Is Bush Sinking?
The president’s worrisome poll numbers.

August 1, 2001 12:40 p.m.

 

Printer-Friendly

E-mail a Friend

York Archive

n the last two days, Republicans have been dismissing a new poll showing George W. Bush's job-performance-approval rating slipping below 50 percent. "I would relax on this," Republican National Committee chairman Jim Gilmore said Tuesday on CNN, suggesting that people should not "live and die day-by-day and hour-by-hour by these polls." But a close look at the new survey, by pollster John Zogby, reveals evidence of a gradual erosion in Bush's position that might spell trouble for the president in the long run.

In the poll, conducted in the last week of July, 47 percent of those surveyed gave Bush a positive job rating, while 51 percent gave him a negative rating. That's a shift from another Zogby survey in late June, when 51 percent gave Bush a positive job rating, and 48 percent gave him a negative rating.

Some critics have questioned the way Zogby categorizes the answers to the basic question, "Overall, how would you rate President George W. Bush's performance in office?" Respondents are given four possible answers: Excellent, Good, Fair, and Poor. The number of "excellent" and "good" responses are counted as positive job-approval ratings, while the "fair" and "poor" responses are counted as negative. Criticism of the survey has centered on whether respondents who give Bush a "fair" are actually giving him a negative job-approval rating.

"This is the scale I've always used," says Zogby. "The theory is, you're not going to go very far with a 'fair' rating. You don't have a bully pulpit when you've got a large number of people saying you're doing just 'fair.'" (Zogby adds that, using the "fair/poor" standard, his polls taken during the Lewinsky scandal found Bill Clinton's job-approval ratings to be consistently lower than the sky-high numbers found in other polls. "Republicans loved it when it was Clinton," Zogby says.)

A comparison of voters' responses to Zogby in late June and then in late July indicates that Bush's approval rating is indeed slipping. In the late June survey, this was the breakdown on the job-approval question (the numbers do not total 100 because a small number of respondents said they could not answer):


Excellent
15.6
Good
35.0
Fair
27.4
Poor
20.7

These are the results from the poll in late July:


Excellent
17.2
Good
30.0
Fair
33.6
Poor
17.3

On both ends of the scale, a slightly different number of people rated Bush "excellent" and "poor" in late July than in June. Both numbers are within the poll's margin of error. But the most significant shift seems to be a slippage in the number of people who gave Bush "good" ratings. In June, it was 35 percent; in July it was 30 percent. That was accompanied by a corresponding increase in the number of people who gave Bush a "fair" rating. "This is the way slides usually take place," says Zogby. "There is an increasing lukewarmness there." During that time, there were no major events to push Bush's ratings one way or the other; just a slow downward movement.

Just as worrisome for the president's political team, Zogby points out that Bush's approval numbers remain mediocre among the groups he needs to help him govern most effectively: independents, suburban voters, parents, and moderates. "The very groups he needs to build a majority are the ones giving him some of the poorest ratings," Zogby says.

 
 

BACK TO NRO


 
 
shim
shim