|
Trojan
Horses: Saving the Classics from Conservatives, by Page
DuBois (New York University Press, 151 pp., $19.85)
he leftist
hegemony in American classics has taken a severe battering recently
in books that range from Mary Lefkowitz's devastation
of Martin Bernal's Afrocentrism thesis to Victor Davis Hanson and
John Heath's passionate j'accuse, Who
Killed Homer?
Most hegemons decided that discretion is the better part of valor
and, like Joel Chandler Harris's Tar Baby, "dey doan say nuffin'."
With Trojan Horses, however, Page DuBois, a professor of
classics and cultural studies at the University of California, San
Diego, rides out of the west, like Zorro, to rescue the classics.
But this Zorro is protecting not the field hands hard-working
students and teachers of Greek and Latin but the field's
evil multiculturalist commandants.
Page DuBois tries to show that conservatives have an "impoverished"
vision of the ancient world, "lacking in complexity and nuance."
To make this claim against such scholars as Mary Lefkowitz, Victor
Davis Hanson, and Donald Kagan, however, is a task for which her
flimsy feminist saber is wholly inadequate. She spends all of four
pages misrepresenting Who Killed Homer? And she basically
admits that Lefkowitz has refuted Bernal's Out of Africa
thesis by writing, "Lefkowitz's outrage and insistence on denouncing
inaccuracies draw attention away from the real need in American
universities, to include the histories of Africa, for instance."
Unable to refute these fine scholars, DuBois spends pages denouncing
a PBS series for children, developed from William Bennett's best-selling
Book of Virtues. One episode tells of the myth of Daedalus,
who had invented a way to fly, and his son, Icarus, who, ignoring
his father's advice, flew too near the sun and fell to his death.
Bennett uses the story to praise obedience. Why, DuBois asks indignantly,
does Bennett omit the story of Pasiphae, the Cretan queen, whose
affair with a bull produced the monstrous Minotaur?
Is DuBois seriously suggesting that PBS broadcast a cartoon for
children about a woman having sex with a bull? It could be the start
of a new feminist curriculum, in the tradition of Clinton's Surgeon
General, Joycelyn Elders, who recommended teaching masturbation
in elementary school: sex education, myths and literature about
sex, and the history of the oppression of sexual minorities. Instead
of E. D. Hirsch's core curriculum, feminists could develop a hardcore
curriculum.
Its graduates would be ably prepared for DuBois's courses at UCal,
San Diego, where she entertains freshmen with slides of Greek vases
bearing "images of sexual activity that are still censored or censured
in contemporary America." (She does not seem to have spent much
time on the Internet.) Warned by the fate of a colleague who had
been reprimanded for showing dirty pictures, she once asked students
who would be offended to leave. "I waited: no one left. Peer pressure
or interest? You be the judge." She then devotes a page to the content
of the vases.
Many Americans know that politicized courses fill the pages of university
catalogues. They are less aware of the pervasive obscenity, verbal
and visual, that accompanies actual university lectures. Occasionally
a student complains. There is much ritual breast-beating. The dean
had no idea! A letter of apology is penned. ("Dear student, I never
dreamed that using the F-word over and over again would offend anyone.")
Then the beat goes on.
Only about forty pages of Trojan Horses are devoted to DuBois's
shadowboxing with important scholars. Most of the book gives her
various takes on sex, democracy, and gods in antiquity, derived
from her undergraduate lectures: The ancients were polytheists,
while we believe in one god, at most; the Athenians practiced direct
democracy, while we have representative democracy; attic comedy
contains dirty jokes, while our comedy, well, it does, too. This
section may derive less from DuBois's ignorance of popular culture
than from her extensive lecture material on sexually explicit vases.
It would be a shame to let it go to waste.
Her depiction of the ancient world as a pornographic slideshow is
not idiosyncratic, as the puffs on the book's dust jacket show.
It is, in fact, the orthodox liberal view, promulgated by New York
University Press and stamped with approval by the Dean of the Graduate
School at NYU and the Dean of Arts and Sciences at Berkeley.
Incidentally, what does the myth of Daedalus signify? For DuBois
the myth raises six questions, none of them the one that occurred
to me: Can technology be used safely without maturity and self-control?
The "Ode to Man" in Sophocles's Antigone shows that this
question troubled the Greeks. For DuBois, however, the myth asks
the question, "How is it that most of us have sex only among ourselves,
and not with animals?"
A contemporary Doctor Johnson might ask, "Why is it that it's the
professors with one-track minds who whelp most loudly about complexity
and nuance?"
|