![]() |
|
|
||
|
Columns
/ Current
Issue / Goldberg
File / Nota
Bene / Subscribe
/ Ad
Info / Washington
Bulletin / Home
|
||
|
6.05.00 5.31.00 5.30.00
|
|||
|
6/05/00
12:55 p.m. By National Review Staff |
|||
|
The smart talk is that the foremost liability of a Ridge VP candidacy would be the solid week of press focus on the abortion issue as soon as he is selected. Bush and Ridge would spend days trying to justify their divergent views on the issue, no matter what the media wouldn't let them talk about anything else (in a NRO interview earlier this week, James Carville is particularly perceptive on the media's fixation with abortion). Most Bush campaign officials and close observers think the top dogs in the Bush operation are shrewd enough to realize this. So why the flirtation with Ridge? Old Texas hands say it is vintage George W. very publicly reaching out to pro-choicers to seem "inclusive," than reliably ending up on the side of pro-lifers. They don't expect the VP nomination to turn out any differently. In this scenario, Ridge is perfect to be placed prominently on the "short list," but not actually on the ticket. As more reporters clue into this, more attention will focus in on the new thing, Jack Danforth, and possibly the new, new thing, Fred Thompson (who has a pro-choice problem of his own). Ridge may have gotten the closest he will ever be to the Bush ticket over the course of the last three weeks. |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
Columns
/ Current
Issue / Goldberg
File / Nota
Bene |
||
|
National Review 215 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10016 212-679-7330 Customer Service: 815-734-1232.
Contact
Us.
|
||