|
inston
Churchill loved the great fight songs. When, in his eighties, he
became too old to get pleasure out of books he used to sit with
his record player in the afternoons and listen to military marches.
He liked especially the high-souled trumpet calls in the repertoire;
after his death in 1965 some of these were played at his state funeral,
and their notes sounded in the baroque spaces of Saint Paul's. The
"Reveille" was played together with "The Last
Post" by trumpeters high up in the Whispering Gallery
of the massive dome; "Fight the Good Fight" was sung;
and so, too, was "The Battle Hymn of the Republic."
The selection
of this last might seem surprising. Though his mother was an American,
Sir Winston spent his life battling for a constitutional monarchy,
not a republic. No matter. "The Battle Hymn" is one of
the supreme fight songs; it can make even a dull mind conscious
of the possibility of a sublime destiny; for such a man as Churchill,
who spent his entire life breathing the fumes of exalted purposes,
the song was more intoxicating than champagne. Like Beethoven's
"Eroica" symphony, or the "Leonore" overture,
the "Battle Hymn" lifts the suppliant skyward, into the
heroic realms; and for an instant even a mediocre soul may feel
itself in communion with the great ones of the earth, with those
soldiers and statesmen, artists and priests, who have shown themselves,
like Churchill himself, capable of grandeur.
The "Battle
Hymn," as it happens, was composed neither by a soldier nor
a statesman, but by a mediocre poet. Julia Ward was born a banker's
daughter in New York in 1819; she moved to Boston at the time of
her marriage, in 1843, to a doctor, Samuel Gridley Howe. Mrs. Howe
was a blue stocking and a woman of letters; she poured forth a series
of poems, a play, a book on Cuba; but it was not until the crisis
of 1861 that she rose above the forgettable in her work. She went
to Washington, and while touring the nearby bivouacs of the Army
of the Potomac (those "hundred circling camps") she heard
the soldiers singing "John Brown's Body":
John
Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave,
John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave,
John Brown's body lies a-mouldering in the grave,
But his soul goes marching on . . . .
Someone asked
Mrs. Howe whether she could give the tune a fresh and incisive set
of words. The next morning, as she liked to tell the story, she
started from sleep in the early dawn, and the "lines of the
desired poem began to twine themselves" in her mind. She got
out of bed and "in the dimness . . . . scrawled the verses
almost without looking at the paper."
Mysterious
Lilies
In Patriotic
Gore, his book on the literature of the Civil War, the critic
Edmund Wilson argued that Mrs. Howe's "Battle Hymn" was
an exercise in Old Testament Puritanism, a form of religious sentiment
very much alive in America in the middle of the nineteenth century.
Wilson drew attention to Mrs. Howe's echo of the prophet Isaiah:
I have trodden
the winepress alone . . . . I will tread [upon recalcitrant peoples]
in mine anger, and trample them in my fury . . . .
The "Battle
Hymn"'s emphasis on Old Testament wrath was, Wilson believed,
typical of the Calvinist mind; in his essay he contended that, for
latter-day American Puritans, the Christ of the New Testament was
a "merely peripheral" figure, inferior to the angry and
jealous Old Testament Jehovah whom 19th-century Yankees like John
Brown and Mrs. Howe supposedly adored.
"I have
not been able to guess," Wilson wrote of the last verse of
the "Battle Hymn," "where Julia Ward Howe got these
lilies in the beauty of which Jesus is supposed to have been born.
The only lilies mentioned in the Gospels are those that toil not
neither do they spin." Jesus, Wilson argued, was an afterthought
for Howe, a passive onlooker embowered in flowers, half a world
away from the moral action of the age, the battles of the Civil
War. "He is really irrelevant to her picture." The lilies
"serve to place Him in a setting that is effeminate as well
as remote." The "gentle and no doubt estimable Jesus,"
Wilson concluded, "is trampling no grapes of wrath." Mrs.
Howe, we are given to understand, wanted to bring her contemporaries
back to the tribal cruelties of the Old Testament, to God the Father,
to a "militant, military God" who, "far from wanting
us to love our enemies," only wanted us to pluck their eyes
out, to torture and destroy them.
The
Sweetest Canticle
Wilson has I think misread the "Battle Hymn." He labors
to read the poem as an encomium to the militant God of the Old Testament,
a repudiation of the New Testament flower child for whom, Wilson
thinks, Mrs. Howe had little patience. But Wilson's reading is not
borne out by the language of the "Battle Hymn." Mrs. Howe
was content, in her poem, to reproduce the orthodox Christian doctrine
of the Trinity, with all its attendant mysteries and ambiguities:
as a result the "Battle Hymn" leaves the reader unable
to say precisely which of the "Three in One, One in Three"
she has in mind in any given line.
Consider, for
example, Wilson's contention that the "Hero, born of woman"
to whom Mrs. Howe refers in the third verse of the "Battle
Hymn" is an Old Testament figure. The Hero, Wilson thinks,
labors only in the Father's vineyards; he has nothing at all to
do with the Son. When however we read the verse attentively we find
that Mrs. Howe's Hero is at once a more ambiguous and a more complicated
figure than Wilson would have us believe. The Hero is, at least
in part, the Son himself; the woman who bore him is Mary. The coming
of this Son forms the opening text of the "Battle Hymn":
"Mine eyes have seen the glory of the coming of the Lord."
This, of course, is as much a Son-centered New Testament text as
it is an Old Testament Father-centered one: it is the Nunc dimittis
of Luke 2:29-30, where, upon the first presentation of the child
Jesus in the Temple, Simeon says,
Lord now
lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word.
For mine eyes have seen thy salvation.
Simeon, "just
and devout," waiting, Saint Luke tells us, "for the consolation
of Israel," had seen the coming of the Lord: for "the
holy ghost was upon him." Francis Bacon thought the Nunc
dimittis the "sweetest canticle." Edmund Burke called
it "the beautiful and prophetic ejaculation." Its inclusion
by Mrs. Howe in the first verse of the "Battle Hymn" shows
up the wrongheadedness of Wilson's attempt to read the poem as an
exercise in a purely Old Testament faith as an effort, that
is, to move away from the message of the Gospels, to prefer the
Father to the Son.
Mrs. Howe did
of course draw, if only unconsciously, on the imagery of the Old
Testament in composing the "Battle Hymn": her poem owes
a great deal to the book of the Father. But she drew, too, on the
poetry of the New Testament, the book of the Son. The most celebrated
image in the "Battle Hymn" the "grapes of
wrath" whose vintage the Lord is "trampling out"
has both New Testament and Old Testament antecedents. The
fathers of Israel are said by the Old Testament prophet Ezekiel
to "have eaten sour grapes." Chalk one up for Wilson.
But the "winepress of the wrath of God" forms a part of
the poetry of the last book of the New Testament, the Revelation
of John the Divine:
And the Angel
thrust in his sickle into the earth, and gathered the vine of
the earth, and cast it into the great winepress of the wrath of
God. And the winepress was trodden without the city, and blood
came out of the winepress.
Mrs.
How's Faith-and President Lincoln's
In composing
the "Battle Hymn" Mrs. Howe took pains to impress upon
the verses the complexity of her faith. Christians are enjoined
to be compassionate; and they are at the same time called upon to
do justice. The ends of mercy require them to be gentle; the ends
of justice force them frequently to be severe. The "Battle
Hymn" preserves the tensions inherent in the faith. Mrs. Howe
invokes the "beauty of the lilies," and the uncountable
mercies of Christ; but the "Battle Hymn" insists that
even as Christians revel in the gentleness of the lamb they have
still an obligation to mete out a harsh justice to the wolf. The
Son, with his transfiguring "glory," is at the same time
a Hero, one who must wield a "terrible swift sword," and
"crush the serpent with his heel."
The tensions
of the "Battle Hymn" are the same tensions exquisite
and troubling of Lincoln's second inaugural address. Everyone
knows the gentleness of Lincoln's language in that speech, "With
malice toward none, with charity for all . . . ." But fewer
remember how explicitly Lincoln reminded the nation that the obligation
to be charitable the obligation to be compassionate, the
obligation, finally, to love is often at odds with the obligation
to do justice, the obligation to honor what Mrs. Howe, in the "Battle
Hymn," called the "righteous sentence" of the Lord:
Yet, if God
wills that it [the War] continue, until all the wealth piled by
the bond-man's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil
shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash,
shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three
thousand years ago, so still it must be said "the judgments
of the Lord, are true and righteous altogether."
We must be
charitable; and yet we must also judge, and judge at times severely.
Lincoln's judgment on the South was clear:
Both [the
North and the South] read the same Bible, and pray to the same
God; and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange
that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing
their bread from the sweat of other men's faces; but let us judge
not that we not be judged. . . . The Almighty has His own purposes.
Lincoln invokes
Christ's principle, "judge not that ye not be judged,"
only after he himself has rendered very efficient judgment. Did
Mrs. Howe do anything so very different? She gives us Christ in
the flower-garden; but only after she has sounded forth the trumpet.
Necessary
Paradoxes
The paradox at the heart the "Battle Hymn" the
paradox at the heart of the second inaugural address is central
to the faith in which both are consecrated. The "fiery gospel,"
written in the "burnished rows of steel" of Mrs. Howe's
war poetry, is at the same time a gospel of sublime, transfiguring,
all-embracing love. We cannot in our present state hope fully to
understand this mystery, and yet it is important that we keep it
always before our eyes. It was unfortunate, then, that in the service
in the National Cathedral on September 14th an overstrained effort
at ecumenical blandness should have led to a blunting of the paradox.
By all means, honor the three great monotheistic faiths in the cathedral.
But do not censor do not mortify the faith most closely
woven into the fabric of the Republic by depriving its poetry of
its point and its punch the fact of the incarnation. The
second verse of Martin Luther's hymn, "A Mighty Fortress is
Our God," was unceremoniously dropped from the text sung in
the cathedral that day. Why? I can only think because it refers
not merely to God but to the divinity of Christ:
Did we in
our own strength confide, our striving
------would be losing,
Were not the right man on our side, the man of God's
------own choosing:
Dost ask who that may be? Christ Jesus, it is he;
Lord Sabaoth his Name, from age to age the same,
------And He must win the
battle.
I assumed,
as I watched the telecast of the service that day, that the explicit
reference to Christ in the last verse of the "Battle Hymn"
would be similarly purged in the name of a sanitized, air-brushed
secularism. But it was not; the drab school of civic ritual was
defied. The last verse of the "Battle Hymn" was sung as
Mrs. Howe published it in the February 1862 number of The Atlantic
Monthly:
In
the beauty of the lilies Christ was born across
------ the sea,
With a glory in his bosom that transfigures
------ you and me:
As he died to make men holy, let us die to make
------ men free,
------While God is marching
on.
We must really
insist on having both Mrs. Howe's lilies and her terrible
swift sword before our eyes. We need to keep the faith that inspired
the "Battle Hymn" in all the potency of its paradoxes
close to us. It remains the indispensable fight song.
|