HELP
Saturday, June 11, 2005

THE SHAMANIC WAY OF THE BEE [Andrew Stuttaford]

The world of New Age, um, wisdom never fails to provide hours of harmless entertainment. Here (via a morning surfing Scott Burgess’ delightfully acerbic blog) is a web page dedicated to a clearly important piece of work previously unknown to me – The Shamanic Way of The Bee.

There you will find this: “In The Shamanic Way of the Bee the intriguing world of bee shamanism - the Path of Pollen - is revealed and explained as both a vital part of our heritage and a practical system of healing, wisdom and spiritual development. It is written as a marriage of ethnography and autobiographical memoir, detailing the true adventure story of his initiation into this ancient tradition. As with all new and unusual experiences, his immersion in a new world order and way of being was sometimes terrifying, sometimes exquisitely beautiful, and readers everywhere will be enchanted as they share his journey.”

Perhaps I should review it.

Kathryn? Kathryn?


Posted at 06:33 PM

THE EU BUDGET [Andrew Stuttaford]

Yes, yes, I know that’s not a headline to bring the crowd to its feet (and I promise not to mention it at Chicago – unless, hint, asked, hint), but the next round in the EU’s gathering crisis is the budgetary talks being held next week. Basically, the Commission in Brussels wants more money (there’s a surprise), and most national politicians don’t want to hand any more over (there’s another). One possible source of funds? The (very partial) rebate on the UK’s budget contribution negotiated by a handbag-swinging Mrs Thatcher way back when.

Jacques Chirac, desperately trying to deflect attention from the slight, uh, embarrassment recently inflicted on him by French voters has suggested that the UK should give up this rebate as a “gesture of solidarity” to Europe.

Tony Blair (credit where credit’s due) hit back with a gesture or two of his own (nicely illustrated over at EurSoc).

"Britain has been making a gesture because over the past 10 years, even with the British rebate, we have been making a contribution to Europe two and a half times that of France. Without the rebate, it would have been 15 times as much as France. So that is our gesture. The reason why the rebate exists is because otherwise there would be this quite unfair proportion of British contribution. The reason for the unfairness is because the spending of Europe is so geared to the common agricultural policy."

France, needless to say, is the main beneficiary of the Common Agricultural Policy (the subsidy/protection regime for the EU’s farmers).

Will Chirac give that up?

Mais non.


Posted at 12:01 PM

GEORGE GALLOWAY [Andrew Stuttaford]

Here’s an interesting list of questions for those such as James Wolcott who believe that George Galloway is a hero of our time.

Hat-tip Harry


Posted at 11:59 AM

AYAAN HIRSI ALI [Andrew Stuttaford]

Ayaan Hirsi Ali is, a regular readers will know, one of the most interesting figures now active in politics in European. A relentless campaigner for secular values and women’s rights, she says nothing that that has not been said many times before on the continent of Voltaire, Tom Paine and John Stuart Mill. Despite that, as this article reminds us, she finds herself under attack from the very people who should be among her allies.

Amongst some on the left, it seems, the values of the Enlightenment are trumped by the pieties of multiculturalism.

Also check out the comments from the Norwegian human rights activist who believes that strict immigration controls are the best way to protect both “European values and Muslim women’s human rights.”

Interesting times.


Posted at 11:58 AM

NEW 'CINDERELLA MAN' AD COPY? [John Podhoretz]
The superb Ron Howard movie isn't breaking the bank at the box office yet, and there's some thought that it has to do with the confusing title and the terrible ad line: "When the country was on its knees, he brought America to its feet." An e-mailer to Jeffrey Wells's invaluable (if annoyingly politicized) site Hollywood Elsewhere has a notion that there could be a revision of the ad copy given star Russell Crowe's outrageous conduct at a New York City hotel last week:

"When the country was on its knees, he threw a telephone at its face."

Posted at 10:44 AM

JUST TO GET YOU ANGRY [John Podhoretz]
Evidently it's just fine to encourage children to defile the American flag, as Michelle Malkin shows.

Posted at 10:32 AM

Friday, June 10, 2005

GOOGLE IS SO, LIKE, OH-FOUR [Warren Bell]
My cool email pal Craig Good of Pixar doesn't Google anymore. He uses Teoma.

Posted at 09:54 PM

AND I WAS THIS CLOSE TO A BILLION DOLLARS [Warren Bell]
My phone idea has been done.

And apparently there are other companies, too. Thanks, emailer Bill, for crushing a dream. And to all of you who said, "It's just call forwarding," uhh, it's just not because it's way better, and call forwarding is lame, and this is so sweet.

Napoleon Dynamite's tone doesn't really translate to the printed page.

Posted at 09:44 PM

RE: MR. SMITH [K. J. Lopez]
I somehow managed to read JPod's "in which he was sensationally good" as " in which he looked sensationally good."

Posted at 07:08 PM

MR. AND MRS. SMITH REVIEWED [John Podhoretz]
Warren and K-Lo, I saw it. Pluses: Angelina Jolie's astonishing looks, a scene in which she hangs drapes that is so unbelievably sexy it's hard to describe, a final shootout inside an Ikea-like superstore and the hilarious Vince Vaughan. Minuses: It's a very peculiar effort to mix a romantic comedy about a marriage that needs a kick in the pants with the cartoonish superviolence of a movie like Lethal Weapon. The movie doesn't really engage you. It's a comedy that's just not funny enough. What's worse, Brad Pitt seems very bored (as compared to a very similar part in The Mexican, a poorly reviewed movie that was actually not so bad and in which he was sensationally good). There's one genuinely disturbing moment here, when Pitt and Jolie get into an actual, physical fight and he slams his foot repeatedly into her torso. You don't see the blow landing, and she then kicks him in the privates right after, but playing that kind of intimate abusive violence for laughs really isn't right.

Posted at 07:02 PM

WEATHER DATA [She Who Knows Full Well This Weather Thread Has Gone on Way too Long]
A Californian (who else at 6:45 EST Friday?) e-mails:
The USDA completed a study on amenities to understand why people choose to live where they do and, more importantly, why they are leaving the farm belt.

Basically, they came up with a rating system that shows that places in the west and south that aren't cold in the winter or too humid in the summer are nice places to live. Our tax dollars at work. Oh, and have more scenery around is preferable too.

The study is here.

I came across it in Scientific American's May issue. The intro to the story is here.

Kind of fits in with the weather discussion you have going on. And yes, LA is nice (Culver City is about 70 degrees right now...). But we do have Barbara Boxer.
Me: Yeah, and I have Hillary and Charlie Schumer. I can adjust. Pod already backed up his SUV.

Posted at 06:51 PM

OPERATION DESTROY IT [K. J. Lopez]
Where is the al Qaeda training camp in Pakistan and why haven't we shut it down? Citizen Smash asks a good question.

Posted at 06:32 PM

RE: MR. AND MRS. SMITH [She Who Only Watches According to Jim/Ellen/Coach--Anything-Else-that-Warren-Bell-Worked-On Repeats]
I'll watch Friends repeats instead and be hopeful someday Brad and Jen will be back together.

Posted at 06:22 PM

MR. AND MRS. SMITH [Warren Bell]
The reviews aren't very good, but I am looking forward to what looks like a stylish and fun action comedy starring my Celebrity Exemption, Angelina Jolie, and that guy whose name I don't recall. If the movie does well, it may be just in time for Angelina, who hasn't had anything like a hit in five long years. (Not including Shark Tale, where she did a voice.) You have to go all the way back to the first Tomb Raider to find a Jolie pic that grossed $100M in the U.S. Her co-star can relate -- he went from 1995's Se7en to 2001's Ocean's Eleven without cracking $70M in domestic B.O.

Posted at 06:20 PM

RE: TEMPS [K. J. Lopez]
Warren, please keep me up to date on "for rent" signs in the neighborhood there. Nevermind about Virginia. L.A. calls.

Posted at 06:13 PM

TEMPS [Warren Bell]
What's that outside my window? A thermometer reading 78? Next to a humiditometer (?) reading 57 percent? And a slight breeze? And Angelina Jolie?

L.A. rules.

Posted at 06:03 PM

WHY IS NRO STONEWALLING ON THE BIRD WARS? [Warren Bell]
Two separate incidents document clear-cut examples of Avian terror. And yet, Kathryn Lopez dismisses the danger with a pun. A pun! I'll tell you what's "for the birds," Ms. Lopez. Appeasement!

Survival tip: It is a common myth that bird eyesight is dependent on movement. Standing still only makes you an easier target. You must always be prepared to run, and I recommend only going outdoors with people slower than you.

Posted at 06:02 PM

INQUIRING MINDS WANT TO KNOW [K. J. Lopez]
an e-mail:
Where do I apply to read the Corner professionally for the White House? I used to be able to do some work and refresh every half hour or so. Now with Bench Memos, The Buzz, TKS, The-As-Yet-To-Be-Named Media Blog, I do well to cram four hours of work into my nine hour day. Keep up the good work.

Posted at 05:59 PM

THE PRESIDENT DOESN'T READ BLOGS [K. J. Lopez]
So such shameless moments in the blogosphere as some of these are wasted (see "stud")?

Posted at 05:58 PM

RE: DALLAS AND HUMIDITY [Rod Dreher]
OK, you have a point there. Walking around NYC last weekend I sweated more than I have all year in climate-controlled Dallas. The first day and a half we were gallivanting around Brooklyn with the two boys, Julie and I were like, "Why did we ever leave?" A day later, with blistered feet, aching backs, sweat-soaked clothes and trailing a couple of very demanding shorties, we said, "Oh yeah, that's why."

"Daaa-aaa-aaaa-d! I'm TI-I-I-I-RED!"

"Matthew, you walked across the Brooklyn Bridge and back when you weren't even three years old. Don't give me this."

"But Daaa-aaa-aaa-d!"

Et cetera, ad infinitum.

Posted at 05:47 PM

DALLAS AND HUMIDITY [Now You've Gone and Done It Pod]
I believe all anybody ever does in Dallas is go from airconditioned car to airconditioned garage to airconditioned office to airconditioned car to airconditioned home. We here in New York WALK EVERYWHERE. AND WALK AND WALK AND WALK. You're all getting me started. And I warned you not to.

Posted at 05:36 PM

1600 READING [Rod Dreher]
We had White House communications director Dan Bartlett in today for an editorial board meeting. I asked him if blogs fit into the WH's communications strategy. He said he has people on his staff whose full-time job is to monitor the blogs to keep up with what's going on. I asked him what the most important blogs to read, from the White House's point of view, are. He said that in terms of what influences the mindset of the Washington media, Kausfiles, the Slate daily roundup of the papers, and Andrew Sullivan were crucial ones to keep up with. In terms of staying abreast of what's happening with the conservative base, the White House makes sure to read The Corner (of course), Instapundit, and Powerline.

I also asked him if the president reads blogs. Answer: "No."

Posted at 05:30 PM

WORLD'S SMALLEST DEHUMIDIFIER [Rod Dreher]
Pod, the always-hot, always-humid, miserable-till-November Dallas bureau has no sympathy for your shvitzy self.

Posted at 05:29 PM

THE MAN DOES GET BROWNIE POINTS [All She Sees Is Dollar Signs]
for working a Chicago plug into his whining, though.

Posted at 05:03 PM

FIRST CLASS TICKETS FOR POD [She's in NYC Dealing with It without Whining]
There you go:



(Photography by Jonah Goldberg)

Posted at 05:00 PM

I'LL BET IF YOU GO TO CHICAGO... [Totally Lost It Pod]
...for the big fundraiser, it won't be humid like it is here. I spent a summer in Chicago once and while it was frequently hot, it wasn't HUMID LIKE IT IS HERE...humid...

Posted at 04:59 PM

IT'S HOT, PART 2 [Losing It Pod]
Someone is trying to get me started about the humidity. I'm warning you. This is not a wise plan, getting me started on the humidity. I must resist your mind games. Must...resist...

Posted at 04:54 PM

ANOTHER REASON TO COME TO THE CHICAGO DO [Andrew Stuttaford]
It's being held indoors. Safe from the bird menace.

Posted at 04:52 PM

IT'S HOT [Cranky Pod]
That's all I'm saying. This has no political, moral or social ramifications. It's just hot as H-e-double-hockeysticks in New York City. And humid. Don't get me started on the humidity. I mean it. Do not get me started.

Posted at 04:51 PM

IT AIN'T EASY BEING CHEESY [K. J. Lopez]
Warren, Andrew: That thread is for the birds.

Posted at 04:45 PM

BIRD WARS [Andrew Stuttaford]
And, Warren, there was this disturbing incident in Houston last month. Watch the skies, Mr. Bell. It's always been good advice...On the other hand, I'm not entirely convinced by this.

Posted at 04:22 PM

FORTUNE COOKIES [ Shannen Coffin ]
A few years ago, I got a fortune cookies that said: "You would make a good lawyer." Since I'd been practicing law for about 10 years at the time, the question that occured to me was "If I do what?"

Posted at 04:04 PM

IT'S WACKO NIGHT ON PBS [Tim Graham]
It might be a little hard to believe, but on the cusp of potential PBS budget cuts, "Now with David Brancaccio" is promoting that tonight they will interview former New York Times reporter and current Nation Institute fellow Christopher Hedges on the Christian right. The promotional page even highlights how the "ire" of the Christian right was raised by a Hedges piece in Harper's, rebutted by Stanley Kurtz of NRO. Right there, PBS is promoting that Hedges compared the Christian right to Hitler, and they're telling the world: yes, this is an expert we think more of America needs to hear!

PS: Thanks to Pledge Week, this episode doesn't seem to be airing on WETA in Washington, DC. Instead, we're getting "John Denver: The Wildlife Concert" -- from 1995.

Posted at 03:52 PM

OH, HOW I ONLY WISH I WERE KIDDING [Warren Bell]
Yesterday I warned of the coming Bird Wars. I am too late.

Advice: invest in cat production facilities.

Posted at 03:42 PM

WIFE JOKES [Warren Bell]
Ahh, John, if only they were jokes. No, my wife is quite the technophobe, leaving me a very busy job as Technology Czar of our home. Between TiVos, Macs, an AirPort network, I spend countless hours a week saying, "Well, it worked yesterday, let me look at it."

As for washing machines, I assume we have one, but honestly, I wouldn't even know where to look.

Posted at 03:40 PM

WARNER WARNING [John J. Miller]
My governor wants to be your president. He raised my taxes. He'd probably try to raise yours, too.

Posted at 03:39 PM

RE: PRINTING THE WEB [K. J. Lopez]
Or about the time he put the baby's clothes on backward? And the day he half-day he stayed home and undid a year's worth of good habits and organization?

Posted at 03:37 PM

A BILLION DOLLAR IDEA [Warren Bell]
And I'm just giving it away. If someone does this and makes a billion dollars, that's fine, but it might be nice to send me a card or something.

I thought of this as my wife and I were discussing this morning how frustrating it is that we have so many phone numbers in our life. She gets work calls at work, on her cell, and at home, where we have two lines. I have the same situation. Some work people use my cell, some use my home, some use my office, some use my home office. (I know, these are not the problems of Ed and Edwina Lunchpail, but bear with me.)

So here's that billion dollar idea: it's called FIND ME. Find Me is a telecom service that provides you with one phone number that you give to everyone. Then you tell Find Me where you want to be contacted at any given moment in the day. Getting into the car? Call Find Me's toll-free number, enter a PIN (not a PIN number, because that would be a Personal Identification Number number, and boy does that irk me, just like ATM machine), and tell Find Me to route all calls to your cell. Or program Find Me with a schedule, so that all calls at 8 AM routinely start going to the cell, at 9 AM to the office and so forth. Tell Find Me which numbers should always go to the office, or which should go to voicemail (mother-in-law. Oops. Was that out loud?). Your friends and family can have an emergency code that allows them to try all of your phones until you are found. And Find Me will automatically recognize a fax machine and send it to your fax.

And you only ever have to give out one phone number for the rest of your life.

You're welcome.

Posted at 03:33 PM

"SO IF THIS IS THE YEAR THAT TONY BLAIR WANTS THE WORLD TO SAVE AFRICA, WHY NOT START WITH ZIMBABWE?" [K. J. Lopez]
David Frum

Posted at 03:21 PM

RE: PRINTING THE WEB [John Podhoretz]
Warren, really. Wife jokes? What next? Does she get to post how you stayed home home one day with the kids and put too much soap in the washing machine and when she came home, bubbles came out the front door?

Posted at 03:21 PM

MORE SIMPSONS FORTUNE COOKIES [K. J. Lopez]
Woody [Allen, who writes fortune cookies, about Homer]: That is ... he's like a young me.

Writer: Please, Young Mi was a hack compared to this guy.

Posted at 03:20 PM

TRUE FORTUNE COOKIE STORIES [John Podhoretz]
My earlier post about a fortune I once got in a fortune cookie has inspired some fantastic stories from e-mailers:

"The day I asked my wife out for the first time on a date, she had earlier gotten a fortune saying 'Today is your lucky day.' Some wise acres would site that as evidence fortune cookie fortunes are bunk…but my wife has saved it to this day."

"In 1988 I was an exchange officer for the US Air Force flying with the Royal AF in Scotland, but dating a girl who lived and worked in Manhattan. On one trip to NYC, I proposed marriage and she accepted. Her mother wanted to meet us for dinner in town. Coincidentally, my parents were driving through from Maryland. I coordinated a team rendezvous at a large Chinese restaurant near Penn Station. Dinner was very chatty, but my fiancée grew colder and more stern as time passed without my announcement that we were planning to marry--I was waiting for a chance to ask my intended’s mother for permission first. Finally, the bill and the fortune cookies arrived following a long stony silence from my fiancée. My mother expects everyone to read their fortunes. I saved mine for last as it read: 'Stop searching, happiness is just beside you.' So I read it aloud, and continued, 'and if it’s alright with you Mrs M, I would like to marry your daughter.' We bought champagne, my fiancée’s demeanor changed instantly, and we married 8 months later. My wife has kept that fortune pressed in an album ever since."

"In 1989, the first time I went with my new girlfriend to a Chinese restaurant (in New Haven, Conn.) I got a fortune cookie. I read it to her out loud: 'You and your wife will be very happy together.' She didn't believe me until I showed her the fortune. We've been married for almost 15 years, and yes we're very happy together."

Posted at 03:14 PM

RE: "IT WOULD TAKE 3,066 YEARS TO PRINT THE ENTIRE WEB." [Warren Bell]
And yet it would only take my wife a minute to call me at work during an important meeting to ask me what's wrong with the printer.

Posted at 03:13 PM

BARBARA BOXER, "BULLY" [K. J. Lopez]
From City Journal

Posted at 03:12 PM

FOOLS RUSH IN [K. J. Lopez]
You can buy "celebrity air" on ebay. (Or buy an empty jar at the Wal-Mart for much less.)

Posted at 03:02 PM

"ABBOTT, COSTELLO [K. J. Lopez]
back asylum for Chen"

Just for the headline.

Posted at 02:56 PM

"IT WOULD TAKE 3,066 YEARS TO PRINT THE ENTIRE WEB." [K. J. Lopez]
A blogger makes some guesstimates, based on Google numbers.

Posted at 02:48 PM

LAWYERS PILE INTO IRAQ TO DEFEND SADDAM HUSSEIN [K. J. Lopez]
Financial Times:
Radical Arab militants have been trickling into Iraq to join the fight of Ba'athists and radical Islamists against US forces. But another,non-violent Arab contingent of volunteers has been gearing up for battle on a different front the defence of Saddam Hussein.

During the past year, the committee for the defence of Mr Hussein, known by its acronym Isnad, has swelled to more than 2,500 lawyers. Some are Iraqis, led by Mr Hussein's head lawyer, Khalil al-Duleimi. But the majority come from Arab states, with Jordan providing as many as 600 of the legal experts. In Libya, the head of the support committee is Aisha, the daughter of Colonel Muammer Gadaffi.

Posted at 02:46 PM

RE: CHINA-INDIA -- SOME POINTS [John Derbyshire]
BTW, when recommending Bo Yang's book "The Ugly Chinaman," I should have added a warning not to let a Chinese person see you reading it. They hate that. "It's OK for us to say these things about ourselves, but..." etc. etc.

A Chinese person not a million miles from my own household caught me reading it and expressed fierce indignation. It was several hours before I stopped hearing about the Opium Wars, burning of the Summer Palace, extraterritoriality, etc., etc.

Posted at 02:43 PM

"KEEP THE ALCOHOL AND LOSE THE FOOD." [K. J. Lopez]
More Amtrak woes--this time the cafe car, also a liability. Excuse me a sec. M y knee jerks. Privatize it all. The Starbucks Express. The T.G.I. Express. The Medievil Times Railroad. Let the market in! (I suspect the last won't actually hit the rails.)

Posted at 02:43 PM

THIS IS A JOKE, RIGHT? [K. J. Lopez]
HBomb poster Alex Keyssar wants the U.S. to give Gitmo back to it's rightful owner--you know, adorable old Fidel. It would be a "delightfully positive" step. Uncle wouldn't actually torture people. Only Rumsfeld does that.

Posted at 02:36 PM

I CAUGHT YOU A DELICIOUS BASS [K. J. Lopez]
For both Napoleon Dynamite and Star Wars fans: Anakin Dynamite. Very funny if you saw the former. (More video--it's Friday.)

Posted at 02:32 PM

GLOBAL WARMING [K. J. Lopez]
Bush, Blair, Arhnuld, the NYTimes: NR weighs in here.

Posted at 02:14 PM

IS THIS THE WAY TO ARMADILLO? [K. J. Lopez]
British troops have some fun. (It's a music video. Read this story first.)

Posted at 02:13 PM

JUSTICE FOR LE MONDE? [Rachel Z. Friedman]

Melanie Phillips has a piece in the Spectator about the recent French court judgment against Le Monde. The paper was found guilty of racial defamation against the Jewish people for a piece it ran in 2002 called “Israel-Palestine: the Cancer.” Here’s Phillips:

One might have expected such a momentous ruling pronouncing Le Monde guilty of racial prejudice against the Jews to have made waves. Not a bit of it. The French have ignored it. The case was only brought to light by the Middle East commentator Tom Gross in the Wall Street Journal Europe, who asked why nothing had been written about it anywhere a week after the ruling. Following his article, the Guardian belatedly ran a story.

The media has been silent because the same kind of calumnies are routinely published and broadcast in Britain and throughout Europe: obsessively disproportionate and libellous coverage which equates Israel with the Nazis, misrepresents its defence against terror as brutal aggression, and singles out the Jewish people in their ancient and restored nation state as uniquely unworthy of self-determination.

But should we celebrate the ruling? Here’s Phillips again:

…[H]eartening as it is to see a public body at last calling this prejudice by its proper name, the case against Le Monde also provokes unease. Racial prejudice is hateful and should be exposed as such. But this should be done at the bar of public opinion, not in a court of law.
. Read the whole thing here. (See here for Tom Gross's WSJ piece.) And check out Phillips’s Diary too, if you’re not already a reader. On Iran, for example, see this post and this one. For another good point about the campaign to delegitimize Israel—and Israel’s own ineptness in countering it—see here.

Posted at 02:04 PM

"A HEART-RENDING MOMENT FOR THE JEWISH STATE" [K. J. Lopez]
JPod takes us to meet the people of Gush Katif, soon to be on the move.

Posted at 01:49 PM

THIS WILL HURT [K. J. Lopez ]
The world's scariest tampon (sorry; it's an anti-rape device causing controversy in South Africa).

Posted at 01:31 PM

CHINA-INDIA -- SOME POINTS [John Derbyshire]
(1) The "ugly Chinaman" phenomenon predicted (correctly, I think) by VDH as being a future talking point in the world "beyond the wall" has been a talking point among educated Chinese for 30 years or so. There is in fact a founding text here, Bo Yang's "Chou-lou-de Zhong-guo-ren" (The Ugly Chinaman).

(2) China is quite desperately resource-poor. This has good consequences in the long term. The govt. of a resource-poor nation can only finance its operations by farming the populace for taxes, which sooner or later involves getting their consent. The nearest thing to a dictator that Britain ever had was Henry VIII, but he had to crawl on hands & knees to Parliament to beg for funds. (Cf. a resource-rich place like Saudi Arabia, whose rulers really have no need for their populace at all -- probably regard them as a nuisance. Or Iraq...) The downside, of course, is the temptation to foreign land-grabbing adventures -- stealing other people's resources.

(3) Whether or not "diversity" in your population is really a good thing is still an open question. In recent decades, both nations with lotsa "diversity" (e.g. the USA) have prospered, and so have nations with practically none (e.g. Japan.) India has plenty of diversity; China very little. So an India/China rivalry could be a test case for the thesis that "diversity" is good/bad/irrelevant under 21st-century conditions.

Posted at 12:14 PM

"BARBERING ON DUTY" [K. J. Lopez]
Firemen in Iowa City are prohibited from cutting each others hair after a local newspaper firestorm.

Posted at 12:11 PM

RE: RIGGED [K. J. Lopez]
Would you think less of me if I didn't lose sleep over the possibility?

Posted at 12:07 PM

RE: GEEK SUCCESS RIGGED? [Tim Graham]
Say, um, K-Lo, did you recall that MTV-Movie-Award-winning "Napoleon" was distributed by.....MTV Films? Perhaps that helped a bit with those awards. I noticed the director dude sorta left them out of his thank yous...hmm.

Posted at 12:04 PM

WE'RE MOVING TO ALEXANDRIA [K. J. Lopez]
Virginia, that is. They're going wireless.

(Although how can I rule out Fairfax. Any city councilmen reading and want to tell me about your wired plans?)

Posted at 11:56 AM

TRUE FORTUNE COOKIE STORY [John Podhoretz]
One day, 23 years ago, I got the most specific fortune ever. It said: "You or a close friend will be married within a year." Wow! I put it in my wallet and dated it, thinking that perhaps if I met my intended and wanted to wed her within the twelvemonth, I could whip out the fortune and use it as my proposal. Anyway....I didn't get married, nor did a single one of my close friends. That's why you never get a real fortune in one of those cookies, I guess.

Posted at 11:52 AM

RE: FORTUNE COOKIE WRITERS [K. J. Lopez]
This would not be The Corner if there weren't a Simpsons reference:
Homer: These fortunes are terrible. They're supposed to predict stuff and ease you through times of doubt and sickness.

Manager: Well with all due respect sir I suppose you could come up with better fortunes?

Homer: You will be aroused by a shampoo commercial.

Manager: That's not bad!

... Manager: This gentleman here can write better fortunes than all of you put together. Show them!

Homer: Okay lets see, um... The price of stamps will climb ever higher....

Posted at 11:48 AM

ANOTHER DYNAMITE GEEK SUCCESS [K. J. Lopez]
Napoleon Dynamite and its young Mormon star Jon Heder had a pretty cool showing at the MTV Movie awards. Pop culture isn't always filth. Sometimes it's fun and sweet (and completely odd). And sometimes that good stuff is even celebrated.

Posted at 11:42 AM

FLAG FLAP [John Derbyshire]
Somehow I'd missed this one.

"Walking into the Oregon State Employment Office at 119 N. Oakdale Ave. in Medford, Oregon can already be a daunting experience for many who are looking for work or have to file a claim. To many it can be a stressful occasion. Being met by a Mexican flag hoisted above the Stars and Stripes on the back wall of this state-run office is for many, like Earl Howard of Shady Cove, OR, 'downright un-American'."

There's a follow-up here. The dipwad officials took down the Mexican flag... then they took down Old Glory, too! "So as not to offend anyone...."

Heaven forbid we should offend anyone. Anyone, that is, except patriotic Americans. It's OK to offend THEM.

Posted at 11:42 AM

RE: FRENCH MEN GETTING FAT [K. J. Lopez]
One of the poll questions, if the translation is right, had a good portion of those polled saying they'd like to "request to work part time." That's it, John J. They think "staying home" is a vacation. As for the men wanting to crave cheese at all hours and get pregnant, I don't understand the Parisians!

Posted at 11:31 AM

FRENCH MEN GETTING FAT [John J. Miller]
Nearly 40 percent of French men say they would like to become pregnant, according to a new survey. I am not making this up! (Is this what Simone de Beauvoir was talking about in The Second Sex?) My favorite detail from the poll: Overwhelming numbers of French guys said they wanted to "live their fatherhood more intensely," provided that they could take time off work and still get paid.

Posted at 11:21 AM

RE: WAAH! BOO-HOO! [Tim Graham]
JPod, Jonathan Alter claiming he's a centrist is almost as funny as Hillary the Centrist. This is the guy who last week said the Pope's position on embryo-destroying stem-cell research was perverted. (Not to mention his column this week that he links to.) This is the guy who claimed Howard Dean showed "the old [ideological] labels are increasingly useless." The guy who wrote a cover story on liberal Barack Obama with the title "The Audacity of Hope." The guy who tried to support the CBS hit job on the Reagans by claiming there were 5,834 docudramas on the sins of the Kennedy family. The guy who used Newsweek in 2000 as a campaign vehicle to lambaste George W. Bush as the nation's most uncaring executioner of potentially innocent Death Row inmates. His post should have been titled "The Audacity of Denial."

Posted at 11:19 AM

BARNETT ON KENNEDY [Jonathan H. Adler]
Randy Barnett explains why he was troubled by Justice Kennedy's silent concurrence in Raich. In short, if Kennedy really believed the result was consistent with his Lopez and Morrison, particularly his own Lopez concurrence, he could have explained why.

Posted at 10:25 AM

RE: BOLTON [K. J. Lopez]
Henry Sokolski today goes into some actual important stuff to know about Bolton (he's served us well...and will again).

Posted at 10:06 AM

"EMBARRASSING" & "HUFFINGTON POST" [K. J. Lopez]
are pretty frequently in the same sentence, aren't they?

Posted at 10:01 AM

BOLTON LATEST--“NAMES OF CONCERN” [Rich Lowry ]
Sen. Roberts, chairman of the intelligence committee, is attempting to work out a deal on these intelligence intercepts between Biden and Dodd on the one hand and the administration on the other. Remember: Bolton asked for the names of US persons that had been blacked out in a handful of NSA intercepts. The Dems' wild theory is that Bolton's requests had something to do with his disputes with a couple of intelligence analysts. Now, Biden and Dodd are asking that 36 “names of concern” be given to John Negroponte so he can certify whether or not there is any overlap with the 19 names provided to Bolton. 36. That's a lot of concern. Bolton had disputes with 2 analysts, Christian Westerman and Fulton Armstrong. 2. The Biden/Dodd request is clearly yet another fishing expedition. Roberts will try to bid them down. Bolton only needs two more votes to get to cloture. If the administration can never satisfy Biden and Dodd, it can probably make some offer in this dispute that is enough to pry away those two votes from the Democrats. Stay tuned...

Posted at 10:00 AM

WAAH. BOO-HOO. I WRITE FOR NEWSWEEK AND ROGER AILES IS MEAN TO ME. WAAH! [John Podhoretz]
Jonathan Alter, the Newsweek columnist, has a truly embarrassing item on the Huff Puff today whining that Roger Ailes didn't like a column of his and was trying to get Alter in trouble over it. Gee, you'd think a Newsweek columnist might have a little more backbone than to get all ootsy-tootsy when he gets criticized, even if the criticism is unfair. Fox practices "intimidation journalism," Alter says. That's as opposed to Alter's brand of journalism, which alternates between liberal piety and sneering obnoxiousness. Full disclosure: Yes, I am a Fox News Channel contributor. Boo! Scared you with my intimidation journalism!

Posted at 09:54 AM

DID YOU EVER EVEN THINK [K. J. Lopez]
about the guy who writes the fortune cookie lines?

Posted at 09:52 AM

RE: CHICAGO FUNDRAISER [K. J. Lopez]
Actually...the suits might consider the Quatloo thing.

What's the exchange rate like, anyway?

Posted at 09:51 AM

RE: RE: SANTORUM [K. J. Lopez]
So glad you linked to that mod interview, JPod. EVERYONE had forgotten!

Posted at 09:50 AM

RE: SANTORUM [K. J. Lopez]
That's going to be a real bad thing for conservatives if Santorum loses. If you're a Pennsylvania conservative who is inclined to punish your junior senator for the last election, for who is the judiciary chairman, I'd give that some more thought, as I wrote a few weeks ago. And I say that as no fan of your senior senator, as Corner readers well now.

Posted at 09:45 AM

SANTORUM'S TROUBLES [John Podhoretz]
Talking about "man on dog" carnal acts is never a good idea electorally.

Posted at 09:44 AM

THE CHICAGO FUNDRAISER [Captain James Tiberias Podhoretz]
No, you can't pay in quatloos.

Posted at 09:42 AM

SANTORUM TROUBLES [Jack Fowler]
Arlen Specter’s buddy seems to be in deepening re-election trouble according to a new Keystone Poll out this week(as Buzz reported; here's the whole poll): the incumbent Republican now trails Democrat Bob Casey Jr. by a 44% to 37% margin in the 2006 Senate match-up. In the previous Keystone survey conducted in March, Casey led Santorum 44% to 43% -- the son of the late popular governor may not be moving ahead, but the incumbent (whose “favorable” numbers aren’t) is falling behind. This one is going to be a doozie.

Posted at 09:40 AM

CAPTAIN'S LOG, STARDATE... [K. J. Lopez]
Just drawing you in here. Got Chicago?

I know you hate these plugs, but we...do too! But they are worth it if they make one more of you cool peeps sign up. Yes, because we take your money--as you may have heard, it's a fundraiser for us, to help us do cool new things (don't you like the new media blog, by the way? And Bench Memos?) and keep doing the worthwhile things we're already doing--hopefully making your stays here informative, entertaining, enriching. But we also want you with us in Chicago because it's going to be a lot of fun, based on previous events. You'll meet some good people (our readers never disappoint) and ask some of the burning questions you've been wanting to of some of the NR crew (Who was the writer paid only in beer for the first year of NRO? Tell us about the details of the Goldberg-Lowry prison rescue. What...you said Kathryn is actually a Roddenberry? ). There's actually some stirring intellectual discussion too. Anyway, give it some thought it you can. You won't be disappointed and we're most grateful that you'd consider. Here are the details. Thanks a ton.

Posted at 09:30 AM

CAVUTO SAID IT WAS AN "OUTLANDISH" QUESTION [K. J. Lopez]
I'm getting many e-mails like this:
I listened to Cavuto's interview with W and I think you're being a bit unfair in your criticism. He asked the question in the context of Social Security, noting the polls suggest the President is having a hard time getting his message out to the American people. My reaction to the question was that it was a proxy for the more direct (and less politic) question: "Does the focus of the media on vapid, titillating stories like the Michael Jackson trial make it more difficult for you as President to get the public engaged on complex, real-world issues such as the financial stability of the Social Security system?"

I'm not in the tank for Cavuto but fair is fair. He was trying to get W to chastise the media for wasting time on stories of no lasting consequence while giving the big, life-altering stories short shrift....
I had not seen or read the whole interview when I linked to it (just the Sullivan post). But you can here and see that context.

Posted at 09:22 AM

THIS WILL MAKE YOU MAD [K. J. Lopez]
A terrible welfare-state disaster from Britain. A 12-year-old mother, her two teen mother sisters, their poor children, her irresponsible mother who blames the schools bad sex ed, the absent father, the absent fathers (not all teens--far from in one case), the taxpayers' $60,000 a year...

Posted at 09:16 AM

WHAT WAS THAT I WAS JUST SAYING ABOUT THE SAN FRAN CHRONICLE? [K. J. Lopez]
Sean Penn is covering the Iranian elections for them:
Hollywood actor Sean Penn, adopting the role of a journalist, scribbled in his notebook as Friday prayer worshippers in Tehran chanted "Death to America." Penn, 44, in Iran on a brief assignment for the San Francisco Chronicle ahead of presidential elections on June 17, may be one of the best known faces in film, but he went unrecognized by the 6,000 faithful at Tehran University.

Working with a translator, Penn took copious notes as hardline cleric Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati urged the congregation to vote en masse "to make America angry."

Posted at 09:10 AM

"WHOSE SIDE IS DEAN ON? " [K. J. Lopez]
The Palm Beach Post is mad.

Posted at 08:57 AM

REAL GEEK SUCCESS STORIES [K. J. Lopez]
From a NYTimes profile of Bill Pryor:
His father, William H. Pryor Sr., was the band director in the local Catholic high school, and so it was no surprise that the younger Mr. Pryor, an award-winning timpanist, would enter college majoring in music. But when he came home for the summer, his mother spied him watching C-Span, and knew he was headed in another direction.




(As one who was caught watching C-Span once or twice or more in college, I am qualified to make this call. More qualified than the Daily News I daresay.)

Posted at 08:44 AM

"NERDS MAKE BETTER LOVERS" FALSE ADVERTISING? [K. J. Lopez]
Does David Arquette really qualify as a "geek"? (I had a motherly concern for his character in Never Been Kissed--PING! another good bad movie--so he won me over a while back.) It's not like Courteney found him at the local physics lab. The Daily News is just giving false hope to geeks everywhere. Memo to geeks: You're not going to meet Christina Aguilera in the stacks. (I mean that literally--unless she's filming a bodice-ripping video there. That's not to say there aren't many cool singles hanging around the library. Segue to Laura Bush at White House Correspondents Dinner: “I was the librarian who spent 12 hours a day in the library and yet somehow I met George.”.)

Posted at 08:43 AM

HEAR CHARLIE RANGEL'S OUTRAGE [John Podhoretz]
On Monday, Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel likened the liberation of Iraq to the death of 6 million in the Holocaust. Rangel did it on Steve Malzberg's radio show. Steve is one of the best hosts in the business, and he's posted the soundbite on his website here. These are a few images from the struggle Rangel likens to the Shoah.

Posted at 08:35 AM

DEAN-DURBIN '08 [K. J. Lopez]
Polarizing, baby! On top of Dick Durbin's little echo of Howard Dean's "White Christian" nonsense yesterday on the Senate floor during the Pryor debate, Durbin went to town on the VRWC, accusing the big bad Fox, specifically, of making Dean news that he isn't. Nevermind that the not-so-Foxy San Francisco Chronicle broke the "White Christian" thang. But that may be his point, that the VRWC in concert with the VRWM has brainwashed the real fair and balanced media folk.

Posted at 08:21 AM

TOM DELAY, SLAVEDRIVER? [Tim Graham]
So the House moved to cut PBS funding yesterday. Do you think the Republicans caught the nasty PBS DeLay hatchet job on Friday night? That DeLay supports "virtual slavery" in the Mariana Islands with Jack Abramoff? (Funny, I don't remember PBS ripping into Hillary Clinton's Fundraiser with Felons that just ended its time in the courtroom.) It's official: the old "Now" show, now reborn as a half-hour show, is the same old partisan liberal bilge, even if Bill Moyers left the building. David Brancaccio is next verse, same as the first.

Posted at 08:02 AM

SOUNDS LIKE A MAN NOT RUNNING FOR REELECTION...? [K. J. Lopez]
Boston Globe:
Governor Mitt Romney has promised to endorse Lieutenant Governor Kerry Healey in the 2006 gubernatorial race if he decides to run for president, a top Republican Party official and a Healey adviser said....

Posted at 06:28 AM

" DO YOU THINK THAT THE FOCUS ON MICHAEL JACKSON HAS HURT YOU?" [K. J. Lopez]
Ugh.

Neil Cavuto asked that of the president. I know the few times I've met the president I have been in total groupie mode, so I shouldn't talk. But you get an interview with the president and you ask him about Michael Jackson? That dude's been on cable news too long. Next he'll ask the leader of the free world about car chases.

Posted at 06:26 AM

HAVE YOU NOTICED LATELY [K. J. Lopez]
that you have a few minutes every week that you didn't seem to have maybe two months ago, for the longest time? It's because you don't have MoDo to read--just the frustration stress that's absent is a gift.

Posted at 06:22 AM

A FATHER AND SON [K. J. Lopez]
Adam Bellow has a brutally honest piece in the New York Times today marking what would be his father's 90th birthday.

Posted at 06:20 AM

SYRIA'S CEDAR HIT LIST [K. J. Lopez]
NYT:
WASHINGTON, June 9 - The United States has received "credible information" that Syrian operatives in Lebanon plan to try to assassinate senior Lebanese political leaders and that Syrian military intelligence forces are returning to Lebanon to create "an environment of intimidation," a senior administration official said Thursday.

Posted at 06:14 AM

RE: GOOFY D.C. [K. J. Lopez]
Did you ever, btw, read Mike Ledeen's Walt Disney piece?

Posted at 05:56 AM

D.C. IS REALLY GOOFY [K. J. Lopez]
As in Disney's.

Posted at 05:55 AM

Thursday, June 09, 2005

RE: SARCASM [Warren Bell]
Near the bottom of that Times Online (UK) article on the brain's sarcasm centers: "The research threw little light on the popular national stereotypes of the English as highly sarcastic and the Americans as totally lacking in irony."

Americans are lacking in irony? Lopez, I know you don't like to fly, but I think you need to get to Europe and disabuse them of this notion tout-freakin-suite. I'm still bruised from where you cocked an eyebrow at me.

Posted at 07:20 PM

RE: RE: SWEET [This Poster Is So Gone]
Do we know if he screamed "You guys are retarded" at the judges when he lost?

You know he wanted to.

Posted at 07:17 PM

RE: SWEET [Don't Tell Anyone I Was Supposed to Meet I Am Still Here]
Pedro offers you his protection.

Posted at 07:11 PM

SWEET [Warren Bell]
From emailer Justin of the blog Southern Appeal, a kid in the National Spelling Bee breaks off his Napoleon Dynamite impression, and it rules.

Posted at 07:10 PM

RE: "MANUFACTURED CONTROVERSY" [Editor Who's Pretending She's Not Still in the Office]
Mr. Media Blog Stephen Spruiell has some more.

Posted at 06:54 PM

"MANUFACTURED CONTROVERSY" [Jonathan H. Adler]
Science policy blogger Roger Pielke thinks the NYT news story on edited climate change reports is "pretty weak stuff." Andrew Revkin, author of the original story, responds here, and seems to agree that it's not that big a story. I guess no one told the NYT editorial page.

Posted at 06:49 PM

DEATH OF ENVIRONMENTALISM [Jonathan H. Adler]
I have more on the subject here (and in the comments). Those interested should also see the material linked here.

Posted at 06:44 PM

COKED-UP CATERPILLARS... [Rich Lowry ]
...to win war on drugs. That's the news out of Colombia....

Posted at 05:13 PM

"REBUILDING A MAINSTREAM CONSENSUS FOR ENVIRONMENTALISM." [Jim Boulet ]
The full text of Mark Van Putten's essay, “Rebuilding a Mainstream Consensus for Environmentalism,” discussed by G. Tracy Mehan III today in NRO, is on line here.

His critique closely matches many of the essays on the failure of liberalism politically: we didn't need to persuade ordinary voters in order to get our way so we didn't bother and now we are paying the price:

[N]ational environmental groups gained influence and funding through their ability to deploy professional staff to master the arcane intricacies of federal legislation and regulation. These staff forged close relationships with key congressional staff, primarily among Democratic legislators, who were then usually in the majority. Environmental groups relied on these relationships in the 1980s and 1990s to thwart anti-environment initiatives, especially during the Reagan administration.

Although successful in the near term, these tactics were pursued largely at the expense of developing a positive message and effective strategies for mobilizing mainstream Americans into a bipartisan constituency for environmental protection. This grassroots organizing is hard work, takes a long time to show results, and requires dispersing resources around the country instead of supporting a centralized staff in Washington, DC, or New York City.

Van Putten does not mention how environmentalists relied on the courts and the media to accomplish what they could not win in the back room of the legislature, another sign of their political weakness.

Just as the Supreme Court striking down Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal legislation turned out to be the last gasp of conservatism for a generation, today's paleoliberals are left depending on Sandra Day O'Connor, the New York Times editorial page and Al Franken. That is why every Bush judicial nominee to the right of George McGovern is likely to provoke a bitter confirmation fight.
Posted at 05:11 PM

SARCASM [K. J. Lopez]
discovered in Israel

Posted at 05:03 PM

CANADA [K. J. Lopez]
Here's Grace-Marie Turner's quick take.

Posted at 04:59 PM

SHAMELESSLY [Warren Bell]
Congrats to my cousin, Rachel Engler, on her commission as an Ensign in the U.S. Navy Nurse Corps. Proud parents Brian and Max are both career Naval officers.

And special congratulations to my son Jackson, who graduated elementary school today, and then went on to steal the show in their culmination pageant. Walk tall, you special young man. (Gosh, it's hard to type between the teardrops...)

Posted at 04:55 PM

I HOPE YOU KNOW [K. J. Lopez]
all the judge action is over in Bench Memos; Congrats Judge Pryor--Three "extremists" confirmed!

Posted at 04:54 PM

FREEING CANADIAN MEDICINE? [Jonathan H. Adler]
A Candian court invalidated a Quebec law barring private medical insurance. I don't know much about the Canadian legal system (or health care policy), but this report makes it sound like a big deal.

Posted at 04:52 PM

"GULAG"/ANTI-AMERICANISM/MSM [K. J. Lopez]
Heather Mac Donald says the media doesn't give itself enough credit.

Posted at 04:10 PM

OBAMA ON OWNERSHIP [Jonathan H. Adler]
In a recent commencement speech, Senator Obama equated the "Ownership Society" with "Social Darwinism." Needless to say, he doesn't like it.

Posted at 04:10 PM

RE: AMNESTY/ "GULAG" [K. J. Lopez]
Jim Robbins writes on a real gulag today. And he writes, in part: "To the average North Korean prisoner, Guantanamo, with its wholesome food, hygienic sanitation, medical care, regular religious services, fresh clothes, forgiving climate, trained personnel, and periodic Red Cross visits would be an astonishing land of plenty. The same goes for the average North Korean citizen."

Posted at 04:01 PM

POWERLINE ON AMNESTY [Jonathan H. Adler]
Powerline's John Hinderaker thinks Amnesty has gone over the edge.

Posted at 03:55 PM

SURPRISE SURPRISE [Shannen Coffin]
To the shock and dismay of the ACLU, Americans generally let out a big yawn at the supposed daunting threat of the USA PATRIOT Act. An ABC-Washington Post poll shows that a near filibuster proof majority of Americans (59%) favor extending the PATRIOT Act, which grants expanded investigational authority to the FBI in terrorism investigations. Though certain proposed changes were met with less enthusiasm, the poll demonstrates that most Americans get it when it comes to using every tool at our disposal to combat terrorism on American soil.

Posted at 03:41 PM

ET, PHONE DNC HEADQUARTERS [K. J. Lopez]
Steven Speilberg says Hollywood failed Kerry.

Posted at 03:39 PM

INDIA V CHINA [Rich Lowry ]
E-mail:

Hoagland is pretty late in the insight that India is likely to outperform China in the long run. He does make a great point on the currency basket for Asia.

Even before 9/11 the Bush administration was working hard to improve relations with India. It's a natural US ally as a democratic, largely English speaking democracy concerned with militant Islam and a rising, nationalistic/fascistic China. We now have a services trade deal, military cooperation and a large Boeing deal to show for these efforts. It just took us a while to seek this logical partnership because post colonial India was a de facto Soviet ally in the Cold War. Bush moved crisply after Clinton barely got the ball rolling.

It has long been noted that the return on invested capital for India is much higher than for China thanks to its emphasis on developing a knowledge economy instead of being a low cost manufacturing center (not that this is a bad thing).

The scariest short term scenario with China is that the confluence of the government's need to stoke nationalism to keep the country together, Taiwan's negligent underinvestment in defense, China successfully upgrading its Naval and Air Forces without our knowledge and the impending European arms sales might lead them to make a grab for Taiwan sparking a crisis around the time of the 2008 Olympics. In the long term, they could make geopolitical trouble for us in a de facto alliance with a passive aggressive Europe, but we have many cards to play and China itself has some internal contradictions, unfavorable demographic trends and emerging factors -- like the adoption of Christianity -- that probably work in our favor.

There are really no bad scenarios with India. They can destroy anybody that may mess with them and are almost too diverse to degenerate into a civil war or hyper nationalistic state.

Posted at 03:38 PM

ADMINISTRATIVE SUBPOENAS [Jonathan H. Adler]
In a separate post, Orin Kerr weighs the case for and against authorizing administrative subpoenas here. This is a potentially big issue in the debate over reauthorizing the sunset provisions of the USA-Patriot Act.

Posted at 03:32 PM

KENNEDY'S VOTE [Jonathan H. Adler]
Orin Kerr offers his thoughts on Justice Kennedy's vote in the Raich case here.

Posted at 03:31 PM

ATTACK REVISIONS [Jonathan H. Adler]
My biggest fan has kinda, sorta corrected the record, though many errors remain. (The original, with comments, was here.)

He can say what he likes about me, as I'll let my record speak for itself, "forthcoming" articles and all. As for my colleagues' accomplishments (some of which are noted here), in the past year alone Case law faculty have received prestigious academic awards, trained Iraqi judges, published several books, and even been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize. (No joke, see here.)
Posted at 03:28 PM

HILLARY'S NUCLEAR OPTION [Tim Graham]
Anyone thinking that Media Matters for America isn't a front for the Clinton Government in Exile needs to see how they're going full-power against the new Hillary book.

Posted at 03:27 PM

RE: CLEMENT [K. J. Lopez]
He's a young, gracious fellow. And here's some trivia etc.:

At 38, Clement would be the youngest solicitor general since William Howard Taft, 32. Asked about this comparison with the last president to have facial hair and the only one to ever get stuck in the White House while bathing, the svelte Clement replied, "So far, I have managed to make it out of the bathtub."

Posted at 03:25 PM

GOOD MOVE [Shannen Coffin]
Congratulations to Solicitor General Paul Clement, confirmed by voice vote last night in the Senate. He will be an excellent advocate for the United States. (Hat tip to Howard Bashman).

Posted at 03:22 PM

INDIA, NOT CHINA... [Rich Lowry ]
....might be Asia's rising power, according to Jim Hoagland.

Posted at 02:53 PM

“I WAS OUT FRONT ON THIS BEING UNDECIDED” [Rich Lowry ]
Oh, the courage! That's Chuck Hagel talking about his stance on the Bolton nomination. Check it out on the Buzz...

Posted at 02:51 PM

ROCK THE VOTE IS THE NEW AARP [Jonathan H. Adler]
The Spring 2005 issue of AFF's Doublethink magazine has an article by Sean Higgins on the curious politics of Rock the Vote, including its effective endorsement of the AARP's position on social security. It's not on-line yet, but will be shortly here. Higgins does a write-up of last night's Rock the Vote 10th anniversary on NRO here.

Posted at 02:30 PM

HAPPY BELATED BIRTHDAY, TOM JONES [K. J. Lopez]
from Mark Steyn

Posted at 02:00 PM

LOSS FOR SPITZER [K. J. Lopez]
A mutual-fund jury acquits.

Posted at 01:54 PM

QUICK CLARIFICATION [K. J. Lopez]
Earlier I posted a link to Barack Obama distancing himself from Dean. I did not mean to imply that Obama is off-the-handle. My only point was, if you wanted to find a positive spin for Democrats, when there are Deans and Boxers mouthing off regularly all around you, it makes it all the easier for those who aren't positively fringe to make clear they're more centered, whether that be politically or just mentally.

Posted at 01:52 PM

SPEAKING OF DEAN-LIKE TALK [K. J. Lopez]
Dick Durbin hits that Christian complaint again. I'll post the transcript when I get my hands on it.

Posted at 01:12 PM

WISE WORDS FROM PETE FROM ATLANTA [K. J. Lopez]
An e-mail I must share:
Hello Kathryn:

I would like to encourage anyone thinking about attending the Chicago event to JUST DO IT! Atlanta was a ton of fun. The 7 hours (!) passed by in a flash (and continued with many of the NROers and attendees proceeding to a local bar until the wee hours of the morning.)

I was able to speak with all of the NRO writers there (and also head suit Ed Capano). All were wonderful. Jay Nordlinger is truly the world's most gracious human being (as was previously noted). I would also note that it was very much a treat to meet and speak with the other attendees. Smart and interesting group.

I am envious that Chicago will have Byron York, who was not in Atlanta (his book is marvelous!), although I will note that Atlanta was lucky to have the delightful Warren Bell.

Posted at 01:05 PM

FAKE BUT ACCURATE [K. J. Lopez]
Andy Borowitz reads Dean like a book:
Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean apologized today for calling Republicans “pretty much a white, Christian party,” saying that he failed to mention that they were “fat and ugly” as well.

Posted at 01:00 PM

THE SIMPSONS [K. J. Lopez]
The Movie

Posted at 12:54 PM

RE: KEGGERS IN LAGLIO [K. J. Lopez ]
I change the subject line.

Posted at 12:45 PM

RE: KEGGERS IN MALIBU [K. J. Lopez ]
He won't be passing on any bad habits to his kids.

Posted at 12:44 PM

KEGGERS IN MALIBU [K. J. Lopez ]
"does anyone really believe that George Clooney drinks Bud?"

Posted at 12:43 PM

"IT’S HARD TO IMAGINE THAT PRESIDENT BUSH COULD HAVE MADE A BETTER CHOICE FOR SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION CHAIRMAN THAN CHRIS COX, THE REPUBLICAN CONGRESSMAN FROM CALIFORNIA. " [K. J. Lopez]
The NR case for Chris Cox.

Posted at 12:23 PM

"SHIRTLESS IN STARBUCKS" [K. J. Lopez]
Not surprisingly, based on e-mails I'm getting, this could easily be a money-making concept (more Hooters than maternity ward though). The suits may consider it after Chicago.

Posted at 12:00 PM

MEET LEONARD [K. J. Lopez ]
An interview with Darth Vader.

Posted at 12:00 PM

"I DIDN’T LOVE HALF OF IT. DIDN’T HATE ANY OF IT. " [K. J. Lopez]
Lileks does ROTS

Posted at 11:56 AM

COMPARING PRYOR VOTES [K. J. Lopez]
whining about the Senate and more are over on Bench Memos.

Posted at 11:50 AM

RE: K-LO'S BOSOX ASSIGNMENT FOR ME [Shannen Coffin]
I'm still recovering from the Red Sox miserable appearance on Queer Eye this week to think such thoughts (Kevin Millar: "I guess I'm gay now."). Not one of my prouder moments.

Posted at 11:35 AM

RE: LIVING HISTORY [K. J. Lopez ]
Rodster, I'll remind you what I said when you IMed me (where we conduct most of our business here at NRO) announcing that I lead you into a huge discovery: I was casually ribbing you on a Friday night. We had some wacky conversations back in the day--NYC misses you! (And, my memory is foggy, but it is possible I just wanted to get you steamed about something--always a good way to get interesting pieces out of people...heck, I'd let Shannen Coffin write about the divinity of the Red Sox if I thought it would make people click--hhhmmm.) Anyway, I didn't expect a revolution to start. Heck, I had had a granola bar for breakfast that day. I don't think my reticence to divide up conservatives into various cultural categories means I don't want to talk about people's differences. I think that the crunchy-type differences are just differences people have without thinking too much (or at all) about where they fit on a political spectrum, not distinct ideological categories. (Am I a Rascal Con when I listen to Rascal Flatts?)

That said, you know I look forward to the book, even if you see me roll my eyes once or twice, which I will, maybe just to egg you on.

Posted at 11:26 AM

RE: TRANSGENDERED CRUNCHY-CON DOLPHINS [Rod Dreher]
I've been out of town the past few days and am just now catching up to Kathryn's comment from Friday re: crunchy conservatism and South Park conservatism. She wrote:
Conservatives can eat organic and-shocking as it may be-can be pretty darn funny. Neither makes us anomalies. Conservatism is about ideas, but it's not a lock-step army, with dress and behavior codes. ... If, in the end, "South Park Conservatives" and "Crunchy Cons" make more people realize conservatives are people too-i.e. most of red America-cool, fine. But my worry has always been these unnecessary labels and things just further ghettoize and stereotype.


I call revisionist history! La Lopez, I remind you that it was you who started this whole crunchy con thing when you told me my interest in organic vegetables sounded "so lefty." Actually, I thank you for that (and am giving you mad props in my book), because it made me think about the ways I live that don't fit the standard conservative template, but which are authentically conservative. I don't understand why we right-wingers show our diversity by agreeing not to talk about actual differences among ourselves, differences that go deeper than mere style. As we all know, the conservative big tent contains right-wingers who identify primarily as economic conservatives, those whose conservatism is chiefly religious or social, those for whom conservatism is mostly a matter of defense and foreign affairs (and those divide into Realists and Idealists), and so forth. But we all coalesce because we have more in common than we do with those who identify as liberals.



In fact, by talking about our differences in a constructive way--that is, not as if we were adherents of a dogmatic religion, but all followers of a broad but distinct historical tradition--we don't reinforce stereotypes, we help demolish them. An official from my publisher's office was at the Book Expo in Manhattan last week, the same one you went to, and he was talking up "Crunchy Cons," which'll be out in February. He said that the industry types he was talking to--and they're all ultraliberal--refused to believe that conservatives could actually care about the environment, oppose factory farming, and so forth, without being liberal. Well, guess what: we can, and I've endeavored to show why the left doesn't own these issues. Far from ghettoizing us, I believe my book, if it succeeds, will force the MSM to re-examine its stereotypes.

Posted at 11:19 AM

BRING CATS -- LOTS OF CATS! [Warren Bell]
The Rise of the Birds has begun.

This story about a very smart talking bird appears to be about 18 months old, which is both good and bad. Good because our government has had time to make secret plans for the coming Bird Wars, and bad because obviously a massive media cover-up has kept this story from causing nationwide panic. We'll have to move fast now -- first piece of business is to stop the shooting of feral cats in Wisconsin.

Clearly, the cats will be a strong ally in what will be an asymmetrical war. Not since Epaminondas defeated the Spartans at Leuctra will there be such a need for steely military men of will.

(Sorry, VDH, but I have dying to do that.)

Posted at 11:16 AM

BOTTLE THAT ARGUMENT UP [K. J. Lopez]
I've got one too many people in my in-box telling me people actually are worried that breastfeeding i