|
![]() |
|
|
SINCE IT'S TOO LATE FOR THE INSURGENTS TO TAKE MY ADVICE [Jonah Goldberg] They would be very smart to set off a series of very loud bombs across Iraq. They wouldn't need to kill anybody, just be big enough to scare people from leaving their houses. The first hours are crucial. Posted at 11:03 PM THE ELECTIONS [Jonah Goldberg] Over a year ago, David Brooks wrote a controversial column claiming that America needed to lose for the Iraqis to win. The logic of the column was compelling to many. The Iraqis as a people had nothing to take pride in. Their country was liberated by outsiders. The only way for them to regain (or gain for the first time) their self-confidence as Iraqis, Brooks' theory went, was for them to shake off the Americans. I didn't think he was right, but I thought he grasped a fundamentally correct fact: the Iraqis did/do need something in their narrative which makes them the heroes, not the Americans. If these people really show up to the polls in large numbers, they'll have exactly the heroic story they need. I think everybody should be hoping they muster the very real courage required. Posted at 11:01 PM WATCH SPIRIT OF AMERICA [K. J. Lopez] coverage of the Iraq elections, online and on CSPAN. Posted at 09:38 PM PHYSICIAN, HEAL THYSELF [Stefan Sharkansky] A Georgia man, Dr. Daniel M. Sosin of the Centers for Disease Control, admits that he still votes absentee in Seattle, years after he completed a graduate degree at the University of Washington and moved permanently to Atlanta. Reached at his home in Atlanta, he said there is an explanation why he votes in Washington, but declined to actually state the explanation. [longer version here] Posted at 09:30 PM " I CAN'T WAIT, THE DREAM IS BECOMING TRUE AND I WILL STAND IN FRONT OF THE BOX TO PUT MY HEART IN IT." [K. J. Lopez] Mohammed@IraqtheModel on the elections. Posted at 09:17 PM ACS REDUX [Jonathan H. Adler] Apparently someone read my post on the American Constitution Society and thought the activities I described threaten the group's 501(c)(3) non-profit status. Please. Even putting the most partisan spin on these rather innocuous actions, they wouldn't come close to the standard (and if they did, half of the non-profit advocacy groups in D.C. would be in a heap o' trouble). My claim was not that ACS is "partisan" in the legal sense, but that the group is more self-concsiously activist -- and, in my experience, less focused on the exploration and refinement of ideas -- than it's right-of-center counterpart, the Federalist Society. Both groups are "political" in the sense that each has an ideological orientation, but this "political" nature manifests itself in distinct ways. Posted at 09:15 PM GOV'T FUNDING GREENS [Jonathan H. Adler] For those who've asked for more information about federal funding of environmental groups, I would recommend this report by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and this searchable database of current EPA grants. Note that both may well understate the amount of money involved. The EPA database, for instance, only covers grant money from the EPA; it excludes EPA contracts and government funding from other agencies. The Senate report also only focuses on a handful of prominent groups. I've also posted additional commentary on the subject here. Posted at 09:02 PM LIBERATION DAY [K. J. Lopez] Martin Kramer on the day Baghdad fell and today. Posted at 08:59 PM VOTING IN CALIFORNIA [K. J. Lopez] Radioblogger has photos. Posted at 08:54 PM PAYOLA & THE POST [Jonathan H. Adler] I was quite critical of the Washington Post's double-standard when it comes to op-ed writers and government funds in yesterday's article. Today, Fred Hiatt of the Post wrote that disclosure of potential conflicts of interests will now become part of the paper's "offical acceptance process" for op-eds. This is a good first step. The Post should also report on the extent of government funding of non-profit advocacy organizations. Taxpayers deserve to know how much of their money goes to such groups. Posted at 08:43 PM APPEASEMENT WATCH [Andrew Stuttaford] Just when you think that the EU’s foreign policy can stoop no lower, something like this happens: “European Union plans to ban Cuban dissidents from national day receptions at EU embassies in Havana has sparked a diplomatic battle, officials said yesterday. Such a ban would bow to an explicit demand from the regime of Fidel Castro. Under a Spanish proposal that will be put to foreign ministers in Brussels on Monday, EU embassies in Havana, including Britain's, would be advised not to invite dissidents to national day receptions. Vaclav Havel is outraged, as we all should be. Posted at 07:21 PM THE PERFECT VALENTINE'S DAY GIFT? [Jack Fowler] Duh!! It's a cabin for you and your sweetie on the National Review 2005 British Isles Cruise. Reserve yours now at www.nrcruise.com. Posted at 05:59 PM ON THE EVE OF ELECTIONS [K. J. Lopez] An American soldier sends this dispatch from Iraq: It is now dusk in Baquba, a city that lies thirty-five miles Northeast of Baghdad, along the edge of the Sunni Triangle. The streets are quiet. Vehicular traffic has been banned today, a curfew is due to come into effect soon after dark. Mothers hurry home from the markets. Children scurry to keep up with them. Election posters cling to the walls and streetlights. The city is filled with expectations. The vast majority of the people realize what is at stake here. They are ready to cast their ballots tomorrow, to elect representatives who will govern them and craft a new constitution for their nation. They are eager to write a new chapter in the history of their country. Meanwhile, the enemies of freedom lurk in the dark alleyways of this city. Domestic and foreign terrorists lie in wait. They fear not only the outcome of the vote, but the very process itself. They want to halt the inexorable march of freedom. They may try to disrupt the voting. No matter what happens tomorrow, they are doomed to failure in the long run. The elections will take place, the citizens of Baquba will cast their ballots. The transformation of Iraq is about to commence. Still, this is not the end of the beginning; nor the beginning of the end; it is the beginning of the beginning. Sunday will mark the first step on the long road to political and moral recovery in Iraq – and in the region. When the sun rises, the people will speak. Posted at 11:26 AM RE: INTELLIGENT DESIGN [John Derbyshire] From a reader (one of several): "[Quoting my previous Corner post] 'The fact (wait a minute... yes, it's a fact) that the Georgia school board thought it was striking a blow against its enemies by mandating a statement that every one of those enemies would cheerfully agree with, shows the gulf of misunderstanding that exists in this area.' "Actually, those enemies apparently don't agree with this statement - they filed and won a lawsuit seeking to have the stickers removed. (See 2005 WL 83829, Jan. 13, 2005). Apparently, stickers stating the fact (yes, you're right, it's a fact) that evolution is 'only' a theory violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, which mandates that 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.' So apparently, according to Judge Cooper in the ND GA, putting factual stickers in the front of high school textbooks constitutes establishing a religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof." To which I responded: "What we have here, [Reader's name], is a lot of scientifically illiterate people -- on both sides. "It's not a fact, it's a THEORY -- and a darn good one." Posted at 11:21 AM RE THE COMPARISON [Cliff May] Further imagine that in South Africa, the whites who once held power but had lost it, were murdering blacks and threatening them if they dared show up at the polls to vote. Do you think the major story would be on the failure of the ANC to control the “security situation”? Do you think there would be proposals to delay elections for a while? Do you think there would be a debate about whether the elections would be legitimate if blacks were frightened and decided not to vote? Posted at 11:18 AM THE PARKA CRITICS [Jim Robbins] More on the VP's Parka: Incidentally that parka looked like an Air Force N3B with insignia and name tag -- the Post was a bit silly comparing the latter to "the way in which children's clothes are inscribed with their names before they are sent away to camp." Posted at 11:15 AM EXCESSIVE ERIC [Tim Graham] "One weakness of liberals is our inability to credit right-wingers with a sufficient degree of malevolence." -- Eric Alterman's MSNBC.com blog, January 24. "I love the defense of 'I forgot' and 'Nobody ever asked me.' Nobody never asked her if she has sexual relations with animals, either." -- Eric Alterman blogging on Maggie Gallagher, January 26. Pray we never heard a word out of Eric Alterman's mouth about the need for our politics to be more civil? Posted at 11:07 AM BUSTER VS. REAL BLUSTER [Tim Graham] As even ABC picks up on the PBS "Postcards for Buster" controversy, complete with on-screen headline about "government" going after a "bunny," it's worth noting that PBS has a history of promoting alternative lifestyles. In a brief turn on "Scarborough Country" Thursday night, I could only explain for a second how subtle this Buster dose of political correctness was for PBS, at least in comparison to the classic ancient example, the 1991 PBS/CPB/NEA-funded documentary "Tongues Untied," full of profanity and very overt sex talk. For all of you young'ns who wouldn't remember, you won't believe it if you look here. A newer example aimed directly at kids was the "uplifting" indoctrination film "It's Elementary," which aired on PBS stations in 1999, which became a national controversy when Idaho Public Television protested the special. Posted at 11:02 AM WOW [Shannen Coffin] Ok, after begging, scratching and pleading to see an advance copy of Jonah's Groundhog Day piece, I had to read it in the magazine like everyone else. All I can say is "Wow." And I thought it was a boy gets girl movie. Jonah's writing on the slap to post-modernity that is a 1 1/2 hour Bill Murray classic (though arguably not in his top three -- Caddyshack and Stripes are better comedies, whether or not they are "greater" films), reminds me of three things: 1) the essay I wrote in freshman year at a Catholic college analyzing Darth Vader in terms of Soren Kierkegaard's Sickness Unto Death (all that self becoming the self stuff); 2) the time I met Bill Murray at a Chicago White Sox game (delightfully funny in person); and 3) that I really have no business writing on these pages. So just continue to consider me among the lesser lights of NRO. I've got to say, Jonah, that you really worked that one over. Posted at 10:44 AM AGH! [Jonah Goldberg] Please stop sending me results of googlefights. Some of 'em are pretty funny, but my email box runneth over. Posted at 08:52 AM Friday, January 28, 2005 RE: GOOGLEFIGHT [Jonah Goldberg] Folks, put quotation marks around names if you want more accurate results. Otherwise, phrases with common words and names do better than phrases with less common words and names. Posted at 07:05 PM BEHOLD... [Jonah Goldberg] Googlefight. Posted at 05:45 PM BEER SAVES LIVES [Jonah Goldberg] Testing the limits of Kathryn's patience with me:
A Slovak man trapped in his car under an avalanche freed himself by drinking 60 bottles of beer and urinating on the snow to melt it. Posted at 05:43 PM IRAQI ELECTION WATCH [Cliff May] The Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (full disclosure: they pay me) also will have an Election Watch section this weekend, including excerpts from Iraqi media, blogs and democracy activists, as well as analysis from Walid Phares, Andrew Apostolou and other experts. Cornerites invited to stop in. Posted at 05:42 PM GOOD SENSE ON HARDBALL [Rich Lowry ] An LATimes reporter named Tony Perry was on “Hardball” last night, and made a lot of sense. Check out this exchange when Chris Matthews was asking a somewhat appalling question: MATTHEWS: Suppose the minority Sunnis, who ran the government with Saddam Hussein when he was in power, supposed they decide as a community, 90 percent of them decide not to vote. Can we continue to call them insurgents or are they not secessionists, people who say we`re not part of this new government and therefore you have to ask the moral authority question. Can American service people fire on them if they simply say we`re not part of this new government? Do we have the right to tell them that they can`t do that... Posted at 05:39 PM DENTAL UPDATE [Jonah Goldberg] From a reader: Hello Jonah, Posted at 05:34 PM RE; THE GAMMA ANTI-MATTER BOMB [Jonah Goldberg] From a reader (I could do without the "even your columns" comment): Positrons and antielectrons are the same thing. Good Job S.F. Chronicle, and to the careful readers at www.defensetech.org. Should I go into my spiel now about how really, really, really, really, really awful journalism about science is these days? I'm a non-practicing chemist (currently typing with one hand, holding baby #2 with the other), and it ticks me off. Posted at 05:33 PM PLAIN DRESS AND DEMOCRACY [Jim Robbins] Americans have long suffered European ridicule for simplicity of dress at official functions, but we have also been proud of it. In that sense Vice President Cheney's parka fits a well established American tradition. In 1853 Secretary of State William Marcy sent a circular to American diplomatic agents abroad, recommending that they should appear in public in "the simple dress of an American citizen." This brought continued comment from Europeans, who were more given to outlandish costumery. Our point was -- we are American democrats, not European monarchists. We don't need a fancy costume to get our point across. In the same way, we don't invest out political leaders with crowns, scepters and other baubles. Marcy's inspiration was Benjamin Franklin, who while in Paris during the Revolution was noted for his rustic contrast to Parisian couture. Congress later put Marcy's instruction into law. When an Ambassador to St. Petersburg later showed up at a the coronation of the Tsar wearing an elaborate uniform of his own devising, he was chastised and ridiculed by his countrymen. Posted at 05:26 PM THE AP STORY ON ICKES [Rich Lowry ] Former Clinton aide Ickes supports Dean for party chair (Just noticed: Drudge was on Ickes thing first.) Posted at 05:16 PM WOW [Rich Lowry ] Harold Ickes apparently just endorsed Howard Dean for DNC chair. Posted at 05:11 PM ISLAM FOR FEMINISTS [K. J. Lopez] A Cornell scholar reinterprets the Koran. Posted at 05:09 PM RE: SPECTER AND NEW HEARINGS [K. J. Lopez] Not to doubt the chairman's best intentions or anything, but I did think the headline on that story I just linked to gave him a wee bit more credit than he deserves. Read the piece and see what I mean. Posted at 05:03 PM SPECTER AND NEW HEARINGS [K. J. Lopez] Arlen Specter says he'll resist most Democratic attempts for new hearings on old judicial nominees. Posted at 05:02 PM A COMPARISON [Rich Lowry ] Here is a great point. I even heard Chris Matthews make it last night. E-mail: “Subject: Sunnis/South African Whites Do you think we would have heard any squawking if South African whites were underrepresented in the first election in which black Africans were permitted to vote?” Posted at 05:00 PM GONZALES--NOT HISPANIC ENOUGH? [K. J. Lopez] That's not quite the argument this time. But he has rendered his nomination as the first Hispanic AG "meaningless," according to the Congressional Hispanic Caucus , for daring not to meet with the group. The Hispanic Dems in Congress therefore will not be supporting Gonzales. [The Caucus isn't the only Hispanic group in the House, however. The Hispanic Conference supports Gonzales.] Posted at 04:56 PM THE CHINA SYNDROME [Cliff May] News Bulletin: While the UN was calling Americans stingy, it also was turning down $50 million in aid. Why? Because the funds were being offered by free and democratic Taiwan, and Beijing just knew the tsunami victims wouldn’t want help from such a source. My Scripps Howard column is here. Posted at 04:38 PM "THANK YOU, HOLLYWOOD" [K. J. Lopez] Dave Bossie knows how to get to Hollywood liberals. Posted at 04:31 PM FINAL GASP [Allison Hayward] One last comment before I surrender and go have cocktails with the kids. Which is: that an editorial supporting a re-vote appearing in the issue with the Groundhog Day cover (which is magnificent beyond words, I might add) may prove most fitting. But let's hope not! Posted at 04:24 PM IRAQ [Rich Lowry ] Was just talking to someone very knowledgeable who walked me through some of the process. This is how I understand it. The negative spin coming out of Sunday will be, of course, that the Sunnis are being locked out and therefore the insurgency will get worse. But there are many mechanisms to bring in the Sunnis. There is a three-person presidential council. It is extremely likely that a Sunni will be asked to serve on it. Members of that council have to be approved by a 2/3 vote of the assembly that is elected on Sunday, so there is incentive for its members to be broadly representative. Then the presidential council must unanimously pick the prime minister. So, again, the PM is very likely to be, to some extent, a compromise choice. The PM then makes appointments to fill out the government. If he picks from individuals elected to the assembly there will be vacancies that have to be filled--creating the opportunity to put Sunnis in those slots in the assembly. Also, the assembly will likely appoint a constitution drafting committee, and it will include Sunnis. Many of the governmental mechanisms in play here are designed to require compromise. And it is true that Arab countries don't have experience with democracy, but they do have historic experience with people sitting down in a room and hammering out compromises. That is what tribal leaders have done throughout all history. It was something that the much-maligned governing council was pretty good at, for all its flaws. So there is a chance that this election, even if the Sunnis don't turn out, will produce a government that represents a kind of (imperfect, of course) consensus of Iraqi society. Posted at 04:13 PM RE: AMERICANS IN IRAQ [KJL] Here's another. Posted at 04:10 PM AMERICANS IN IRAQ [K. J. Lopez] Some blogs to watch this weekend. Posted at 03:34 PM DEMS, DITCH HOLLYWOOD [K. J. Lopez ] New Donkey writes: “when you really get down to it, are Sean Penn's pithy thoughts on Iraq any more meaningful than Howard Dean's views on Method Acting?” He continues: Maybe the real problem is that politicians struggle and strive for high office in part because it gives them the opportunity to hang out with celebrities whose visages and alleged life experiences regale Americans in every grocery-store checkout line. This theory is reflected in the old jibe that "politics is show business for ugly people."He concludes quoting the Sex Pistols. Posted at 03:31 PM THE GIFT AND SACRIFICE OF LIFE [K. J. Lopez ] "She was aware that if she gave birth she wouldn't have had any hope of surviving." More women—more families—make sacrifices like this one than you and I will ever know. The word "hero" is so overused, but I think in the case of a mother willing to give up her own life for that of her child is a heroine—and, especially in this day when we are all told “Me First.” 41-year-old Rita Fedrizzi, who just died, is one of those heroes—she gave birth to a baby boy three months ago; she had refused cancer treatment because she was told it would have required aborting her son. (We saw another instance of this kind of selflessness in the news last week.) R.I.P., Mrs. Fedrizzi. And I doubt I'm the only one who will have the three children and husband she leaves behind in my prayers. [N.B.: Just to clarify: I don't mean to say that a woman should always refuse treatment if she is pregnant. That's the choice this woman made, but others simply choose not to abort, and have treatment and often both mother and child survive--and, of course, in all these cases the details are different, the illness is at different stages, etc. My intention was simply to note that the instinct not to abort, in a Roe-32-years-later world, is an admirable one.) Posted at 03:26 PM RE: STYLE SECTION SNOTTINESS [Tim Graham] AP's on Parkagate too! Posted at 03:23 PM PAGING FATHER DAMIEN KARRAS [Jim Boulet] One actual reaction to Senator Hillary Clinton's self-proclaimed new moderation on abortion: "My head lifted off my shoulders and spun around, I was so mad," said one pro-choice Democrat. Something like Linda Blair in "The Exorcist"? Posted at 03:18 PM FOX [Rich Lowry ] Fyi--I'm scheduled to be on around 3:45 pm. Posted at 03:14 PM JONAH'S BIG GROUNDHOG DAY COVER [K. J. Lopez]
It's the Feb 14 issue of NRODT. Do you get NRODT yet? Sign up if not. Posted at 03:12 PM WHO KILLED KENNY AND GAVE CHENEY HIS COAT? [K. J. Lopez] Just one last thing on Cheney: The in-box is about 85/15--people who defend his parka or, at least, think the WashPost is ridiculous to highlight it so or people who just have to note he looks like Kenny from SouthPark in it. Posted at 03:09 PM RE: DENTISTS [John Derbyshire] Jonah: I have long suspected that dentists (and ortho-, perio-, endo-dontists, oral surgeons, etc.) have a nice little thing going. Still, be it ever so nice and remunerative, I'd rather shovel manure than be a dentist. I can hardly bear to look at my own teeth. Other people's? Yeccch. If it's a cartel, I say they're welcome to it. Posted at 03:05 PM ANTI-MATTER BOMB (WITH GAMMA RAYS!) [Jonah Goldberg ] Science moves us closer to the show which cannot be named and the Hulk! From defensetech.org:
Posted at 03:04 PM PATRICK RUFFINI VS. CHRISTINE TODD WHITMAN [Ramesh Ponnuru] It's not a fair fight. Posted at 03:02 PM SPEAKING GIG [Jonah Goldberg] Just a reminder. The Young Republicans at American University Feb. 2 (Groundhog Day!) at 8:15. PM. 4400 Mass Ave, in the University Club Room. I'm told all are welcome, but I have no idea what seating will be like. And you Georgetown and Georgewashington kids aren't invited because why should you cheapskates get a free-ride off of AU. Okay, you can come too. But you're banned from asking questions. Posted at 03:00 PM CHURCHILL AND HAMILTON [K. J. Lopez] Roger Kimball has more on the "little Eichmans" prof. Posted at 03:00 PM RE: DENTIST TRIP [KJL] Here I figured he was going to tell us he had off Fridays because he's a lesbian. Posted at 02:57 PM THE DENTIST GUILD [Jonah Goldberg] I just got back from the dentist. Okay actually, I just got back from a late lunch with my bride which I went to after the dentist. Nonetheless, I learned something interesting. According to my loquacious dental hygenist, specialists in dentistry aren't allowed to practice general dentistry and vice versa. In other words, if you do root canals, you pretty much can only do root canals. If you're a kids dentist, you can't handle grown-ups. Etc. I found this out when I (wink, wink) jokingly asked for as much nitrous as they could spare. She said they didn't have any because they don't do anything that requires it in their practice. I said, "What happens when you've got to pull some teeth? (Or when you want to have a righteous nitrous-and-Quiet-Riot party?). She said they aren't allowed to do extractions. From their she spilled the beans. I didn't get much info about why this is so. I can't imagine there's a federal law about this and if it was up to the states it wouldn't be a nationwide policy. Now I could be misinformed, but I suspect there's a racket here. I willl find out more...or I won't. It's that kind of hard-hitting, definitive reporting you've come to expect from me. Posted at 02:54 PM MORE WASHINGTON STATERS [Rich Lowry ] E-mail: “Rich: Don't get me wrong, I like Kirby and Carlson. I think they are doing a great job. But so is Mike Siegal (who is on 770 AM the same conservative talk station that airs Rush and is the home of Michael Medved's show). Don't forget Professor Sean Neuman, Esq. of St. Martin's College in Lacey, Washington either--who is also arguing for better government accountability and fairer elections. This election was screwed up and the system will not get fixed unless there is a challenge.” Posted at 02:48 PM ST. VALENTINE'S CANDY FOR THE REST OF YOU [John Derbyshire] Possibly that chap in Kenya who ate his wife's heart was inspired by that "Demotivators" line of candy Kathryn linked to earlier (which a friend in Michigan passed along too). Posted at 02:48 PM INTELLIGENT DESIGN [John Derbyshire] Following my earlier post, some readers have e-mailed in arguing that David's Opinion Journal piece demonstrates that there is a determination on the part of learned scientific journals to keep I.D. proponents out of their pages. Well, I should certainly hope so! I hope they will also keep out of their pages proponents of the Flat Earth theory, the Hollow Earth theory, the phlogiston theory of combustion, the theory of the Four Body Humours, and the tooth fairy theory. Not everything that anyone can think up is worthy of inclusion in a scientific journal. Speaking personally, if I were to open my copy of, say, The Astronomical Journal (supposing I were a subscriber, which I am not) and found myself looking at an article that took UFO abductions seriously, I would cancel my subscription at once. Lay people don't realize how many pseudoscientific cranks there are out there. The world is swarming with them! A couple of years ago I published a book about an unsolved math problem. You wouldn't believe some of the mail I got -- weird, weird stuff, written in all earnestness, claiming to have solved that problem by dint of techniques from bibliomancy to yoga. Let me tell you, the world is teeming with lunatics armed with iron conviction and reams of theoretical justification for their crackpot notions. Scientists see themselves as working to expand a little clearing of light, of reason, in a vast chittering black jungle of superstition and madness. Is it any wonder they are defensive? Science, and its peer-reviewed journals, need solid defenses, constantly manned. I would rather scientists were over-scrupulous about what they let in than otherwise. After all, as numerous examples (e.g. continental drift) have shown, a sound theory will eventually get recognition, however wacky it might seem at first sight. Nobody knows all this better than working scientists -- which is why (see my current NRODT piece) scientifically-trained I.D.-ers like Michael Behe know better than to submit I.D. pieces to respectable journals of real science. Posted at 02:44 PM RE: CAN GOD COME TO CLASS?: [Rod Dreher] This is related, K-Lo: I'm reading Naomi Schaefer Riley's God on the Quad, which takes a look at how religiously oriented colleges are doing their thing these days. (Actually, you interviewed her a few days back about it, didn't you?) Last night, I read the chapter about Thomas Aquinas College, the orthodox Roman Catholic "Great Books" school in southern California. I was pleased to learn from Naomi's book that the school's applications jumped bigtime after they started advertising in National Review. Anyway, perhaps the most startling thing I learned from this chapter was that of the TAC undergrads, nearly every one of them orthodox Catholics, who went to religious high schools and grammar schools, a large percentage of them studied at Protestant "Bible-based" schools -- not Catholic parochial schools. Isn't that something? I've got to be honest here and admit that my five-year-old son is part of a small Catholic population at a wonderful Reformed school in our neighborhood, which operates as a hybrid homeschooling program (that is, the kids get half a day of classroom instruction, and the parents take over at home later). At least two other orthodox Catholic parents have their kids in our son's kindergarten class there. I can't speak for the other parents, of course, but one big reason Julie and I chose to put our son there is because we have total confidence in the seriousness with which this school takes Christianity. And frankly, we believe it will be easier to raise our son as a faithful orthodox Catholic as an outsider in this Reformed school than to put him in a Catholic school that doesn't take either Christian or Catholic identity all that seriously. I was amazed to read in God on the Quad that quite a few TAC parents felt the same way. Posted at 02:42 PM RE: WHATSINGTON [Rich Lowry ] Allison, you make some good points in the abstract. But Washington is a specific case. Maybe you can make an argument for changing the Washington state law to prevent a judge from ever ordering a re-vote. But the law is there, and if there ever were an instance where there is a legitimate case for a contest, this is it. Would a re-vote be very, very, very close? Probably. But most very, very, very close votes are decided by a couple of thousands votes, which is a landslide in this context. (By the way, Rossi may seem to have the upper hand politically at the moment, but that could change--if for instance, Washington state voters decided this has dragged on too long.) Also, there have been re-votes prior to this latest rash of litigation--witness that amazing re-voting year of 1975. Finally, Rossi not filing a contest in this instance is not going to stem the tide of election-related litigation across the country. And why should conservatives oppose his legitimate case just because many people file illegitimate cases? Posted at 02:42 PM SHE THINGS ME DUMMEE [Shannen W. Coffin] Mary Landrieu doesn't like me very much. In response to a recent column I had on her undistinguished record on the filibuster in the Shreveport Times, she had this response today. Apparently, I have both thought without facts and facts without thinking. Or something like that. But Landrieu herself admits that she's voted to block 10 appellate court judges, the likes of Miguel Estrada (who she publicly supported during her reelection campaign), Janice Rogers Brown, and Bill Pryor. The facts pretty much speak for themselves. Posted at 02:28 PM CAN GOD COME TO CLASS? [K. J. Lopez ] In case you are running out of things to read (as if): A quick review of mine that appeared in the Sunday edition of the Real Paper of Record, FYI. Posted at 02:20 PM A GOOD PROPOSAL FOR DETECTING NON-CITIZEN VOTERS [Stefan Sharkansky ] The one variety of illegal voting that hasn't yet been discovered in Washington State is the non-citizen voter. Not necessarily because it doesn't happen, but because it is extremely difficult to detect. There don't seem to be any readily accessible databases for distinguishing citizens from aliens. John Carlson, a popular conservative radio host in Seattle, proposed an interesting solution to this problem on his program yesterday as he was interviewing Secretary of State Sam Reed. Carlson suggested that Reed should persuade the Mexican government to give him a copy of the Matricula Consular ID card database so his elections staff could cross check the Mexican file against the voter database. Secretary Reed embraced the idea and agreed to contact not only the Mexican authorities but other countries whose consulates issue identification cards to their nationals living in the U.S. Since an increasing number of businesses and even government agencies now accept the Matricula Consular as valid identification, it wouldn't be a bad idea for every state's election officials to have access to this list in order to prevent vote fraud by ineligible foreigners. Posted at 02:17 PM WHATSINGTON? [Allison Hayward] On the outside chance some might I assume I hold views I do not hold, let me reply generally to some of the recent posts. Dino Rossi would be a great Governor, and eminently preferable governor, and a credit to his party. Were I a Washington State Washingtonian, rather than the other kind, I would have voted Rossi. I was attempting, in case it wasn't evident, to take the debate away from the specifics regarding Washington state, and discuss more abstractly how we settle very, very, very close elections, and the increasingly prominent role judge-ordered remedies seem to play. I contend, and I don't think anyone disputes this, that this was a very, very, very close election. But there have been other very, very, very close elections and they will continue to occur from time to time. The "sloppy" character of American election administration invites litigation in many close cases, since if you look hard enough you'll find something wrong -- good for me professionally, but if you don't see at least a potential problem with this approach as the way to settle close contests, then you don't. Again, if you have a tie, you need a tie-breaker, which can take the form of a recount, or litigation, or a poker hand, or -- potentially -- litigation followed by a re-do. I also wonder at the supposition that a re-do with bring finality to the contest. That would assume, of course, that the second election isn't very, very, very close, wouldn't it? I know about the polls and all, but polls aren't dispositive. Moreover, who's to say the second run will be cleaner than the first? Maybe the arguments will run the other way next time. The seeds of doubt about the "process" have been sown, and may reverberate with voters in unpredictable ways. I guess what I am trying to get at is the re-do idea seems animated by a belief that there can be a "clean" election completely free from tabulation error, voter suppression, voter fraud, etc. I'm just not sure that can happen. Posted at 02:17 PM RE: WASHINGTON STATE [Kirby Wilbur ] Allison, Washington State law specifically provides for any candidate or citizen to file an election contest here in Washington state. The minimal threshold for a judge to uphold the contest is to prove more illegal votes than the margin of difference. The judge has four courses of action: 1) void a recount and revert to the previous count ( two recounts are allowed and the one being contested can be voided ), 2.) give the issue to the legislature for resolution; 3.) nothing if he finds insufficient grounds; or 4.) order a new election. Here we have a gubernatorial contest with 2.9 million votes cast, and the Democrat winning by 129, after the second recount; Dino Rossi won the election by 261 and the first recount by 42. Already, hundreds of felons who voted, illegally, have been found, 348 provisional ballots were inserted directly into the voting machines instead of their security envelope, there is a difference of at least 1800 in the numbers of votes counted and the number of voters in King County, there have been some votes cast by dead people and the problems mount. Dino Rossi, the Republican candidate, is a conservative of honor and integrity. He would not have filed a challenge to simply harass or make mischief. There are solid and substantive grounds to use a process approved by our legislature. This is NOT a case of judicial activism gone wild. Posted at 01:36 PM RATHER BIASED [Tim Graham] Dan Rather can easily state on national television that "George Bush received preferential treatment to get into the National Guard, and once accepted, failed to satisfy the requirements of his service." But get a load of how reluctant he is to take the same approach to the terrorists this morning: "Well, this is big news, that they have picked up two of what are alleged to be, allegedly, supposedly and reportedly and there's no reason to doubt, two of the prime operatives of Zarqawi here inside Iraq." Posted at 01:18 PM NOBEL ENDEAVOR [KJL] 70 Nobel prize winners write a letter of support on behalf of Kofi Annan. Posted at 01:12 PM DEATH SENTENCE [John Derbyshire] for man who ate wife. Posted at 12:58 PM LEAVING OUT RELEVANT I.D. FACTS [K. J. Lopez ] Houston Chronicle runs an antiwar piece by a “part-time teacher” whose brother died serving in Iraq. No mention, however, that the writer is a well-established antiwar activist. Posted at 12:56 PM “MEGABITCH” STUDIES [K. J. Lopez ] The diversity experts at San Francisco State's College of Ethnic Studies had to bring in diversity experts, and still don’t seem to have figured it all out after deposing the “Queen Bitch of the Universe” as dean. Posted at 12:48 PM "MAJORITY BACKS INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTS FOR SOCIAL SECURITY" [KJL] A Cato/Zogby poll. Posted at 12:44 PM CABLE & WIRELESS [John Derbyshire] I blegged some weeks ago for advice on whether to go with cable or wireless, assuming, I mean, that I wanted to set up a home network, WHICH OF COURSE I ABSOLUTELY DO NOT. Now I'm breaking the hearts of people who wrote in at that time recommending wireless. Sorry, but I read all the e-mails I got on that topic -- there were a couple of hundred, as I recall -- including the ones that assured me that having a wireless network would double my income, lengthen my lifespan, and improve my sex life. The strong consensus I got was that for an ordinary domestic ethernet network, cable is more secure, more capacious, and not much more troublesome to install. And I can STILL have a wireless link for my laptop. So I went with cable. I mean to say, I WOULD have gone with cable, if... Posted at 12:42 PM ANSWERS TO PREVIOUS POSTS [John Derbyshire] "Military justice is to justice as military music is to music." This seems to have been Clemenceau remarking on the Dreyfus affair. (Of which, by the way, there is a condensed account in Prime Obsession. Sorry, couldn't resist.) Cat-5 cable: Answers all over the place on this. One professional network engineer tells me he just runs the cat-5 cable anywhere, never gives it a thought, & has had no problems. Others want me to keep it a foot away from power wires at least. I'm going to compromise & avoid power lines as much as I can, crossing at right angles when absolutely necessary. And most everyone agrees that making your own RJ45 terminations is a dog. I am discouraged; but I've bought the darn tool now (it cost $16) so shall give it the old college try. Posted at 12:34 PM 2 FOR 1 SALE! [Jack Fowler] Now get two of our delightful, critically acclaimed kids books--Volume Two of The National Review Treasury of Classic Children’s Literature (over 37 tales and fables from Twain, Kipling, Alcott, London, Burnett, and so many more) and The National Review Treasury of Classic Bedtime Stories (the beautiful collection of Thornton Burgess woodland adventures that is perfect for beginning readers)--for just $29.95. What gives is NR’s 2 for 1 Winter Clearance sale (part of our ongoing effort to clear out the storeroom to make space for the kegs and slot machines). Wait, make that 3 for 1--for that same $29.95 we’ll also include a FREE copy of L. Frank Baum’s revered Queen Zixi of Ix. This is a great opportunity, and a limited-time offer, so act now. Order your copies here. Posted at 12:33 PM FOR THE RECORD [K. J. Lopez] Cheney was dressed (gulp) more Chirac-like while walking around the Auschwitz museum. Posted at 12:27 PM WA UPDATE [Stefan Sharkansky] Some setbacks today for the Washington Democratic party in its attempt to dismiss Dino Rossi's election contest, at least on the political front. Secretary of State Sam Reed, a Republican who has throughout the election controversy frustrated Republicans and been praised by Democrats for his lack of partisanship ("he's not like Katherine Harris" they extol) has filed responses with the court arguing against the Democrats' motions to dismiss. Meanwhile as the Democrats' lawyers are arguing that its the role of the legislature not the courts to settle this election contest, the Democratic speaker of the statehouse now publicly disagree with the state party on that point. Posted at 12:22 PM MORE RE: CHENEY STYLE [K. J. Lopez] Another e-mail: "As one who has some of the same heart problems as the Vice President, I can tell you that cold weather is an extreme hazard for heart patients. Just breathing very cold air gives me angina. I'm really glad the Veep bundles up." Posted at 12:19 PM INTELLIGENT DESIGN [John Derbyshire] Either before, after, or while reading my article on Intelligent Design in YOUR SUBSCRIPTION COPY OF NRODT, you might want to read David Klinghoffer's piece in Opinion Journal. (David is a former literary editor of NR.) Indidentally, a little back-story to my piece: I showed it round to some academic biologists before signing off with NR editors on it. One of these professionals objected that I had used the phrase "I.D. theory" at one point. Whatever you may think of I.D., she pointed out, it's not a theory. After some cogitation I agreed, and asked the editors to drop the word "theory." I mention this because there is a school board in Georgia (Cobb County, IMS) that has had stickers put on all its biology textbooks to the effect that standard-model evolution theory is "not a fact, but a theory." This is of course correct! Facts are what scientists observe; theories are the arguments they cook up to explain the facts they have observed. The fact (wait a minute... yes, it's a fact) that the Georgia school board thought it was striking a blow against its enemies by mandating a statement that every one of those enemies would cheerfully agree with, shows the gulf of misunderstanding that exists in this area. But while indeed the standard model of evolution is not a fact, but a theory, then I.D. is not a theory, but only a critique of a theory. Not necessarily anything wrong with that, but let's at least keep our terms straight. I would like to see some scientifically literate school board somewhere mandate stickers in biology textbooks stating that "INTELLIGENT DESIGN IS NOT A THEORY, BUT A CRITIQUE." Then we might be getting somewhere with this dismal business. Posted at 12:15 PM FASHION AT AUSCHWITZ [K. J. Lopez] An e-mail: The Washington Post’s absurd story today that criticizes Vice-President Cheney’s attire at commemoration ceremonies at Auschwitz as childish, while simultaneously describing uber-weasels Chirac and Schroeder as “adults,” puts me in mind of a famous quote by Albert Einstein: "If most of us are ashamed of shabby clothes and shoddy furniture, let us be more ashamed of shabby ideas and shoddy philosophies... It would be a sad situation if the wrapper were better than the meat wrapped inside it." Posted at 12:13 PM SPEAKING OF VALENTINE’S DAY [K. J. Lopez ] This item, in the February Washingtonian, near broke my heart: “Capital Comment” asked a few Washingtonians (including Mrs. Tom DeLay) what their most memorable valentine was. Here’s Brian Lamb: “It’s not my kind of holiday. I can’t remember giving anyone anything of significance for Valentine’s Day. A few years ago I did get a stone of some kind in the shape of a heart. I don’t know where it is now, but it was from someone important.” Maybe the Brian Lamb Fan Club should take out an ad in Derb’s Book of Love. Posted at 12:03 PM RE: WASHINGTON [Rich Lowry ] Hey Allison, I'm by no means an expert in Washington state law, but it is my understanding that it provides for judicial review of elections and a judge has wide latitude to order rememdies. Like it or not, that's just the law. There was a court-ordered re-vote in a Adams county race in Washington in 1975. In the Rossi-Gregoire race, I think there was a fundamental unfairness in how the vote count/re-count was conducted in King County, as I argued in the column. On top of that there were all the irregularities. This thing is an irrecoverable mess and a new election should be held. Then, we can have finality, just three months from now, or whenever it shakes out. Obviously, the only reason to have a re-vote is if the result is in doubt--so there is no need to run all the races not decided by 129 votes over again. This kind of thing is extremely rare, but occasionaly is the right thing to do. Note the 1975 New Hampshire U.S. Senate race example I cited. And the re-vote that is being held in North Carolina. Is it less than ideal to have a “do over”? Of course. But seems to me manifestly better than shuffling a deck of cards. Posted at 11:50 AM SAUDIS SPREADING HATE [Rod Dreher] Here's a PDF link to a new Freedom House report out today, the result of their investigation of American mosques. Freedom House has found that mosques around the country are distributing Saudi-produced literature urging Muslims to hate Christians, Jews, Americans and even moderate Muslims. One document allegedly picked up in a Houston mosque directs Muslims to quietly prepare for jihad that will install an Islamic regime in the United States. You must read this report yourself, because I have very little confidence that the MSM will report its findings. Our government and our media have a see-no-evil policy when it comes to this kind of thing. Posted at 11:40 AM VEEP STYLE (OR LACK THEREOF) [KJL] Getting a lot of these: It looks, from the pics, that it's actually a military-issued, cold-weather parka with hood (1 each). I can honestly say that this was probably one the of the best things I was ever issued. With the buttoned in liner, it the warmest piece of clothing I have. That and my military-issued mittens are the perfect combination for shoveling and keeping toasty. Posted at 11:37 AM HONEY SUGAR DOLL BABY [K. J. Lopez] Ah, yes, Derb. I forgot about that column. When you submitted it, I was pretty sure it was a gag--someone pretending to be you. So what are you there doing with those cable wires? Get thee to Vermont and fix things, man. BTW, I'm not for ridding the world of Valentine's Day, but there is definitely a market for anti-V-Dayers. Posted at 11:24 AM FASHION CRITICISM OF THE VEEP [K. J. Lopez] Ramesh, how could the WashPost website editors resist. Here's some of the piece (I'm guessing some of you saw "fashion criticism" and never clicked): "Cheney stood out in a sea of black-coated world leaders because he was wearing an olive drab parka with a fur-trimmed hood. It is embroidered with his name. It reminded one of the way in which children's clothes are inscribed with their names before they are sent away to camp. And indeed, the vice president looked like an awkward boy amid the well-dressed adults." Posted at 11:21 AM AVOID THE LIBERAL GULAGS! [Jack Fowler] There are worse things than a smart, decent kid being turned into a liberal doofus after four years of indoctrination by wack-job college profs – but not many. And there aren’t many cheaper ways you can help prevent that from happening than the NRO Sawbuck Challenge. For every $10 you send us, we’ll send a high school college guidance office -- the high school(s) of your choice if you wish – a copy of the special NR edition of Choosing the Right College: The Whole Truth about America’s Top Schools. This primo guide to 125 leading US colleges and universities will help hundreds of kids (at each school) pick the right college, and shun supposedly fine institutions that are little more than liberal gulags. Help kids avoid this terrible fate. Take the Sawbuck Challenge, here. Posted at 11:13 AM AARP DOING "A GRAVE DISSERVICE TO ITS MEMBERS, CONGRESS AND THE PUBLIC" [K. J. Lopez] From an e-mail press release: FAIRFAX, Va. --- USA Next Chairman Charlie Jarvis blasted AARP’s just released poll on Social Security as “misleading and biased,” and vowed to get the truth out to AARP members as well as Congress and the general public.More here. Posted at 11:10 AM HALLMARK HOLIDAY [John Derbyshire] Abolish St. Valentine's Day, Kathryn? You will have to prise the sappy card from my cold dead fingers. Posted at 11:02 AM RE: WASHINGTON [Allison Hayward] I just ran "designed sloppiness" through the Internet Anagram Server, and it yielded "single deed nips sops." That says it all. Another anagram is "Goddess peels nip sin" which I read to be a comment about cosmetic surgery. Potentially enlightening, but not of much help in the election reform debate. Posted at 10:48 AM DE PROFUNDIS [John Derbyshire] Where is Derb? In the Land of Overstretch, that's where. End-of-month diary & some columns coming up. Just two quick notes: (1) Many thanks to the military / retired-military readers (I logged 68 of you) who responded to my bleg for opinions on the Graner sentence. Opinion was overwhelmingly anti-Derb -- that is, practically all of you thought the sentence just right or too light. (There was a sizeable contingent in favor of having Graner shot.) As John Hillen reminds me, "military sentencing in general over there is pretty harsh." Main reasons for the strong anti-Graner sentiment: He dishonored his service & nation, he inflamed the enemy, he endangered his comrades. However, military people all see Graner's behavior as the mark of a rogue soldier taking advantage in a slack unit, and want some accountability for Graner's superiors, who permitted the slackness. By way of consolation, everyone who commented agrees with me that the Abu Ghraib horseplay does not rise to the level of "torture," nor even to the level of routine arduous-training exercises in the U.S. armed forces, and the stupendous fuss raised by the media & congressional bedwetters is at least as big a scandal as the prisoner abuses themselves. This, remember, is from people many of whom want Graner shot. (Though none of my respondents quoted it, I can't resist recycling the old adage that "Military justice is to justice as military music is to music." Anyone know the origin?) (2) A new bleg concerning cat-5 cable, i.e. the kind of cable you would use if, oh, you were wiring up your house for a home network by way of establishing a new, hi-tech home office for your self. (Which of course I am not doing. No! Certainly not! ESPECIALLY not without getting everything approved & signed off on by my town's code-compliance bureaucracy. Good heavens no!) Here's the bleg. I have seen on various websites that your cat-5 cable should be kept at a distance from ordinary power cable. This is proving really hard to do in some locations. (I mean, it WOULD, for anyone cabling up an old house -- which I myself AM NOT DOING. No!) How important is this? What distances, actually, are involved? I can't find anything that tells me. Also: I have yet to crimp on my first RJ45 connector. How hard is this? Any suggestions? I got a tool from Radio Shack, but my experience with Radio Shack stuff has been... variable. Posted at 10:43 AM SPEAKING OF THE WASHINGTON POST [Ramesh Ponnuru] interesting to note that the top story on their homepage is fashion criticism of the vice president. Posted at 10:41 AM SEN. CLINTON ON RICE [Ramesh Ponnuru] I thought Krauthammer's analysis was uncharacteristically flat-footed. He thinks that Senator Clinton's support for the Rice nomination was smarter than the other 2008 hopefuls' opposition to it. But I think he's ignoring the greater leeway she has. It may be that if you administered truth serum to him, Senator Bayh would admit that voting against Rice harms the Democratic party. But he needed to do it, personally, to enhance his appeal to the party's left. Clinton's choice may not reflect any difference in their views about the political interests of the party, but about their different circumstances within it. Clinton can get away with a lot more and retain the loyalty and affection of liberals. Posted at 10:40 AM RE: WASHINGTON [Allison Hayward] I am not sure I agree with Rich's article regarding doing over an election in Washington State. As far as I know, do-overs are disfavored, and if state law doesn't specifically provide for them I am not sure post hoc where the authority comes from to have one. I am also not sure how an election administrator justifies a "do-over" for one office on the ballot - though I understand that it happens. If there is fraud, then that potentially affects every matter on the ballot. If it is important to "get it right" for one than it is important to get it right for others. My own, potentially unpopular view on this is that given the "designed sloppiness" of elections, very very close races such as we see in Washington state, might be better seen essentially as ties. A do-over election is really a tie-breaker, but an expensive and controversial one. Litigation is another tie breaker, expensive and controversial, too. But maybe that's all they are. Why not ask the candidates to play a hand of poker as a tie-breaker? As long as at the end of the day we know with finality who is governor, or congressman, or alderman, the election has served its purpose of peacefully transferring authority. Elections do evince "designed sloppiness" and that means, at least to me, that technical perfection is just not going to happen unless we radically change them. Elections are administered for the most part by volunteers, many of whom are partisans, and getting people registered and to the polls is almost entirely the task of ardent partisans. Add bounties into the mix to "enhance participation" and you get financial, as well as political, incentives to cheat. Here's a radical idea - require all elegible voters to register and vote. Then the accuracy of voter rolls would be of paramount importance (how else to know who's complied?) and partisans would be out of the registration and mobilization business. But I would guess most people reading this find that proposal distasteful. Posted at 10:32 AM THE DILBERT COLUMNIST [K. J. Lopez] seems to be the Couch/Pajamahedeen model. Posted at 10:29 AM LOOK, JONAH [K. J. Lopez] Dilbert's clearly been in your in-box. Posted at 10:28 AM CHASTITY-BELT-PLEA TACTIC [K. J. Lopez ] NARAL childishly mocks responsibility talk: HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) - An abortion rights group is urging supporters to ask lawmakers to mail them a chastity belt in anticipation of the Legislature's annual designation of Chastity Awareness Week. More here. This is the apparently horrid resolution they're protesting (as far as I can tell there's no money involved, it's just one of those resolutions schools, etc., can take or leave). Because it is simply outrageous to encourage kids to wait. Posted at 10:16 AM WASHINGTON STATE-- HERE'S A POLL FROM STRATEGIC VISION: [Rich Lowry ] Attached is a poll of Washington voters on the disputed gubernatorial election conducted by Strategic Vision, LLC. The poll was conducted January 24-26, 2005 with 800 voters polled and a margin of error of +/- 3%. The poll finds that 53% of respondents favor a revote for governor; 35% oppose; and 12% are undecided. If there was a revote, 51% would support Republican Dino Rossi; 43% would support Christine Gregoire; and 6% were undecided. When asked who they believe actually won the gubernatorial election in November 53% said Dino Rossi; 37% said Christine Gregoire; and 10% were undecided. When asked if they believed if the courts would allow a revote, 41% said yes; 55% said no; 4% were undecided. Christine Gregoire was viewed favorably by 38%; 57% viewed her unfavorably; and 5% were undecided. Dino Rossi was viewed favorably by 50%; 47% viewed him unfavorably; and 3% were undecided. Posted at 09:54 AM LIVE FROM NY, IT'S ELECTION NIGHT [K. J. Lopez] You'll recall we had multiple readers checking in from China and a long list of other exotic locations on Election night/morning. That night, Derb expressed his disappointment in himself, too, on this topic. Posted at 09:46 AM IT'S NOT TORTURE, IT'S ART [Jonah Goldberg] From a reader in the military: Jonah, I have a response to your reader who asks how we would feel if soldier's were forced to watch a crucifix being desecrated or a Torah being destroyed. Those things already happen, and they're paid for by the US Government under the premise that the acts are "art". Maybe we can just say that the people at Gitmo are artists, not interrogators. Then the left would have to appreciate their pushing the envelope. Just a thought. Posted at 09:43 AM REMEMBER THE GIPPER [Jack Fowler] Mark the late Great Man’s 94th birthday (Feb. 6) by getting a copy of Tear Down This Wall, The Reagan Revolution: A National Review History. This is a wonderful and affordable “best of” collection of NR articles about – and by – Ronald Reagan, plus a few Gipper speeches (including some about his “favorite magazine”). This is a great book for every conservative’s family library. Our good friends at Barnes and Noble have got their hands on a number of copies, so go to your local store and get one before they’re gone, or go to the B&N website and order it. Did I mention Tear Down This Wall has an Introduction by our leader, Rich Lowry? Posted at 09:40 AM NOT BANNED IN CHINA (OR BOSTON) [Jonah Goldberg] From a reader, following-up on yesterday's post about how NRO is banned in China: Howdy Jonah, Posted at 09:31 AM ALL BECAUSE OF OUR FLATTER BELL CURVE [Roger Clegg] A professor friend e-mails: "Larry Summers should have posed this question: What institution has a higher proportion of males than the MIT math department? The penitentiary." Posted at 09:08 AM I WANT CHILDREN LEFT BEHIND! [K. J. Lopez] A Rhode Island school district cancels their annual spelling bee, claiming it runs afoul of No Child Left Behind, in a very literal sense: The administrators decided to eliminate the spelling bee, because they feel it runs afoul of the mandates of the federal No Child Left Behind Act.A local anchorwoman has some common sense, commenting: Winning a spelling bee..."just meant you were a good speller." Posted at 08:59 AM PIRRO WANTS HER SPOT [K. J. Lopez] If Hillary doesn't run for reelection, Jeanine Pirro will be one happy Republican candidate. (Sigh. If we're talking about Fox commentators, it's time to approach Rich!) Posted at 08:44 AM THE TRUTH ABOUT HRC [K. J. Lopez] I can't help but think that some of the concerns in that NYTimes piece are a little put on. She's a sister in their struggle and they know it. As she rallied them last April at the March for Women's Lives abortionfest/mini-Democratic convention: I am overwhelmed by this huge crowd but if all we do is march today, that will not change the direction that this country is headed under the leadership of this administration. This march must be the beginning, not the end of making sure that we register every American who agrees with us that this is a question of conscience and faith and personal choice. Posted at 08:42 AM HILLARY AND PARENTAL NOTIFICATION [K. J. Lopez] Of course, the abortion lobby shouldn't be worried about their gal Hill. In the NYTimes piece today, for instance, there is this: "In response, two of Mrs. Clinton's aides qualified her support for parental notification laws, saying she preferred an approach like New York's, which does not require minors seeking abortions to tell their parents, but does provide them with information about their medical options. " So she supports parental notification as long as it does not involve parental notification? Posted at 08:34 AM SKIPPING '06? [K. J. Lopez] Hillary Clinton gets grief for her so-called abortion common-ground talk from NY abortion advocates. Maybe she's more focused on a national audience to care. Posted at 08:33 AM EXCESSIVE ERIC [Tim Graham] "One weakness of liberals is our inability to credit right-wingers with a sufficient degree of malevolence." -- Eric Alterman's MSNBC.com blog, January 24. "I love the defense of 'I forgot' and 'Nobody ever asked me.' Nobody never asked her if she has sexual relations with animals, either." -- Eric Alterman blogging on Maggie Gallagher, January 26. Pray we never heard a word out of Eric Alterman's mouth about the need for our politics to be more civil? Posted at 08:10 AM RE: POOR SPONGEBOB [Tim Graham] It's too bad the still-unresolved question of SpongeBob's star turn for the We Are Family Foundation is getting mixed together with the PBS "Postcards for Buster" controversy, where arrogant ultraliberal Boston PBS station WGBH wanted to instruct the little children on accepting "Mom and Gillian." In a brief turn on "Scarborough Country" last night, I could only explain for a second how subtle this dose of political correctness was for PBS, at least in comparison to the classic ancient example, the 1991 PBS/CPB/NEA-funded documentary "Tongues Untied." For all of you young'ns who wouldn't remember, you won't believe it if you look here. Posted at 08:09 AM ACTUALLY, A LOT OF SINGLE PEOPLE WOULD BACK JUST BANNING VALENTINE'S DAY, COME TO THINK OF IT [K. J. Lopez] The Vermont Teddy Bear Company's "Crazy for You" bear remains under fire, with the Vermont Human Rights Commission has joined the chorus claiming the bear causes "real hurt and emotional turmoil." Posted at 07:51 AM "BUSINESS" IS GOOD [K. J. Lopez] That title gave me chills. Feldt resigns at a time when Planned Parenthood is doing more abortions than ever, which helps keep them afloat (some government money helps, too). Posted at 07:42 AM GLORIA FELDT [K. J. Lopez] resigns as head of Planned Parenthood. Posted at 07:36 AM MIKE MCMANUS [K. J. Lopez] Another government-payroll columnist. Seems more Gallagher than Williams (but I haven't read the Salon piece yet). Posted at 07:33 AM NOT PERFECT, BUT NOT SADDAM [K. J. Lopez] NYTimes: BASRA, Iraq, Jan. 27 - A convoy of flag-bedecked sedans and pickup trucks, packed with cheering campaigners, nosed its way through the this southern Iraqi city on Thursday, accompanied by a pop-music-style refrain, a paean to Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, the country's most important Shiite cleric.Compare to their last "election" in 2002. (Sistani pop songs beat "I Will Always Love You.") Posted at 06:19 AM "THIRD WAY 3.0" [K. J. Lopez] Edwards '08. The only fun part of the primary season might be watching Hillary crush earnest Edwards. (And Edwards would be less of a lightening rod than Hill, so he'd be their safe bet--all works out.) Posted at 05:52 AM POOR SPONGEBOB [K. J. Lopez] Creator says he's "asexual." Posted at 05:49 AM NIP, TUCK, TAX [K. J. Lopez ] Tax cosmetic surgery? Too much fun could have been had with this during Kerry’s run for the White House. Posted at 05:41 AM ANOTHER DAY, ANOTHER NAME [K. J. Lopez ] Sorry, just being a jerk. Sometimes the temptation is too hard to resist here. Posted at 05:40 AM 2 COLD 2 [K. Jean L. ] t y p e. Posted at 05:36 AM Thursday, January 27, 2005 "THANKS, SENATOR KENNEDY" [K. J. Lopez] Just relaying that on behalf of our troops serving and sacrificing in Iraq. A line from a speech Ted Kennedy delivered at Johns Hopkins today will no doubt be heard around the world. He said, "The U.S. military presence has become part of the problem, not part of the solution." Posted at 07:42 PM EVEN DISCLOSURE IS NOT ENOUGH? [K. J. Lopez] If you didn't click on the Glenn Reynolds link to Kaus, do read it, he makes a legit point, as does Mark . Posted at 06:15 PM REAGAN CONS IN PRIMETIME [K. J. Lopez] An e-mail: "Did anyone notice the scene last night where camera panned across Gary Sinise's office and concentrated on good size picture of Reagan on his desk? Very interesti | ||||||