|
![]() |
|
|
MAKE ME ONE SON, PLEASE. [KJL] Parents are increasingly putting in their sex-selection orders at fertility clinics. Posted at 11:31 PM WELL, THEY WOULD GIVE THE CLOTHES OFF THEIR BACKS [KJL] A N.C. housing project refuses strippers' toy donations. Posted at 11:25 PM THE NEXT BEST THING? [KJL] Foam laps for men instead of a woman. Gee whiz, to think I thought Mr. Wonderful was a sad commentary...(ok, after I laughed...I'm not a total stick in the mud). Posted at 10:46 PM RE: LIVING AMERICAN INTELLECTUALS CHALLENGE CUP [John Derbyshire] A class of '06 law school student: "Dear Mr. Derbyshire---I found your article about public intellectuals (as I find most of your writings, despite my lack of your affection towards mathematics) very interesting. As a current law school student, I want to second the nomination of Judge Posner, who I see has been brought to your attention. I would also suggest the inclusion of Justice Scalia on your list of public intellectuals, whom, along with Posner, is regularly the wellspring of the greatest amount of classroom discussion from my professors. This is despite (or perhaps in spite of) the fact that the profs do not agree with their opinions. The fact that my profs feels as though they must, at least, bring attention to Justice Scalia's writing, even when it may be a dissenting opinion, speaks volumes..." This is one of many nominations for Justice Scalia -- the ONLY member of the SCOTUS to be nominated. Posted at 10:43 PM RE: LIVING AMERICAN INTELLECTUALS CHALLENGE CUP [John Derbyshire] Michael Novak, George Will, Robert Bork, Norman Podhoretz all getting lots of votes. VDH is *way* out ahead though. Looks like Vic could run for President. High time I got round to reading THE OTHER GREEKS. Posted at 10:38 PM PINOCHET [KJL] indicted Posted at 10:33 PM KUDLOW FOR NATIONAL COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS [KJL] This, I've heard, may be more than NR just touting its own. Posted at 10:28 PM MOBSTERS BULLY [KJL] Algerian terror suspect in Italian jail. Posted at 10:26 PM MS.ERY [KJL] I just got this e-mail from Gloria Steinem: Dear Ms. Friend,ME: a) prisons? Not the first place I think of when I think of spreading the NRO/NR word. But, hey, if that’s your movement’s future, Gloria… b) so can you actually imagine being stuck in a prison cell with only Ms. to read? Surely there are laws against such cruelty. I know there’s something in the Constitution along those lines. c) "Christmas or Kwanzaa, Diwali, Ramadan, Chanukah or the Winter Solstice." Come on, she had to leave something out. d) I'm pretty sure Ms. Steinem would kick me off the “Dear Ms. Friend” direct mail list if she read The Corner. Posted at 10:23 PM JFK, MINORITY PRESIDENT: YET ANOTHER SOURCE [Peter Robinson] It turns out that just last year John Fund wrote about JFK's 1960 defeat in the popular vote . (With thanks to John for his usual lucidity--and apologies for having missed the article when it first appeared). "The Associated Press reported that Kennedy's plurality was just 112,827 votes nationwide, a margin of 49.7% to 49.5%. But was Kennedy, like George W. Bush, actually a 'minority president,' elected without a popular-vote plurality? "It's uncertain because in Alabama, JFK's name didn't actually appear on the ballot. Voters were asked to choose between Nixon and a slate of 'unpledged Democrat electors.' A statewide primary had chosen five Democratic electors who were 'loyalists' pledged to JFK six who were free to vote for anyone. "The Democratic slate defeated Nixon, 324,050 votes to 237,981. In the end, the six unpledged electors voted for Sen. Harry Byrd of Virginia, a leading Dixiecrat, and the other five stuck with their pledge to Kennedy. When the Associated Press at the time counted up the popular vote from all 50 states it listed all the Democratic votes, pledged and unpledged, in the Kennedy column. Over the years other counts have routinely assigned all of Alabama's votes to Kennedy." "But scholars say that isn't accurate. 'Not all the voters who chose those electors were for Kennedy--anything but,' says historian Albert Southwick. Humphrey Taylor, the current chairman of the polling firm Louis Harris & Associates (which worked for Kennedy in 1960), acknowledges that in Alabama 'much of the popular vote . . . that is credited to Kennedy's line to give him a small plurality nationally' is dubious. 'Richard Nixon seems to have carried the popular vote narrowly, while Kennedy won in the Electoral College,' he concludes." Posted at 10:14 PM NOT EVERYONE SEES CLEARLY EVEN ON PETERSON CASE [KJL] Note the BBC's phrasing:"In November, Peterson was convicted of first-degree murder for killing his wife and second-degree murder for the death of his unborn child, who was to be named Conner." No, they did actually name him Conner, and he was actually a child, murdered. Posted at 10:12 PM RE 1960: WHO ACTUALLY WON? [Peter Robinson] A reader has pointed out a site that provides the actual 1960 vote totals: One of the little appreciated facts about 1960 is that Nixon got more votes than Kennedy. The figures that appear in standard reference works are 34,226,731 for Kennedy and 34,108,157 for Nixon, but the Kennedy total includes 324,050 votes for an unpledged slate of Democratic electors in Alabama, where Kennedy’s name was not on the ballot. His actual vote total was 205,476 less than Nixon’s. Posted at 08:57 PM LIVING AMERICAN INTELLECTUALS CHALLENGE CUP [John Derbyshire] Vic Davis Hanson coming up strong on the outside... Posner losing ground... Alasdair MacIntyre gaining... Posted at 08:34 PM 1960: WHO REALLY WON? [Peter Robinson] Just shot an episode of Uncommon Knowledge, on the Electoral College, on which my guests were Tara Ross (whose new book, Enlightened Democracy: The Case for the Electoral College is wonderfully cogent) and Jack Rakove, a professor of history here at Stanford. When I asked how many times the Electoral College had given chosen as president the candidate who had lost the popular vote, Tara and Jack mentioned the elections that usually get mentioned, namely those of 1876, 1888 and 2000, in which the winners of the popular vote (Tilden, Cleveland and Gore, respectively) lost the electoral vote (to Hayes, Harrison and George W. Bush), and that of 1824, in which it is possible but not certain (because of the way states cast their votes in those days) that Jackson won the popular vote, even though he lost the final electoral vote to John Quincy Adams. Then Jack added the election of 1960, making an assertion that I’d never, ever heard. In 1960, Jack explained, a number of Southern states, including, for example, Alabama, placed two slates of Democratic electors on the ballot, one slate that was pledged to vote for John Kennedy, and a second that was pledged to vote for Virginia senator Harry Byrd. If you subtract the votes for Byrd from the overall Democratic vote total to derive the number of votes actually cast for John Kennedy, you’ll discover is that the candidate who actually won the 1960 popular vote was…Richard Nixon. John Kennedy, minority president. Why do you suppose Michael Moore has never complained about that? Posted at 08:04 PM PROBABLY DESERVED (RE: MCCAIN) [KJL] Two readers just addressed me as "Low-Blow" as in "Dear Low-Blow." Posted at 08:01 PM MCCAIN [KJL] declares his "no confidence" in Rumsfeld. Gosh. You think that will guarantee him the opening spot on the Today Show tomorrow? Okay, actually, it won't because of Peterson, but you hear me. Posted at 06:31 PM RE: BLEG: AN AMERICAN WRITER [John Derbyshire] Thanks to blogger David M. for this illumination: In answer to Mr. Derbyshire's bleg, it appears that JF Neal and John Neal are indeed one and the same.Wonder where that "F" came from? Posted at 06:20 PM RICH CLINTON LEGACY [KJL] No, no, not THAT Rich's Clinton LEGACY. Read about Mark Rich & Oil-for-Food. Posted at 05:55 PM RE: PEDRO [Shannen Coffin] Yes, K-Lo, reports are that Pedro Martinez will leave the Red Sox for the Mets and a 4 year/$50 million contract. Lots of "respect" (Pedro's favorite term for money) in that deal, even if the Mets will not come close to the playoffs during his tenure. It's a disappointing signing from a Sox fan's perspective, but the risk of matching that offer by Red Sox management was just too great. A prima donna with a fragile makeup (both mentally and physically) and a much more hittable fastball than in his prime made "four more years" too rich for Sox GM Theo Epstein's blood. Yet he will be missed. For most of his Sox career, he posted ERAs that were just plain unbelievable. And few true Sox fans will ever forget his 6-inning, no hit relief appearance against Cleveland in the 1999 ALDS. Of course, we will have fond memories of his final appearance with the Sox, winning game 3 of the World Series, was, while not vintage Pedro, damned good pitching. Good luck, Petey. But not too much luck. Posted at 05:49 PM REMEMBER WHAT WE DID? [KJL] in primary season, NRODT ran a "please nominate this man" cover on dean--dean was out before the scream, thanks to us! See, feel, taste the power the NR conglomerate holds over the Democratic party....at a whim/ in a drunken rage of insanity I could insist the DNC nominate Dean for chair and kill his chances.... Posted at 05:32 PM PEDRO [KJL] to the Mets? Posted at 05:23 PM BLEG: AN AMERICAN WRITER [John Derbyshire] Reading a very obscure book about the early 19C writer George Borrow (THE BIBLE IN SPAIN etc.), I came across the following footnote: "Even the American J.F. Neal had much in common with Borrow. He spent the early 1820s in London; was, like him, a boxing enthusiast, having taken lessons from Richmond the Black; like Borrow, too, was a journalist in those years and had an enthusiasm for language learning." Is this the John Neal (1793-1876) listed in the OXFORD COMPANION TO AMERICAN LITERATURE, author of BROTHER JONATHAN? If so, what's that middle initial doing in my book? The OCAL just gives "Neal, John." Were there two John Neals? Or only one? Anybody know? Posted at 05:17 PM SOCIAL SECURITY AND RED-STATE DEMOCRATS [Ramesh Ponnuru] One thing worth keeping in mind as the Social Security debate gets going is that Bush can't count on his popularity in the red states to frighten Democrats into supporting him. I have long been bullish about personal accounts. The last two to three elections have established that reform is not political poison, and may even be a plus (at least in the sense that it reduces the traditional Democratic advantage on entitlements). But it has hardly been established that opposition to reform is dangerous. There may be very good political reasons for a Democratic senator in a red state to go along with a Bush nominee to the Supreme Court. But I can't think of one Democratic senator who will have to go along with him on Social Security--the political calculation will all be the other way. Republicans are going to have to pick off a few Democrats by actually getting them to agree on the policy. Gulp. Posted at 05:13 PM SENTENCE: [Jane Jolis] Death penalty. Unanimous. Posted at 04:50 PM WILL CBS AND "60 MINUTES" RECANT? [Tim Graham] The author of "Hitler's Pope" isn't the only one who needs to recant. CBS was an ardent publicist, as Brent Bozell explained. Posted at 04:33 PM INTELLECTUALS [John Derbyshire] *Easily* the leading candidate for inclusion in my "intellectuals" list: Richard Posner. I did actually specify -- beginning of 3rd graf -- "living Americans." Sorry, all you Ayn Rand fans. Leading candidate for female intellectual: Gertrude Himmelfarb. Leading name people want REMOVED from my list: Garry Wills. This is from DOZENS of e-mails -- I think over 100 at 4pm. Lots of really, really ridiculous suggestions, apparently offered in earnest. I mean, look, I *like* Ann Coulter, but... Posted at 04:30 PM HOUSE CONS KINGED [KJL] Washington, D.C. --Congressman Steve King (IA-05) has been chosen to lead a prominent conservative Republican forum on Capitol Hill during the 109th Congress. Posted at 03:35 PM NO CHEERS FOR CRICHTON [Ramesh Ponnuru] from Ross Douthat. Posted at 03:28 PM PIANIN, CTD. [Ramesh Ponnuru] He's not one of my favorites. Posted at 03:17 PM DASCHLE, CTD. [Ramesh Ponnuru] Interesting that Daschle seems to feel more warmly toward Lott than toward Bill Frist. Posted at 03:12 PM DESERTER RESPONDS [KJL] to Citizen Smash. Posted at 03:09 PM HILLARY CLINTON ON IMMIGRATION [Ramesh Ponnuru] A number of people have written about the possibility she will move to Bush's right on the subject (not terribly hard to do). Here's an email about it: "Hillary has done very little to move in our direction re immigration but this could be major if she moves further. Promising to 'end illegal immigration as we know it' could be a key ad of 2008. "I've been thinking that it is about time that liberal Dems wake up and smell the coffee on immigration. Substantially reducing immigration levels would be a great issue for them. Supporters could include: 1. Environmentalists, for obvious reasons "The problem will be with the up-scale social liberals, but they are more concerned with being able to kill babies and Hillary is golden on that issue." Posted at 03:06 PM ERIC PIANIN ON TOM DASCHLE [Ramesh Ponnuru] Pianin, perhaps the Washington Post's most biased reporter, had a Daschle-legacy article in yesterday's paper. You will not be surprised to see the reference to "the Republicans' three-year campaign to portray Daschle as unpatriotic." Nor will you be surprised that the existence of this campaign is presented as objective truth rather than Democratic spin. Republicans are not given a chance to deny the charge. Daschle turns out to be a sweet, moderate, accomplished public servant. What was surprising was this sentence: "Daschle and Lott believed that conservative House Republicans had gone too far by impeaching the president for essentially lying about his affair in a civil proceeding, and they worked successfully behind the scenes to avert a conviction." Lott didn't say that at the time; nor has he said it since. Pianin seems to have gotten actual news here without realizing it--he doesn't play the comment up. But what's all this about behind-the-scenes work to avert a conviction? Everyone knew that the votes weren't there for conviction. How much work had to be done? Posted at 02:57 PM "WARD CLEAVER DADS FOR BUSH" [KJL] Gary Andres in the Washington Times: Men with children favored the president on the question of agreement on cultural direction by nearly 60 percentage points (Bush 77, Kerry 18), while men without kids slightly favored Mr. Kerry (Bush 37, Kerry 43). The pattern among women still strongly favors President Bush, but the differences are smaller -- a 25 percent advantage for the president among women with kids and a statistical tie among those without children. Posted at 02:50 PM SCOTT PETERSON'S SENTENCING [KJL] decision will come down at 4:30 Posted at 02:43 PM A KERIK DEFENSE [Rich Lowry] E-mail: "Ah, Rich, didn't you write about the disgraceful conditions in U.S. prisons a while back? Well, in NYC we had a sewer called Riker's Island, an embarrassment to civilization itself. Bernie Kerik cleaned that mess up. In order to do something like that you have to be able to understand multiple layers of organization and have the will to create change throughout a system. The NYPD improved under Kerik -- despite Jonah's protestations that Bratton was the real innovator. Kerik made the NYPD better. He created the Iraqi police out of dust. I'm not quite sure what you mean by 'more obvious qualifications.' A degree from an Ivy League school, perhaps? Kerik is the real deal, not a pretender. This was the guy to pull the Homeland Security Department together into a functional and coherent whole. Losing Kerik here is a case of American prissiness getting the better of American ingenuity. A sad day, not a day to blissfully bid `good riddance.'" Posted at 02:40 PM THE VIRTUE OF THE TRIAL BALLON [Rich Lowry] The Bush administration generally hates trial ballons. It considers them messy and inconsiderate to the people subject to them. But they have their uses. It might have helped in the Kerik case, for instance, if we had known for a week or so that he was the leading contender, so the media could take a few whacks at him and the administration could have gotten a better sense of how many Kerik-related targets were out there. Posted at 02:37 PM BUMPED [Rich Lowry] Fyi--I wasn't on Fox. Something was happening with the Peterson case... Posted at 02:33 PM MARK SANFORD [KJL] for President? I suspect if I had to give away a dollar for everyone (i.e. near everyone outside Washington or SC) who just asked "who?," I'd go broke pretty quickly. Posted at 02:27 PM THE ELECTION IS OVER... [KJL] ...or is it? Today is Electoral College day. Just hours before the Ohio electors were set to vote (they now have), a challenge was filed, which can still be heard. Posted at 02:04 PM RE: GOLDEN GLOBES [KJL] The Passion of the Christ is noticably absent from the nominees. Posted at 01:35 PM FOX [Rich Lowry] FYI--I'm scheduled to be on “Dayside” around 1:40 pm. Posted at 01:25 PM DC'S "THIRD WORLD HELL HOLE?" [Michael Graham] Jurkek Martin’s column in the Financial Times about Dulles Airport is pretty funny and parts of it certainly ring true. But I can’t agree with the fundamental premise that flying out of Dulles is a uniquely horrible experience. Dulles is my primary airport and I’ve never had a problem. My wife just flew down to SC to run a half marathon and we both agree that Dulles is a relatively easy travel experience. When I compare it with Denver or (horrors!) Atlanta, Dulles is downright relaxing. I haven’t traveled abroad enough to judge Martin’s comparisons to Heathrow or de Gaulle. I flew to Israel a few months ago on El Al (Flight: excellent! Proctological exam: average) and Dulles compared favorably to Ben Gurion. My co-workers here in DC tend to agree with Martin, however. Dulles is their last choice. Have I just been lucky? Posted at 01:22 PM UN-FREEZING FROGS [Jonathan H. Adler] Wood frogs often freeze solid over the winter, only to thaw out in spring time and resume their regular lives. Basically, the wood frog generates its own natural anti-freeze that protets its cells when they are frozen, and scientists are trying to reproduce the effect for use in organ transplants. The Washington Post has a time-lapse video of a thawing frog here. It's cool, but if any Corner readers have wood frogs of their own, I would not recommend trying this at home. Posted at 12:46 PM ONE COOL DINNER [KJL] The Iraq the Model brothers at Roger Simon's place. Posted at 12:41 PM YES, WE CAN GET THEM THERE BY DEC. 24 [Jack Fowler] We’re talking about National Review acclaimed books, which make great Christmas presents – for everyone from kids to curmudgeons – and which can be ordered securely here. Posted at 12:32 PM GOLDEN GLOBE [KJL] nominations have come out and Sideways leads the pack. Tom Hibbs reviews it here. Posted at 11:58 AM RE: REHNQUIST [Shannen Coffin] The Supreme Court issued four opinions today. Chief Justice Rehnquist authored one of them, but did not participate in two of the remaining three. Posted at 11:54 AM DEMS’ CORNER [Stanley Kurtz ] Here’s one last point on Kinsley’s piece. Keep in mind that Kinsley has already called for the abolition of legal marriage. So when he points to the next phase of the civil-rights struggle, it’s not hard to imagine what he means. This is why the Democratic party is driving itself into a corner. Their arrogant conviction that they are the inevitable future--their restless struggle to find ever more radical fields on which to fight battles for “civil rights”--is rapidly consigning the Democrats to the past. Posted at 11:51 AM BEINART’S REACH [Stanley Kurtz ] The Starr-Kuttner exchange gets more interesting when you compare it to Peter Beinart’s much discussed call for a purge of Democratic doves. (Here’s my take on Beinart.) Beinart takes pains to deny that gay marriage had anything to do with the Democrats’ loss. Yet Starr and Kuttner each loudly acknowledge the gay-marriage effect, while saying virtually nothing about terrorism or foreign policy. So far, then, the big picture looks something like this. There are three broad policy challenges for the Democrats–foreign policy, economic policy, and social policy. Beinart wants a more hawkish foreign policy, and denies that social policy is a problem at all. Starr fingers social policy as the key to the Democrats’ dilemma, and calls for a retrenchment on social issues in order to save liberalism elsewhere. Kuttner acknowledges the political harm of liberal social policies, but hopes that a refurbished crusade over pocketbook issues can overcome any difficulties. In saying this, Kuttner directly draws on the widely publicized views of The Nation’s Thomas Frank. In short, when it comes to making sense of the election, the Democrats are all over the map. Their big thinkers and big publications are touting mutually contradictory strategies and analyses. It’s still early on, of course. The Dems have time to get their act together. And parties can certainly win without everyone being on the same page. In fact, that may be the only way parties can win. Even so, we’re talking about the Democrats’ liberal core here. Beinart’s purge is never going to succeed if he can’t inspire a broader constituency among his fellow liberals. And Starr will never provoke a meaningful retrenchment on gay marriage if prestigious Democratic organs like TNR stand in the way (not to mention his own co-editor). In the absence of more consensus on a new direction, the Democrats risk lapsing into Kuttner-like denial and Kinsley-like obliviousness. My money’s on the latter. Posted at 11:45 AM LISTENING IN ON THE LEFT [Stanley Kurtz ] Eavesdropping on the Democrats’ post-election conversation is fascinating stuff. Compare Michael Kinsley’s latest to this piece by American Prospect co-editor, Paul Starr. Starr’s got it all over Kinsley. Kinsley develops a tired liberal cliché--the ever-widening radicalization of the Sixties’ struggle for civil rights is an unstoppable revolution. Yet as Starr acknowledges, this “civil rights struggle” is solidifying our national polarization–and killing the Democratic party. Of course, the problem is the extension of the Sixties’ civil-rights struggle to illiberal policies like affirmative action, and the undemocratic application of a flawed civil-rights analogy to the gay-marriage issue. Starr himself calls the Massachusetts Goodridge decision “bad law.” Although he uses code, Starr seems to be angling for the end of Democratic opposition to the Federal Marriage Amendment. The other American Prospect co-editor, Robert Kuttner answers Starr here. Kuttner is deluded–claiming that the real problem with the election is that the Republicans had the media on their side (!), and that mainstream voters would have broken for Kerry if only they’d been warned more clearly about our “theocratic president whose base rejects modernity.” George Will dismisses Kuttner’s rant. Kinsley is oblivious. Kuttner is in deep denial. Starr sees clearly. Posted at 11:42 AM REHNQUIST [Shannen Coffin] The Chief Justice of the United States, William Rehnquist, is scaling back his activity. According to Howard Bashman's "How Appealing " Blog, the Supreme Court issued a statement today that "Chief Justice Rehnquist will not participate in decisions argued during the November sitting, unless his vote is necessary to break a 4-4 tie." This is truly disheartening news. Posted at 11:39 AM LEAVITT TO HHS [Jonathan H. Adler] Yep, President Bush has nominated EPA Administrator Mike Leavitt to be HHS Secretary. What this means for EPA is very unclear. The agency was adrift under Christie Todd Whitman, but Leavitt had begun to right the ship. Leavitt had a superior understanding of both environmental policy and environmental politics than Whitman. Moreover, unlike his predecessor, he didn't allow his agency to undermine the White House. No word on his possible replacements. Posted at 11:29 AM CORNWELL RECANTS [KJL] From The Economist: As he admits, Hitler's Pope (1999), his biography of Pope Pius XII, lacked balance. “I would now argue,” he says, “in the light of the debates and evidence following Hitler's Pope, that Pius XII had so little scope of action that it is impossible to judge the motives for his silence during the war, while Rome was under the heel of Mussolini and later occupied by the Germans.”Hat tip. Good for him for being honest, but one imagines the damage is already done. Posted at 10:46 AM RUMMY MUST BE HELD TO ACCOUNT.... [Jonah Goldberg ] But Kofi shouldn't. So says the Economist. No Oil for Pacifists has the details. Posted at 10:41 AM IT'S NOT MCCLELLAN [KJL] W. is nominating EPA's Mike Leavitt as HHS secretary. Posted at 10:41 AM HAMAS "ART" [KJL] on display in Australia. Posted at 10:38 AM DAVID CORN VS. BEINART [Jonah Goldberg] David Corn responds. Maybe we should fix drunk driving before al Qaeda? Junkyardblog has the goods. Posted at 10:37 AM KERIK [Jonah Goldberg] I'm with Rich. I was never particularly wowed by the guy. Bratton was the real innovator in New York's war on crime. All the trend lines were going in the right direction by the time Kerik got there. It seems opportunistic to pile on now, but I just don't think we've lost much of anything. Posted at 10:30 AM RE: FINDING NEMO [KJL] I know we've talked about it before, including little kids getting a little traumatized by the opening scene (ok, maybe K-Lo too). Posted at 10:27 AM RE: KERIK [KJL] Michelle Malkin makes some nomination suggestions. Posted at 10:19 AM FINDING NEMO [Jonah Goldberg] Okay, I've had to watch or listen to this film many, many times now because certain members of my family who happen to be shorter than three feet tall will burst into flames if they don't watch "fishies" regularly. Nevertheless, has anyone noticed that it's, well, pro-life? Little Nemo, while still in his egg, is treated as an ensouled, uh, fish. No they don't use the word "ensouled," but as I'm now starting to pay close attention to the more subtle ways abortion politics play out in the popular culure, I think it's kind of interesting. Posted at 10:19 AM FINDING NEMO [Jonah Goldberg] Okay, I've had to watch or listen to this film many, many times now because certain members of my family who happen to be shorter than three feet tall will burst into flames if they don't watch "fishies" regularly. Nevertheless, has anyone noticed that it's, well, pro-life? Little Nemo, while still in his egg, is treated as an ensouled, uh, fish. No they don't use the word "ensouled," but as I'm now starting to pay close attention to the more subtle ways abortion politics play out in the popular culure, I think it's kind of interesting. Posted at 10:17 AM GOD & NEUTRALITY [KJL] From that story yesterday about Mike Gerson defending the president on God, be sure not to miss the comments of Baptist minister Rev. C. Welton Gaddy, whose quotes critizing the president's contention that God is not neutral cap off the article. Here's what the president said: "The course of this conflict is not known, yet its outcome is certain. Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty, have always been at war, and we know that God is not neutral between them." So Rev. Gaddy is saying that God is neutral on these aforementioned issues? Posted at 10:15 AM BERNIE KERIK [Rich Lowry] I feel sorry for him for what he must be going through now, but good riddance to his nomination as far as I'm concerned. Maybe now Bush can nominate someone for the job whose qualifications for the office are a little more obvious. Posted at 10:14 AM THAT SOUND YOU HEAR IS MULLAHS QUAKING IN THEIR BOOTS [KJL] From "How to Approach Iran" in today's Washington Post, signed by Madeleine Albright and former foreign ministers from the U.K., France, Italy, Canada, Denmark, Spain, and the NEtherlands: If the Americans need to increase their support for diplomatic efforts, Europeans must prove to the Iranians that severe political and economic consequences will result if Iran does not renounce the nuclear weapons option. In the event that diplomacy fails and Iran decides not to abandon its efforts to develop nuclear weapons, Europeans should be ready for alternative courses of action, including going to the U.N. Security Council, and they should repeatedly stress their willingness to act. The transatlantic community should not be trying to force a confrontation with Iran, but we must not fear one if that's what is necessary to prevent the introduction of another nuclear weapons program into the combustible Middle East.Emphasis mine. Gosh, what, so maybe a decade or more from now, the mullahs will be ousted when the U.S. decides to really lead, after the U.N. has long refused to? Something like that? Posted at 09:59 AM RE: HOLA [KJL] Scroll down, young man. What an easily answered question in The Corner! Posted at 09:56 AM HOLA [Jonah Goldberg] I'm here bright and early at Señor Greenberg's in Cabo San Lucas. How's everything in El Norté? Posted at 09:39 AM RUDY'S ORANGE [KJL] Rudy Giuliani has been spotted wearing an orange tie in recent days. I just got off the phone with his Giuliani Partners press office, which confirms he's wearing it in support of Viktor Yushchenko. Posted at 09:32 AM ANOTHER WAR FABLE? [KJL] Readers are skeptical about the Marine ring story. One of many e-mails: "I'm a little doubtful. I bet they cut off the ring and still couldn't save the finger, hence the 'lost' ring (so the cut wouldn't show). So they made a nice story, why not. No doubt the guy loves his wife, God bless them both." Posted at 09:15 AM "GOD NEVER GIVES YOU MORE THAN YOU CAN HANDLE. I FIGURE SHE HAS A LOT TO SHOW EVERYONE... TO SHOW THE WORLD" [KJL] A girl is born with a birth defect that leaves her faceless. In the world of Dutch infant euthanasia and PEter Singer, she might not be alive today, at about age 2. But in the lives of of her parents, mercifully, she is their blessing. Posted at 09:12 AM OBITUARY -- FRANK CAREY [John Derbyshire] The Daily Telegraph obituaries are essential reading first thing in the morning. Here is one from today's paper, on WW2 air ace Frank Carey. Sample: "On his sixth day of continuous combat, during which he bagged some 14 'kills,' Carey was shot down. He had attacked a Dornier 17 bomber and was following it closely down in its last moments; the pilot was dead but the surviving rear gunner pressed his trigger to set Carey's Hurricane alight, wounding him in a leg. "The fire stopped, and Carey landed in a large field between Allied and enemy lines. After thumbing a lift on the back of a Belgian soldier's motorcycle he joined a party of refugees until a British Army truck picked him up. "Eventually Carey arrived at a casualty clearing station in Dieppe where he encountered the 16th Duke of Norfolk, a fellow patient who apologised that he was only there with gout." Posted at 09:06 AM RE: KERIK [Tim Graham] Both ABC and NBC were doing some White House-pounding on the Kerik nomination this morning. I was especially struck by how ABC was talking up Kerik's rumored extramarital affairs. Why, back in the Clinton years, you could not only have an affair, but lie about it to the FBI, have an independent counsel attached to you to cost the taxpayers millions, and still serve in the cabinet as HUD Secretary. I don't remember ABC having any reservations or criticism about that...not to mention what they had to say about Clinton's affairs pre-Lewinsky. Posted at 08:29 AM THIS IS THE DAY [Jack Fowler] when you will stop procrastinating and get those special kids in your life something for Christmas (12 days away!) of true significance and meaning, something that will inspire them and entertain them and broaden their horizons. Nothing does that like a good book, and we’ve got good books like it’s nobody’s business--The National Review Treasury of Classic Children’s Literature (original and Volume Two), The National Review Treasury of Classic Bedtime Stories, and Queen Zixi of Ix, or The Story of the Magic Cloak. Big, beautiful, lavishly illustrated, jam-packed with children’s tales and adventures by some of the best writers America and England ever produced (Kipling, Twain, London, Alcott, Burnett, Baum, Carroll!!), an NR kid’s book (there’s one for every age) is the perfect gift. We’re running some special offers--take advantage of them now, before time runs out. You can order these acclaimed and delightful books here. Posted at 08:12 AM MORE ON MOORE [Michael Graham] From today’s Washington Times: Fat chance Posted at 07:51 AM IF ONLY BERNIE KERIK COULD SAY THE SAME... [Michael Graham] "I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants."—Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton. This is why the Bernard Kerik issue resonates. It has nothing to do with second-guessing the Bush White House vetting process. It’s the fact that the head of law enforcement in NYC and the potential leaders of homeland security could have such a blatant disregard for the law. And everyone outside the Bush administration sees what the White House won’t: That enforcing immigration law is a key part of homeland security. Will the next DHS nominee be any more serious about illegal immigration that Kerik? Not unless President Bush suddenly gets serious about it, too. Posted at 07:48 AM ALSO FROM TODAY IN HISTORY [KJL] Martial law went down in Poland 23 years ago today. Posted at 07:46 AM GOOD MORNING! [KJL] If you were out and about, know that The Corner was relatively active this weekend. Check in starting about here to catch up. We have it all, scandals, movies, sex, saints, sinners, the great (or gross, open to interpretation) thickburger quest, and more (and Moore). Posted at 07:30 AM WE GOT HIM [KJL] It was a year ago when we caught Saddam Hussein. Some of the immediate NRO reax: Cliff May; Jed Babbin; Mac Owens; Amir Taheri; The Corner. Posted at 07:25 AM SORRY I MISSED THAT [KJL] From one of the regulars: Did you see the Fritz Hollings piece on 60 minutes? The only reason I watched was because I thought someone would finally call him in his segregationist past. Surely Mike Wallace, the "relentless" "bulldog" of CBS News will level his famous "piercing glare" and why then-Governor Hollings told Eisenhower that minorities had no right to demonstrate outside segregationist lunch counters. Posted at 07:18 AM RE: FINGER VS. RING [KJL] It might make for a winning chick flick, but a member of the USAF ain't buying tickets, he e-mails: I'm sorry but that guy was an idiot. Posted at 06:25 AM DEFENDING THE VETTING [KJL] The White House defends the Kerik vetting process, claiming they knew all the stories--just not the housekeeper. I'm not sure I believe that--perhaps they knew the stories, but in recent days details became worse? I dunno. If that is true--that what they knew came to be seen as worse than previously believed post-nomination, I imagine Rudy's going to be doing a distancing job. Posted at 06:04 AM RADICAL CHIC [John J. Miller] The leader of Mexico's Zapatista movement is writing a detective novel, reports the New York Times today. But does the Times really have to refer to Subcommander Marcos as "the rebel leader who made wearing a black ski mask sexy"? It makes you wonder what New York Times writers wear when they're trying to impress their dates. That's their own business, of course, but it would be nice if they weren't trying to invent the next Che Guevara at the same time. Posted at 05:54 AM WHERE IN THE WORLD IS OSAMA BIN LADEN [KJL] Hamid Karzai says he's "definitely" in the Afghanistan region--and is confident he'll be caught. Posted at 05:51 AM COLOR BIND [John J. Miller] A nice editorial on race-blind college admissions, including a reference to Cornerite Roger Clegg, in today's Wall Street Journal. Posted at 05:43 AM MARINE CHOOSES RING OVER FINGER [KJL] Severing his wedding band could have saved his finger, but he would have none of that. Unfortunately, doctors lost the wedding ring in the process. But he got his message across, all the same. Posted at 05:27 AM |
|
|||||||||||||||