![]() |
|
The
Man & the Myth Q&A by Kathryn
Jean Lopez |
|
|
|
Kathryn Jean Lopez: Literarily, Lord of the Rings has never gotten real respect, has it? Joseph Pearce:
It's never received any respect from the self-styled literati who have
sought to hijack literature for their own secular humanist agenda. On
the other hand, it has never lacked the respect it so evidently deserves
from those who appreciate a great work of literature when they see it! Pearce:
Basically, Tolkien's moral traditionalism, i.e. his belief that good and
evil are objectively real, goes against the grain of our philosophically
relativist and morally bankrupt age. Pearce:
If it were nothing other than Christian mythology it would still have
more of real relevance to say to the modern world than any number of pseudo-Freudian
fantasy novels. The central point is that the moral dimension in The
Lord of the Rings is powerfully applicable to our lives. Concepts
such as self-sacrifice; the exaltation of the humble; the power of humility
versus the destructive and self-negating futility of pride (theologically
understood) are at the center of everybody's lives even if they
don't realize it! Pearce:
Perhaps the best way of answering this question would be to allow the
leading feminist writer, Germaine Greer, to answer for me. In 1997, Ms.
Greer wrote the following: "Ever since I arrived at Cambridge as
a student in 1964 and encountered a tribe of full-grown women wearing
puffed sleeves, clutching teddies, and babbling excitedly about the doings
of hobbits, it has been my nightmare that Tolkien would turn out to be
the most influential writer of the twentieth century. The bad dream has
materialized." Clearly one woman's nightmare is another woman's delight!
Personally, I have spoken about Tolkien in various parts of the country
and can state unequivocally that there are more women than men in attendance.
Clearly the whole "boy thing" is very much a "girl thing"
also! Pearce:
Having quoted a leading feminist, perhaps I'll answer this question by
allowing Tolkien to answer for me: "The Lord of the Rings
is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously
so at first, but consciously in the revision." The Book, like every
other book from the Bible downwards, can be read or mis-read, used or
abused. If The Lord of the Rings is read as its author intended
it to be read, its religious dimension will shine through. Ultimately
questions of right or wrong, good and evil, are religious questions. Pearce:
Tolkien set out with a good heart to write a good story. The goodness
of the former shines forth in the latter. Pearce:
Tolkien believed that certain truths could be more effectively conveyed
through the medium of mythology than through any other literary medium.
Consequently, he set out to create a mythological world in which to have
room to speak truthfully. Pearce:
It seemed to me that the hostile critics knew as little about the man
behind the myth as they knew about the myth itself. My desire to learn
more about Tolkien was inspired by a desire to exorcise ignorance with
the power of knowledge. Pearce:
Certainly there are similarities. At its best, Harry Potter is a poor
imitation of Tolkien. Pearce: If the films lead to more people reading the books they will have an edifying impact even if the films themselves fail to do the books justice. God can, and does, bring good from evil. As Tolkien wrote in The Lord of the Rings, "Above all shadows rides the Sun." |