HELP
Archive
E-mail Comments
Send to a Friend
<% printurl = Request.ServerVariables("URL")%>Print Version
Friday, December 10, 2004

MOVIE AWARDS [KJL]
While Michael Moore lobbies the Academy for his Oscar in Variety and the like, you can vote for the non-Oscar-campaigning Mel Gibson's The Passion of the Christ for a People's Choice award here. Voting is winding down this weekend, fyi.

Gibson partner Bruce Davey said of Oscar lobbying: "This film should be judged on its artistic merit, not on who spends more money for advertising. That's really what the academy was meant to be and to celebrate." Meanwhile, you may not be an academy member, but you can have your say here if you think The Passion is worth commendation as a movie.

Posted at 05:53 PM

RUMSFELD IS THE NEW ASHCROFT [Rich Lowry]
If the last couple of days have made anything clear it is that Rumsfeld has replaced Ashcroft as the media/left's favorite hate figure in the Bush cabinet. The Humvee controversy is more legit than many of the Ashcroft controversies--this is NRO's take--but it still demonstrated how eager Bush critics are to beat up on their newest most-hated Bushie.

Posted at 05:37 PM

PHONE CARDS [Rich Lowry]
I know there are a lot of outfits out there gathering phone cards for the troops, but wanted to pitch one in particular here. I met these guys at Fox yesterday who are out of western New York and are taking donations to send phone cards to the troops. They say that phone cards are, obviously, something the troops really care about, and they are also very easy to ship. You can make your checks out to AT&T for pretty much any amount--from $5 to $1,000--and send them to Dawn Hanavan at the Western New York Area Labor Federation, 295 Main Street (Room 832), Buffalo, NY, 14203.

Posted at 05:24 PM

SILVIO [Michael Ledeen]
Now that Berlusconi has been acquitted, I wonder how long it will be before the European press apologizes. Not to mention the glitterati up in Baghdad-on-the-Hudson who have been accusing him, lo these many years, of being a crook and even a murderer (cf. Sig. Alessandro Stille, who fell for the nonsense linking Berlusconi to the Sicilian Mafia, HOHO).

Posted at 05:21 PM

WOMEN OF THE CORNER [KJL]
One of our peeps is working on something on airport pat-down nightmares. If you have a nightmare you'd like to share, please send them along, with "airport" in the subject line. Will be used anonymously if preferred, etc.

Posted at 05:18 PM

REHNQUIST [KJL]
will swear W in?

Posted at 04:59 PM

PBS'S ROBUST HUMANIST CITIZEN-JOURNALIST [Tim Graham]
About that AP story on Bill Moyers today...I know everyone is properly focused on BM's classic distillation of the who-us-liberal? media thesis -- hard right-wing media versus running-dog profit-obsessed media that's not liberal at all -- don't miss how AP reporter Frazier Moore has constructed a very puffy pillow of a press release here.

Moyers is a not a fire-breathing leftist, but a "humanist" and "a citizen-journalist with a robust background." And notice how Friendly Frazier sucks up by noting "one example of typically good journalism" was a Moyers segment denouncing Condi Rice as a dreadful judge of national security and an Iraq War liar. Liberally biased journalism is the best journalism. In fact, journalism isn't journalism unless it's "saving capitalism from its excesses." Nobody ever saved Moyers from his excesses.

Posted at 04:20 PM

AS THE YEAR WINDS DOWN, ANOTHER ENDING [Peter Robinson ]
In this morning’s mail:
We Regret to Announce that The Office of Ronald Reagan Will Close on December 31, 2004.

When I saddle up and ride into the sunset it will be with the knowledge that we’ve done great things.

—Ronald Reagan

Posted at 04:17 PM

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL CRICHTON, MY FRIEND RECANTS [Peter Robinson ]
Yesterday I posted the comments on Michael Crichton’s latest novel of my friend, George Savage, who argued that since in his previous novels Crichton sounded like a liberal, trying to scare us all to death about new technologies, Crichton’s new stance, as a debunker of liberal pseudo-science, was suspect. Within an hour I’d received a couple of dozen emails from Crichton fans, all of which I forwarded to George. And? And a day after I nailed George’s theses to the church door, George would now like me to take them down. As George explains:
Crichton's 2003 Commonwealth Club speech [to which several Corner readers directed me] is news to me. I'm persuaded that I got something important wrong. I assumed that the shift in focus apparent in State of Fear (which I haven't yet read) was aimed primarily at selling more books. However, this change may well be a result of all of the books Crichton has already sold. By this reading, the author is successful enough to feel comfortable departing from his tried-and-true techno-thriller formula to deliver a serious and heartfelt message. Pretty much the opposite of hypocrisy.
And after that glowing review of the Crichton novel in today’s l Street JournalGeorge and I will both be reading State of Fear over the holidays.

Posted at 04:09 PM

RE: CABO SAN LUCAS [Rick Brookhiser]
It isn't Rio de Janeiro, either. Just look at it as the price of living in civil society.

Posted at 03:37 PM

THE NEW NR DIGITAL IS UP [KJL]
You can subscribe to NRODT on paper here. Or subscribe to NR Digital here. Or give a gift of NRODT on paper here. Or give a gift of NR Digital here.

Posted at 03:20 PM

FLEW [Ramesh Ponnuru]
The interview.

Posted at 03:09 PM

POP-CULTURE NONSENSE [Steve Hayward]
Since Jonah is away it is up to the rest of us to keep up the pop culture trivia portfolio at The Corner, so I offer this ridiculous entry. I wrote a piece for AEI recently commenting on the senescence of environmental doomsaying and offering the quip that recent eco-apocalypse books sort of had a "Soylent Green" feeling to them, and that while Hollywood likes to do remakes, even Hollywood wouldn't remake something as absurd as Soylent Green. Well guess what?

Posted at 02:33 PM

HEY, HEY, HEY, THIS AIN'T CABO SAN LUCAS! I WANT MY MONEY BACK. [KJL]
It's raining on Lexington Avenue and my coffee is cold.

Posted at 02:07 PM

BERLUSCONI [KJL]
in the clear

Posted at 01:43 PM

KEY INTERIM APPOINTMENT TODAY [Roger Clegg]
Ken Marcus, who has done great work over the past year as acting head of the Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights, is leaving at the end of the day to begin as staff director at the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. His interim replacement will be either a conservative political appointee or a liberal career employee. Guess who our choice is? The whole world is watching …

Posted at 01:39 PM

THE WAR ON TERROR = A REALLY BIG BUG [Jonah Goldberg]
From a reader:
Jonah: In the mid 1970's a tribe of people in New Guinea were discovered that were so remote they had never had any contact with modern civilization. These people did not even know who Mary Anne is, or for that matter, Gilligan. When the scientists studying the tribe requested more supplies a helicopter was dispatched to the tribe's location. The reaction of the tribe was that an "insect" of that size simply could not exist (they obviously had missed not only Gillian's Island but all those 50's monster movies). Their way of dealing with this impossibility was they refused to look at the helicopter. It was impossible in their worldview, so it did not exist, or at least could not be acknowledged to exist. I fear that the "softies" you speak of are like that primitive tribe. The fact of terrorism is so counter to their world view that it simply cannot exist. They can read about it, have it shown to them, even get killed by it, but they can never, ever "see" it.

Posted at 01:09 PM

HARD CONS & SOFT DEMS [Jonah Goldberg]
One point many liberals make in these emails is that they would be "hard" on terror if it weren't for either Bush's "botching" of the Iraq war or the Iraq war in general. This strikes me as another way of ducking the issue. If you agree with the premise that the war on terror is an existential threat, why would the Iraq war make you soft on the war on terror? FDR surely botched many things in the fight against Nazism but why would that make you soft against Nazism? (And I don't know any historian who doesn't think he lied repeatedly in order to move America into the war). Besides, the fact that so many liberals don't see Iraq as part of the war on terrorism merely highlights my earlier point: there's a huge divide between how conservatives and liberals see the world. Indeed, even if you thought Bush was wrong to go into Iraq, I'm at a total loss to understand why you couldn't see that the conflict there now is central to the war on terror.

Posted at 01:02 PM

RE: CANINE HYMNOLOGY [John Derbyshire]
Generally speaking, dogs don't fare well in hymnology. A search for "dogs" in the CyberHymnal turns up just two references:

"For many dogs do compass me, In council they do meet..." from Sternhold's and Hopkins's "O God, my God, wherefore dost Thou"

"Then Dives sent out his hungry dogs, To bite him [i.e. Lazarus] as he lay..." from the traditional English hymn "Dives and Lazarus"

I note, however, that a search for "cats" in the CyberHymnal turns up nothing at all...

Posted at 12:58 PM

RE: CANINE HYMNOLOGY [John Derbyshire]
Generally speaking, dogs don't fare well in hymnology. A search for "dogs" in the CyberHymnal turns up just two references:

"For many dogs do compass me, In council they do meet..." from Sternhold's and Hopkins's "O God, my God, wherefore dost Thou"

"Then Dives sent out his hungry dogs, To bite him [i.e. Lazarus] as he lay..." from the traditional English hymn "Dives and Lazarus"

I note, however, that a search for "cats" in the CyberHymnal turns up nothing at all...

Posted at 12:58 PM

THE BUCKLEY AND BUCKLEY SHOW [Jack Fowler]
Bill and Chris’s Excellent Adventure last night at the Goldwater Institute.

Posted at 12:55 PM

RE: DOG-MA [Jonah Goldberg ]
I just saw Jack's post about dogs in the bible. And it's true that dog's don't come out well in the Good Book. But, for clarity's sake, we should note that Islam is much harsher on dogs and dog-owners that Christianity or Judaism. And Western Civilization is, simply, dog's best friend.

Posted at 12:41 PM

SOFT DEMS [Jonah Goldberg]
I've gotten a bunch of interesting emails re today's G-File. So far they seem to illustrate a point I didn't have room to flesh out in the column: the huge ideological divide between conservatives and liberals. At this point, I'm really begining to think there's simply a broad ideological chasm on foreign policy that isn't bridgeable. Kevin Drum et al think the if the war is so important Republicans should make it bi-partisan. Conservatives think the war is so important liberals should stop whining about partisanship. So the more conservatives don't care what liberals think, the more liberals think conservatives really aren't serious about the threat From there it's easy to see how they think conservatives don't really believe there's a threat either, we're just using it as a "wedge issue." In other words, from a conservative perspective, the more we do the right thing the more proof it is to liberals that we're doing the wrong thing. Or something like that.

Posted at 12:27 PM

HEY, HEY, HEY... [Jonah Goldberg]
Hola, I'm at Señor Greenberg's Mexicatessen in Cabo San Lucas. Nice place, nice people. Good times.

Posted at 12:15 PM

THOSE NEW STEM-CELL PROPOSALS [Ramesh Ponnuru]
I've written some more in their defense in TechCentralStation.

Posted at 11:45 AM

RE DIVERSITY [Cliff May]
And how about diversity of opinion in the media, too? How many conservatives, how many Republicans, how many evangelical Christians are reporting and editing at The New York Times?

Posted at 11:40 AM

ANTHONY FLEW [Ramesh Ponnuru]
I suppose it's wrong of me to feel this way, but I'm sort of sad to see him go theist. I met him a decade or so ago when I was at the Institute for Economic Affairs in London for a summer. He was very likable. And he was just exactly what one would want an atheist philosopher to be--which isn't meant to be as condescending as it sounds.

Posted at 11:37 AM

THE DIVERSITY THAT MATTERS [Roger Clegg]
Amusing article this morning in USA Today, about how Bush has quietly appointed an administration that is racially and ethnically very diverse. And yet—surprise—the Left is for some reason not falling all over itself to praise him: “Critics … say there's a shortage of diversity on at least one measure: diversity of opinion. Bush's appointments, especially for his second term, have put a premium on loyalists who are more likely to endorse and carry out his policies than to press alternatives. … Another reason Bush hasn't gotten as much credit as Clinton: The interest groups most likely to praise diversity of personnel generally disagree with Bush on policy. Leaders of the NAACP and NOW opposed Bush's re-election and criticize him for curtailing affirmative action and other programs designed to help women and minorities. ‘There's diversity of color, but it's the policies that one would be more interested in,’ says New York Rep. Charles Rangel, a Democrat who is one of the senior black members of Congress.” Oh, so now the Left thinks that it’s really not skin color that is so important; it’s diversity of opinion? Funny, you never hear this when the discussion is about academia—even though it’s a lot more reasonable to want diversity of opinion there than in a unitary Executive Branch.

Posted at 10:38 AM

SOLOMON [Stanley Kurtz]
Here’s a good piece by John Leo on the Solomon Amendment case. I think we’re going to be hearing much more about this fight in the future.

Posted at 10:27 AM

FLOODGATES [Stanley Kurtz]
Here come the polyamorists, and a bunch of other folks as well

Posted at 10:25 AM

"MADRID STYLE ATTACK" AVERTED IN LONDON [KJL]
according to police. But, "an attack is still inevitable."

Posted at 10:15 AM

ANTHONY FLEW [Andrew Stuttaford]
Tim, I wouldn't read too much into that story about the conversion of Professor Flew. The concept of a "leading" British atheist is pretty meaningless. The average Brit tends to be benignly indifferent to most questions of religious belief, and profoundly suspicious of anything looking like religious enthusiasm. For these purposes atheism is (quite correctly) seen as a religion. Flew therefore will simply be seen as a crank (particularly as he is a 'philosophy' professor) who has changed his mind, and his influence will be, well, nil.

Posted at 10:12 AM

SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWER [Cliff May]
"It is outrageous and amazing," wrote Salama Ni'mat, a columnist for the London-based Arabic-language daily Al-Hayat, "that the first free and general elections in the history of the Arab nation are to take place in January: in Iraq, under the auspices of American occupation, and in Palestine, under the auspices of the Israeli occupation." My Scripps Howard column this week.

Posted at 10:05 AM

SUCH PRAISE! [Jack Fowler]
Here’s what the Wall Street Journal editorial page had to say last December 26th about NR’s children’s books. This is why we call them “acclaimed.” And this is why you absolutely must buy them for this Christmas:
Once upon a time, in the days before Japanese animation, there was St. Nicholas--the magazine, not the jolly man in the red suit. As we pick our way through GameCubes and PlayStations under our trees this Boxing Day, we may find it hard to credit that there was a time (from 1873 to 1940, to be precise) when the arrival of the latest issue of St. Nicholas occasioned the same sense of excitement now reserved for the latest Harry Potter sensation.
For good reason. Though we now tend to dismiss 19th-century children's stories as moralistic, in fact the opposite is more often true. Today the American child who opens a book or clicks on his TV is more likely to get a cartoon sermon on the virtues of recycling than the kind of rip-roaring adventures that were standard fare back when Mary Mapes Dodge was editing St. Nicholas.
Children's literature, she insisted, “must not be a milk-and-water variety” of what adults are served. To the contrary, children's stories need to be “stronger, truer, bolder, more uncompromising.” And she backed that up by publishing the best authors she could find: from Rudyard Kipling, Lewis Carroll and Mark Twain to Jack London, L. Frank Baum and Louisa May Alcott. She herself is better known as the author of “Hans Brinker,” and it's no coincidence that when Millie Benson--author of the Nancy Drew series--made her own writing debut at age 12, it would be in the pages of St. Nicholas.
The good news is that even children of the 21st century now have the opportunity to relive the exploits that brought so much joy to their late-19th and early 20th-century counterparts. For William F. Buckley Jr.'s National Review has just reissued its second volume of St. Nicholas stories in its “Treasury of Classic Children's Literature” (along with a companion volume of Bedtime Stories).
Whether it's Louisa May Alcott's country girl Daisy Field making her way in the big city or Allen French's Sir Marrok avenging wrongs across medieval Britain or Frances Hodgson Burnett's little grain of wheat that was too proud for its own good, the stories involve characters forced to make choices: between lying and telling the truth, between selfishness and generosity, between cowardice and courage.
In his introduction, Mr. Buckley affixes these stories with the much-maligned adjective “wholesome” but notes that they come “with bite and wit and cunning.” They don't mince the dark side, either: These fictional worlds are populated by wicked witches, mean-spirited neighbors, irredeemable villains and a Mother Nature that can be heartless.
Yet however fantastic the settings, the presentation of vivid characters caught up in drama helps excite in children an appreciation for the human condition. After all, how are we ever to expect our children to recognize good and evil in real life if they have never been introduced to it in their imagination?
Remember, any time you purchase an NR kids book, you get a free copy of L. Frank Baum’s classic story, Queen Zixi of Ix (which comes in a special, limited hardcover edition, in case you want that). All of our books can be ordered here.

Posted at 09:42 AM

CRICHTON MOVIES [John J. Miller]
It's unusual for one of his books not to become a movie. And it looks like Hollywood owes him a big thank-you, considering all the revenue it has generated from Crichton's concepts.

Posted at 09:16 AM

CRICHTON'S PROSPECTS [Steve Hayward]
I'll be writing shortly for NRODT about the current state of the global warming issue, using Crichton as the hook. One big thing to watch is whether Hollywood will buy the movie rights, and then make a film, of this book, or whether Hollywood is too narrow minded to move beyond "The Day After Tomorrow." I'm guessing Hollywood will take a pass on this one, and you'll also start to hear whispers from the trade that Crichton is an awful person, etc. He has, over the years, delivered some less than flattering assessments of how Hollywood has adapted his novels, so this could be the excuse for payback.

Posted at 08:23 AM

ATHENS, JERUSALEM, AND THE FORESTS [John Derbyshire]
Regarding the incompleteness of the "Athens and Jerusalem" narrative, a reader points to an authority:

"Jornandes the Goth called the north of Europe the forge of the human race. I should rather call it the forge where those weapons were framed which broke the chains of southern nations. In the north were formed those valiant people who sallied forth and deserted their countries to destroy tyrants and slaves, and to teach men that, nature having made them equal, reason could not render them dependent, except where it was necessary to their happiness." ---From Montesquieu, "The Spirit of Laws"

Posted at 08:15 AM

ZHANG ZIYI [John Derbyshire]
A fellow-sufferer has directed me to a new Zhang Ziyi website. How can there ever be enough? As some character in Dickens says: "I love another. She is another's. Everything seems to belong to somebody else."

Posted at 08:09 AM

COMING AROUND SLOWLY [Tim Graham]
AP religion reporter Richard Ostling notes that leading British atheist Antony Flew has changed his mind, and that God exists. But it's still not the God of Christianity or of Islam, which he sees depicted as omnipotent Oriental despots, "cosmic Saddam Husseins."

Posted at 07:47 AM

LASER THREAT [KJL]
Unnerving AP story:
WASHINGTON - Terrorists may seek to down aircraft by shining powerful lasers into cockpits to blind pilots during landing approaches, federal officials are warning in a bulletin distributed nationwide.

The memo sent by the FBI and the Homeland Security Department says there is evidence that terrorists have explored using lasers as weapons, though there is no specific intelligence indicating al-Qaida or other groups might use lasers in the United States.

"Although lasers are not proven methods of attack like improvised explosive devices and hijackings, terrorist groups overseas have expressed interest in using these devices against human sight," the memo said.

"In certain circumstances, if laser weapons adversely affect the eyesight of both pilot and co-pilot during a non-instrument approach, there is a risk of airliner crash," the agencies said.

In September a pilot for Delta Air Lines reported an eye injury from a laser beam shone into the cockpit during a landing approach in Salt Lake City. The incident occurred about 5 miles from the airport. The plane landed safely.

FBI and other federal officials are investigating. It is not clear if a crime was committed or if the laser was directed into the cockpit by accident.

Steve Luckey, a retired airline pilot who is chairman of the Air Line Pilots Association's national security committee, said pilots are concerned about a recent increase in laser incidents, but do not know what to make of them. He said he has learned of two or three cases in the past 90 days.

"The most recent incidents appear to be aimed at pilots in the vicinity of airports," Luckey said. "A few seem to be intentional, and we're wondering why and what's going on."

Posted at 06:49 AM

CRICHTON RAVE [John J. Miller]
Ron Bailey reviews the new Michael Crichton book, State of Fear, in today's Wall Street Journal (sorry, no free link): "a lightning-paced technopolitical thriller that turns on a controversial notion: All that talk we've been hearing about global warming -- you know, polar ice caps melting, weather systems sent into calamitous confusion, beach weather lingering well into January -- might be at best misguided, at worst dead wrong. Think 'The Da Vinci Code' with real facts, violent storms and a different kind of faith altogether. ... [The book is] every bit as informative as it is entertaining. And it is very entertaining."

The villain is "a Ralph Nader clone." (Oddly, his name is Nick Drake, like the folksy singer of "Pink Moon" fame.)

Posted at 05:59 AM

PROTECTING THE FARMLAND [KJL]
Victor Davis Hanson had this piece in the NYT yesterday, by the way.

Posted at 05:48 AM

REID AND SCALIA [KJL]
The NYT reprimands Harry Reid for being too easy on Scalia.

Posted at 05:45 AM

TOO COOL [KJL]
Omar and Mohammed from the Iraq the Model blog, in the country with the wonderful folks with Spirit of America, evidently met with President Bush yesterday. One would certainly hope they have White House fans, and clearly must.

One also prays that doesn't cause them any grief at home.

Posted at 05:42 AM

"IMPEACH MINETA" [KJL]
Michelle Malkin begins the brief.

Posted at 05:35 AM

Looking
for a story?
Click here