|
![]() |
|
|
CRANBERRIES! [KJL] No...this is not another pop-music post. But i've got more than a few recipes, will share some tomorrow/Monday. Meanwhile, what's the best wine to go with Turkey? (I'm always amazed at the experts who read NRO--I'm sure there must be wine experts...) Posted at 11:46 PM FOR ONE WHO GAVE ALL [Jim Robbins] MSNBC's web site has a picture of a dead US soldier, gunned down entering a room during urban combat in Iraq. The soldier is lying in a large pool of his own blood. It is a very disturbing image. Army policy states that such pictures may not be used when the soldier is identifiable, out of respect for the family, as well as the soldier. One can't make out the features very well, but it took me about a minute looking at casualty reports on DefenseLink to find out who had been killed in that circumstance on that day. I know the Army is receiving complaints about MSNBC's actions but because the network is exploiting a loophole in the policy, the Army can't do much about it. Sources at the Pentagon say it is up to market forces to make the network see reason and take down this offensive image. I already wrote my letter to MSNBC -- let's help them understand the error of their ways. Posted at 11:27 PM SO, WHAT'S THE BUZZ? [KJL] The Passion can't possibly be disses by the Oscars...right? Posted at 10:01 PM HOW SILLY WOULD IT BE TO ASK [KJL] "Where is Duran Duran?" (Rich thinking: she really wanted to ask about Falco.) But seriously, "Imagine" just had to make the top 3, right? Posted at 09:53 PM EVEN MY DOG HATES BUSH? [Tim Graham] Have you heard the latest humor from the New York Times? The election may be over, and the results may be sinking in. Reporter Robin Finn bucked up liberal readers with a profile of Manhattan politician Christine Quinn: "The family dog, Sadie, a mutt with two doting human mommies and no daddy, wears her political heart on her sleeve: a Kerry bandanna and a button that reads, cheekily, 'I Pee on Bushes.' Who says partisan politics has to be humorless? Or confined to people?" Posted at 09:51 PM HARRY REID AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD [Tim Graham] With all the media talk that new Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid is pro-life, note that Planned Parenthood is accentuating the positive: "Reid is the lead Democratic sponsor of the Equity in Prescription Insurance and Contraceptive Coverage Act (EPICC) and the Putting Prevention First Act (PPFA). If passed, both bills would increase access to contraception and education that improve the lives of women and children." PPFA is also noting what could be the new Christmas sensation in Australia: the "first spray-on contraceptive." But when can you buy the Ban Roll-On version? Posted at 09:48 PM CLINTON DOUBLE ENTENDRE WATCH [Tim Graham] NPR's coverage of the Clinton library opening was predictably one-sided, featuring soundbites from Leon Panetta, Stan Greenberg, South Carolina Democratic boss Dick Harpootlian, Clinton-loving Washington Post reporter John F. Harris, and liberal historian Robert Dallek. But the laugh track failed to kick in when Dallek said "Bill Clinton could become the measuring rod by which the Democrats make a comeback." Posted at 09:46 PM WHOLE LOTTA BLOGGING GOING ON [KJL] Here's more NR Cruise blogging. And this one promises photos, so check again. And just got ahead an treat yourself to this summer's National Review Cruise. Posted at 09:42 PM AM I WEIRD? [KJL] (Ok, dumb question.) I actually have something specific in mind, though. I'm a lot more interested in Bush saving his Secret Service agent than the Pacers-Pistons brawl. (That said, I totally appreciate how out of line the players were going in the stands, especially.) Posted at 09:32 PM AND DON’T FORGET HOW HUMBLE KIM IS [Cliff May] Press reports that North Korean dictator Kim Jong-il's portrait was removed are “a groundless fabrication," said Ri Gyong-son, an official of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK). “General Kim Jong-il is the fate of the Korean people and the DPRK's socialism; it is unimaginable that the DPRK people and army can separate their fates from Kim Jong-Il," he said. "It is nothing but a stupid and ridiculous act, just like trying to remove the sun from the sky. The adoration for the leader originated from people's life; it will never change." Posted at 09:29 PM PETER KIRSANOW, TONIGHT [KJL] He's on CSPAN tonight at 9:15p.m. and 12:15 a.m. (EST) The Ashbrook Lecture on Racial Rebellion: The End of the Victim/Grievance Movement Posted at 09:15 PM RE MIDDLEBURY [Cliff May] Charles, I’ll give you odds that your daughter’s professor, whose political leanings remain veiled, is a closet conservative. Were he on the Left, he wouldn’t need to play his politics close to the vest. I have some MSM experience with this. During the years I was at the NY Times, I worked very hard to keep my views to myself, to report straight down the middle, to be meticulously fair to both sides. To do otherwise, would have been professional suicidal (and, I should add, my views were much more “media mainstream” back then; that is to say, I was at most center-right back in the 1980s, not a Bill Buckley conservative/neo-con/wing-nut as I am today). Rare is the left-winger on campus or in the MSM who worries about letting his ideological proclivities show. Common is the right-winger on campus and in the MSM who worries about not getting tenure or ending up covering the real estate beat in Trenton (respectively). Posted at 09:04 PM L’ESPRIT DE NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN [Cliff May] France has proposed that Baathist representatives of "la resistance" should participate in any future conference convened to discuss the future of Iraq. Our friends at MEMRI have more here. Posted at 08:58 PM CLONING THE U.N. [KJL] Sorry! That headline probably unnecessarily scared you. Depressing news from the U.N., given how a fight it's been--with the U.S. & Costa Rica as stalwarts for life. But I had heard earlier in the week that this was the direction this was going in--a nonbinding kinda declaration, and there we are. Ah well. The real battle on cloning is upcoming yet--getting a real domestic ban in place. A heated debate to be had in Bush Term II. Posted at 08:50 PM WELL, OF COURSE [KJL] Someone was blogging from the NR Cruise. Posted at 08:41 PM CLOSING IN? [Andrew Stuttaford] From today’s Guardian: ”A public prosecutor in Paris said yesterday that 12 past and present officials from Jacques Chirac's UMP party would appear in court next year after allegations of vote-rigging in the capital in the days when the French president was its mayor. In a 196-page report which could further damage Mr Chirac's reputation, the prosecutor said the officials, including the former mayor of the third arrondissement, Jacques Dominati, and his two sons, should be tried for "fraudulently influencing" the outcome of a poll.” Jacques Chirac, some people may recall, has been a little, well, critical of US efforts to bring democracy to Iraq. Perhaps he should start looking a little closer to home. And, oh yes, the same Guardian report contains this little nugget: “Meanwhile, it emerged yesterday that expenditure by the Elysée palace has increased hugely since Mr Chirac was elected president in 1995. The revelation came a day after French MPs approved a 2005 presidential budget of €31.9m (£22m). The daily Le Monde said in 1994, the final year of François Mitterrand's presidency, that the Elysée had spent (in equivalent terms) €3.3m. Allegations of runaway spending under Mr Chirac are not new and were countered yesterday by his office, which said the budget increase was mainly due to a shortfall due to the abolition, in 2001, of the "special funds", an unaudited and hidden multi-million-pound slush fund that the French state allocated itself for "extraordinary expenses". Income to offset the cut appears in the presidential budget. “ There’s one place, and one place only, for this destructive and useless individual. Jail. Posted at 07:55 PM CHAMBER OF SECRETS (3) [Andrew Stuttaford] Warning – this post may violate French law. The ‘revelation’ that France’s new EU commissioner, Jacques Barrot, was in the past convicted for his role in a political funding scandal (because Barrot later benefited from an amnesty, mentioning this conviction is, apparently, a crime), is beginning to cause trouble in Brussels. Incoming EU president Barroso is now saying that no-one ever told him that the French nominee had had these legal, ahem, difficulties in the past. Um, Barroso, old chap, have you ever heard of Google? Regrettably, the post of an EU Commissioner is an important one. If we are to believe Barroso, it seems that not even the most rudimentary check was made on the background of Chirac’s nominee (given who was doing the nominating, a little caution might have been appropriate). For that lapse alone, Barroso should resign. And he should take the collection of thieves, cronies, timeservers, lightweights and has-beens that he has the gall to call a commission with him. Posted at 07:52 PM HOLLAND 2004 (2) [Andrew Stuttaford] Via the invaluable Zachtei blog “A student of the Dalton Scholengemeenschap in The Hague was beat up after giving a presentation about Islam and the murder of Theo van Gogh, by a group of Moroccans who hadn't even heard the presentation. According to his classmates, they were acting on behalf of a girl who had, and who thought the lecture was insulting. Neither the classmates nor the teacher were able to identify anything offensive in the presentation.” And, one might add, even if they had, that would not have justified this thuggery. Posted at 07:48 PM HOLLAND 2004 [Andrew Stuttaford] ”GEERT WILDERS, the Dutch MP and controversial critic of Islam, has two policemen by his side even when in his high-security parliamentary office in case someone tries to decapitate him. Each day, he does not know where he is going to sleep that night, as he is taken from safe house to safe house in a convoy of armoured cars. He was taken into hiding when police investigating the murder of the film-maker Theo van Gogh on November 2 uncovered a network of radical Muslims with advanced plans to kill Mr Wilders, and other “enemies of Islam”. A video circulating on the internet offered 72 virgins in paradise to any Muslim who beheaded him.” It has come to this. Posted at 07:47 PM 9/11 BILL BATTLE CONTINUES [Jack Fowler] Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. James Sensenbrenner released this statement today on latest chapter in the Capitol Hill battle over 9/11 legislation, and the "hell-bent" desire by the Senate to pass a wimpy bill. Makes you want to scream: "We have put together a bill that still needs some work; thus I am pleased the Speaker will allow the conferees to continue their efforts to produce a bill that improves the security of the American public. This legislation is a response to the problems identified in the 9/11 Commission Report. "A key issue in the negotiations was whether or not drivers licenses should be issued to illegal aliens. Realizing that the 19 9/11 hijackers had 63 validly-issued U.S. drivers licenses, the 9/11 Commission wisely recommended, 'The federal government should set standards for the issuance of birth certificates and sources of identification, such as drivers licenses. Fraud in identification documents is no longer just a problem of theft.' (Report, p. 390) Regrettably, the Senate thus far has been hell-bent on ensuring illegal aliens can receive drivers licenses, regardless of the security concerns. "At the outset, House Republicans said that we would evaluate the merits of the provisions based on whether they enhanced the security of the American people. Unfortunately, the Senate has refused to consider many of the provisions, tagging them as 'extraneous' or 'controversial.' "We must consider these provisions in order to be faithful to those who lost loved ones on 9/11 and to the work of the 9/11 Commission. I will continue to negotiate with the House and Senate conferees to enact a good bill, but not one that fails to learn from the tragedy of 9/11." Posted at 07:45 PM THE NEXT TARGET? [Andrew Stuttaford] From the Daily Telegraph: “Churchgoers risk lung cancer because of unhealthy air caused by candles and incense, researchers say.” The solution, as Antoine Clarke over at Samizdata notes, is obvious: The EU must “immediately ban all church-going for children, impose a tax on adult church-goers, put health warnings on the outsides of all churches….” And, over here, I’d expect Nurse Bloomberg to do the same. Well, mayor, why not? Posted at 07:21 PM I HAVE RETURNED.... [Jonah Goldberg] Cruise was great fun, but exhausting for a hermit like me. Lucy had a grand time. The first panel I was on, included Bernard Lewis and Victor Davis Hanson, which is a bit like having me follow Yo Yo Ma and Itzach Perlman so I can play my kazoo. The second panel was quite fun, though it descended into a fairly intense metaphysical conversation between myself, Derb, Dinesh D'Souza, Ramesh and John O'Sullivan. I thought it was pretty interesting even if I'm not positive I know what it was all about. I think it would probably have been better in the original Greek. One last thing before I retire for the evening: Charles' post about Middlebury. I have several close friends who went there in the late 80s and early 90s. They all said that the PC stuff never really penetrated there. Maybe it's like a tropical disease which dies as it approaches more northerly climes. Nevertheless, having visited a couple dozen campuses in the last couple years, I can attest that the left-wingyness of academy endures. Posted at 06:03 PM Friday, November 19, 2004 T-DAY [KJL] Readers--who have just done it--point out you can order the Turkey Day W for a Thanksgiving centerpiece, but time is limited (one reader said EST tonight, I'm not 100 percent certain)... Posted at 07:13 PM SPECTER'S ENEMIES LIST [KJL] I know you'll be shocked to know some of your NR friends are on it (and, NR). Courtesy of politicspa. Posted at 06:58 PM OPERATION POPCORN [KJL] Take a soldier to the movies. Posted at 06:56 PM HARRY REID [KJL] hearts Scalia for CJ of SCOTUS? Posted at 06:53 PM MIDDLEBURY [Charles Murray] I wonder if the story about the leftist stranglehold in universities is similar to the story about incompetent public schools: we inveigh against the mass (as indeed I do), but the one we happen to know personally isn't all that bad. In my case, I was recently talking to my daughter, a sophomore at Middlebury, about her course in political philosophy. She's now two months into it, and she remarked that she still doesn't have any idea what her professor's politics are. That's not easy for someone teaching political philosophy. In fact, I'm not sure I could pull off that trick for two months myself. And then there was the convocation for her freshman class last year, when Middlebury's President told his incoming students that true diversity in a college isn't measured by skin color, but by the richness and range of intellectual perspectives. That was pretty cool too. So that I'm not misunderstood, I agree that leftist domination in universities is real in the social sciences and humanities, and it is often a problem. We may, however, underestimate the prevalence of professors who act in good faith to keep their politics from spilling over into their classrooms. So I'm sharing some good news to go along with the bad. Posted at 06:49 PM ANOTHER SERIOUS ISSUE [KJL] A reader e-mails: I think it's time that NRO came out on the most important question facing Americans next week. That is, of course -- Cranberry Sauce: Can-shaped or Fresh?I confess to being ashamed of my answer. Posted at 06:43 PM KEEP LOOKING FOR VOTES! [KJL] John Kerry sent out an e-mail to supporters this afternoon that said, among other things, "Regardless of the outcome of this election, once all the votes are counted -- and they will be counted -- we will continue to challenge this administration. This is not a time for Democrats to retreat and accommodate extremists on critical principles -- it is a time to stand firm." Posted at 06:40 PM AL HUNT [KJL] is leaving the WSJ for Bloomberg Posted at 06:37 PM A MORE MANLY [KJL] timewaster. (Also, much more dorky. No princesses here--no offense to princesses, one or two of them must moonlight as dorks.) Posted at 06:34 PM CORRECTION [KJL] Loyola is not in Philly, of course. LaSalle is. Posted at 06:31 PM SORRY [KJL] for the delay in posting. Some computer issues K-Lo is having. Will be better...must be better... Posted at 06:21 PM CHAMBER OF SECRETS (2) [Andrew Stuttaford] French EU Commissioner Barrot's secret? Here is the answer, courtesy of EU Observer. "EUOBSERVER / BRUSSELS - Nigel Farage, a British eurosceptic MEP, caused a furore in the European Parliament on Thursday (18 November) by launching a strong attack on the French Commissioner, Jacques Barrot. Mr Farage, who belongs to the UK Independence Party, said that Mr Barrot should not be allowed to be a commissioner alleging he received an eight month suspended sentence in 2000 for a funding scandal involving his political party...under French law no reference is allowed to be made to the case in public after Mr Barrot came under a presidential amnesty" Hmmm, Interesting (and seemingly backed up by the story linked to here). And who was president of France in 2000? Why, it was Jacques Chirac. Posted at 02:15 PM YEAH... [KJL] ...maybe that time waster works best for the women in the room. Posted at 02:15 PM TIME WASTER [KJL] The K-Lo version of a Jonah tradition. Posted at 02:12 PM TALKING TURKEY [KJL] A regular Corner contributor just told me he has already in his possession the hottest toy of the political season. I want my W./Turkey doll. Who wouldn't? It can be ordered through the NR Book Service. Posted at 01:55 PM CHAMBER OF SECRETS [Andrew Stuttaford] A key aspect of any democratic parliament is the ability of its members to speak openly in its chamber, free from threat of prosecution or other litigation. That's not, apparently, true in the thieves' cabal better known as the EU Parliament. According to the Daily Telegraph, the leader of the (admittedly highly eccentric) UK Independence Party is now in trouble for revealing - in the course of a debate - certain aspects of the record of the new EU Commissioner from France. Of course, there can be some valid reasons for secrecy (principally relating to security) even under parliamentary privilege, but it's still alarming to note that the parliament's president (he's a bit like the speaker) has now ordered the UKIP MEP to retract the remarks under threat of "legal consequences". The demand for 'retraction' seems to suggest that national security was not the problem. So what was? The Daily Telegraph is uncharacteristically cagey. Does anyone out there know? Posted at 01:40 PM ENEMIES [John J. Miller] Our Oldest Enemy is also our newest enemy -- check out this K.I.A. report from Iraq. Posted at 01:32 PM THE UN PUTS THE BOOT IN [Andrew Stuttaford] The organization may be corrupt, malign and useless, but is it too much to expect that the UN will not set out actively to wreck Afghanistan's new democracy? It seems that it is.. Read this report from the Independent and consider its implications: "So alarmed is the UN [by increased opium production in Afghanistan] that it is suggesting a remedy more radical than any that has been put forward before - bringing in US and British forces to fight a drugs war similar to the war on terror. It wants them to destroy farmers' crops on a massive scale before they can be harvested." If there is anything more guaranteed to alienate the locals than that particular bone-headed suggestion, I can't think what it is. As to the wider point, it is only the 'war on drugs' that makes possible the super profits that make opium such a valuable currency for terrorists and other criminals. War against terror or war against drugs? You can't fight both, and I think that I know which one matters most. Posted at 01:25 PM THIS WE BELIEVE [Ramesh Ponnuru] Leon Wieseltier, the literary editor of the New Republic, thinks that in the aftermath of the election liberalism is being caricatured, and condescended to. His apparent remedy is to indulge in some caricaturing of his own: "Perhaps the most odious feature of contemporary conservatism is its equation of success with virtue. In the realm of economics, this long ago resulted in the strange belief in the moral superiority of the wealthy, a vulgar Calvinism according to which money is a proof of merit and riches are a mark of righteousness. . . . It is not the triumphalism of the Republicans that is so distasteful. . . , it is the sanctimony; and this is owed to a further refinement of the Republican worldview, according to which moral values are finally religious values. . . . The good are with God, the bad are without God. And since winners are good and losers are bad, it follows that the winners are with God and the losers are without God. What clarity!" Well, I don't know about you, but Wieseltier has described my views perfectly. It's like the man has a window into my soul! And there's more: "Moreover, the 'faith' that is being praised as the road to political salvation, the Bush ideal of religion, is a zealous ignorance, a complacent renunciation of proof and evidence and logic and argument, as if the techniques of reason were merely liberal tools." All of us conservatives know we can't hold a candle to the reasoning powers of the New Republic. We also know that the most odious feature of contemporary liberalism is, of course, Leon Wieseltier. Posted at 01:17 PM MARINE [Michael Ledeen] I got a lot of anguished emails about Machiavelli and the British soldier who had the chance to kill Hitler in the First World War. I suppose it's hard for people to deal with Machiavelli out of context, and I should have written more, so I apologize for laziness. My point--Machiavelli's point, actually--is that real decisions in real life are almost never easy, and those called upon to make those tough decisions have to be willing to "enter into evil." Sometimes by doing that--as briefly as possible, he implores us--means doing things we know to be morally wrong. I gave the Hitler example because Machiavelli knows, as every grownup thoughtful person knows, that it is also possible to do the morally right thing, and by so doing, we unleash great evil. Life is tough. And the abstract moralists are not a very good guide for leaders, at least not all the time. Obviously I was trying to get people to think more deeply about the Marine in Fallujah. And along those lines, I urge everyone to look at the wonderful remarks by "Baldilocks" on her excellent blog. She reminds us--and many of my correspondents got this wrong--that the Marine did not shoot a PRISONER. He shot an enemy combatant. And his own experience had shown how dangerous such persons were, even--maybe especially--those who appeared severely wounded. Posted at 01:12 PM RE: PHILLY [KJL] Residents are assuring me it's just good advertising to suburban commuters. Here's one e-mail: Would that it were true. Those billboards are advertising to the suburbanites who commute to or through Philly. Most middle-class families (and anyone else uninterested in politics based on race or high taxes) have left Philly in the last decade. (I believe Philly is the only city of America's ten largest to have lost population over that period.) What is left is lots of Democrats, including a huge academic community (UPenn, Villanova, Temple, St. Joseph's, Loyola). Posted at 01:07 PM RE CAMPUS BIAS [Cliff May] From the far left all the way to the center left, commentators are arguing that President Bush should appoint Cabinet members who disagree with him, who don’t share his vision, who aren’t eager to implement his agenda. (For example, David Gergen has an op-ed in today’s New York Times on “the promise and the peril of a cabinet speaking in unison.”) So why is it that these same commentators are not demanding ideological diversity on the campuses? Why don’t they want some young professors who will tell the superannuated hippies and old New Leftists that their vision is wrong, and their agenda outmoded, foolish and destructive? And how about the MSM? Wouldn’t it be nice to have a few editors and producers who disagreed with the weltanschauung of Dan Rather, Peter Jennings, et al? Posted at 01:03 PM THE RIGHT’S PHILLY PRESENCE [KJL ] Have you’all noticed all the conservative billboards in Philadelphia? I was barely paying attention on Amtrak and found three Laura Ingrahams and one Bill Bennett. And, I’m sure I missed some. Arlen Specter aside, maybe NRO should just set up shop in Philly. The roadways certainly give the impression of right-wing brotherly love, most recent elections aside. Posted at 12:38 PM HAVE TURKEY WITH W [KJL] You know I want one. (Seriously, I now need some for next week.) Posted at 11:59 AM SPEAKING OF RALPH NEAS [KJL] Here's his press release re NARAL's Nancy: NEAS LAUDS KEENAN APPOINTMENT TOAnd the word "abortion" appears where...? Posted at 11:58 AM HELPING WOUNDED IRAQ-WAR VETS [KJL] From Fayettville Observer (NC): Hurt Troops Need Clothes, ToiletriesFurther details here Posted at 11:54 AM MICHAEL MOORE HATES AMERICA [KJL] Is on DVD. Read Andrew Leigh’s review of it here. Buy the DVD here. See the site here. See special military price here. Posted at 11:42 AM HMMM [KJL] An e-mail: I must protest. It is not enough that certain, select NROniks get to go off to a Caribbean Cruise. They now also debase themselves by taunting Kathryn in the Corner! The horror! The absolute depravity!ME: Don't flood Lowry (though man, the lineup is starting to tempt me). Just sign up for the NR 50th Anniversary British Isles cruise! Do you really have something better going on this summer? It's got its own pretty tempting lineup. Posted at 11:39 AM "PENTAGRAM" [KJL] Rod, this makes that graffiti story a tad funnier. Posted at 11:34 AM MARINE'S WIFE & UNBORN CHILD [KJL] fight for their lives after senseless shooting in Pennsylvania. Posted at 11:30 AM BAD SCENE [Stanley Kurtz] What can we say about the findings of the studies cited by Tierney? The bottom line is that a bad situation is getting very much worse. Massive imbalance is rapidly becoming near total monopoly. The University of Chicago, so important to conservatives, may be lagging at the rear of this trend, but it’s being dragged along nonetheless, as we’ve seen. I see no easy solution here. The elimination of tenure at least has to be considered. While meant to protect and encourage free discussion, tenure has instead allowed a determined ideological cadre to purge its opponents and take control of the academy. I’m not saying I favor eliminating tenure. But I think it’s time to debate the issue. As the Tierney article points out, David Horowitz and others are pushing for legislative reform via an “Academic Bill of Rights.” I have been supporting HR 3077, a bill that would reform federal subsidies to area studies. Carefully tailored legislative remedies will help. But in the end, nothing big can change until the academy decides to reform itself. Yet the emerging total monopoly of the left looks to make real reform impossible. That leaves only the creation of new colleges (like Ave Maria) or other alternative institutions that offer programs for college students–think tanks for students, so to speak. Perhaps the best solution would be more small programs within universities that are congenial to conservatives–on the model of the Robert George’s Madison program at Princeton. But leftist faculties will do all they can to prevent the emergence of even such small programs. For now, we have to keep exposing the shameful truth about bias in the academy, while hoping that new ideas or new institutions will arise to solve the problem. As the studies show, bad as it is, this situation is getting worse. But at least we’ve now got empirical proof of what every honest person should have known all along. Posted at 11:04 AM BIASED CAMPUS [Stanley Kurtz] Got to NYT very late yesterday, where I finally found John Tierney’s article on bias in the academy. This piece announces the publication of several empirical studies of faculty bias (which I know was briefly mentioned in The Corner, but is worth highlighting). Here are some key excerpts: “...a national survey of more than 1,000 academics, shows that Democratic professors outnumber Republicans by at least seven to one in the humanities and social sciences. That ratio is more than twice as lopsided as it was three decades ago, and it seems quite likely to keep increasing, because younger faculty members are more consistently Democratic than the ones nearing retirement.” A study of voter registration records at two major universities “which included professors from the hard sciences, engineering and professional schools as well as the humanities and social sciences, also found the ratio especially lopsided among the younger professors of assistant or associate rank: 183 Democrats versus 6 Republicans.” These stats are important. But the pathetic rationalizations for this bias by the liberal professors interviewed by Tierney are almost as interesting as the numbers. The conservative profs get the last laugh in this piece, though. Thanks goodness for John Tierney. One item especially caught my attention. The ratio of Democratic to Republican professors ranged from 3 to 1 among economists to 30 to 1 among anthropologists. I’m an anthropologist, and I am not in the least surprised. Posted at 11:01 AM JUST 35 (OR SO) SHOPPING DAYS TILL CHRISTMAS [Jack Fowler] It's hard to figure what day or time it is here on balmy Caribbean. But I do know that Santa is prepping to crowbar himself down the chimney. What will he bring to that special youngster in your life? Another idiotic toy that is broken in five minutes? Or some videogame featuring a busty virtual chick ripping the heart out of a street punk? Hey, how about this as an option: get them a great book -- of the world's best children's literature? You know, the kind of gift that will last (and influence!) a lifetime, and that needs no joystick or battery, and that kills no brain cells? We have a number of special offers for our acclaimed children's titles, one of which is that when you buy one copy of Volume Two of The National Review Treasury of Classic Children's Literature (an absolutely super book) you can get additional copies for half price -- and we pay for (U.S. Postal) shipping, and we send along a FREE copy of L. Frank Baum's classic Queen Zixi of Ix (bottoms up Daniel!). If your kids or grandkids don't have these books, you're shortchanging them something terrible. So get on the stick before Saint Nick is airborne -- you can order these great books here. Merry Cruisemas! Posted at 10:56 AM THAT OL' DEBBIL RUMSFELD [Rod Dreher] A reader in the Carolinas writes: Yesterday, local radio news reported on some [politically motivated (?)] vandalism against a Baptist church. The sheriff deputy quoted in the report said, "We think this is the work of juveniles because of the spray-painted satanic words and Pentagons." Posted at 10:47 AM NPR'S PRO-INSURGENT PR [Tim Graham] The Media Research Center's man in Milwaukee notes National Public Radio is demonstrating a classic weakness on the front of "peace" -- offering free propaganda time to supporters of the Iraqi insurgency, entertaining without question the idea that America is a ruthless predator. On the November 17 All Things Considered, they did a story suggesting that one could be for both "peace" and the Iraqi insurgents. Reporter Emily Harris profiled Fallujah resident Mohammed Abdullah, who claims U.S. troops are committing "the new genocide" in his city. The report centers on how Abdullah was invited to Rome, in Harris's words, as "a representative of a human-rights-and-democracy organization." She concludes by humanizing Abdullah laughing in a phone conversation with his family, taking video pictures of birds on the piazza with the same camera "he's used to record ruined houses and dead bodies after U.S. bombings in Fallujah." It's amazingly one-sided, with no need for an American rebuttal. PS: If you try to listen to the story, note that NPR.org forces you to see and hear an ad for Starbucks. At least something about this report will upset liberals. Posted at 10:44 AM SOHO SOUTH [Rick Brookhiser] City Desk has taken itself to a new city. While my NR colleagues are on the bounding main, I wanted a place where George W. Bush and John Kerry were only rumors, and where Alexander Hamilton was unknown. Buenos Aires fit the bill. My hotel (the Faena) is a blend of belle epoque and post modern--mirrors, velvet, armoires with feet, armrests with swan heads, sommeliers with shaved heads. Beef is the food of choice here--vegans would be very unhappy here. Mayor Bloomberg will be unhappy to know that people can smoke. If I can, I will link to a picture of restaurant decorated with white unicorn heads. Posted at 10:41 AM IS THERE A RIGHT TO CHOOSE [KJL] to be beaten? Posted at 10:35 AM RE: NARAL [KJL] And, uh, front page of the WashPost? Oh, yeah, I guess that is right. Since she and Ralph Neas will be facing off with the titan Senate Judiciary chair on judges... Posted at 10:32 AM NANCY NARAL [Tim Graham] Washington Post reporter Evelyn Nieves (a known liberal quantity) profiles Nancy Keenan -- Montana Democrat, lapsed Catholic, and D.C. lobbyist for People for the American Way --in her new role as the leader of NARAL Pro-Choice America. Nieves can't seem to locate a liberal label anywhere. There are four references to "conservatives," including an unwieldy use of "the antiabortion conservative religious right" (as opposed to the liberal religiious right?) but apparently NARAL-PCA is just about "reproductive rights for women," not lifestyle liberalism. Aside from the labeling disparity, and the light talk of Keenan being considered for excommunication, the weirdest part is the reporter's biased assumption that "Polls have shown that a majority of Americans favor keeping abortion legal," but then how do pro-life conservatives keep getting elected? A more accurate report would say polls show a majority of Americans support abortion remaining legal in some form, but a majority of Americans also support more restrictions on abortion. A less biased reporter would allow someone to note that NARAL-PCA fights any and all abortion restrictions, including partial-birth abortion, including Laci and Conner's Law, including the notion that infants mistakenly born alive in an abortion have rights. That would seem to imply the label they never use: "pro-abortion." Posted at 10:29 AM ANNAN OUTTA THERE? [KJL] Evidently there is a no-confidence vote in the works at the United Nations. Posted at 10:23 AM TERRIBLE STORY--ON SO MANY LEVELS [KJL] From California: A teenager shoots his pregnant girlfriend when she goes to have an abortion. The girl is now paralyzed. He is convicted of aasult with a deadly weapon--of the girlfriend. The prosecutors did not seek a charge against the baby he killed in the process because the girl wanted the baby dead. Posted at 10:10 AM “UNACCEPTABLE” [KJL ] Nancy Pelosi, among other Dems yesterday, say that it is “unacceptable” (I'm looking at yesterday's Roll Call still) to allow and indicted congressman serve in a leadership position. Did they feel that way about a certain Democratic president not so long ago? Posted at 10:06 AM GET ME AN INTERN NOW [KJL] I need to erase anything nice I've ever said about the Derb. Though, geez, I'm about ready to sign up for the British cruise (which is something, considering, I don't leave 215 Lexington Avenue. Posted at 09:53 AM DE PROFUNDIS [John Derbyshire] This is Derb reporting from somewhere in the Caribbean. We NR staffers assigned to the cruise are working our tails off here, holding panel discussions, bonding with readers and fans, keeping the flag of conservatism flying in foreign seas. It's gruelling -- hard work, hard work, to quote someone or other -- but we can handle it. Ha ha ha! Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! Wheeeeeeeee! (Yeah, sorry, Kathryn -- it took me 6 days to figure out how to send e-mail from here. *Really* tricky internet setup on this ship. Ha ha ha ha ha ha!) Posted at 09:50 AM DELAY [KJL ] I think I disagree with John Podhoretz this morning. I do agree with him a bit: that it all looks bad, and that's how people are seeing it, as my normal-people focus grouping overwhelming shows. The Tom DeLay rule change sounds terrible. To people hearing about it on the evening news last night, it sounded like the GOP is trying to protect a criminal. But, the new rule makes sense, it seems to me. As Roll Call explained it yesterday, “Under the new Republican guidelines, if a leader or chairman is indicted on a felony charge, the Steering Committee must meet within 30 days and make a recommendation to the full Conference on whether the lawmaker should be removed from his position.” That protects against partisan witch hunts in courts to oust the like of a DeLay (who a Texas District Attorney wants to do in, seemingly obviously). Perhaps that’s the way the rule should have been written when it was born, in Rostenkwski days. But I don’t get all upset at rules changing. (Like seniority and the Jud Cmte, but we won’t go there.) And, odds are, criminals aren’t going to stay in leadership positions. Besides the weight of the world weighing in on the House if they tried to keep an obvious felon in leadership, the new rule, as Roll Call noted, “requires a leader or chairman who has been convicted of a felony to immediately step down, a provision that did not exist in the previous rules.” Posted at 09:39 AM "IT IS NOT ALL DEATH AND DESTRUCTION" [KJL] Iraq reality check: The Chaldean archbishop of Kirkuk criticized Western media "misinformation" about his country and insisted that Iraqis are looking forward to elections "because they will be useful for national unity." Posted at 08:48 AM SPAIN [KJL] re-arrests an al Jazeera reporter for al Qaeda ties. Posted at 08:46 AM SPECTER [KJL] was just kidding. Posted at 08:41 AM REJECT THE KYOTOIST WRECKERS [Andrew Stuttaford] Despite Russia's recent decision to sign up to Kyoto (a decision only taken as a result of EU bullying and bribery) Putin's economic adviser, Andrei Illarionov, does not seem altogether impressed by Al Gore's favourite treaty: "The Kyoto protocol requires a supranational bureaucratic monster in charge of rationing emissions and, therefore, economic activities. The Kyotoist system of quota allocation, mandatory restrictions and harsh penalties will be a sort of international Gosplan, a system to rival the former Soviet Union's. The majority of humankind does not accept this system, despite claims of worldwide support. Even with Russia's ratification, 75 per cent of the world's CO2 is emitted by, 68 per cent of the world's GDP is produced in, and 89 per cent of the world's population live in countries that are not handcuffed by Kyoto's restrictions. Like fascism and communism, Kyotoism is an attack on basic human freedoms behind a smokescreen of propaganda. Like those ideologies of human hatred, it will be exposed and defeated." Wise words, and the welcome arrival of a splendid, if vaguely Bolshevik-sounding, new insult: "Kyotoism." A noun, and an adjective ("Kyotoist"), to savour. Thanks, Andrei! Posted at 08:21 AM REVIEWER REVIEWED [John J. Miller] It seems that within a few hours of every TV appearance I make on behalf of Our Oldest Enemy, some nitwit posts a "customer review" on Amazon.com in which he expresses dismay that anybody would even think to criticize France. These "reviewers" aren't always so honest as this one -- who at least says he hasn't read the book -- but they are usually about this ignorant: "I must admit outright that I have not read this book, but have watched an interview with the author about the book and his beliefs about France. Being a history major in college I am outraged at his dimissal of France as an enemy and his manipulations of the facts about history. It seems strange that France has been such an enemy over the years since we have never been to war against them..." This is one thing people who don't want to like my book love to say: We've never been to war with France. Well, that's just not true. There was, for instance, the Quasi War -- America's first war following the ratification of the Constitution. Also, American GIs battled the soldiers of Vichy France in North Africa. And there were constant threats of war, during the Napoloenic era, during Andrew Jackson's presidency, and during the Civil War period. I could go on and on and on about this. And if you want to learn about it, for crying out loud read the book! Posted at 08:08 AM HAVING A GREAT TIME, WISH YOU WERE HERE [Jack Fowler] Excrutiatingly busy/rewarding/fun day yesterday on the Zuiderdam. Seminars starring Bernard Lewis, VDH, Jay, Jonah, John Hillen, John O'Sullivan, Michelle Malkin, Dinesh D'Souza (in same room at same time with Ramesh Ponnuru , so the conspiracy theory that they're the same person is kaput) -- the crowd OD'ed on brilliance. Then a screening of the forthcoming Walden Media film, I Am David, more about which when I return to NYC, but suffice it to say the NR masses loved it. Not too long later, up pool-side there was a smoker. Geez Loueeze, I can't take much more -- life's not supposed to be this fun! Oh yeah -- on top of all this we're being flooded with orders for the next trip to the British Isles in July '05; go to www.nrcruise.com to find out more about that looming humdinger. Later, landlubbers. Posted at 07:54 AM DELAY ACCUSER GETS SLAPPED [KJL] House Ethics Committee rebukes Chris Bell. Posted at 05:53 AM I'M. SO. CONFUSED. [KJL] Al Qaeda in Iraq? But how? I thought there was no connection....oh, I forgot, we brought them all there. Posted at 05:38 AM Thursday, November 18, 2004 SEN. CORNYN ON SPECTER FIGHT [KJL] From the Senate floor today: And I want to say something to my constituents and the people who may be listening who have contacted my office in very sincere concern for what they have seen played out here on the Senate floor and in the judicial confirmation process. I want to say to all of them, I appreciate your passion. I appreciate your concern. I appreciate your interest in the instruments of the government that ultimately the people of this country control. And we are going to need the involvement, the attention, the passion of all of the people.Translation: They heard you. This is just one battle in a larger fight, and some good things came of it. And it's just warm up for much uglier battles to come. Posted at 07:19 PM BY THE WAY [KJL] There's some important stuff in that Specter statement. Those Judicary Committee Republicans did some real work: --"I have already registered my opposition to the Democrats' filibusters with 17 floor statements and will use my best efforts to stop any future filibusters. It is my hope and expectation that we can avoid future filibusters and judicial gridlock with a 55-45 Republican majority and election results demonstrating voter dissatisfaction with Democratic filibusters. If a rule change is necessary to avoid filibusters, there are relevant recent precedents to secure rule changes with 51 votes." And, important for FMA supporters: --"I have long objected to the tactic used in bottling up civil rights legislation in the Judiciary Committee when it should have gone to the floor for an up-or-down vote. Accordingly I would not support committee action to bottle up legislation or a constitutional amendment, even one which I personally opposed, reserving my own position for the floor." Those committments would not have been made without people calling in and e-mailing. Good job, folks. Posted at 06:12 PM I WAS BETTER THAN W. ON TERROR [Michael Graham] Here's the verbatim from Bill Clinton's ABC interview, airing tonight: "We had 9/11 style threats for the millennium and teh extent of our preparations and the work we did, and number of terrorists we brought to justice...the twenty Al Qaeda cells we broke up...if you look at all that and the fact that we apparently still came closer to getting Bin Laden than anybody has since, even though they had a lot more options, military options than we had, I feel, I wish I had gotten him." The reference to coming closer to getting Osama is particularly offensive given that Clinton has three opportunities to capture or kill him and declined all three times. Uh, Mr. Clinton, that's not a terror-fighting success. That's a failure. Posted at 06:05 PM CHICAGO & RELIGION [Stanley Kurtz] For more on the political tone of the University of Chicago Divinity School, and the relative isolation of Jean Elshtain, go here, here, and here. Posted at 06:01 PM OUR EUROPEAN BETTERS [KJL] Just got an interesting e-mail from a reader: Yesterday the national soccer teams of England and Spain met in Madrid. England has several black players. Throughout the match the Spanish fans in, full voice and in vast numbers, made monkey noises every time a black player on the English team touched the ball. To those not familiar with European soccer this is a shock but the conduct is quite common in many cities in Europe during matches. It is so common that the European Football Association has a campaign in place to try and stop the practice. If you take a look at today's Guardian it has several accounts of the racist conduct during the match. Posted at 05:58 PM ONE MORE SPY STORY [Cliff May] From another good reader: In the days of Wild Bill Donavan there was very little bureaucracy; just enough analytical and clerical staff to get the job done. Further, every task taken on was executed with the approval of, and in support of the President and his policies. OSS had many successes in those days and very few failures. Also, they never "spoke out of school". Posted at 05:48 PM SPY STORY [Cliff May] From a reader of my Scripps column on what’s wrong at the CIA and State: clifford...when i was in Cambodia in the mid-seventies, an 'attache' at the embassy approached me for info on what was going on out in the outlying towns...Battambang, Seam Riap and other places. i flew DC3's for a civilian airline hauling cargo, but why he asked ME, i didn't know until i talked to the chief pilot. he said those types were AFRAID to go out into the field, and needed grist for their reports back to Langley. i don't think it has EVER CHANGED IN THE LAST THIRTY YEARS. if you want to make it in the agency or state dept, i think you have to go along to get a leg up. you got 'em pegged. Posted at 05:46 PM WHY LABOR UNIONS LOSE MEMBERS [Jim Boulet] Richard "Skip" Daly, business manager of the Laborers, Hod Carriers, Cement Workers and Miners Local Union 169, complains to The Nation: They voted for a Republican who's got the biggest deficit spending ever; they voted against all of their self-interest. And the issue that came out in exit polling was "we voted on the moral values." What that says to me is, these people believe it's more important than their family's well-being that we don't have abortion. And, to me, that is an intolerance that we have not experienced in this country since we put into insignificance the Ku Klux Klan.Union leaders now think they have a right to impose the moral values of Massachusetts upon their red state members. Union membership continues to decline. There is a connection. The student protesters of the 60's and 70's didn't all go to law school. Some joined the staffs of major labor unions. Soon, the unions funded by the dues of pro-American hard hats were pushing a McGovernite foreign policy abroad and political correctness at home. The hard hats lost interest. Wonder why? Posted at 05:39 PM REVOLTING, BUT IMPRESSIVE [Andrew Stuttaford] "Not a burger for tree-huggers." Posted at 05:34 PM GROUPTHINK WATCH [Andrew Stuttaford] From an article in the New York Times reporting the stunning fact that Republicans are "outnumbered in academia" (who knew?): One theory for the scarcity of Republican professors is that conservatives are simply not that interested in academic careers. A Democrat on the Berkeley faculty, George P. Lakoff, who teaches linguistics and is the author of "Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think," said that liberals choose academic fields that fit their world views. "Unlike conservatives," he said, "they believe in working for the public good and social justice, as well as knowledge and art for their own sake, which are what the humanities and social sciences are about." Somewhere, deep in the shallow, shallow mind of George P. Lakoff, ignorance and pomposity are fighting for control of his ideas. It remains unclear which will win. Posted at 05:30 PM GORE PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARY [KJL] Weirder things have happened, I'm sure. Posted at 04:52 PM "YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO DIE" [KJL] Citizen Smash's rules of engagement. Posted at 04:44 PM WHERE'S THE OUTRAGE!? [Jonah Goldberg] Should you get tired of emailing Specter's office...From a reader: Jonah... Posted at 04:36 PM PELOSI BLAMES CATHOLICS [KJL] From Roll Call: You gotta blame somebody when your party loses the White House, the Senate and the House. So why not blame the Catholics? Posted at 04:33 PM SISTER MARY FOB [KJL] AP, from the Clinton Library opening: "Wet bleachers and lengthy security lines earlier in the day did little to squelch the enthusiasm of thousands waiting to attend. Sister Judith Dalesandro was among four nuns who arrived from a Roman Catholic convent in Jonesboro. Posted at 04:27 PM TOMORROW & SAT. IN DC [KJL] The JPII Center by CUA is holding a great-sounding seminar on the culture of law, which includes Cardinal Dulles and (be still my heart) Russell Hittinger (former K-Lo prof). Details here. Posted at 04:21 PM IN NYC & LOOKING FOR SOMETHING TO DO TONIGHT? [KJL] The New York Young Republicans have some things planned...see here. Posted at 04:18 PM SORRY [KJL] for The Corner slowness. The Specter thing was in the air. Clinton was on TV. I went out for wine. It was time. Posted at 04:16 PM OH, BROTHER [KJL] Did you e-mail Congress urging that Specter not be made chairman? This, evidently, is what CNN thinks of you. Posted at 04:09 PM RE: LIBRARIES [KJL] I've gotten a few of these--they are evidently partially publicly funded, which, as this e-mailer points out, makes sense: My admittedly rudimentary understanding of presidential libraries is that only the Archives aspect of the library is, in fact, publicly supported. For these libraries to be a legitimate destination for researchers, and any good at all, they incorporate the official government documents from the administration, and the archivests that go along with that. I don't think we would want the nation's archives doled out to a private group for whatever they might do with them. Posted at 04:06 PM QUICK HEARINGS AND EARLY COMMITTEE VOTES [KJL] on nominees approved by Specter. Sigh. But I think better there was a debate than there wasn't. Posted at 03:53 PM WILL THEY BE BASED ON SCOTTISH LAW? [KJL] AP: Sen. Arlen Specter, a Republican moderate seeking a key chairmanship in a party of conservatives, is drafting a written commitment of quick hearings and votes on President Bush's judicial nominees regardless of their views on abortion, party sources said Thursday. Memo to AP Stylebook Editor: He is a liberal, not a mod. Posted at 12:52 PM MEMO TO SPIES AND DIPLOMATS [Cliff May] My Scripps Howard column this week – a longer version of The Corner item I wrote a few days earlier. Posted at 12:42 PM MARINE IN FALLUJAH [Mackubin Thomas Owens] I am working on something about the shooting incident in Fallujah involving a Marine. But I could never do a better job than the young Marine who sent this e-mail to his family after the incident. Killing a prisoner in cold blood is one thing. Dealing with an adversary who does not recognize “the law of land warfare” is something else. This is an unfortunate incident but it is no war crime. The e-mail: This is one story of many that people normally don't hear, and one that everyone does. Posted at 12:35 PM PRESIDENTIAL LIBRARIES [KJL] Couldn't/Shouldn't they be privately funded? Especially since they get spun/built by the ex-admin? Posted at 12:35 PM PATRICK RUFFINI [Ramesh Ponnuru] back from a stint at the Bush campaign, is blogging again Posted at 12:29 PM LAST THING ON MY MARINES [KJL] They gave me a t-shirt--a rocking on, at that--"Pain is weakness leaving the body." Jonah's Non-Marine Military Guy is not going to like to hear that. The Marine Buying Off of K-Lo continues. Posted at 12:26 PM RE: MARINES [KJL] I am also inspired to reach out more. Besides the folks among the Marines I met with this morning who asked about my Specter obsession and other inside things, there were more than a few who wanted a map to the blogosphere--we have miles to go yet! Before my colleagues and I meet Dan Rather's salary, too!!! Posted at 12:11 PM MARINES [KJL] Got back a few ago from speaking to a Marine media-training seminar here in NYC. Humbling to know men and women fighting for freedom are reading us, can use our help, and are thanking us. God bless every last one of you--all branches. Posted at 12:06 PM THAT'S AN ANGLE [KJL] An e-mail: People like me, who sit at a computer all days long, love the digital version, because we can read it at work and still look as if we're doing something. Posted at 12:03 PM DOH! [KJL] I misspoke--that was Washington state's first count, completed at long last (i.e. not a recount). Posted at 11:43 AM TAX REFORM [Ramesh Ponnuru] I'd been hearing, even before the election, that the administration was looking at getting rid of the deduction for state and local taxes as part of its tax-reform package. I'm all for the policy: Why should low-tax states subsidize high-tax ones? Why should the federal government encourage states to have high taxes? But didn't tax reformers get their heads handed to them over this precise issue in 1985-86? Of course, there were more New York Republicans then to worry about. The administration is also apparently looking at taxing employer-provided health insurance. Again, a good policy: that tax break has done a lot of damage to health-care markets over the years. And anyone who wants to get rid of the alternative minimum tax without swelling the deficit has to look at taxing health insurance: It's one of the few tax breaks that can generate the necessary funds. But again, there are obvious political risks here. Posted at 11:40 AM WHERE'S COSMO? [Jonah Goldberg] Everyone keeps asking me if Cosmo came on the cruise. Alas, no. Cosmo is not a sea-faring beast. But it's nice so many folks care. I should probably just say, "Oh, he's on the poop deck" and walk away. Lil Lucy on the other hand is here and once again proves to be an adept cruiser. She loves the buffet, loves the pool and has no sea sickness issues whatsoever. Her mother is a different case, alas. Posted at 10:49 AM AND HE DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH THAT WOMEN, EITHER [Michael Graham] "[There's] not any example of where I ever disgraced this country publicly. I made a terrible public-personal mistake, but I paid for it, many times over. And in spite of it all, you don't have any example where I ever lied to the American people about my job, where I ever let the American people down."--Bill Clinton, yesterday. And not to re-debate the definition of "is," but does anyone know the etymology of the phrase "public-personal mistake?" Bill Safire--a little help? Posted at 09:09 AM WHY WE LOVE BILL CLINTON [Michael Graham] When it comes to Bill Clinton, some things never change. Today's Washington Post lead editorial is a reminder that the Clinton Library opening today was paid for, in part, by former-wanted-fugitive-turned-pardoned-millionaire Marc Rich. The library cost $165 million to build, and as the WaPo notes, "we still don't know the sources of much of that money." If you haven't read "Legacy" yet, this would be a good week to pick up a copy. The fact that President Clinton still can't (or won't) make a full disclosure of his actions while in office, and that his behavior has tainted even something as benign as a library, is the perfect memorial to his presidency. Posted at 09:03 AM MESA MISTAKE [Stanley Kurtz] Here’s a remarkable ad from MESA, the Middle East Studies Association. According to this ad, MESA publications will not accept advertising “from defense and intelligence related agencies from any government.” So let’s get this straight. MESA’s members request and benefit from millions of dollars in federal subsidies under Title VI of the Higher Education Act. Higher education lobbyists have no problem telling Congress that our national security needs mandate ever higher subsidies. And Congress duly appropriates this money in an effort to stem the shortage of Arabic translators and area studies experts in our defense and intelligence agencies. Yet while taking this money on the pretext that it contributes to our national security, MESA members prohibit our defense and intelligence agencies from advertising in their publications. Then they try to pretend that they’re keeping out all defense and intelligence agencies, when it’s obviously the American government they’re trying to exclude. The public is getting taken to the cleaners by these professors. It’s time to wise up and reform Title VI. Posted at 09:00 AM RELIGION AT UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO [Stanley Kurtz] The mail from yesterday’s posts on the University of Chicago seemed to center around the problems of the elephant and the glass. How you feel about the direction of the university depends a lot on which part of the elephant you’re touching. To libertarian leaning economists, the elephant feels pretty conservative. In many of the other social sciences, the elephant seems fairly uniformly leftist. Of course, the same is true at many universities. Then there’s the glass half full/half empty problem. One correspondent pointed to Jean Bethke Elshtain at the Divinity School as evidence that conservative scholars have a real presence at Chicago. A couple of other correspondent’s bemoaned the Divinity school as a place where actual believers are isolated and put upon by progressive skeptics. One of these pointed to Elshtain as the exception that proves the rule, arguing that she is in some respects marginalized. Here’s an interesting letter from a religious student with both an upside and a downside: “I completed an MA in social sciences at Chicago last year. If it's not enemy territory, I don't know what is. None of my friends were practicing any religion. Most were atheist or agnostic. Many were staunch followers of Saskia Sassen- in fact, she was their raison d'etre there. I can count the number of conservatives in my cohort on one hand. I think it was at a Paul Griffiths lecture that I realized something was deeply awry. A former U of C prof, now at UIC, Griffiths was speaking at the Div School on the benefit of having faith when teaching about... faith. The reaction was spectacular. As former colleagues could only spittle their disgust for this convert (he somehow found faith there and became a Catholic), he deftly handled them much as I would imagine C.S. Lewis handling atheists after a reading of Mere Christianity. There were walkouts. At the end of the year, one administrator whispered her faith to me, hoping I didn't deride her. When I told her I'm a practicing Catholic, she rejoiced, and then told me her boss always teased her about her "superstitions." I found one bright spot: the Catholic campus ministry, the Calvert House, run by Fr. Mike Yakaitis. A man with his theology doctorate, he can intellectually run with the big dogs. He's unusually (for a university) orthodox, which has won a following: he had to expand beyond his normal four masses a weekend to six this year, with an incredible freshman turnout. Not all hope is lost.” Posted at 08:57 AM ISRAEL KILLED ARAFAT [KJL] Rumors ain't gonna die. Posted at 08:35 AM DEATH PENALTY FOR BREAKING FAST? [KJL] From Iran Posted at 08:30 AM MILITARY & THE NET [KJL] One e-mail from a major: 1. Our professional military is extremely "wired". Staff officers are beginning to make us | ||||||