have some MSM experience with this. During the years I was at the NY Times, I worked very hard to keep my views to myself, to report straight down the middle, to be meticulously fair to both sides. To do otherwise, would have been professional suicidal (and, I should add, my views were much more “media mainstream” back then; that is to say, I was at most center-right back in the 1980s, not a Bill Buckley conservative/neo-con/wing-nut as I am today). Rare is the left-winger on campus or in the MSM who worries about letting his ideological proclivities show. Common is the right-winger on campus and in the MSM who worries about not getting tenure or ending up covering the real estate beat in Trenton (respectively). Posted at 09:04 PM L’ESPRIT DE NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN [Cliff May] France has proposed that Baathist representatives of "la resistance" should participate in any future conference convened to discuss the future of Iraq. Our friends at MEMRI have more here. Posted at 08:58 PM CLONING THE U.N. [KJL] Sorry! That headline probably unnecessarily scared you. Depressing news from the U.N., given how a fight it's been--with the U.S. & Costa Rica as stalwarts for life. But I had heard earlier in the week that this was the direction this was going in--a nonbinding kinda declaration, and there we are. Ah well. The real battle on cloning is upcoming yet--getting a real domestic ban in place. A heated debate to be had in Bush Term II. Posted at 08:50 PM WELL, OF COURSE [KJL] Someone was blogging from the NR Cruise. Posted at 08:41 PM CLOSING IN? [Andrew Stuttaford] From today’s Guardian: ”A public prosecutor in Paris said yesterday that 12 past and present officials from Jacques Chirac's UMP party would appear in court next year after allegations of vote-rigging in the capital in the days when the French president was its mayor. In a 196-page report which could further damage Mr Chirac's reputation, the prosecutor said the officials, including the former mayor of the third arrondissement, Jacques Dominati, and his two sons, should be tried for "fraudulently influencing" the outcome of a poll.” Jacques Chirac, some people may recall, has been a little, well, critical of US efforts to bring democracy to Iraq. Perhaps he should start looking a little closer to home. And, oh yes, the same Guardian report contains this little nugget: “Meanwhile, it emerged yesterday that expenditure by the Elysée palace has increased hugely since Mr Chirac was elected president in 1995. The revelation came a day after French MPs approved a 2005 presidential budget of €31.9m (£22m). The daily Le Monde said in 1994, the final year of François Mitterrand's presidency, that the Elysée had spent (in equivalent terms) €3.3m. Allegations of runaway spending under Mr Chirac are not new and were countered yesterday by his office, which said the budget increase was mainly due to a shortfall due to the abolition, in 2001, of the "special funds", an unaudited and hidden multi-million-pound slush fund that the French state allocated itself for "extraordinary expenses". Income to offset the cut appears in the presidential budget. “ There’s one place, and one place only, for this destructive and useless individual. Jail. Posted at 07:55 PM CHAMBER OF SECRETS (3) [Andrew Stuttaford] Warning – this post may violate French law. The ‘revelation’ that France’s new EU commissioner, Jacques Barrot, was in the past convicted for his role in a political funding scandal (because Barrot later benefited from an amnesty, mentioning this conviction is, apparently, a crime), is beginning to cause trouble in Brussels. Incoming EU president Barroso is now saying that no-one ever told him that the French nominee had had these legal, ahem, difficulties in the past. Um, Barroso, old chap, have you ever heard of Google? Regrettably, the post of an EU Commissioner is an important one. If we are to believe Barroso, it seems that not even the most rudimentary check was made on the background of Chirac’s nominee (given who was doing the nominating, a little caution might have been appropriate). For that lapse alone, Barroso should resign. And he should take the collection of thieves, cronies, timeservers, lightweights and has-beens that he has the gall to call a commission with him. Posted at 07:52 PM HOLLAND 2004 (2) [Andrew Stuttaford] Via the invaluable Zachtei blog “A student of the Dalton Scholengemeenschap in The Hague was beat up after giving a presentation about Islam and the murder of Theo van Gogh, by a group of Moroccans who hadn't even heard the presentation. According to his classmates, they were acting on behalf of a girl who had, and who thought the lecture was insulting. Neither the classmates nor the teacher were able to identify anything offensive in the presentation.” And, one might add, even if they had, that would not have justified this thuggery. Posted at 07:48 PM HOLLAND 2004 [Andrew Stuttaford] ”GEERT WILDERS, the Dutch MP and controversial critic of Islam, has two policemen by his side even when in his high-security parliamentary office in case someone tries to decapitate him. Each day, he does not know where he is going to sleep that night, as he is taken from safe house to safe house in a convoy of armoured cars. He was taken into hiding when police investigating the murder of the film-maker Theo van Gogh on November 2 uncovered a network of radical Muslims with advanced plans to kill Mr Wilders, and other “enemies of Islam”. A video circulating on the internet offered 72 virgins in paradise to any Muslim who beheaded him.” It has come to this. Posted at 07:47 PM 9/11 BILL BATTLE CONTINUES [Jack Fowler] Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. James Sensenbrenner released this statement today on latest chapter in the Capitol Hill battle over 9/11 legislation, and the "hell-bent" desire by the Senate to pass a wimpy bill. Makes you want to scream: "We have put together a bill that still needs some work; thus I am pleased the Speaker will allow the conferees to continue their efforts to produce a bill that improves the security of the American public. This legislation is a response to the problems identified in the 9/11 Commission Report. "A key issue in the negotiations was whether or not drivers licenses should be issued to illegal aliens. Realizing that the 19 9/11 hijackers had 63 validly-issued U.S. drivers licenses, the 9/11 Commission wisely recommended, 'The federal government should set standards for the issuance of birth certificates and sources of identification, such as drivers licenses. Fraud in identification documents is no longer just a problem of theft.' (Report, p. 390) Regrettably, the Senate thus far has been hell-bent on ensuring illegal aliens can receive drivers licenses, regardless of the security concerns. "At the outset, House Republicans said that we would evaluate the merits of the provisions based on whether they enhanced the security of the American people. Unfortunately, the Senate has refused to consider many of the provisions, tagging them as 'extraneous' or 'controversial.' "We must consider these provisions in order to be faithful to those who lost loved ones on 9/11 and to the work of the 9/11 Commission. I will continue to negotiate with the House and Senate conferees to enact a good bill, but not one that fails to learn from the tragedy of 9/11." Posted at 07:45 PM THE NEXT TARGET? [Andrew Stuttaford] From the Daily Telegraph: “Churchgoers risk lung cancer because of unhealthy air caused by candles and incense, researchers say.” The solution, as Antoine Clarke over at Samizdata notes, is obvious: The EU must “immediately ban all church-going for children, impose a tax on adult church-goers, put health warnings on the outsides of all churches….” And, over here, I’d expect Nurse Bloomberg to do the same. Well, mayor, why not? Posted at 07:21 PM I HAVE RETURNED.... [Jonah Goldberg] Cruise was great fun, but exhausting for a hermit like me. Lucy had a grand time. The first panel I was on, included Bernard Lewis and Victor Davis Hanson, which is a bit like having me follow Yo Yo Ma and Itzach Perlman so I can play my kazoo. The second panel was quite fun, though it descended into a fairly intense metaphysical conversation between myself, Derb, Dinesh D'Souza, Ramesh and John O'Sullivan. I thought it was pretty interesting even if I'm not positive I know what it was all about. I think it would probably have been better in the original Greek. One last thing before I retire for the evening: Charles' post about Middlebury. I have several close friends who went there in the late 80s and early 90s. They all said that the PC stuff never really penetrated there. Maybe it's like a tropical disease which dies as it approaches more northerly climes. Nevertheless, having visited a couple dozen campuses in the last couple years, I can attest that the left-wingyness of academy endures. Posted at 06:03 PM Friday, November 19, 2004 T-DAY [KJL] Readers--who have just done it--point out you can order the Turkey Day W for a Thanksgiving centerpiece, but time is limited (one reader said EST tonight, I'm not 100 percent certain)... Posted at 07:13 PM SPECTER'S ENEMIES LIST [KJL] I know you'll be shocked to know some of your NR friends are on it (and, NR). Courtesy of politicspa. Posted at 06:58 PM OPERATION POPCORN [KJL] Take a soldier to the movies. Posted at 06:56 PM HARRY REID [KJL] hearts Scalia for CJ of SCOTUS? Posted at 06:53 PM MIDDLEBURY [Charles Murray] I wonder if the story about the leftist stranglehold in universities is similar to the story about incompetent public schools: we inveigh against the mass (as indeed I do), but the one we happen to know personally isn't all that bad. In my case, I was recently talking to my daughter, a sophomore at Middlebury, about her course in political philosophy. She's now two months into it, and she remarked that she still doesn't have any idea what her professor's politics are. That's not easy for someone teaching political philosophy. In fact, I'm not sure I could pull off that trick for two months myself. And then there was the convocation for her freshman class last year, when Middlebury's President told his incoming students that true diversity in a college isn't measured by skin color, but by the richness and range of intellectual perspectives. That was pretty cool too. So that I'm not misunderstood, I agree that leftist domination in universities is real in the social sciences and humanities, and it is often a problem. We may, however, underestimate the prevalence of professors who act in good faith to keep their politics from spilling over into their classrooms. So I'm sharing some good news to go along with the bad. Posted at 06:49 PM ANOTHER SERIOUS ISSUE [KJL] A reader e-mails: I think it's time that NRO came out on the most important question facing Americans next week. That is, of course -- Cranberry Sauce: Can-shaped or Fresh?I confess to being ashamed of my answer. Posted at 06:43 PM KEEP LOOKING FOR VOTES! [KJL] John Kerry sent out an e-mail to supporters this afternoon that said, among other things, "Regardless of the outcome of this election, once all the votes are counted -- and they will be counted -- we will continue to challenge this administration. This is not a time for Democrats to retreat and accommodate extremists on critical principles -- it is a time to stand firm." Posted at 06:40 PM AL HUNT [KJL] is leaving the WSJ for Bloomberg Posted at 06:37 PM A MORE MANLY [KJL] timewaster. (Also, much more dorky. No princesses here--no offense to princesses, one or two of them must moonlight as dorks.) Posted at 06:34 PM CORRECTION [KJL] Loyola is not in Philly, of course. LaSalle is. Posted at 06:31 PM SORRY [KJL] for the delay in posting. Some computer issues K-Lo is having. Will be better...must be better... Posted at 06:21 PM CHAMBER OF SECRETS (2) [Andrew Stuttaford] French EU Commissioner Barrot's secret? Here is the answer, courtesy of EU Observer. "EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Nigel Farage, a British eurosceptic MEP, caused a furore in the European Parliament on Thursday (18 November) by launching a strong attack on the French Commissioner, Jacques Barrot. Mr Farage, who belongs to the UK Independence Party, said that Mr Barrot should not be allowed to be a commissioner alleging he received an eight month suspended sentence in 2000 for a funding scandal involving his political party...under French law no reference is allowed to be made to the case in public after Mr Barrot came under a presidential amnesty" Hmmm, Interesting (and seemingly backed up by the story linked to here). And who was president of France in 2000? Why, it was Jacques Chirac. Posted at 02:15 PM YEAH... [KJL] ...maybe that time waster works best for the women in the room. Posted at 02:15 PM TIME WASTER [KJL] The K-Lo version of a Jonah tradition. Posted at 02:12 PM TALKING TURKEY [KJL] A regular Corner contributor just told me he has already in his possession the hottest toy of the political season. I want my W./Turkey doll. Who wouldn't? It can be ordered through the NR Book Service. Posted at 01:55 PM CHAMBER OF SECRETS [Andrew Stuttaford] A key aspect of any democratic parliament is the ability of its members to speak openly in its chamber, free from threat of prosecution or other litigation. That's not, apparently, true in the thieves' cabal better known as the EU Parliament. According to the Daily Telegraph, the leader of the (admittedly highly eccentric) UK Independence Party is now in trouble for revealing - in the course of a debate - certain aspects of the record of the new EU Commissioner from France. Of course, there can be some valid reasons for secrecy (principally relating to security) even under parliamentary privilege, but it's still alarming to note that the parliament's president (he's a bit like the speaker) has now ordered the UKIP MEP to retract the remarks under threat of "legal consequences". The demand for 'retraction' seems to suggest that national security was not the problem. So what was? The Daily Telegraph is uncharacteristically cagey. Does anyone out there know? Posted at 01:40 PM ENEMIES [John J. Miller] Our Oldest Enemy is also our newest enemy -- check out this K.I.A. report from Iraq. Posted at 01:32 PM THE UN PUTS THE BOOT IN [Andrew Stuttaford] The organization may be corrupt, malign and useless, but is it too much to expect that the UN will not set out actively to wreck Afghanistan's new democracy? It seems that it is.. Read this report from the Independent and consider its implications: "So alarmed is the UN [by increased opium production in Afghanistan] that it is suggesting a remedy more radical than any that has been put forward before - bringing in US and British forces to fight a drugs war similar to the war on terror. It wants them to destroy farmers' crops on a massive scale before they can be harvested." If there is anything more guaranteed to alienate the locals than that particular bone-headed suggestion, I can't think what it is. As to the wider point, it is only the 'war on drugs' that makes possible the super profits that make opium such a valuable currency for terrorists and other criminals. War against terror or war against drugs? You can't fight both, and I think that I know which one matters most. Posted at 01:25 PM THIS WE BELIEVE [Ramesh Ponnuru] Leon Wieseltier, the literary editor of the New Republic, thinks that in the aftermath of the election liberalism is being caricatured, and condescended to. His apparent remedy is to indulge in some caricaturing of his own: "Perhaps the most odious feature of contemporary conservatism is its equation of success with virtue. In the realm of economics, this long ago resulted in the strange belief in the moral superiority of the wealthy, a vulgar Calvinism according to which money is a proof of merit and riches are a mark of righteousness. . . . It is not the triumphalism of the Republicans that is so distasteful. . . , it is the sanctimony; and this is owed to a further refinement of the Republican worldview, according to which moral values are finally religious values. . . . The good are with God, the bad are without God. And since winners are good and losers are bad, it follows that the winners are with God and the losers are without God. What clarity!" Well, I don't know about you, but Wieseltier has described my views perfectly. It's like the man has a window into my soul! And there's more: "Moreover, the 'faith' that is being praised as the road to political salvation, the Bush ideal of religion, is a zealous ignorance, a complacent renunciation of proof and evidence and logic and argument, as if the techniques of reason were merely liberal tools." All of us conservatives know we can't hold a candle to the reasoning powers of the New Republic. We also know that the most odious feature of contemporary liberalism is, of course, Leon Wieseltier. Posted at 01:17 PM MARINE [Michael Ledeen] I got a lot of anguished emails about Machiavelli and the British soldier who had the chance to kill Hitler in the First World War. I suppose it's hard for people to deal with Machiavelli out of context, and I should have written more, so I apologize for laziness. My point--Machiavelli's point, actually--is that real decisions in real life are almost never easy, and those called upon to make those tough decisions have to be willing to "enter into evil." Sometimes by doing that--as briefly as possible, he implores us--means doing things we know to be morally wrong. I gave the Hitler example because Machiavelli knows, as every grownup thoughtful person knows, that it is also possible to do the morally right thing, and by so doing, we unleash great evil. Life is tough. And the abstract moralists are not a very good guide for leaders, at least not all the time. Obviously I was trying to get people to think more deeply about the Marine in Fallujah. And along those lines, I urge everyone to look at the wonderful remarks by "Baldilocks" on her excellent blog. She reminds us--and many of my correspondents got this wrong--that the Marine did not shoot a PRISONER. He shot an enemy combatant. And his own experience had shown how dangerous such persons were, even--maybe especially--those who appeared severely wounded. Posted at 01:12 PM RE: PHILLY [KJL] Residents are assuring me it's just good advertising to suburban commuters. Here's one e-mail: Would that it were true. Those billboards are advertising to the suburbanites who commute to or through Philly. Most middle-class families (and anyone else uninterested in politics based on race or high taxes) have left Philly in the last decade. (I believe Philly is the only city of America's ten largest to have lost population over that period.) What is left is lots of Democrats, including a huge academic community (UPenn, Villanova, Temple, St. Joseph's, Loyola). Posted at 01:07 PM RE CAMPUS BIAS [Cliff May] From the far left all the way to the center left, commentators are arguing that President Bush should appoint Cabinet members who disagree with him, who don’t share his vision, who aren’t eager to implement his agenda. (For example, David Gergen has an op-ed in today’s New York Times on “the promise and the peril of a cabinet speaking in unison.”) So why is it that these same commentators are not demanding ideological diversity on the campuses? Why don’t they want some young professors who will tell the superannuated hippies and old New Leftists that their vision is wrong, and their agenda outmoded, foolish and destructive? And how about the MSM? Wouldn’t it be nice to have a few editors and producers who disagreed with the weltanschauung of Dan Rather, Peter Jennings, et al? Posted at 01:03 PM THE RIGHT’S PHILLY PRESENCE [KJL ] Have you’all noticed all the conservative billboards in Philadelphia? I was barely paying attention on Amtrak and found three Laura Ingrahams and one Bill Bennett. And, I’m sure I missed some. Arlen Specter aside, maybe NRO should just set up shop in Philly. The roadways certainly give the impression of right-wing brotherly love, most recent elections aside. Posted at 12:38 PM HAVE TURKEY WITH W [KJL] You know I want one. (Seriously, I now need some for next week.) Posted at 11:59 AM SPEAKING OF RALPH NEAS [KJL] Here's his press release re NARAL's Nancy: NEAS LAUDS KEENAN APPOINTMENT TOAnd the word "abortion" appears where...? Posted at 11:58 AM HELPING WOUNDED IRAQ-WAR VETS [KJL] From Fayettville Observer (NC): Hurt Troops Need Clothes, ToiletriesFurther details here Posted at 11:54 AM MICHAEL MOORE HATES AMERICA [KJL] Is on DVD. Read Andrew Leigh’s review of it here. Buy the DVD here. See the site here. See special military price here. Posted at 11:42 AM HMMM [KJL] An e-mail: I must protest. It is not enough that certain, select NROniks get to go off to a Caribbean Cruise. They now also debase themselves by taunting Kathryn in the Corner! The horror! The absolute depravity!ME: Don't flood Lowry (though man, the lineup is starting to tempt me). Just sign up for the NR 50th Anniversary British Isles cruise! Do you really have something better going on this summer? It's got its own pretty tempting lineup. Posted at 11:39 AM "PENTAGRAM" [KJL] Rod, this makes that graffiti story a tad funnier. Posted at 11:34 AM MARINE'S WIFE & UNBORN CHILD [KJL] fight for their lives after senseless shooting in Pennsylvania. Posted at 11:30 AM BAD SCENE [Stanley Kurtz] What can we say about the findings of the studies cited by Tierney? The bottom line is that a bad situation is getting very much worse. Massive imbalance is rapidly becoming near total monopoly. The University of Chicago, so important to conservatives, may be lagging at the rear of this trend, but it’s being dragged along nonetheless, as we’ve seen. I see no easy solution here. The elimination of tenure at least has to be considered. While meant to protect and encourage free discussion, tenure has instead allowed a determined ideological cadre to purge its opponents and take control of the academy. I’m not saying I favor eliminating tenure. But I think it’s time to debate the issue. As the Tierney article points out, David Horowitz and others are pushing for legislative reform via an “Academic Bill of Rights.” I have been supporting HR 3077, a bill that would reform federal subsidies to area studies. Carefully tailored legislative remedies will help. But in the end, nothing big can change until the academy decides to reform itself. Yet the emerging total monopoly of the left looks to make real reform impossible. That leaves only the creation of new colleges (like Ave Maria) or other alternative institutions that offer programs for college students–think tanks for students, so to speak. Perhaps the best solution would be more small programs within universities that are congenial to conservatives–on the model of the Robert George’s Madison program at Princeton. But leftist faculties will do all they can to prevent the emergence of even such small programs. For now, we have to keep exposing the shameful truth about bias in the academy, while hoping that new ideas or new institutions will arise to solve the problem. As the studies show, bad as it is, this situation is getting worse. But at least we’ve now got empirical proof of what every honest person should have known all along. Posted at 11:04 AM BIASED CAMPUS [Stanley Kurtz] Got to NYT very late yesterday, where I finally found John Tierney’s article on bias in the academy. This piece announces the publication of several empirical studies of faculty bias (which I know was briefly mentioned in The Corner, but is worth highlighting). Here are some key excerpts: “...a national survey of more than 1,000 academics, shows that Democratic professors outnumber Republicans by at least seven to one in the humanities and social sciences. That ratio is more than twice as lopsided as it was three decades ago, and it seems quite likely to keep increasing, because younger faculty members are more consistently Democratic than the ones nearing retirement.” A study of voter registration records at two major universities “which included professors from the hard sciences, engineering and professional schools as well as the humanities and social sciences, also found the ratio especially lopsided among the younger professors of assistant or associate rank: 183 Democrats versus 6 Republicans.” These stats are important. But the pathetic rationalizations for this bias by the liberal professors interviewed by Tierney are almost as interesting as the numbers. The conservative profs get the last laugh in this piece, though. Thanks goodness for John Tierney. One item especially caught my attention. The ratio of Democratic to Republican professors ranged from 3 to 1 among economists to 30 to 1 among anthropologists. I’m an anthropologist, and I am not in the least surprised. Posted at 11:01 AM JUST 35 (OR SO) SHOPPING DAYS TILL CHRISTMAS [Jack Fowler] It's hard to figure what day or time it is here on balmy Caribbean. But I do know that Santa is prepping to crowbar himself down the chimney. What will he bring to that special youngster in your life? Another idiotic toy that is broken in five minutes? Or some videogame featuring a busty virtual chick ripping the heart out of a street punk? Hey, how about this as an option: get them a great book -- of the world's best children's literature? You know, the kind of gift that will last (and influence!) a lifetime, and that needs no joystick or battery, and that kills no brain cells? We have a number of special offers for our acclaimed children's titles, one of which is that when you buy one copy of Volume Two of The National Review Treasury of Classic Children's Literature (an absolutely super book) you can get additional copies for half price -- and we pay for (U.S. Postal) shipping, and we send along a FREE copy of L. Frank Baum's classic Queen Zixi of Ix (bottoms up Daniel!). If your kids or grandkids don't have these books, you're shortchanging them something terrible. So get on the stick before Saint Nick is airborne -- you can order these great books here. Merry Cruisemas! Posted at 10:56 AM THAT OL' DEBBIL RUMSFELD [Rod Dreher] A reader in the Carolinas writes: Yesterday, local radio news reported on some [politically motivated (?)] vandalism against a Baptist church. The sheriff deputy quoted in the report said, "We think this is the work of juveniles because of the spray-painted satanic words and Pentagons." Posted at 10:47 AM NPR'S PRO-INSURGENT PR [Tim Graham] The Media Research Center's man in Milwaukee notes National Public Radio is demonstrating a classic weakness on the front of "peace" -- offering free propaganda time to supporters of the Iraqi insurgency, entertaining without question the idea that America is a ruthless predator. On the November 17 All Things Considered, they did a story suggesting that one could be for both "peace" and the Iraqi insurgents. Reporter Emily Harris profiled Fallujah resident Mohammed Abdullah, who claims U.S. troops are committing "the new genocide" in his city. The report centers on how Abdullah was invited to Rome, in Harris's words, as "a representative of a human-rights-and-democracy organization." She concludes by humanizing Abdullah laughing in a phone conversation with his family, taking video pictures of birds on the piazza with the same camera "he's used to record ruined houses and dead bodies after U.S. bombings in Fallujah." It's amazingly one-sided, with no need for an American rebuttal. PS: If you try to listen to the story, note that NPR.org forces you to see and hear an ad for Starbucks. At least something about this report will upset liberals. Posted at 10:44 AM SOHO SOUTH [Rick Brookhiser] City Desk has taken itself to a new city. While my NR colleagues are on the bounding main, I wanted a place where George W. Bush and John Kerry were only rumors, and where Alexander Hamilton was unknown. Buenos Aires fit the bill. My hotel (the Faena) is a blend of belle epoque and post modern--mirrors, velvet, armoires with feet, armrests with swan heads, sommeliers with shaved heads. Beef is the food of choice here--vegans would be very unhappy here. Mayor Bloomberg will be unhappy to know that people can smoke. If I can, I will link to a picture of restaurant decorated with white unicorn heads. Posted at 10:41 AM IS THERE A RIGHT TO CHOOSE [KJL] to be beaten? Posted at 10:35 AM RE: NARAL [KJL] And, uh, front page of the WashPost? Oh, yeah, I guess that is right. Since she and Ralph Neas will be facing off with the titan Senate Judiciary chair on judges... Posted at 10:32 AM NANCY NARAL [Tim Graham] Washington Post reporter Evelyn Nieves (a known liberal quantity) profiles Nancy Keenan -- Montana Democrat, lapsed Catholic, and D.C. lobbyist for People for the American Way --in her new role as the leader of NARAL Pro-Choice America. Nieves can't seem to locate a liberal label anywhere. There are four references to "conservatives," including an unwieldy use of "the antiabortion conservative religious right" (as opposed to the liberal religiious right?) but apparently NARAL-PCA is just about "reproductive rights for women," not lifestyle liberalism. Aside from the labeling disparity, and the light talk of Keenan being considered for excommunication, the weirdest part is the reporter's biased assumption that "Polls have shown that a majority of Americans favor keeping abortion legal," but then how do pro-life conservatives keep getting elected? A more accurate report would say polls show a majority of Americans support abortion remaining legal in some form, but a majority of Americans also support more restrictions on abortion. A less biased reporter would allow someone to note that NARAL-PCA fights any and all abortion restrictions, including partial-birth abortion, including Laci and Conner's Law, including the notion that infants mistakenly born alive in an abortion have rights. That would seem to imply the label they never use: "pro-abortion." Posted at 10:29 AM ANNAN OUTTA THERE? [KJL] Evidently there is a no-confidence vote in the works at the United Nations. Posted at 10:23 AM TERRIBLE STORY--ON SO MANY LEVELS [KJL] From California: A teenager shoots his pregnant girlfriend when she goes to have an abortion. The girl is now paralyzed. He is convicted of aasult with a deadly weapon--of the girlfriend. The prosecutors did not seek a charge against the baby he killed in the process because the girl wanted the baby dead. Posted at 10:10 AM “UNACCEPTABLE” [KJL ] Nancy Pelosi, among other Dems yesterday, say that it is “unacceptable” (I'm looking at yesterday's Roll Call still) to allow and indicted congressman serve in a leadership position. Did they feel that way about a certain Democratic president not so long ago? Posted at 10:06 AM GET ME AN INTERN NOW [KJL] I need to erase anything nice I've ever said about the Derb. Though, geez, I'm about ready to sign up for the British cruise (which is something, considering, I don't leave 215 Lexington Avenue. Posted at 09:53 AM DE PROFUNDIS [John Derbyshire] This is Derb reporting from somewhere in the Caribbean. We NR staffers assigned to the cruise are working our tails off here, holding panel discussions, bonding with readers and fans, keeping the flag of conservatism flying in foreign seas. It's gruelling -- hard work, hard work, to quote someone or other -- but we can handle it. Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Wheeeeeeeee! (Yeah, sorry, Kathryn -- it took me 6 days to figure out how to send e-mail from here. *Really* tricky internet setup on this ship. Ha ha ha ha ha ha!) Posted at 09:50 AM DELAY [KJL ] I think I disagree with John Podhoretz this morning. I do agree with him a bit: that it all looks bad, and that's how people are seeing it, as my normal-people focus grouping overwhelming shows. The Tom DeLay rule change sounds terrible. To people hearing about it on the evening news last night, it sounded like the GOP is trying to protect a criminal. But, the new rule makes sense, it seems to me. As Roll Call explained it yesterday, “Under the new Republican guidelines, if a leader or chairman is indicted on a felony charge, the Steering Committee must meet within 30 days and make a recommendation to the full Conference on whether the lawmaker should be removed from his position.” That protects against partisan witch hunts in courts to oust the like of a DeLay (who a Texas District Attorney wants to do in, seemingly obviously). Perhaps that’s the way the rule should have been written when it was born, in Rostenkwski days. But I don’t get all upset at rules changing. (Like seniority and the Jud Cmte, but we won’t go there.) And, odds are, criminals aren’t going to stay in leadership positions. Besides the weight of the world weighing in on the House if they tried to keep an obvious felon in leadership, the new rule, as Roll Call noted, “requires a leader or chairman who has been convicted of a felony to immediately step down, a provision that did not exist in the previous rules.” Posted at 09:39 AM "IT IS NOT ALL DEATH AND DESTRUCTION" [KJL] Iraq reality check: The Chaldean archbishop of Kirkuk criticized Western media "misinformation" about his country and insisted that Iraqis are looking forward to elections "because they will be useful for national unity." Posted at 08:48 AM SPAIN [KJL] re-arrests an al Jazeera reporter for al Qaeda ties. Posted at 08:46 AM SPECTER [KJL] was just kidding. Posted at 08:41 AM REJECT THE KYOTOIST WRECKERS [Andrew Stuttaford] Despite Russia's recent decision to sign up to Kyoto (a decision only taken as a result of EU bullying and bribery) Putin's economic adviser, Andrei Illarionov, does not seem altogether impressed by Al Gore's favourite treaty: "The Kyoto protocol requires a supranational bureaucratic monster in charge of rationing emissions and, therefore, economic activities. The Kyotoist system of quota allocation, mandatory restrictions and harsh penalties will be a sort of international Gosplan, a system to rival the former Soviet Union's. The majority of humankind does not accept this system, despite claims of worldwide support. Even with Russia's ratification, 75 per cent of the world's CO2 is emitted by, 68 per cent of the world's GDP is produced in, and 89 per cent of the world's population live in countries that are not handcuffed by Kyoto's restrictions. Like fascism and communism, Kyotoism is an attack on basic human freedoms behind a smokescreen of propaganda. Like those ideologies of human hatred, it will be exposed and defeated." Wise words, and the welcome arrival of a splendid, if vaguely Bolshevik-sounding, new insult: "Kyotoism." A noun, and an adjective ("Kyotoist"), to savour. Thanks, Andrei! Posted at 08:21 AM REVIEWER REVIEWED [John J. Miller] It seems that within a few hours of every TV appearance I make on behalf of Our Oldest Enemy, some nitwit posts a "customer review" on Amazon.com in which he expresses dismay that anybody would even think to criticize France. These "reviewers" aren't always so honest as this one -- who at least says he hasn't read the book -- but they are usually about this ignorant: "I must admit outright that I have not read this book, but have watched an interview with the author about the book and his beliefs about France. Being a history major in college I am outraged at his dimissal of France as an enemy and his manipulations of the facts about history. It seems strange that France has been such an enemy over the years since we have never been to war against them..." This is one thing people who don't want to like my book love to say: We've never been to war with France. Well, that's just not true. There was, for instance, the Quasi War -- America's first war following the ratification of the Constitution. Also, American GIs battled the soldiers of Vichy France in North Africa. And there were constant threats of war, during the Napoloenic era, during Andrew Jackson's presidency, and during the Civil War period. I could go on and on and on about this. And if you want to learn about it, for crying out loud read the book! Posted at 08:08 AM HAVING A GREAT TIME, WISH YOU WERE HERE [Jack Fowler] Excrutiatingly busy/rewarding/fun day yesterday on the Zuiderdam. Seminars starring Bernard Lewis, VDH, Jay, Jonah, John Hillen, John O'Sullivan, Michelle Malkin, Dinesh D'Souza (in same room at same time with Ramesh Ponnuru , so the conspiracy theory that they're the same person is kaput) -- the crowd OD'ed on brilliance. Then a screening of the forthcoming Walden Media film, I Am David, more about which when I return to NYC, but suffice it to say the NR masses loved it. Not too long later, up pool-side there was a smoker. Geez Loueeze, I can't take much more -- life's not supposed to be this fun! Oh yeah -- on top of all this we're being flooded with orders for the next trip to the British Isles in July '05; go to www.nrcruise.com to find out more about that looming humdinger. Later, landlubbers. Posted at 07:54 AM DELAY ACCUSER GETS SLAPPED [KJL] House Ethics Committee rebukes Chris Bell. Posted at 05:53 AM I'M. SO. CONFUSED. [KJL] Al Qaeda in Iraq? But how? I thought there was no connection....oh, I forgot, we brought them all there. Posted at 05:38 AM Thursday, November 18, 2004 SEN. CORNYN ON SPECTER FIGHT [KJL] From the Senate floor today: And I want to say something to my constituents and the people who may be listening who have contacted my office in very sincere concern for what they have seen played out here on the Senate floor and in the judicial confirmation process. I want to say to all of them, I appreciate your passion. I appreciate your concern. I appreciate your interest in the instruments of the government that ultimately the people of this country control. And we are going to need the involvement, the attention, the passion of all of the people.Translation: They heard you. This is just one battle in a larger fight, and some good things came of it. And it's just warm up for much uglier battles to come. Posted at 07:19 PM BY THE WAY [KJL] There's some important stuff in that Specter statement. Those Judicary Committee Republicans did some real work: --"I have already registered my opposition to the Democrats' filibusters with 17 floor statements and will use my best efforts to stop any future filibusters. It is my hope and expectation that we can avoid future filibusters and judicial gridlock with a 55-45 Republican majority and election results demonstrating voter dissatisfaction with Democratic filibusters. If a rule change is necessary to avoid filibusters, there are relevant recent precedents to secure rule changes with 51 votes." And, important for FMA supporters: --"I have long objected to the tactic used in bottling up civil rights legislation in the Judiciary Committee when it should have gone to the floor for an up-or-down vote. Accordingly I would not support committee action to bottle up legislation or a constitutional amendment, even one which I personally opposed, reserving my own position for the floor." Those committments would not have been made without people calling in and e-mailing. Good job, folks. Posted at 06:12 PM I WAS BETTER THAN W. ON TERROR [Michael Graham] Here's the verbatim from Bill Clinton's ABC interview, airing tonight: "We had 9/11 style threats for the millennium and teh extent of our preparations and the work we did, and number of terrorists we brought to justice...the twenty Al Qaeda cells we broke up...if you look at all that and the fact that we apparently still came closer to getting Bin Laden than anybody has since, even though they had a lot more options, military options than we had, I feel, I wish I had gotten him." The reference to coming closer to getting Osama is particularly offensive given that Clinton has three opportunities to capture or kill him and declined all three times. Uh, Mr. Clinton, that's not a terror-fighting success. That's a failure. Posted at 06:05 PM CHICAGO & RELIGION [Stanley Kurtz] For more on the political tone of the University of Chicago Divinity School, and the relative isolation of Jean Elshtain, go here, here, and here. Posted at 06:01 PM OUR EUROPEAN BETTERS [KJL] Just got an interesting e-mail from a reader: Yesterday the national soccer teams of England and Spain met in Madrid. England has several black players. Throughout the match the Spanish fans in, full voice and in vast numbers, made monkey noises every time a black player on the English team touched the ball. To those not familiar with European soccer this is a shock but the conduct is quite common in many cities in Europe during matches. It is so common that the European Football Association has a campaign in place to try and stop the practice. If you take a look at today's Guardian it has several accounts of the racist conduct during the match. Posted at 05:58 PM ONE MORE SPY STORY [Cliff May] From another good reader: In the days of Wild Bill Donavan there was very little bureaucracy; just enough analytical and clerical staff to get the job done. Further, every task taken on was executed with the approval of, and in support of the President and his policies. OSS had many successes in those days and very few failures. Also, they never "spoke out of school". Posted at 05:48 PM SPY STORY [Cliff May] From a reader of my Scripps column on what’s wrong at the CIA and State: clifford...when i was in Cambodia in the mid-seventies, an 'attache' at the embassy approached me for info on what was going on out in the outlying towns...Battambang, Seam Riap and other places. i flew DC3's for a civilian airline hauling cargo, but why he asked ME, i didn't know until i talked to the chief pilot. he said those types were AFRAID to go out into the field, and needed grist for their reports back to Langley. i don't think it has EVER CHANGED IN THE LAST THIRTY YEARS. if you want to make it in the agency or state dept, i think you have to go along to get a leg up. you got 'em pegged. Posted at 05:46 PM WHY LABOR UNIONS LOSE MEMBERS [Jim Boulet] Richard "Skip" Daly, business manager of the Laborers, Hod Carriers, Cement Workers and Miners Local Union 169, complains to The Nation: They voted for a Republican who's got the biggest deficit spending ever; they voted against all of their self-interest. And the issue that came out in exit polling was "we voted on the moral values." What that says to me is, these people believe it's more important than their family's well-being that we don't have abortion. And, to me, that is an intolerance that we have not experienced in this country since we put into insignificance the Ku Klux Klan.Union leaders now think they have a right to impose the moral values of Massachusetts upon their red state members. Union membership continues to decline. There is a connection. The student protesters of the 60's and 70's didn't all go to law school. Some joined the staffs of major labor unions. Soon, the unions funded by the dues of pro-American hard hats were pushing a McGovernite foreign policy abroad and political correctness at home. The hard hats lost interest. Wonder why? Posted at 05:39 PM REVOLTING, BUT IMPRESSIVE [Andrew Stuttaford] "Not a burger for tree-huggers." Posted at 05:34 PM GROUPTHINK WATCH [Andrew Stuttaford] From an article in the New York Times reporting the stunning fact that Republicans are "outnumbered in academia" (who knew?): One theory for the scarcity of Republican professors is that conservatives are simply not that interested in academic careers. A Democrat on the Berkeley faculty, George P. Lakoff, who teaches linguistics and is the author of "Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think," said that liberals choose academic fields that fit their world views. "Unlike conservatives," he said, "they believe in working for the public good and social justice, as well as knowledge and art for their own sake, which are what the humanities and social sciences are about." Somewhere, deep in the shallow, shallow mind of George P. Lakoff, ignorance and pomposity are fighting for control of his ideas. It remains unclear which will win. Posted at 05:30 PM GORE PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY [KJL] Weirder things have happened, I'm sure. Posted at 04:52 PM "YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO DIE" [KJL] Citizen Smash's rules of engagement. Posted at 04:44 PM WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE!? [Jonah Goldberg] Should you get tired of emailing Specter's office...From a reader: Jonah... Posted at 04:36 PM PELOSI BLAMES CATHOLICS [KJL] From Roll Call: You gotta blame somebody when your party loses the White House, the Senate and the House. So why not blame the Catholics? Posted at 04:33 PM SISTER MARY FOB [KJL] AP, from the Clinton Library opening: "Wet bleachers and lengthy security lines earlier in the day did little to squelch the enthusiasm of thousands waiting to attend. Sister Judith Dalesandro was among four nuns who arrived from a Roman Catholic convent in Jonesboro. Posted at 04:27 PM TOMORROW & SAT. IN DC [KJL] The JPII Center by CUA is holding a great-sounding seminar on the culture of law, which includes Cardinal Dulles and (be still my heart) Russell Hittinger (former K-Lo prof). Details here. Posted at 04:21 PM IN NYC & LOOKING FOR SOMETHING TO DO TONIGHT? [KJL] The New York Young Republicans have some things planned...see here. Posted at 04:18 PM SORRY [KJL] for The Corner slowness. The Specter thing was in the air. Clinton was on TV. I went out for wine. It was time. Posted at 04:16 PM OH, BROTHER [KJL] Did you e-mail Congress urging that Specter not be made chairman? This, evidently, is what CNN thinks of you. Posted at 04:09 PM RE: LIBRARIES [KJL] I've gotten a few of these--they are evidently partially publicly funded, which, as this e-mailer points out, makes sense: My admittedly rudimentary understanding of presidential libraries is that only the Archives aspect of the library is, in fact, publicly supported. For these libraries to be a legitimate destination for researchers, and any good at all, they incorporate the official government documents from the administration, and the archivests that go along with that. I don't think we would want the nation's archives doled out to a private group for whatever they might do with them. Posted at 04:06 PM QUICK HEARINGS AND EARLY COMMITTEE VOTES [KJL] on nominees approved by Specter. Sigh. But I think better there was a debate than there wasn't. Posted at 03:53 PM WILL THEY BE BASED ON SCOTTISH LAW? [KJL] AP: Sen. Arlen Specter, a Republican moderate seeking a key chairmanship in a party of conservatives, is drafting a written commitment of quick hearings and votes on President Bush's judicial nominees regardless of their views on abortion, party sources said Thursday. Memo to AP Stylebook Editor: He is a liberal, not a mod. Posted at 12:52 PM MEMO TO SPIES AND DIPLOMATS [Cliff May] My Scripps Howard column this week – a longer version of The Corner item I wrote a few days earlier. Posted at 12:42 PM MARINE IN FALLUJAH [Mackubin Thomas Owens] I am working on something about the shooting incident in Fallujah involving a Marine. But I could never do a better job than the young Marine who sent this e-mail to his family after the incident. Killing a prisoner in cold blood is one thing. Dealing with an adversary who does not recognize “the law of land warfare” is something else. This is an unfortunate incident but it is no war crime. The e-mail: This is one story of many that people normally don't hear, and one that everyone does. Posted at 12:35 PM PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES [KJL] Couldn't/Shouldn't they be privately funded? Especially since they get spun/built by the ex-admin? Posted at 12:35 PM PATRICK RUFFINI [Ramesh Ponnuru] back from a stint at the Bush campaign, is blogging again Posted at 12:29 PM LAST THING ON MY MARINES [KJL] They gave me a t-shirt--a rocking on, at that--"Pain is weakness leaving the body." Jonah's Non-Marine Military Guy is not going to like to hear that. The Marine Buying Off of K-Lo continues. Posted at 12:26 PM RE: MARINES [KJL] I am also inspired to reach out more. Besides the folks among the Marines I met with this morning who asked about my Specter obsession and other inside things, there were more than a few who wanted a map to the blogosphere--we have miles to go yet! Before my colleagues and I meet Dan Rather's salary, too!!! Posted at 12:11 PM MARINES [KJL] Got back a few ago from speaking to a Marine media-training seminar here in NYC. Humbling to know men and women fighting for freedom are reading us, can use our help, and are thanking us. God bless every last one of you--all branches. Posted at 12:06 PM THAT'S AN ANGLE [KJL] An e-mail: People like me, who sit at a computer all days long, love the digital version, because we can read it at work and still look as if we're doing something. Posted at 12:03 PM DOH! [KJL] I misspoke--that was Washington state's first count, completed at long last (i.e. not a recount). Posted at 11:43 AM TAX REFORM [Ramesh Ponnuru] I'd been hearing, even before the election, that the administration was looking at getting rid of the deduction for state and local taxes as part of its tax-reform package. I'm all for the policy: Why should low-tax states subsidize high-tax ones? Why should the federal government encourage states to have high taxes? But didn't tax reformers get their heads handed to them over this precise issue in 1985-86? Of course, there were more New York Republicans then to worry about. The administration is also apparently looking at taxing employer-provided health insurance. Again, a good policy: that tax break has done a lot of damage to health-care markets over the years. And anyone who wants to get rid of the alternative minimum tax without swelling the deficit has to look at taxing health insurance: It's one of the few tax breaks that can generate the necessary funds. But again, there are obvious political risks here. Posted at 11:40 AM WHERE'S COSMO? [Jonah Goldberg] Everyone keeps asking me if Cosmo came on the cruise. Alas, no. Cosmo is not a sea-faring beast. But it's nice so many folks care. I should probably just say, "Oh, he's on the poop deck" and walk away. Lil Lucy on the other hand is here and once again proves to be an adept cruiser. She loves the buffet, loves the pool and has no sea sickness issues whatsoever. Her mother is a different case, alas. Posted at 10:49 AM AND HE DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMEN, EITHER [Michael Graham] "[There's] not any example of where I ever disgraced this country publicly. I made a terrible public-personal mistake, but I paid for it, many times over. And in spite of it all, you don't have any example where I ever lied to the American people about my job, where I ever let the American people down."--Bill Clinton, yesterday. And not to re-debate the definition of "is," but does anyone know the etymology of the phrase "public-personal mistake?" Bill Safire--a little help? Posted at 09:09 AM WHY WE LOVE BILL CLINTON [Michael Graham] When it comes to Bill Clinton, some things never change. Today's Washington Post lead editorial is a reminder that the Clinton Library opening today was paid for, in part, by former-wanted-fugitive-turned-pardoned-millionaire Marc Rich. The library cost $165 million to build, and as the WaPo notes, "we still don't know the sources of much of that money." If you haven't read "Legacy" yet, this would be a good week to pick up a copy. The fact that President Clinton still can't (or won't) make a full disclosure of his actions while in office, and that his behavior has tainted even something as benign as a library, is the perfect memorial to his presidency. Posted at 09:03 AM MESA MISTAKE [Stanley Kurtz] Here’s a remarkable ad from MESA, the Middle East Studies Association. According to this ad, MESA publications will not accept advertising “from defense and intelligence related agencies from any government.” So let’s get this straight. MESA’s members request and benefit from millions of dollars in federal subsidies under Title VI of the Higher Education Act. Higher education lobbyists have no problem telling Congress that our national security needs mandate ever higher subsidies. And Congress duly appropriates this money in an effort to stem the shortage of Arabic translators and area studies experts in our defense and intelligence agencies. Yet while taking this money on the pretext that it contributes to our national security, MESA members prohibit our defense and intelligence agencies from advertising in their publications. Then they try to pretend that they’re keeping out all defense and intelligence agencies, when it’s obviously the American government they’re trying to exclude. The public is getting taken to the cleaners by these professors. It’s time to wise up and reform Title VI. Posted at 09:00 AM RELIGION AT UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO [Stanley Kurtz] The mail from yesterday’s posts on the University of Chicago seemed to center around the problems of the elephant and the glass. How you feel about the direction of the university depends a lot on which part of the elephant you’re touching. To libertarian leaning economists, the elephant feels pretty conservative. In many of the other social sciences, the elephant seems fairly uniformly leftist. Of course, the same is true at many universities. Then there’s the glass half full/half empty problem. One correspondent pointed to Jean Bethke Elshtain at the Divinity School as evidence that conservative scholars have a real presence at Chicago. A couple of other correspondent’s bemoaned the Divinity school as a place where actual believers are isolated and put upon by progressive skeptics. One of these pointed to Elshtain as the exception that proves the rule, arguing that she is in some respects marginalized. Here’s an interesting letter from a religious student with both an upside and a downside: “I completed an MA in social sciences at Chicago last year. If it's not enemy territory, I don't know what is. None of my friends were practicing any religion. Most were atheist or agnostic. Many were staunch followers of Saskia Sassen- in fact, she was their raison d'etre there. I can count the number of conservatives in my cohort on one hand. I think it was at a Paul Griffiths lecture that I realized something was deeply awry. A former U of C prof, now at UIC, Griffiths was speaking at the Div School on the benefit of having faith when teaching about... faith. The reaction was spectacular. As former colleagues could only spittle their disgust for this convert (he somehow found faith there and became a Catholic), he deftly handled them much as I would imagine C.S. Lewis handling atheists after a reading of Mere Christianity. There were walkouts. At the end of the year, one administrator whispered her faith to me, hoping I didn't deride her. When I told her I'm a practicing Catholic, she rejoiced, and then told me her boss always teased her about her "superstitions." I found one bright spot: the Catholic campus ministry, the Calvert House, run by Fr. Mike Yakaitis. A man with his theology doctorate, he can intellectually run with the big dogs. He's unusually (for a university) orthodox, which has won a following: he had to expand beyond his normal four masses a weekend to six this year, with an incredible freshman turnout. Not all hope is lost.” Posted at 08:57 AM ISRAEL KILLED ARAFAT [KJL] Rumors ain't gonna die. Posted at 08:35 AM DEATH PENALTY FOR BREAKING FAST? [KJL] From Iran Posted at 08:30 AM MILITARY & THE NET [KJL] One e-mail from a major: 1. Our professional military is extremely "wired". Staff officers are beginning to make use of the internet the way guys my age made use of our canteens.And another, which breaks your heart in parts: Greetings K-LO!!! I served in the Sunni Triangle from July '03 untill April '04 with the Army Guard. I always knew the media was biased in the past, but it really slaps you in the face when you witness it firsthand. Let's get this straight: 1)Saddam was evil. 2)Iraqis lived in fear and with constant torture under Saddam. 3)Millions of Iraqis are incredibly grateful to the U.S. for removing Saddam. 4)Now those millions are working their butts off, and risking their lives to build a decent, modern society. These are all widely documented facts that I personally know to be true from my own experience. And yet, since I've gotten home, I am really shocked at how many people are completely unaware of these things. (maybe it's because I live in a blue state; MN) It disgusts me how many people honestly seem to think Saddam wasn't a big deal, or that we are killing more Iraqis then Saddam ever did. Many assume that since I was "Backdoor Drafted" through the Guard that I would not be proud of my service or the things we are accomplishing. How wrong they are. Actually meeting, and working with Iraqis convinces me more then anything else that they honestly are just normal human beings who have the capacity for peaceful governance, and prosperous industry like anyone else. Iraqi families DO deeply grieve for the million-plus that were murdered, tortured, or raped under Saddam's rule. It is wrong that our media so callously ignores that grief. There is such a huge contrast between actually being among a people,many of whom are missing limbs,or are covered in whip lashes, and yet have such a look of renewed hope and passion as they line up to volunteer to work for the coalition, compared to the medias' portrayal of Iraqis as bitter, and angry with Americans for upsetting their "security under Saddam". The contrast can literally make you sick. It has been my belief since I've returned home that the media really is our true adversary in Iraq. I'll support that statement: everyone admits that the terrorists in Iraq are not a serious military force, and that they simply don't have the strength to incur even a single military defeat on our forces. The only way they can win is through a political victory. They can win political victories by either forcing Iraq into sectarian civil war (which looks more unlikely with each passing day), or by the media's constant drumbeat of defeatism, and pessimism convincing a large enough portion of the U.S. that we are failing, forcing a premature evacuation. It is clear to me that the media's influence was by far the bigger of the two threats. However, I'm elated that our recent election has proven that the media has failed to persuade a majority of Americans into defeatism. This gives me true hope for the future, both in Iraq, and in America. Now, regardless of the fact that my friends and family seem to think I've been brainwashed by the military, and am secretly a paid employee of Haliburton, I can be happy about the direction our country is headed in, and proud of my service in Iraq. (By the way, I love the fact that they think I was "brainwashed", so much so that I carry a card in my wallet that proclaims me an Official Member of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy!!) Well, thanks for everything you guys are doing, and keep up the good work! You keep writing it, I'll keep reading it!!! Posted at 08:28 AM PEGGY NOONAN [KJL] liked your Moneypenny line, Cliff. Posted at 08:10 AM I CAN TAKE A SUBTLE MESSAGE [KJL] Peggy Noonan says "Ssssshhhhhhhh." Peggy writes, "Conservatives have been angry with him for a long time and for good reason. They have expressed their unhappiness. They have made their point. Mr. Specter has been chastened and warned; the leadership of his party told him to fight for himself. He knows the Republican Party will expect him to support the nomination of judges free of a Roe v. Wade litmus test, or any litmus test, including a religious test. Many believe, and with reason, that a practicing Catholic isn't allowed to be a federal judge in America anymore. Mr. Specter will have to be more open-minded, more supportive, than he's been in the past. But he looks like a man who got the message, doesn't he? " I agree, definitely, that he will probably be chairman if no further screw-ups on his part. And I take a chastened Chairman Specter as a partial victory for conservatism--but emphasis on partial. That said, conservatives, I think do have to be realistic. Specter is who he is, and the White House would be freer to be bolded, conservatively speaking, without him. That's just reality. One should not pretend otherwise. We would be better off if he were not chairman. That's reality, too, methinks. Posted at 08:07 AM SPEAKING OF [KJL] Geraghty is back from Rome. Posted at 07:27 AM JUDE LAW PLAYING JOHN KERRY? [KJL] I keep thinking the movie Closer must be a movie about John Kerry. Only closer Kerry Spot reader will find that lamely funny. Jim Geraghty is reading this in a LOL fit. Posted at 07:27 AM NO-FAST-FORWARD BILL [KJL] This seems insane, and you can blame ARLEN SPECTER. (I'm not obssessed. I'm not.) Posted at 07:22 AM "I LOVE MY DOG/ HIS PADDED PAWS/ AT CHRISTMAS HE'S MY/ SANTA CLAUS." [KJL] It's our Poet Laurete! Where's Derb when you need him? OH, on the NR Cruise. (You can still sign up for the next one--conservatives invade Europe!!) Posted at 07:21 AM GET PICKED FOR SECSTATE... [KJL] ...have people talk about your uterus. Posted at 07:15 AM AFTER I SUBSCRIBE TO NR [KJL] where should I put my money? Posted at 07:12 AM SO MY PLAN [KJL] was to earn a killer Christmas bonus in subscription solds while others were on the NR cruise this week--that NRO longtime faithful would overwhelm us with signing up for the print magazine while everyone was on the cruise that I would wipe the floor with any money made on the cruise. Yeah, right. Not really there yet. (Though THANK YOU to those who have signed up in recent days!) Anyone want to help K-Lo here? I'm kidding about the bonus and commission stuff--you have heard by now we're not a profit-making engine here, we're a cause, we've got a mission. And integral to that mission is brining you round the clock commentary (ok, a little slower this week!) on NRO, which NR has invested in, with wisdom, but not without sacrifices--financial and otherwise. Subscribing to the print edition--a completely different product, I should remind you, very little overlap is a way for you to financially support the whole NR enterprise, and get something in return--fortnightly, in your snail-mail box. (Sign up here.) And, of course, if you can't fit another bloody thing into your snail-mailbox, there's NR Digital, the no-trees-killed version of the print magazine. You are missing regular visits from MArk Steyn, Rob Long, Rick Brookhiser, John Derbyshire, and many more, if you are not a subscriber. Posted at 06:52 AM P.O.Y. PONDERING [Tim Graham] Reuters is acting as Time's publicity agent on the Person of the Year selection process, noting in a story that their POY-picking panel includes "Time commentator Andrew Sullivan, NBC News anchor Brian Williams, activist Rev. Al Sharpton, Alessandra Stanley, television critic for The New York Times, and FBI agent Coleen Rowley, one of the 2002 Persons of the Year." Most of those are yes, Kerry-loving media liberals (this year including Sullivan), but...Al Sharpton? How on Earth does everyone have to include this guy in their little plans? Is he really an objective journalist at heart? No. He's still a Tawana-fraud-pushing, violence-urging, racial-ambulance-chasing embarrassment. Time should try a more reputable POY judge -- Anna Nicole Smith, or the host of "Fear Factor," or someone responsible for messing up the flu vaccine. But the most amazing sentence in the Reuters story is this one, summarizing potential POYs Mel Gibson and Michael Moore: "Gibson was proposed for directing 'The Passion of the Christ,' a controversial film seen by many as anti-Semitic. Moore made 'Fahrenheit 9/11,' a film highly critical of the Bush administration which was a huge box office hit." The real spit take in this sentence is that "Passion" was three times as huge as "Fahrenheit." So it really could be turned around this way: "Moore was proposed for making 'Fahrenheit 9/11,' a controversial film seen by many as anti-American. Gibson made 'The Passion of the Christ,' a film highly critical of the human sinner, which was a huge box office hit." Posted at 06:34 AM DON'T KILL THE MESSENGER [KJL] Powerline is defending that NBC reporter who started the Marine business (who is being condemned in the blogosphere). I haven't had a chance to read it all but looks worth reading and clicking. Posted at 06:32 AM 261 VOTES [KJL] The Washington governor's race has been recounted and the Republican won by a whole 261 votes. Posted at 06:24 AM RE: SALVATION ARMY [KJL] I know Jay Nordlinger had a bad experience here in NYC, but I've been impressed with the Salvation Army--on the ground within minutes on 9/11 at what would become known as "Ground Zero," and providing comfort to folks elsewhere who would be stranded wherever their plane was grounded to, among other things. (I wrote about it some here.) They've been called "The Most Effective Irganization in the U.S." and, well, I don't find the bells annoying. Actually, more like the sound puts the whole Christmas thing in better perspective as you are being pushed while you're all fighting for the last Limbo Elmo. (I know, so last season, right? I like Elmo, leave it alone.) Posted at 06:17 AM TARGET & BEST BUY [KJL] ban the Salvation Army's red kettles. Posted at 06:07 AM CATHOLIC POL REPORT [KJL] is here. Gave the wrong link last night. Mea culpa. Posted at 05:50 AM NRO TV TODAY [KJL] John J. Miller is scheduled to appear on the 700 Club today, airing at 10:00 am and repeating at 11:00 pm on the ABC Family channel. He's going to let you know what he really thinks about France. He has a book out on the topic, you might have heard... Posted at 05:44 AM I HOPE YOU ARE SITTING [KJL] Breaking news: "Republicans Are Outnumbered in Academia" Posted at 05:41 AM Wednesday, November 17, 2004 BISHOPS UPDATE [KJL] They did wind up releasing the Catholic pol report before the close of the meeting today. Posted at 07:50 PM "SOMEBODY PLAYING POSSUM JUMPED UP AND SHOT HIM" [KJL] Belmot CLub puts the Marine incident in perspective. Posted at 07:48 PM ISN’T IT CURIOUS? [Cliff May] The MSM is going on and on about President Bush filling his Cabinet with people who “agree with him” – that is to say people who share his vision and are eager to implement his agenda. Instead, they say, he should be hiring people who disagree with him, people with different visions and other agendas. This is particularly curious coming from the MSM (“mainstream media” for those who don’t speak blogian). Why? Because the publishers and seniors editors of the complaining publications -- do they hire people who disagree with them? Do they hire conservatives and evangelicals and other such characters as editors and reporters? No, of course they don’t. And they never would. Not for all the chardonnay in France. Posted at 06:47 PM GOOD QUESTION [KJL] "When Jon Kyl, Jeff Sessions or John Cornyn would make a great chairman, why in the world would Republicans take the great risk of trusting Specter?" Posted at 06:42 PM CORNYN ON SPECTER [KJL] Reuters: "We need some sort of public confirmation of Senator Specter's positions," said Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican and a member of the Judiciary Committee. Posted at 06:40 PM "DON'T KNOW MUCH...BUT I KNOW I HATE YOU," RONDSTADT SINGS... [KJL] Singer Ronstadt says of Bush's reelection: "It’s like Germany, before Hitler took over. The economy was bad and people felt kicked around. They looked for a scapegoat. Now we’ve got a new bunch of Hitlers.” Posted at 06:14 PM PBS NOT PC ENOUGH! [Mark Krikorian ] "There are no Asian/Pacific Islander Americans among the 64 key American innovators in the book, 'They Made America,' by Harold Evans, the basis of the PBS documentary of the same name." Posted at 05:56 PM THE INVISIBLE HAND [Mark Krikorian ] The Wall Street Journal has a story today on a new report that finds that the tight labor market for nurses has eased because of a higher pay drawing more people into the occupation. Now how do you think that would have worked out if the president's proposed guestworker program had been up and running? He has called for opening every occupation in every part of the country to an unlimited number of foreign workers willing to work at any wage. Would nurses' pay have gone up or down? Would hospitals be giving nurses more flexibility in setting their schedules or less? Hospitals know the answer, which is why they are perennially at the forefront of efforts to increase the number of nurses imported from the Third World. As Adam Smith said, "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices." Posted at 05:53 PM LIVERWURST [Mark Krikorian ] So I write a posting about how immigration policymaking is dishonest, opaque, and self-interested -- and what's the reaction? A spirited defense of liverwurst! OK, I take it back; immigration policymaking is like head cheese. Posted at 05:51 PM MILITARY QUESTION [Kathryn Jean Lopez] This is to a select group--those who have served abroad in this war and who have found the blogosphere (NRO in particular, because I am self-interested) useful, or not. Just curious for feedback. Am speaking to a group of Marines tomorrow morning re: alternative media and am wondering any pointers you have for the military making use of NRO & the world wide web more, and why you think it is valuable to do so. And how frustrating (or not) MSM coverage is. Anything specific you'd want the media-focused in your branch of the service thinking about? Families of soldier abroad may have ideas of their own too. Thanks in advance. Posted at 05:36 PM STUD W! [KJL]
Posted at 04:36 PM TOM WOLFE'S NOVEL [Rod Dreher] Today is a big day around my house: my wife will finally finish "I Am Charlotte Simmons," the new Tom Wolfe novel, which means I'll get my hands on it. Julie loves the book, and says she's amazed that Wolfe, in his seventies, got the reality of college life down so accurately. She's seven years out of college, and says the book rings true to her. Moreover, she says that she understands why The New York Times and other MSM outlets have negged the book. She told me last night, "Tom Wolfe rejects the sexual revolution, and his protagonist is a good girl with traditional morals. When she compromises on her standards, she takes it hard. I bet this worldview is inconceivable for the kind of people who write reviews for The New York Times, but it makes perfect sense to readers like me." Posted at 04:23 PM ANOTHER CHICAGO [Stanley Kurtz] Now here’s that letter from the parent of a University of Chicago student: "It is, indeed, a tragedy to see Chicago lose its distinctiveness, which made it unique among American research universities -- and my son is seeing the loss in slow-motion over his undergraduate years. There are still some older faculty around to teach the Core; for example, my son is enjoying the outstanding teaching of Karl Weintraub's wife Katy in the History of Western Civilization sequence. But the administration is slowly gutting (ever more so) the Core, and the newer faculty generally do not support the Core. Even worse, the administration admittedly seeks to make Chicago just like another Ivy League university, which requires obeisance to the liberal shibboleths that rule the Ivies. So, the O-Week activities include mandatory sessions on "diversity" (with all the usual victim classes) and sexuality -- which made my son's service as an Orientation Aide this fall a bit tricky as he tried to steer away from having to lead any of those sessions. My son still loves the U of C, and for the most part I agree that his education is better than he would get most other places. Still, conservative students should view Chicago in the same category as the Ivies or Stanford -- which means, plan on spending four years behind enemy lines!" Posted at 04:21 PM MORE CHICAGO [Stanley Kurtz] I’ll post sections of another letter from the parent of a University of Chicago student. Some of the letters I’m getting emphasize that there are fairly large numbers of conservative students at Chicago, and thus great discussion and generally fair treatment–at least from fellow students. No doubt that’s true. But it seems to me that Chicago is running on (and running down) the “cultural capital” of its long reputation for balance. The key to the long term character of the university is the administration and faculty. Once these tilt decisively to the left, the conditions for educational quality and fairness are undermined. For a time, the U. of Chicago will get by as a place that attracts a large number of conservative students, just because it always had a reputation for fairness on that score. But soon things will slip, as they already clearly have. Exactly when the tipping point is reached no doubt depends on what subjects you study. If you are interested in becoming a scholar of the Middle East, you’re out of luck. Ditto for many other subjects in the social sciences and humanities. And the real problem is that in many subject areas, there is nowhere else to go. Chicago was always disproportionately important to conservatives because they were so unwelcome elsewhere. So to lose Chicago is to lose much more than one school. Posted at 04:16 PM CHICAGO [Stanley Kurtz] Here’s a sad but revealing e-mail from a parent about what’s happened to the University of Chicago, once the only reliable refuge for conservatives among the great universities: “Your take on university of Chicago is spot on. My eldest daughter had them at the top of her list, of course, and was attending interviews, visits to campus, etc. She loved it and was very excited until she began to attend many of the orientation sessions. Victimhood, political correctness, and the gender politics were overwhelming. She was disappointed, of course, and confided that she was not interested in attending a place where those concerns were a part of daily life. She had assumed there would be disapproval from friends and family that had attended Chicago in the past, but was relieved that we were supportive of her choice. She still plans to attend their graduate school in couple of years, but, in my not so humble opinion, the University lost a wonderful undergraduate due to the erosion of independent thought and political correctness.” Posted at 04:12 PM OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY [Andrew Stuttaford] Finally, a use for Elliot Spitzer: "The European Union's financial watchdog refused to sign off the Brussels budget yesterday for the tenth year in a row, finding that 93.4 per cent of spending was either unsafe or riddled with errors." Over you go, Elliot. Posted at 04:07 PM WHEN MORE IS LESS [Andrew Stuttaford] "The EU has agreed to revise the way it deals with Cuba's dissidents in order to develop political dialogue with Fidel Castro's government.... Diplomats said on Tuesday that they would continue to engage with Cuba's opposition but were looking to do so in a more productive way, leaving the path open for talks with government officials." "More productive" eh? We'll see. Posted at 04:04 PM NRO TV [John J. Miller] John J. Miller is scheduled to appear on John Gibson's Fox News show today at about 5:50 pm EST -- the topic is Jacques Chirac and Miller's book Our Oldest Enemy: A History of America's Disastrous Relationship with France. Posted at 03:54 PM PERSON THE YEAR [Jonah Goldberg] Time has no credibility. None. I don't care who they pick. That doesn't mean they won't get it right but that hardly means we should care much if they do. The magazine which had the guts to pick dictators and tyrants when they deserved it has, in recent years, gone the rout of People magazine. Even when they go in a controversial direction, it's invariably controversial in way designed to be not-too-controversial. "Now, Twice the Controversy But Half the Calories!" What was it a few years ago? Whistleblower women? And in 2001 when it deserved to be Osama Bin Laden, they went with Rudy Giulliani. How nice! I don't bash corporations much, but this seems to be one of those conventions that gets approved by a committee of suits before it goes anywhere. Posted at 03:40 PM CANADA... WITH A BULLET [Jonah Goldberg] I haven't checked this guy's stats -- because I'm on a cruise for pete's sake -- but some interesting tidbits: Jonah, Posted at 03:30 PM BY THE WAY... [Jonah Goldberg] Several readers have bcc'd me on emails to the NYT petitioning the Times to replace Safire with me. I do not authorize such actions -- but nor do I condemn them. Posted at 03:21 PM YES, YES... [Jonah Goldberg] It's true, I have revealed myself in ... cheese. [Scroll down if you find this cryptic beyond words]. I've also had a fine time so far. Just got back from lunch with the Ponnurus. Posted at 03:17 PM SWIFTIES [John J. Miller] K Lo: I'm definitely not predicting that the Swifties will make the cover of Time as "Men of the Year"--I'm saying that probably would be my choice. Posted at 01:17 PM OH BROTHER [KJL] This is Arlen Specter doing Rick Santorum no favors: “Sen. Santorum has been enormously helpful,” said Specter Tuesday. “He’s gone above and beyond the call of duty. My number one priority in the next two years is to reelect Sen. Santorum.” Posted at 01:03 PM RUSH'S TOPIC TODAY [Tim Graham] Cartoonist Pat Oliphant has definitely crossed a line in his latest cartoon portraying Condi Rice as a very subservient large-lipped bird. Will the liberal papers run it? Posted at 12:54 PM OY [KJL] Watching the Bishops' Conference on EWTN (the Catholic channel). The buzz about the meeting this November, from where I am sitting, was their expected report on pro-choice Catholic pols, what to do about them. Yeah, not happening. In the interest of time, they're not issuing anything this meeting, but a statement, which hearing it read on EWTN by EWTN's newsman Raymond Arroyo, sounded really lame--like it could have provided aid and comfort to a John Kerry lame. Which, of course, is more than simply lame. (I don't see a link up yet.) Posted at 12:42 PM YEAH, SO GLAD I'M PAYING FOR THAT [KJL] : From the Chronicle of Higher Education Only about 11 percent of full-time students say they spend more than 25 hours per week preparing for their classes -- the amount of time that faculty members say is necessary to succeed in college. Forty-four percent spend 10 hours or less studying. Posted at 12:35 PM THE PRIEST & THE CANTOR [KJL] An Andover, Mass. priest asks a pro-choice pol to step down as parish lector. Said pol told the Boston Globe: ''I'm trying to be a good Catholic...this should be a separate issue. Church should be a sanctuary for me and my faith and not have anything to do with my work." Posted at 12:30 PM IS JOHN KERRY [KJL] taking back his concession? Posted at 12:23 PM SWIFTVETS? [KJL] Think again, John J. Actually, if I had to bet my money on this one, I'd put it on Michael Moore. Here's how one loyal, tested reader: "Choking down the bile as I type it, but I would nominate Michael Moore. Who else galvanized both sides of the aisle as effectively?" Posted at 12:09 PM BAD SIGNS [John J. Miller] From the Los Angeles Times: "Spellings' impending appointment was hailed by Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), who worked closely with her and the White House in crafting No Child Left Behind. 'Margaret Spellings is a capable, principled leader who has the ear of the president and has earned strong bipartisan respect in Congress. I look forward to working with her to strengthen our public schools,' Kennedy said. ... Reg Weaver, president of the National Education Assn., a 2.7- million-member teachers union, said Spellings' nomination was 'a great opportunity for the administration to change the tone of its discourse with the education community.'" Posted at 12:03 PM CHICAGO [Stanley Kurtz] Here’s a sad but revealing e-mail from a parent about what’s happened to the University of Chicago, once the only reliable refuge for conservatives among the great universities: “Your take on university of Chicago is spot on. My eldest daughter had them at the top of her list, of course, and was attending interviews, visits to campus, etc. She loved it and was very excited until she began to attend many of the orientation sessions. Victimhood, political correctness, and the gender politics were overwhelming. She was disappointed, of course, and confided that she was not interested in attending a place where those concerns were a part of daily life. She had assumed there would be disapproval from friends and family that had attended Chicago in the past, but was relieved that we were supportive of her choice. She still plans to attend their graduate school in couple of years, but, in my not so humble opinion, the University lost a wonderful undergraduate due to the erosion of independent thought and political correctness.” Posted at 12:03 PM GREEN FOG [KJL] An e-mail: I am distraught. I went to [a military hospital last] evening to drop off some DVDs for a young Marine [I know]. Anyway on my way around the [hospital], I found myself trapped behind a huge Red Cross van. All of a sudden, two soldiers appeared and opened the doors. I could see that there were some of our wounded in there- clearly new arrivals. The staff lifted them onto the moveable hospital beds (many of the guys had machines attached to them) and wheeled them into the main building.And, when I asked Jed Babbin about the Marine incident yesterday, he wrote back: The idea that the shooting may have been wrongful is justified by the film. But I'm sure that it doesn't portray accurately the room-to-room fighting that was going on. Every time the Marines find someone alive they find someone who may be wired with a bomb and still able to detonate it. I recall Richard Tregaskis, in Guadalcanal Diary, quoting one Lt. Harold H. Babbin, USMC -- my dad -- briefing his platoon on the eve of the invasion:I don’t know what happened in that one incident, and wrongdoing obviously needs to be punished, but am I wrong to want to give these guys volunteering to keep us safe and free others the benefit of the doubt when they are being shot at, with their lives on the line? Posted at 12:00 PM P.O.Y. [John J. Miller] Here's a list of Time's "Person of the Year" since 1927. The editors picked Bush in 2000, so I doubt they'll choose him again this time. Bloggers would be interesting, but they've made some computer and Internet picks in recent years (Andy Grove, Jeff Bezos) so I think they might avoid something similar now. I suspect they will inevitably choose gays and lesbians one of these years, and this one would be as good as any. If it were up to me, I'd think about selecting John O'Neill and the Swift Boat Vets. Posted at 11:51 AM HMMM [KJL] A reader: Time's Man of the Year? Oughta be bloggers. Posted at 11:32 AM AND DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU ON THE WAY OUT [KJL] Harry Reid, yesterday: "We all miss, more than we can describe, Senator Daschle," Reid said. "But Tom Daschle is not here. We're going to proceed forward." Posted at 11:28 AM IRAN [Stanley Kurtz] Today’s biggest story may be a piece by Douglas Jehl buried in today’s New York Times. The same group of dissidents who exposed Iran’s once hidden nuclear program now say that Iran has yet another secret facility at which they are trying to produce nuclear weapons, even as they deny their nuclear ambitions and promise to freeze their current program. The group is apparently giving chapter and verse on the location of Iran’s secret facility. If this pans out, it not only torpedoes the agreement currently being negotiated by the Europeans, it shows that no agreement is reliable. There is no good solution to the nuclear mess in Iran and Korea. This is truly the crisis that threatens our lives and our nation. The president is going to have his hands full with this one. Posted at 11:25 AM IDEOLOGY [John J. Miller] It's perhaps worth remembering that one of Russell Kirk's favorite sayings was a phrase of H. Stuart Hughes: "Conservatism is the negation of ideology." Posted at 11:19 AM MARGARET SPELLINGS IS THE NEW ED SEC PICK [KJL] which is bad news for many coaches. Posted at 11:12 AM NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE NEWS [KJL] Senate Republicans just elected Senator Dole to replace Senator Allen at the NRSC. She defeated Senator Norm Coleman of MN. Vote was close--28-27. Posted at 11:06 AM "IDEOLOGUES" [Rich Lowry] Greetings from the NR cruise! Here is a thought from the ship's internet cafe. I don't mind the word "ideologue," but in our foreign policy debate it is used in such a tendentious way. Consider this from the NYTimes today, about the cabinet shakeup: "`This could actually turn out not so well for the ideologues,' said one administration official, referring to the staff members in the vice president's office and the Pentagon who are openly skeptical of the idea of negotiating solutions to the crises over Iran's and North Korea's nuclear programs." But aren't the people who believe in a certain kind of negotiated solution--despite our experience with the last, failed negotiated deal with North Korea--just as "ideological," maybe more so, than the administration's hawks? If we're going to throw the word around, let's say that the shakeup "could turn out not so well for one set of ideologues in the administration and better for another set of ideologues." Posted at 10:45 AM IT'S ALL ABOUT JONAH [KJL] Hugh Hewitt is campaigning for him to replace Safire. (An idea floated here earlier.) Posted at 10:10 AM JONAH'S NOT ON THE CRUISE, DON'T BELIEVE HIM [KJL] He's all cheese. Posted at 10:07 AM WHITHER CHICAGO? [Stanley Kurtz] Last year, I went to the University of Chicago and debated HR 3077, the bill that would reform federal funding for area studies. Several of the students I met after that panel were in despair about the absence of professors of Middle Eastern studies at Chicago who could balance the overwhelming number of faculty critics of America and Israel. It is shameful that students at the University of Chicago need to import professors like Berkowitz to defend Israel, while critics of American and Israeli policies can easily be found on the Chicago faculty. The Berkowitz-Sassen episode can’t help but raise the question: What has happened to the University of Chicago? Two years ago, I wrote about the gutting of Chicago’s famous Western Civilization program. Things seem to have gone downhill from there. Chicago used to be the only truly great American university where conservative students could get a fair shake. Those days seem a long way off. Slowly but surely, the University of Chicago is transforming into just another leftist dominated university. Perhaps the intellectual monopoly is not quite as total as elsewhere. But the signs are frightening. Of course, any fine faculty will have its share of leftist professors–and rightly so. But why must the other side be shut out? Perhaps if we had more intellectual diversity–the only sort of diversity that should count on a college campus–professors would not confuse mere disagreement with inadmissable bias. The real victims here are the students, deprived of exposure to intelligent representatives of different perspectives, and intimidated into withholding their own views for fear of losing faculty recommendations. Conservative students and parents take note: The University of Chicago is not what it used to be–not by a longshot. And let the University of Chicago administration take note as well. Is there no room for a thoughtful and intelligent supporter of America’s Middle Eastern policies, or of Israel, on your Middle East studies faculty? Is academic merit so unevenly distributed throughout the population that it falls to leftists alone? Posted at 10:01 AM NOT BERKOWITZ! [Stanley Kurtz] This powerful letter of protest by Peter Berkowitz tells the tale of a remarkable incident at the University of Chicago. (Hat tip to Glenn Reynolds.) Apparently, University of Chcago sociology professor Saskia Sassen stormed out of a panel discussion on the Middle East after discovering that Berkowitz and another invited speaker disagreed with her views. Two of the panelists at the event were critical of Israel, while two defended it. This arrangement appears to have struck Sassen as impermissibly biased. “We need to recognize that the Israeli state has operated with excess power in a situation of extreme asymmetry,” said Sassen, justifying her walkout. In other words, acknowledge Israel’s guilt or forfeit your right to participate in scholarly debate. Although she makes a show of caring about freedom, Sassen has no trouble decrying the “scandalous” differences between American democracy and Cuban communism. Sassen’s behavior at the panel shows just how little regard the academic left has for the free exchange of ideas. Her more conservative opponent, Berkowitz, on the other hand, has just edited two marvelous volumes on American conservatism and liberalism. Posted at 09:58 AM GREETINGS LANDLUBBERS [Jonah Goldberg] I made it. The Fair Jessica, Lil' Lucy and I arrived in St. Thomas yesterday and we're in Tortola now. Huge turnout on this cruise -- over four hundred NR fans, followers and friends. Not much to report yet. Lowry seems a bit deep in the grog and Lucy thinks we live at sea now. Will report in when I can, but there's a pina colada with my name on it. Posted at 09:29 AM "MIND YOUR WORDS" [KJL] The message Senate Republicans sent Specter, according to the Philly Inq. Posted at 09:27 AM KIRSANOW IN OHIO [KJL] Frequent NRO writer Peter Kirsanow (and Civil Rights Commission member) will be speaking on "Racial Rebellion: The End of the Victim/Grievance Movement" tomorrow ,Thursday Nov. 18, at noon at the Ashbrook Center for Public Affairs in Ashland, Ohio. In you are nowhere near there, though, CSPAN will be showing at some point. Posted at 09:23 AM WHAT A BEAUT! [Jack Fowler] The National Review Treasury of Classic Bedtime Stories is a thing of true beauty. Inside are ten wonderful adventure stories -- wholesome stories that teach clear morals! -- of the doings of Reddy Fox, Jimmy Skunk, Buster Bear, and many other colorful denizens of Thornton Burgess's glorious Green Meadows, Green Forest, and Laughing Brook (if you're of a certain age, you'll well remember how these delightful stories made your youth all the merrier). And throughout the 360 pages of this sweet hardcover are some 60 charming illustrations by the great Harrison Cady. Perfect for new and beginning readers (first through third grades) and ditto for littler ones who cherish being read a warm tale as they're tucked in for the nightly trip to Nod, The National Review Treasury of Classic Bedtime Stories makes a super Christmas gift. We have a few special offers available when you buy this book, which can be done safely, securely, and swiftly here. Posted at 09:11 AM A RIDGE FAR ENOUGH [John J. Miller] Homeland security secretary quitting, says CNN. Posted at 08:52 AM BUSINESS AS USUAL [Mark Krikorian ] The Congress is now considering an arcane proposal (to exempt certain foreign graduate students from the numerical limits in H-1B work-visa program) that exemplifies much of what's wrong with our immigration system: Dishonesty. The program has a limit of 65,000 visas per year except that the cap is "pierceable," in that any foreign worker indentured to a university or the government isn’t counted toward the cap, and the immigration service won't say how many visas were issued outside the cap. The provision now under consideration would expand the dishonesty by exempting even more visas from the "cap." Secrecy. Members of Congress know that very vocal elements of the public hate this kind of thing, and have succeeded in killing it before. So, instead of having a debate and vote on the merits, Ted Kennedy and Saxby Chambliss are trying to sneak it into the omnibus spending bill that Congress has to pass to keep the government open. Subsidy. Some of the biggest boosters of this measure are universities, for whose graduate departments it would represent a significant financial windfall. One of the main reason that few American students pursue PhDs in many technical fields is that graduate study often serves no useful purpose and in fact can result in a big loss in lifetime earnings. But foreigners would get paid in a different coin -- access to the U.S. -- and so are willing to fill redundant graduate programs that otherwise, without this federal subsidy, might be discontinued. And the subsidy continues, because universities not only get more paying graduate students but they are then able to use these students to get more federal research grants. I know that legislating is like sausage-making, but there's sausage and then there's sausage. I like salami; immigration-policy shenanigans are liverwurst. Posted at 08:32 AM WHERE ARE THE SWOONS? [Tim Graham] As a colleague suspected yesterday, since Madeleine Albright was the first female Secretary of State and Colin Powell was the first black man, Condi Rice will not get the usual media swoon for being the first black woman as Secretary of State (or even the first black woman to hold a cabinet post that weighty.) It's nowhere on the front of the Washington Post today. That would not be the case if Rice was serving a Clinton. On the other hand, that's nice, since she is not being appointed for that reason. But it ought to be interesting to see just how much less gooey reporters are than they were over the selection of Madeleine Albright in Clinton's second term. The most recent boomlet of pro-Madeleine bias is captured here. Posted at 07:44 AM THE BRUTAL FRONTLINE [Andrew Stuttaford] What, I wonder, will Al-Jazeera have to say about this? From the London Times: "In the south of Fallujah yesterday, US Marines found the armless, legless body of a blonde woman, her throat slashed and her entrails cut out. Benjamin Finnell, a hospital apprentice with the US Navy Corps, said that she had been dead for a while, but at that location for only a day or two. The woman was wearing a blue dress; her face had been disfigured. It was unclear if the remains were the body of the Irish-born aid worker Margaret Hassan, 59, or of Teresa Borcz, 54, a Pole abducted two weeks ago. Both were married to Iraqis and held Iraqi citizenship; both were kidnapped in Baghdad last month. US and Iraqi troops have discovered kidnappers’ lairs filled with corpses or emaciated prisoners half-mad with fear, and piles of bodies of men who had refused to fight with the insurgents. As the guerrillas run their last sprint from death, sympathy for their cause is running out among Iraqis." Posted at 07:37 AM DESPERATE MONDAY [KJL] This Monday Night Football stunt just sounds stupid. It's not like they needed the publicity for the show. Posted at 07:31 AM "SURE FEELS LIKE LOVE" [KJL] Wouldn't Stud Duck Larry Gatlin be happy knowing NRO is ocassionally edited to the tune of his hits? Posted at 07:25 AM RE: REED IRVINE [Tim Graham] The entire conservative movement owes Reed Irvine and Accuracy in Media a debt of gratitude for starting the business of professional media watchdogging in the Nixon era. When I first became a young Reaganite in the summer of 1980, I would to walk a few blocks to our small-town library to read Human Events, and there was Reed in its pages, on the case against "60 Minutes" or the New York Times. (Reed also authored or co-authored a set of books compiling AIM's media research, starting with "Media Mischief and Misdeeds" in 1984, to expose and correct liberal bias.) He taught many of us how to read the press with a critical eye. I know Brent Bozell agrees that there would be no Media Research Center without Reed Irvine. May he rest in peace, having run a good race for the good of the country he loved. Posted at 06:36 AM TO RULE THE WAVES [John J. Miller] This weekend, C-SPAN's Book TV will broadcast a talk by my friend Arthur Herman, author of To Rule the Waves: How the British Navy Shaped the Modern World. I'm pretty sure this will be from the presentation he gave (and which I attended) at a D.C. bookstore last week. It hardly matters: Arthur is brilliant and eloquent and To Rule the Waves is very, very good. It's partly a military history of the Royal Navy, but it's also the story of how British admirals and sailors became a powerful force for globalization, and how their influence is still being felt today. NRODT readers will know Arthur for his book reviews--and they'll also know that our current issue includes a big thumbs-up review of To Rule the Waves. I recommend it highly. Posted at 06:33 AM TIME'S MAN OF THE YEAR [KJL] Karl Rove? Posted at 06:12 AM MEDIA CRITIC REED IRVINE DIED. [KJL] RIP Posted at 06:02 AM POWELL FOR SENATE? [John J. Miller] New York Republicans are urging Colin Powell to run for the Senate -- against Hillary in 2006, according to the New York Sun. Posted at 05:54 AM TRYING TO UNDERSTAND THE POWER OF THE CORNER: JUST CAME ACROSS THIS NOV. 3 E-MAIL [KJL] I'd never laid a mouse click on The Corner before last night, but it, and your posts in particular, got me through the night. I've been an internet addict for years clicking through its its highways and byways and bookmarking my favorite rest stops. Discovering The Corner last night was like coming over the horizon and discovering my destination. Posted at 05:33 AM CHAIRMAN ARLEN [John J. Miller] The Washington Post says he's got the Judiciary Committee all but locked up. There's nothing in the story about hugs for Specter, but the article does quote Hatch: "Nobody in the meeting was against Arlen. ... Senator Specter handled himself very well. ... I'm for him, as I should be." Reminds me of an old saying: Don't count your Hatch before he's chickened. Posted at 05:16 AM Tuesday, November 16, 2004 DID HE NEED ONE OF THOSE INTERN MAPS? [KJL] John Kerry went back to the Hill today. Posted at 11:57 PM AN UPDATE ON THE 2004 ELECTIONS [John Hood] Believe it or not, the race for governor in Washington state is still undecided. Democrat Christine Gregoire and Republican Dino Rossi have traded the lead four times since Election Day as election officials keep adding in tens of thousands of absentee and provisional ballots at a pop. There are nearly 22,000 ballots yet to count, including some 10,000 more ballots in King County than local officials had estimated just a couple of days ago. This "find" was good news for Gregoire, who trails Rossi in most of the state but is strong in traditionally Democratic Seattle. The current count has Rossi in the lead by 236 votes out of 2.8 million cast. Washington hasn't elected a Republican governor in about a quarter of a century. Right now, both parties are scouring the list of voters whose provisional or absentee ballots were rejected for technicalities, such as missing or apparently mismatched signatures. Then they are knocking on the voters' doors and asking them to swear out affidavits to try to get their rejected ballots counted. The Democrats just delivered a stack of such affidavits to election officials yesterday. Remember that Congress enacted a federal law after the Florida debacle requiring states to make greater use of provisional ballots. That was supposed to "fix" things. Uh-huh. Posted at 11:26 PM MORE SITCOM BIAS [KJL] According to Jim on ABC tonight pokes ignorant fun at Costa Rica for no apparent reason. No reason? Think again. Who's the Bush ally in the U.N. fighting for a cloning ban? Yup. Costa Rica. They knew what they were doing. I'm completely kidding. The Corner is getting kinda slooow. Just getting punchy while I work. Funny show though. Posted at 09:30 PM YOU [KJL] could still make phonecalls. Posted at 07:08 PM ALSO HEARING [KJL] from a Senate staffer: the caucus and leadership meetings were not love fests. Specter was forced to address the issues and his leadership of the committee, and to defend himself. Hatch in fact did exit the meeting and put his arm around Specter and endorsed him. Posted at 06:41 PM EVIDENTLY [KJL] Hatch just came out of the meeting and told a bunch of reporters that Specter would be ok and would be the chairman. Posted at 06:30 PM "I'M STILL CONSIDERING" [KJL] Goerge Allen told Fox's Brian Wilson after the first, the leadership meeting. Posted at 06:14 PM SPECTER [KJL] CNN just reported that Orrin Hatch literally put his arm around Specter at their 4:00. Posted at 06:11 PM LAMAR COLD SHOULDERS SPECTER A LITTLE [KJL] He's another non-Jud Cmte member though: "It would seem to me and others it'd be inappropriate to be issuing that kind of warning to the president of the United States," Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., told CNN Tuesday. "It sounded like Sen. Specter might have a litmus test, and I don't think the Judiciary Committee should have a litmus test." Posted at 05:59 PM RE: MARY FRANCES BERRY [KJL] She's not got the Left locked up either. Posted at 05:56 PM SPECTER & BUSH [KJL] Club for Growth causes trouble...and has a giveaway. Posted at 05:54 PM "DEAR LEADER" [KJL] Where is he going...or gone? Posted at 05:08 PM HILLARY [KJL] vs. Powell? Posted at 04:56 PM MARY FRANCES BERRY'S [KJL] term is up, but she ain't budging. Posted at 03:24 PM AFTER VAN GOGH (CTD) [Andrew Stuttaford] According to the Dutch website, Expatica, the murder of Theo Van Gogh may also be acting as a wake-up call to Germany. Here's hoping. Meanwhile, here is what the preacher at Berlin's Mevlana Mosque was secretly recorded by Germany's (public) ZDF TV as having to say about his neighbors: "These Germans, these atheists, these Europeans don't shave under their arms and their sweat collects under their hair with a revolting smell and they stink...Hell lives for the infidels! Down with all democracies and all democrats!" Why, you have a nice day too. Posted at 03:04 PM AN INSULT TO DOGGEREL [Andrew Stuttaford] Regular readers may remember the controversy over whether the words of the hymn 'I vow to thee my country' were, as some idiotic parson suggested, too reprehensible to be sung in today's PC C of E. Well, sensitive souls can relax. Songwriter Billy Bragg has come to the rescue with lyrics so irritating that I will now look at 'Imagine' with strange new respect. Some of the words can be found in this Daily Telegraph report. The whole nightmare concludes like this: "For there is a simple principle/ That no one shall displace/ We are all alike in humankind/ We are the human race." And with that, I must admit, I was so overwhelmed with nausea that I had to go and lie down. Posted at 02:00 PM RE: ANOTHER ONE [Jack Fowler] Please do not for a single minute assume that some of us on this mega-luxurious cruise vessel aren't attending to our regular duties. Mine is fishmongering for our products, so let's get right to it and urge you to 1) buy our books, and therefore 2) impact the liver of the Queen Zixi of Ix-loving Daniel Casey. Now the Zuiderdam prints out a daily mini-version of the NY Times (ugh), with today's version carrying David Brooks' column on "I Am Charlotte Simmons," Tom Wolfe's new novel. The point of the column, and I assume Wolfe's book, is that our society is producing a generation of kids who are clueless about virtues and morality. And the point of this message is to bellow that you can do something about this -- yes, by getting a child one of NR's wonderful books. All of our children's "Treasury" titles are wholesome, and filled with tales that are instructive, that teach virtues, that stand athwart the cultural rot, yelling Stop! If you're going to give your son or daughter or grandchild "stuff" for Christmas, why not make sure that at least one item will do their soul some good. Get those kids about whom you truly care National Review's acclaimed books, here. And when you do, you'll get a free copy of L. Frank Baum's delightful tale, Queen Zixi of Ix (drink up Dan!). Posted at 01:54 PM NO SENSE ZONE [Shannen Coffin] Evidence that Bill O'Reilly is officially lost to the dark side. Endorses Bill Clinton as Secretary of State. Fortunately, he wasn't heard at the White House. Posted at 12:34 PM ANOTHER ONE! [KJL] While the rest are cruising, I'm working on my subscription commission. An e-mail: I just subscribed to the mag after freeloading at NRO for years! Posted at 12:29 PM THE TIME HAS COME [KJL] We hear: Specter met with Senate GOP leadership this morning about his chairmanship. He is meeting with the Judiciary Committee members at 4. Posted at 12:26 PM SPECTER & LOTT [KJL] I had forgotten that Specter had defended Lott during the Strom fury. From the 2004 Almanac of American Politics: Specter was one moderate who stood by Trent Lott after his comments at Strom Thurmond's 100th birthday party December 5, 2002. On December 11 he said, "I know Trent Lott very well from working with him in the Senate for the last 14 years and can vouch for the inadvertent slip and and his apology should end the discussion."(Just trivia...) Posted at 11:41 AM M HURT MY FEELINGS, MONEYPENNY! [Cliff May] The Los Angeles Times reports today that two more senior CIA officials have quit because of confrontations with CIA director Porter Goss’s new chief of staff, Patrick Murray, “who many accuse of having a brusque manner.” (See Michael Ledeen on this all, too.) Can you imagine James Bond getting upset because M had a “brusque manner”? Can you imagine him stomping out in a huff because Q cracked wise with him? What does this suggest about the CIA’s descent from the world’s premier spy agency to another entrenched bureaucracy? Posted at 11:33 AM A READER'S REQUEST [KJL] I'm hoping that pictures of the cruise will be posted for Cornerites and others to see. Posted at 11:30 AM GOOD POINT TO CONTINUE TO BEAR IN MIND [KJL] An e-mail: Jim Boulet Jr. makes an excellent point re: the influence that the Judiciary Committee staff will have, and what a bad idea it is to let Snarlin' Arlen pick them. It is something I've stressed in e-mails and phone calls to the current members of the committee, along with my objections to Specter's stand on tort reform, affirmative action and his preference for activist judges. Posted at 11:13 AM TOO MUCH INFORMATION ON TOM [Tim Graham] The New York Times apparently gave Bill Carter too much space for his retiring-Tom-Brokaw article: "By the Friday after Election Day, Mr. Brokaw had recovered from his all-nighter. Speaking by telephone from his third home in Bedford, N.Y., where he had started the day -- as the thermometer soared to about 45 degrees -- by taking a dip in the lake adjacent to his property. (He has been known to skinny-dip in that lake with his wife, Meredith.) " Posted at 10:25 AM NOTHING SACRED IN THE REALITY-TV BIZ [Tim Graham] The Hollywood Reporter notes Emmy-nominated reality producers Dan Cutforth and Jane Lipsitz are developing a new unscripted series about infidelity, featuring stories of unfaithful spouses who have turned to the Ashley Madison Agency, a popular online matchmaking service that caters to attached people seeking extramarital affairs. "The sanctity of marriage is clearly a hot-button topic in today's environment," Lipsitz said. "Exploring the current state of love and commitment against the backdrop of our changing social landscape makes for a fascinating and daring unscripted drama." The program will explore the reasons behind infidelity and will "chronicle the exploits" of members of the controversial online dating service. Ick. Posted at 10:25 AM WJB ON ELECTION 2004 [Stanley Kurtz] Yesterday, William Bennett offered his reading of the election in an address at the Heritage Foundation. Here’s an excerpt: “...the charge that the right wing or the Christian right has taken over this country, and that this is what explains moral values, is false: In fact, what President Bush stood for, ran on, and won on is a center-right morality, what we might call common moral sense. America has not turned far right. What the president stood for is mainstream....I know the religious right, and President Bush is not the religious right. President Bush did not direct a devoted flock on evangelicals–in fact they were out in front of him and his campaign on many issues and were often very frustrated with what they regarded as the White House and the President’s indecisiveness....Evangelical support of President Bush is not even the largest part of the electoral story, because he drew very large support from Catholics, and Hispanics, and even raised his numbers among Jews....And the issues mirrored the numbers–like the numbers, they were largely center-right. President Bush did not campaign on ending abortion, he campaigned and spoke more about partial birth abortion (which John Kerry supports, but a vast majority of Americans oppose). President Bush did not suffocate stem cell research, he was the first president to fund it, and then barred further federal funding of it. President Bush did support a constitutional amendment to bar gay marriage–but so too did voters in every state where they could vote on it for their state laws. In short, the President campaigned from the middle, or the middle right. Not the far right. And he won.” Bennett’s full address will appear in the Winter edition of The Claremont Review of Books. Posted at 10:22 AM NO COMMENT [KJL] From a Piece on RU-486 on a Feminist Website: Dr. Vanessa Cullins, vice president of medical affairs for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, said Holly's death is a tragedy but that medical abortion is safe.[Emphasis, obviously, mine.] (Article here.) Posted at 10:18 AM GREAT MINDS... [KJL] Jonah--(actually I think he may be cruising by now), the pope is talking about abortion and TV, too. Posted at 10:15 AM M. LEDEEN'S DAY WILL BE MADE [KJL] Cnn reporting that Richard Armitage is resigning from State. Even if his war Cabinet didn't have Condi in it. Posted at 10:13 AM RU-486 [KJL] gets a warning label. Posted at 09:53 AM OHIO [KJL] headed for a recount? Posted at 09:44 AM BEWARE WHAT YOU BLOG [KJL] A flight attendant reveals too much for Delta. Posted at 09:37 AM HARVARD LAW STUDENTS [KJL] vs. Specter-as-chairman. Posted at 09:09 AM SPECTER & STAFF [Jim Boulet Jr.] The power a Chairman Arlen Specter would have to staff the Senate Judiciary Committee deserves more concern from Senate Republicans than it has received to date. Personnel is policy. The people a Chairman Specter would hire will be well to the left of the average moderate Republican, let alone the average conservative. In 1987, I visited with a Specter staffer in support of Robert Bork's Supreme Court nomination. I told him that a Justice Bork would not be predictable, unlike, say, California's former Chief Justice, Rose Bird, who was much in the news at the time. Justice Bird famously HREF="http://www.goodbyemag.com/nov99/bird.html">overturned 61 consecutive death penalty cases. California voters removed her in 1986. Specter's man stopped me. "I think Rose Bird is an excellent justice." Posted at 08:58 AM "A BIG DAY" [KJL] That, from Senator Sessions, on Fox a few ago, talking about Specter's chairmanship. He reminded viewers that Specter does not have to become chairman. Which has been our point all along. This is the one moment when Republicans on the committee can rethink this. Do we want this obstacle leading the committee? Posted at 08:48 AM “’OH MY GOD, IS SHE GOING TO HAVE A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN IF I SAY HER FIRST CHILD WASN’T A PERSON?’” [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Peter Singer (Professor of Infanticide, Princeton University) takes his class to a neonatal ward. Posted at 08:08 AM GREAT FOLKS [Jack Fowler] I count my blessings, many of which derive from working here at NR, and the people I meet by virtue of being so fortunately situated. Thousands of good and decent folks have taken our cruises these last ten years, and one of the most interesting couples I've met are Hal and Rebecca Bynum. If Hal's name rings a bell, it should -- the acclaimed songwriter's cv includes “Lucille,” “Chains,” “Papa Was a Good Man,” “There Ain’t No Good Chain Gang,” “Nobody’s Fool,” and tons more. He's the real deal, and you can read all about him at http://www.halbynum.com/. It was an pleasure just to meet Hal and Rebecca, and an honor when they gave me a copy of his new CD, "An American Prayer." I heartily recommend it to all. This is a collection of beautiful poetry -- the common man, in the vernacular, simple and sweet and deep, dead-on imagery -- about faith, country, love, and redemption, rendered in a mesmerizing baritone drawl, perfectly set to music. It would be an understatement to call "An American Prayer" moving. Get it. The great places you go and the great people you meet on an NR cruise. Posted at 07:58 AM PARTYING WITH CLINTON [Tim Graham] Thursday's opening of the Clinton presidential lie-brary is bound to be riddled with bad puns and double entendres. We can declare the race open today with the following news from the Washington Post's gossip: "But what to do on Wednesday night before the big ribbon-cutting? That was a quandary until Washington lobbyists Craig Smith and Matt Gorman drummed up their 'Late Night in Little Rock -- A Clinton-Gore Celebration,' to be held at the Little Rock restaurant Sticky Fingerz." Posted at 07:06 AM RE: RAIL CRUISE [KJL] A request for Jonah (who else is qualified?), from the e-mail box: "I'm there, as long as there is at least one day of seminars devoted to Laser Volcano Lancing." Posted at 07:01 AM THE SPECTER SPECTRE [KJL] Senator Arlen cut out of last night’s NYC right-winger confab over by Grand Central, but Rick Santorum was scheduled to speak and did make it. The whole thing was off the record—though nothing shocking was said—so I won’t go into details other than to say, once again, this is a guy we don’t want to lose, if you are pro-marriage and pro-life. There were some protesters outside, urging Santorum to take on Specter. I understand the sentiment, but, that’s not his place—he’s not on the committee. As I noted yesterday, McCain supporting Specter in this fight is no biggie. Sessions, however, not publicly supporting Specter, is a bigger deal, since Sessions is actually on the Judiciary Committee, unlike McCain…or Santorum. Again, I know there is soreness about Santorum’s support for Specter in the primary, but I’d argue he was doing his team-player thing, which is part of his value. Yeah, I’d love a Sen. Toomey about now. But, life goes on. (I’m not flacking for Santorum, just trying to be realistic.) And, meanwhile, there are still a few hours before a call is made in this Judiciary chairmanship fight, so maybe make a few calls. I might add, people who have been with us on the Specter thing have made big headway--that Frist moment on Sunday was a big public milestone, and reflected things I had been hearing for days off the record. Even if Specter becomes chairman, I think conservatives are better off having fought this fight. Posted at 06:58 AM RE: CUA [KJL] Since a bunch of CUA-ers seem to read The Corner, I tell ya, I did have some cool profs while there. I focused on politics and philosophy and wound up with a bunch of guys who are still there, I’m happy to say. I took a whole slew of classes with David Walsh, a delightfully brilliant Irishman. And I had a few with the eccentric Dennis Coyle, con-law man. Also took Claes Ryn, Philip Henderson, John A. Kromkowski & James O’Leary--and of course, the aforementioned Schneck--all who were terrific. Henderson amazingly made “Executive-Branch Policymaking” exciting at something like 8 p.m. Didn’t think that was possible outside of actually executive-branch policymaking, in the executive branch. My philosophy classes I would pay money to take again, right now, if I weren’t still paying for the first round! The head of the department, Fr. Kurtz Pritzl, a dear man, has a love for teaching and for philosophy that might be unparallel, in a field where love for learning is pretty competitive. My love for Kevin White’s class, went beyond my interest in Aquinas, and had something to do with the messenger in that case, friends would tease. So be it. I had good taste in college, sue me. (I’m counting on White not being a Corner reader, or color this post red.) Fr. Brian Shanley was the only person I ever wanted to hear about the moderns from. Mercifully, he was there--no closet Nietzsche fans in that department! I also was lucky enough to have Russell Hittinger’s last class at CUA, I’ll always be grateful he fit me in. (I am doing nobody justice here, but about two people will enjoy this post anyway.) There are a bunch of other great professors (including John McCarthy, Msgr. Sokolowski, and Jude Dougherty at CUA.philosophy; on that second run through, when I finish paying for the first, I will hit their classes), who I knew more through friends talking about their classes than from firsthand experience, and a few, like David Gallagher who have since left. (And, to hint that I am getting old, one of my fellow undergrads is now a professor there—Angela McKay.) I’m done for now. Enough memory lane. I suppose if I had gone to homecoming this weekend, I would have spared you the scrapbook walk-through here. I'm going back to work now... Posted at 06:34 AM CHIRAC UNLOADS [John J. Miller] A week ago, French foreign minister Barnier wrote a "Letter to America" in the Wall Street Journal. "I'm concerned to see both Americans and Europeans expressing doubts over the future of transatlantic relations," he worried. "I believe we must give a new impetus to our political relations." Apparently his boss, the president of Our Oldest Enemy, hasn't kept track of Barnier's correspondence. Speaking to British journalists, he shared a few thoughts on America: "Britain gave its support but I did not see anything in return. I’m not sure it is in the nature of our American friends at the moment to return favours systematically." "It is like that nice guy in America — what’s his name again? — who spoke about ‘old Europe’. It has no sense. It’s a lack of culture to imagine that." "I am not sure, with America as it is these days, that it would be easy for someone, even the British, to be an honest broker." Posted at 06:31 AM BASIC INSTINCT [KJL] And, dear readers, despite the cruise, I’m sticking to a tried and true policy today, yesterday notwithstanding, no posting till you (meaning your humble K-Lo) actually know what you’re (me) talking about. Where’s Ombudsman Derbyshire when you need him? Oh, yeah, on the Caribbean. Posted at 06:07 AM CASUALTIES OF BLOGS [KJL ] Yesterday, you may recall, I witched about a silly controversy at Catholic U in D.C. In the process, I completely misread a campus-paper editorial and news story, and confused two separate campus speaker policies. In the midst of doing that, I also unfairly (and unintentionally) maligned an old professor of mine, Prof. Stephen Schneck. Schneck is pro-life, first off, and was not only cool with Fr. O’Connell’s prayer at the Bush-Cheney rally on election night, but is also opposed to pro-abortion speakers on campus. (Whoo-hoo! Go, Schneck!) The Tower piece made that completely clear, but in my rush I confused John Kenneth White’s opposition to Fr. O’Connell prayer with Stephen Schneck’s support of it. (Yes, a little embarrassing here.) Dr. Schneck sent me a very kind e-mail last night setting the record straight. I only hope he doesn’t hold himself accountable for my inability to read. In truth, I took more Walsh and Coyle in the politics department, so they bear more of the responsibility, I suppose. And put me in the hall of commentariat dishonor this morning. Posted at 06:02 AM JEFF SESSIONS UNDECIDED RE: SPECTER? [KJL] This sounds like it's not a done deal. But might be by the end of today. You might want to give Senator Jeff Sessions some friendly (and I mean that, he's a gem). Posted at 05:40 AM C’EST UNE BLAGUE, QUOI? [Cliff May] Jacques Chirac told Tony Blair that he had won nothing from Bus for supporting the war against Saddam Hussein’s regime. The possibility that Blair supported the liberation of the Iraqi people from a Fascist regime as a matter of principle and deeply felt conviction would never even occur to Chirac. I know democracies never go to war with one another. But mightn’t we make an exception once in a while? (The devil made me say that! Bite my tongue! Hush my mouth!) The story on Chirac dissing Blair is here. Posted at 12:45 AM EVENING CRUISE REPORT [Jack Fowler] All's swell. Including the deep blue sea. Swelling, that is. I'll admit seeing a few deep green faces, but that's nothing a little dramamine can't cure! We had another great seminar session this afternoon, with our expertati, led by Jay Nordlinger (unrivalled in many things, including moderating a swarm of experts), regaling us on 2008 and more. The wonkery is over for the day. Tonight, there's a perfect dinner awaiting all, and then a late-night pool-side smoker featuring H. Upmann's tasty cigars. Among the many interesting folks in our cabal of 400 is Stacey Tipton, whose company -- www.musicalspanish.com -- produces nifty programs that teach youngun's espanol via music. Neato torpedo, and more proof of America's great entreprenurial spirit! Viva Tipton! Well, there's a pina colada with my name on it up in the Ocean Bar. Gotta go. But not before I tell you that at www.danielcasey.com there's a drinking game where one must knock back a shot every time The Corner mentions Queen Zixi of Ix (the great L. Frank Baum tale you get free when you buy NR's wonderful kids books -- more about that here) and I'll be darned if I don't turn Casey into a drunk by Christmas! Queen Zixi of Ix! Queen Zixi of Ix! Did I happen to mention Queen Zixi of Ix?! Posted at 12:45 AM Monday, November 15, 2004 A FEW MORE EMAILS... [Jonah Goldberg] On abortion etc... Jonah, First, to mollify the red state orientation and reactionary element that is NRO I think one of those steam trains that goes from D.C. through West Virginia in a day would really cover all bases and should be explored for a "cruise." Second, in law school Gtown professors thought this "good Samaritan" law stuff was devastating to conservatives. As it happens I was against good Samaritan laws because affirmative duties to do good are not something free societies deal with well, and worse, inevitably the person with the responsibility (duty) in the law also has a duty to do it non-negligently which is a recipe for damned if you do damned if you don't litigation. However, for the reasons you state a drowning baby that is a stranger to you is a lot different from a non-dying unborn child who is related to you! We all have greater responsibility in the law to our own children. The analysis should be turned against Glen (as he recognizes in the case of unwed fathers') because whereas you have no direct duty to other people's children you most certainly do to your own. It is another reason the abortion regime he touts so assiduously violates natural justice.
Let's assume that there is no federal right to abortion. So, if you are a Virginia legislator, what do you propose that the law on abortion should be, and why? My understanding is that many of those who describe themselves as "pro-life" believe that the government should protect a fetus from the moment of conception exactly as it protects a person already born. This would require that a woman who intentionally undergoes an abortion, except in self-defense, and any person who assists her in that endeavor, be executed, or imprisoned for life. All persons involved should be treated precisely as they would be if they took a 15-year old child, brought him to an office, paid a doctor money and held the kid down while the doctor stabbed him to death with scissors. If you don't like this idea, then perhaps we should execute only the doctor and not the woman. Or perhaps not execute anyone, but jail the doctor for awhile, or pull his license to practice medicine. But why such relatively light punishment, unless you believe that killing a fetus isn't really as bad as killing a person who is already born? But if it's not really as bad, then what's it like? What are you "protecting"? How is what you are "protecting" different from the 15-year old. I'm going to guess that the last thing the Republican Party wants is for Roe to be overturned. There are all kinds of jurisprudential and political reasons why this might be a good thing, but an overturning of Roe would have the ironic effect of forcing Democrats (and I'm going to use "Democrats" and "Republicans" as a short-form for "pro-choice" and "pro-life") to deal in a disciplined way with making the distinction between reasonable and unreasonable restrictions on abortion, while ripping the Republican Party in half. Right now, it's the other way around: Democrats have infantilized themselves by relying on the judiciary to make their case for them, while Republicans get a free ride - they can campaign against a decision without having to deal with the real-world effects of "winning" and of squaring their pro-life campaign with the principles that underlie that campaign. Just some thoughts. I guess you would call me "pro-choice", but I'm somewhat conflicted and my view stems more from a libertarian and pragmatic streak then from any sort of conviction about "rights".And... Jonah, Posted at 10:30 PM PENTAGON VS. BOY SCOUTS? [KJL] The DoD has evidently caved to the ACLU Posted at 05:57 PM CONDI FOR SECSTATE [KJL] says ABC Posted at 05:53 PM WILL KISS [KJL] play at an inaugural ball? (And will I get tickets?) Posted at 05:49 PM RE: CUA [KJL] Mea culpa. I read that Tower editorial too fast. They were criticizing a second policy, that politicians not speak on campus during the election to keep the university non-partisan. Here's a letter from the paper's editor: Ms. Lopez,Me: Seems to me, that non-partisan strategy is a wise one, in addressing the what-to-do-about-JFK-II problem. (Kerry was no JFK, of course, as we've discussed, but he wanted you to believe he was.) The Al Smith dinner in the NYC archdiocese did something similar this year--by having neither candidate show rather than have photos of Cardinal Egan stand with John Kerry. And, on the pro-abortion policy, is it unenforceable? I'd think it's more like, CUA still has a road ahead of it on reaching the ideal, but it's made some good headway. Posted at 05:29 PM DROWNING BABIES, GOOD SAMARITAN LAWS, ETC [Jonah Goldberg] Folks, please don't overread into what I've written about the drowning baby stuff. I haven't attempted to lay down my soup-to-nuts views on abortion and I haven't endorsed wholesale good samaritan laws. People are emailing me with one hypothetical after another. I don't know where I would draw the line on good samaritan laws. But I do know that I think it should be illegal not to stop and save a baby from drowning when it takes about as much effort as stopping to pick up a penny. And I do think there should be no punishment for someone who crosses the street to punch a man in the face if that man is in the process of drowning a baby. No I don't think this is all perfectly analogous to abortion. Which was my point -- that Glenn's analogy didn't work very well. Actually, my original point was that Glenn had written something interesting. But I guess that ship has sailed. Posted at 05:20 PM VALUES DEMOCRATS [Ramesh Ponnuru] A popular bit of advice that Democrats are getting these days is to present their policy agenda in moral terms. They have to make the moral case for raising the minimum wage, increasing environmental regulations, etc. This is probably good advice; I'm not sure, indeed, that Democrats haven't already been taking it for years. But the advice carries with it a risk, and a limitation. The risk is that liberals' moral arguments are peculiarly prone to coming across as self-righteous and moralistic. Conservatives' moral arguments, to the extent they are connected to traditions, have a degree of protection from this charge that liberals' don't. (And, of course, conservatives have not wholly avoided the charge--nor, in too many cases, the reality.) The limitation is that to the extent that the advice is being given as a way of winning back the votes of people who, for example, tell exit pollsters they vote on "moral values," it cannot possibly work. It might work on some voters. But if you're voting Republican on same-sex marriage, it seems unlikely that you'd switch to the Democrats because they said that national health care would promote "our values." Posted at 05:01 PM THE PROSPECT'S OMINOUS SPECTER PERSPECTIVE [Jim Boulet Jr. ] The American Prospect's blog, "Tapped," bemoans the harm already done to Arlen Specter by conservatives: Arlen Specter the independent and outspoken senior senator from Pennsylvania has already lost out on the chairmanship, and at best an empty vessel for carrying out the White House's judicial priorities in the droopy visage of Arlen Specter will be taking the helm.These folks evidently preferred the Arlen Specter who voted for "prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation" in 1996; voted for "expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation" in 2000; and voted against "requiring schools to allow voluntary prayer" in 1994. (Specter even voted against making English our official language in 1982.) The American Prospect seems to believe that having an unadulterated Arlen Specter chair the Judiciary Committee would be second only to having Ted Kennedy himself in that seat. Senate Republicans would do well to ask themselves: what if The Prospect is right? Posted at 04:58 PM SITCOM POLITICS [KJL] The day of that discussion, that night, I caught a little of ABC's primetime lineup. 8 Simple Rules had a WMDs joke. But, have you seen Complete Savages? Kinda funny. Posted at 04:54 PM MORE ON INSTAPUNDIT [Jonah Goldberg] This reader sums it up nicely: Jonah, Posted at 04:50 PM NRO OR [KJL] A reader: Why just rail cruise the blue states? Travel through Red America, too - The trip from Jacksonville, Fla to California only touches one blue state - and their governor could meet us at the station. Of course, by the time it gets to my neck of the woods, SW Louisiana, Amtrak is typically anywhere from 5 to 24 hours late (right now, train 1 - Sunset Limited is 4 1/2 hrs late). We could spend our extra time talking about what a great waste of taxpayer money 90% of Amtrak's routes are! Keep your NY to DC run and scuttle the rest. Posted at 04:48 PM THE CIA [Jonah Goldberg] I have no idea what's going on at the CIA except what I read in the papers. But since any good reform will result in just as many screaming hissy fits from the rank-and-file as any bad reforms, I'm simply hoping for the best. Posted at 04:48 PM THE DROWNING BABY ANALOGY [Jonah Goldberg] Hey folks I just said I thought Instapundit's post was interesting. I didn't say I agreed with it. Two objections that strike me -- and several readers -- as obvious. First of all, no matter what the law requires, morality absolutely requires you to save the drowning baby. That the law imposes no penalty whatsoever to such morally disgusting behavior is a scandal, but it doesn't make the morality any less clear. If the law doesn't require me to save the baby's life, than the law is "a ass." Second, the drowning baby isn't very much like abortion anyway because it is not the natural or default state of a fetus to die just as it is not normal for a baby to drown in water. It takes action by one or more parties to drown a baby in water or to abort a fetus. Surely the law recognizes that it is murder to drown a baby in a puddle. Indeed, the law may or may not require the individual passerby to stop someone from drowning a baby (I would like to think it does) but a policeman is most definitely required to stop anyone drowning a baby -- including its mother or father. Further, if I stopped someone from drowning their baby I sincerely doubt I would be in trouble with the law. In other words, the analogy falls apart because the drowning baby scenario Glenn provides is more like a miscarriage while an abortion is more like a willful killing. Posted at 04:41 PM RE: NRO OR [KJL] Man, that brings back bad memories. After covering the abortion march in D.C. in April, I was basically on the Planned Parenthood express. Nothing like four hours of "Barbara Bush should have aborted." (I swear, I thought I was hearing things, there was hardly anything else anyone wanted to talk about besides how much they hated Bush, at least at my end of the car. Posted at 04:26 PM RE "RAIL CRUISE" [Jonah Goldberg] Actually, Mark's idea isn't half bad (i.e. NROniks taking over a car on Amtrak). The day could start in DC. We do a tour of the DC NR office which would take roughly 25 minutes -- assuming Kate and Ramesh talked for ten minutes apiece. Then it would be off to Union Station. We get a whole car to ourselves. Head into NYC. We have a big fat sloppy lunch with a few speakers and whatnot at some cool spot. Then toward the end of the day we head to the NR NYC office for that tour. See how the sausage gets made etc. Listen to every single participant say "Jeepers Kathryn, you need to clean up your office." Then, off to big sloppy dinner in NYC. And then we catch the late train back to DC. Or something like that. Posted at 04:20 PM WHY DIDN'T I SEE IT? [KJL] An e-mail: "As the coordinator/den mother of your merry band, I hope that you recognize that Mr. Goldberg is seeking to have his next cross-country trip to visit the in-laws underwritten by corporate funds. Transparent, don't you think?" Posted at 04:17 PM RE: LIKE RIDING HERD ON, UH, ME. [Jonah Goldberg] Aquinas was much more of a Herbie the Love Bug fan. But Edmund Burke might have had some affinity for Animal House. Posted at 04:12 PM NUKES DON’T STOP AT THE RIO GRANDE [Mark Krikorian ] Time has a brief item Posted at 04:12 PM ABORTION, TV AND RESCUE [Jonah Goldberg ] Instapundit took our discussion of abortion and TV and went interesting places with it: I realize I'm not quite addressing Jonah's argument here, but it's not so shocking that a single decision like that might change, if not a person's moral status, at least the constellation of duties that someone has in regard to them. A classic example (and one that I've always meant to write a law review article about, but never gotten around to) has to do with abortion and the duty to rescue. Read the whole thing, as he would say. Posted at 04:10 PM RE: SENSITIVITY POLICE [Mark Krikorian ] Several readers reminded me of “paddy wagon,” which only the pathologically oversensitive associate with Irishmen any more. Another suggested that perhaps the mineral gypsum was also a slur against Gypsies (excuse me -- Roma), especially since gypsum is added to cement as... “retarder.” Posted at 04:03 PM BUS CRUISE? [Mark Krikorian ] As a third-string NRO bloviator, I hereby volunteer to speak at Jonah’s bus cruise. Or how about an even cheaper “rail cruise,” where we could take over one of the cars on the Amtrak run between DC and New York? Posted at 04:03 PM RE: LIKE RIDING HERD ON, UH, ME. [Jonah Goldberg] Aquinas was much more of a Herbie the Love Bug fan. But Edmund Burke might have had some affinity for Animal House. Posted at 04:03 PM KEN MEHLMAN [KJL] to head the RNC. Posted at 03:57 PM RUE ARAFAT [Rick Brookhiser] Why not? The French have streets named for Danton and Robespierre. Posted at 03:57 PM RE: LIKE RIDING HERD ON JONAH [Rick Brookhiser] Was Thomas Aquinas also a fan of Animal House? Posted at 03:54 PM FRENCH [KJL] to name streets after Arafat? Posted at 03:37 PM SPECTER UPDATE [KJL] From current Roll Call: With the roster of contentious nomination hearings filling up, Senate Republicans are moving quickly to rule on Sen. Arlen Specter’s (R-Pa.) bid to chair the Judiciary Committee with a pair of meetings Tuesday likely to determine his fate.Senate Judiciary Committee members should be in the pressure cooker now more than ever. Posted at 03:21 PM CUA AT BC [Kathryn Jean Lopez ] Speaking of my alma maters. The Catholic University of America in D.C. is abuzz with a silly controversy. Their president, Rev. David M. O'Connell, lead a prayer at a Bush-Cheney event on election night (the Victory-Party-in-Waiting at the Reagan building). From a GOP perspective, he’s an obvious priest to get—he’s a local, and the party’s chair, Ed Gillespie, is a grad of the school. For the school, it’s a boost to be at a prominent event on election night. Of course he would go if asked. Would I feel the same if he said a prayer at a Kerry event? Of course not, because it would have given the impression of endorsement of a candidate who voted consistently against a ban on partial-birth abortion. (Confession: That partial-birth-abortion fact is the first thing I think of every time I hear John Kerry’s name.) I don’t think Fr. O’Connell’s prayer equals an endorsement of Bush, but, frankly, if it gave the impression, I wouldn’t go nutty, because George W. Bush was the culture-of-life candidate. I find this campus controversy especially laughable given some of the things priests said on the trail for Kerry (Fr. Hummer, for a for instance). CUA’s campus newspaper, The Tower (which I once wrote for), along with some professors I had in my undergrad days (Dr. Schneck, look at me now! Sorry--you can’t win them all!) say that Fr. O’Connell is something of a hypocrite for not allowing pro-abortion speakers on campus while going himself to say a prayer at a Bush-Cheney event. The difference is pretty clear, it seems to me. And, again, if he appeared at a Kerry event, frankly, they might have more of a prayer at using that line of argument. Further--and this gets to what this is really all about--The Tower argues that somehow Catholic U. is not “a real university” because of the current speaker’s policy. This goes back to a very old debate--at many Catholics schools, but one that I have always thought is even more important at CUA, the archdiocesan school for Catholics in the U.S., chartered by the bishops. It’s a debate I was intimately involved in during my years there, before Fr. McConnell was there. (Let’s just say his immediate predecessor had some very different views on what should be allowed on campus.) Are you a university or are you Catholic? Answer: You are both. And it is the Catholicity of the place that makes it special. Without that, you’re just another school. CUA is no small-potatoes place. Grads of the school of philosophy earn pontifical degrees, for instance. You may laugh at that if you are looking for a secular place, but it’s a rigorous program, with some remarkable professors (don't get me started on that adulatory note). And, if you’re looking for secular liberal arts, you’re at the wrong place…but doesn’t, like, the name tell you that? And, by the way, there is diversity of ideas there, but the school is what it is--or is more on the road to being what it should be than it was when I graduated, not too terribly long ago. PLEASE READ THIS AND THIS CORRECTION. Posted at 02:49 PM RE: DOMINICANS [KJL] I was amused by this e-mail: "Today is the feast day for a Dominican superstar-St Albert the Great. He was Thomas Aquinas' teacher---talk about a TOUGH job---kind like riding herd on Jonah." Posted at 02:42 PM SPECTER MUST BE WORKING THE SENATE [KJL] pretty darn hard. He has cancelled his scheduled off-the-record appearance to a NYC right-wing group tonight. He must have heard The Corner was headed there. Translation, I think: He's real nervous. He's still fighting for this chairmanship. Posted at 02:15 PM ME @ NYT [Jonah Goldberg] What a fun idea. Let's also start a campaign to get me accepted at the Jedi academy. That would be about as likely. Though I don't want to prejudge. If the New York Times would like to make me an offer, I'm all ears. Posted at 02:09 PM AP GOV'T WENT WELL [KJL] was (left of center) Mrs. DeAngelis's Advanced Placement Goverment Class at Dominican Academy (my almer mater, as longtime diligent (re: people who should be on the cruise!) readers know. Bright class of girls, some even knew what NR was, more MoDo readers (I gave the latter some alternative-reading tips). I teach an annual class on conservatism there, which is always a blast. I had Mrs. DeAngelis for the same class, and a host of others, when in high school, and never debated so hard in my life. D.A. was the kinda high school every kid should get a shot at--strenuous prep work for life. (Insert school-choice commercial here.) Posted at 02:07 PM A READER [KJL] K-Lo: Let's start a campaign to have them replace Safire with Jonah. Posted at 01:56 PM SAFIRE [KJL] is stepping down as NYTimes columnist. Couldn't it be MoDo? Just about anyone elsE? (This--today's on the Oil-for-Food scandal--being one of the reasons why we'll miss Safire.) Posted at 01:07 PM MARINES [KJL] crash and antiwar rally. Posted at 01:05 PM I MIGHT ADD [KJL] It doesn't really matter that McCain endorsed Specter (shocking, I know), or that Lugar did, lamely. Neither is on the judiciary committee. Specter seems to have public support from Collins, Hagel, McCain, Lott, and Gregg. None of them are on the judiciary committee. So call. Remmeber this, before you get caught up in assurances that Specter voted for Thomas and that he says he will support the president's nominees: besides his actual post-election remarks (read them here), you know this man's temperament. And can you imagine the influence he will wield on a whole host of issues as chairman, behind closed doors? It's not the Bork public spectacle I'm foremost worried about. It's the names he makes the White House cross off their list before hearings even begin. Posted at 12:58 PM BACK TO SPECTER [Kathryn Jean Lopez] Even Lugar's endorsement was sorta lame: Mr. Specter did pick up some support on Sunday. Senator Richard G. Lugar, Republican of Indiana, said he backed Mr. Specter but mainly because of Senate rules. "If Republicans decide they want to change of all them, that's a different situation," Mr. Lugar said in an interview with Wolf Blitzer on CNN. "But they haven't, and therefore Specter ought to be the chairman." Posted at 12:55 PM TOOMEY FOR OMB? [KJL] Santorum talks it up. Posted at 12:52 PM SPECTER AND FRIST [KJL] I thought this was somewhat encouraging (this, the write-up from today's NYTimes): Dr. Frist pointedly declined to endorse Mr. Specter for the post on Sunday, saying the Pennsylvania senator should lobby his Republican colleagues in the Senate's lame-duck session this week. "The case needs to be made to the leadership of the United States Senate," Dr. Frist said, "and also to the existing members of the Judiciary Committee." Posted at 12:50 PM I HEAR YOU CAN GET THROUGH TO SOME SENATE OFFICES TODAY [KJL] No! Not now. Here are your numbers. Posted at 12:46 PM REFORMING NOMINATIONS [KJL] Dave Hoppe recommends: My proposal would be to change the Senate rules so that every nominee would be guaranteed a vote on the floor. The committees would retain an advisory role, but wouldn't be able to scuttle a nominee. After a nominee is submitted to the Senate and has handed in the paperwork, the committee would have 20 session days to hold a hearing. Then the committee would have another 20 session days to vote on the nominee. If after these days have elapsed, the committee has not voted on the nomination, the nominee would be discharged from the committee and placed on the executive calendar. Then the full Senate would have 20 session days to vote on the nominee on the floor. If it has not voted after these days have elapsed, any senator would be allowed to bring up the nomination for a four-hour debate and vote. No extended debate would be allowed on a floor vote on a nomination. Every nominee could get a vote in the Senate after his nomination has been in the Senate for 60 session days.Subscription required. Posted at 12:39 PM VENEMAN, ABRAHAM, POWELL, PAIGE [KJL] are resigning. I just got their resignations letters in my inbox. Posted at 12:37 PM GOOD SHIP LOLLIPALOOZA [Jack Fowler] All's beyond well here on the NR Post-Election Cruise. 400 election-fortified conservatives chomping at the bit (after bellying up to the ice cream bar on the Lido Deck) -- this group looks likes it's ODing on happy pills. We just finished a GREAT session on the recent elections starring Ed Gillespie, Rich Lowry, Dick Morris, Steve Moore, Pat Toomey, Ramesh Ponnuru, and John Derbyshire. I've met mucho NRO fans here, who as the week goes on I will embarrass with postings about their doings and ruminations. As for those of you reading this back in the dreariness of your winter-looming, gray-skied community, where the gutters on your home are clogged with leaves, don't forget -- you were warned that you'd be missing a wonderful trip! Don't make that same mistake with our next phenomenal voyage -- the National Review 2005 British Isles Cruise, of which you can learn more about at www.nrcruise.com. I'm Jack Fowler, and I approve this shameless message of salesmanship. Posted at 12:31 PM NRO OTR...COMING INTO FOCUS. [Jonah Goldberg ] Apparently, these are the guys who do Sean Hannity's and Ann Coulter's bus tours. Posted at 11:36 AM RE: NRO OTR [Jonah Goldberg] Yes, yes, there are many cool things we could do. We could have a historian travel with us to give tours of historic places. Readers could bring potluck grub for big NRO meet-up picnics. Etc. Etc. The thing is, I already agree. I don't need to be convinced. Posted at 11:17 AM HEY ZARKAWI.... [Jonah Goldberg] Do you like apples? How do you like these apples: FALLUJAH, Iraq -- US forces dropped a pair of 2,000-pound bombs early yesterday morning on a bunker complex believed to be an insurgent training facility on the southern edge of this city, where the most dedicated and best trained rebel fighters are making a last stand.
Posted at 10:05 AM NRO OTR [Jonah Goldberg] I'm not mentioned as a speaker on the London cruise. I assume this is a mere oversight. Nevertheless, I think it's time to revisit my old idea for an NRO "cruise" for those who don't quite have the shmundo to drop on an ocean-going trip. Years ago, I suggested an NRO bus cruise. We would rent one or two really cool John Madden or rock star style buses. Have a full wet bar, some TVs for re-runs of everything from Roadhouse (an American classic among my earliest readers, as well as among most scholars) to old episodes of Firing Line. We could start from wherever and pick some cool destination like Vegas and stop along the way to see the world's largest ball of twine, eat the best hoagie and have "seminars" of some kind en route (maybe we'd rent out a room at a brewery). It wouldn't be cheap, but it'd be cheaper than a cruise -- and shorter. Like a three day road trip. People who lived nearby could meet us for some of the events. I still think NRO On The Road is a great idea but, alas, the suits remain unpersuaded. Posted at 09:50 AM COLIN'S RESIGNING [Jonah Goldberg] According to various sites. No details yet. Posted at 09:38 AM BON VOYAGE! [Jonah Goldberg] Oh wait, I guess I don't say that when I'm the one going. I'll be meeting up with the NR Cruisers tomorrow and so I'm running around today getting things in order. But I'll still be hanging around a bit. Posted at 09:33 AM RE: BABY KILLER [Fr. George W. Rutler] I understand that the inmates at San Quentin vow to shun any "baby killer" - there is honor among thieves. Reminds me of a Mafia-connected acquaintance who told me "They can say what they want about my family, but they'd never kill anybody before he was born." Posted at 08:46 AM "BABY KILLER" [Fr. George W. Rutler] The media are freely using the term "baby killer" to describe the wretched Scott Peterson, and understandably so since he was convicted of killing a baby, one month short of birth. He was not accused of terminating a foetus. I do not know why the inconsistency of this has not yet dawned on the commentators. File this in the tangled web category, as in "O what a tangled web we weave..." Posted at 08:18 AM HERE'S AN AMNESTY I LIKE [Mark Krikorian ] During the president's first term, some of the administration's best minds were devoted to concocting euphemisms for "illegal-alien amnesty," like "regularization," "normalization," "legalization," and "earned adjustment." In the real world, though, any time an illegal alien gets legal status -- whether by way of a green card or a "temporary" visa -- he's been amnestied, and that guarantees, among other things, even more illegal immigration. Well, news from Malaysia on the kind of narrow amnesty I can live with -- illegals who deport themselves from that country by a certain date will be able to avoid arrest and imprisonment. This is like a parking-ticket amnesty -- it's not that you get away with your violation of the law, it's just that you won't receive extra penalties so long as you make things right. Posted at 08:17 AM ATTRITION WORKS [Mark Krikorian ] From a story on Irish illegal aliens leaving New York: "Some immigrants, longtime illegal residents losing hope for legal status, say they are being driven out by new security crackdowns that make it harder for those without a valid Social Security number to drive, work or plan a future in the United States." With the president yammering on about the need for a "guestworker" amnesty, we're not going to see as much attrition in the near future as we should, but the fact remains that it works. Squeezing the illegal population -- Irish or otherwise -- until a significant number deport themselves has got to be the first step in any effort to regain control of the borders. Posted at 08:15 AM CALL THE SENSITIVITY POLICE [Mark Krikorian ] First you couldn't say you were "gypped," then "welshing on a bet" and "Dutch treat" and "Indian-giver" were forbidden, but "philistine"? This is from a silly op-ed by a Palestinian writer: "The word 'philistine' means 'boorish and backward'; it comes from the word for 'Palestinian.' It is a derogatory word that demeans an entire culture, and it is used with relative impunity in this country." Besides the errors of definition and etymology, you'd think someone who writes for a living would be ashamed of this sort of thing. Posted at 08:12 AM UP, CHUCK [Tim Graham] Proving the presidential merry-go-round really shuts down, Washington Post eminence Robert Kaiser has turned to touting Sen. Chuck Hagel as a serious candidate for president in 2008. You mean, of the Republican variety? The man who regularly appears on morning TV to bash President Bush's war, echoing Joe Biden on the other side of the split screen? Kaiser seems to think this paragraph, for example, will help Hagel's run: Hagel, 58, is not your standard-issue politician. He is outspoken, does his own reading, thinking and even writing, and has the capacity to charm Nebraskans, foreigners, even Democrats. Richard Fellman, a liberal Democrat and professor at Hagel's alma mater, the University of Nebraska at Omaha, calls Hagel "the best Republican senator this state has had since George Norris," Nebraska's one certifiable political giant, who supported both Roosevelts and the New Deal. Posted at 08:06 AM ARE YOU [KJL] sufficiently enticed? Posted at 07:24 AM IT'S MONDAY [KJL] and 90 percent of NRO writers (and some very wise spending readers) are cruising and sunning and having a jolly old time. But we'll make up for their absense in The Corner, have no fear. But maybe not right now. (I'm finishing some things up and will be out teaching an AP Government class in a bit. But then I'll settle down to some Cornering...and subtly encouraging Cornering... Posted at 07:00 AM Sunday, November 14, 2004 FRIST [KJL] I haven't seen the full transcript yet, but First was tough on Specter from the snippet I just saw replayed on FNC from Fox News Sunday... Posted at 04:49 PM JE SUIS UN COWBOY [Rod Dreher] French conservative Fred Gion says he's ready to sell his apartment in Paris to the first American buyer wanting to flee the Mordor that is Bush's America. As for him, he's had it with sullen France, and wants to emigrate to Red America -- preferably Texas. Posted at 04:24 PM ARAFAT IS REMEMBERED [KJL] in a missile Posted at 04:11 PM "VENGEFUL MOB" [KJL] MoDo, "a nice Catholic columnist" says your humble Corner is part of an intolerance "mob family" re: Specter. Posted at 03:58 PM MUTTON MECCA [Andrew Stuttaford] In the US, readers tell me, it’s Owensboro, Kentucky. Worth a visit, I reckon Posted at 02:54 PM GHOUL [Andrew Stuttaford] A London-based Saudi ‘dissident’ (a word with heroic connotations that this thug quite clearly does not deserve) has released a video onto the Internet that purports to show the death of three British soldiers in Iraq.Amongst its contents: “a severed arm being trampled by a militant in front of the camera.” The London Sunday Times notes that this delightful man’s resume includes setting up an office for bin Laden and calling for the assassination of Tony Blair. An attempt to deport him failed in 1996 and he now has “indefinite leave to remain” in Britain. Well, isn’t that just great? Posted at 02:25 PM THE NANNY STATE... [Andrew Stuttaford] …finally goes completely, irreversibly nuts. Ads for ‘junk food’ are to be banned during British children’s TV programming (a step that has, incidentally, had no effect on childhood obesity trends in Sweden, where such a ban is already the law), and then, adding absurdity to arrogance, there’s this: “Sugar, salt and fat-laden foods such as sweets or burgers will display red labels on their packaging to signify they should be eaten sparingly, with 'virtuous' foods such as vegetables marked green to encourage their consumption. Foods such as cheese, high in fat but nutritious, will be labelled amber.” No word on the future of Marmite. Posted at 01:54 PM YOU GO, ARLEN [KJL] From the Pittsburgh-Tribune Review: Congress returns this week. Specter, a vainglorious man, is seeking meetings with key Republicans to plead his case. An honorable Sen. Specter would holster his vanity, recognize the distraction he has become, and remove himself from Judiciary chair consideration. But we're talking about Arlen Specter, aren't we. Posted at 12:48 AM SPECTER AND TORT REFORM [KJL] gets some ink (or pixels) Posted at 12:45 AM YOU'VE MADE AN IMPRESSION [KJL] From a Bill Frist weekly e-mail Friday: "If you haven’t yet written me about the chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee, don’t (please)!!! My mailbox is overflowing!!! We are addressing the issue appropriately within the institution of the Senate in a respectful and appropriate way that will be beneficial to the President." Posted at 12:37 AM HEH [KJL] Bush took charge during Cheney hospital visit. Posted at 12:25 AM FOLLOWING UP ON JONAH'S POST [KJL] Cheney's ok. Posted at 12:12 AM AND OVER AT WALTER REED... [KJL] a wedding to be thankful for. Congrats to Mr. & Mrs. Spec. Aaron Bugg--and thank you. Posted at 12:10 AM CORNER CONGRATS! [KJL ] My (and NR’s) dear friends Kate Dwyer and Vic Matus got hitched tonight in a classic (and I mean old-times classic) Washington, D.C. wedding. Georgetown grads both, they were married in the Georgetown chapel. From there, a trolley ride to the Hays Adams rooftop (George Schultz held the door for me as I went into the hotel, just in case you forgot were you were), where drinks overlooked the front door of the White House. You don’t get more Beltway than that. Dinner at the Chamber of Commerce with the famous Eric Felten band. A good night with good people. Kate was once an NR editorial associate—before becoming press secretary to young, bright Congressman Paul Ryan (Mrs. Matus and I go back even more, though, to time at the Heritage Foundation). Vic works at that other magazine. Our best wishes to the radiant couple—one of those matches you can’t help but be swept up in! Posted at 12:01 AM |
|
|||||||||||||||