Politics & Policy

Fdr Revisited

The New Deal was no cure-all.

It has been 70 years since Franklin Delano Roosevelt launched his New Deal in an effort to banish the Great Depression — perhaps the most important economic event in American history. The New Deal was controversial then, and still is, because it failed to resolve the most important problem of the era: chronic unemployment, which averaged 17 percent throughout the New Deal period.

#ad#Newsweek columnist Robert Samuelson acknowledged that if World War II hadn’t come along, America might have stumbled through many more years of high unemployment. Samuelson, however, is among those who give FDR high marks for handling the political crisis of the 1930s, the worst this country has faced since the Civil War.

But this crisis was caused by the double-digit unemployment rate, and in my new book, FDR’s Folly, How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression, I report mounting evidence developed by dozens of economists — at Princeton, Yale, Brown, Stanford, the University of Chicago, University of Virginia, University of California (Berkeley), and other universities — that double-digit unemployment was prolonged by FDR’s own New Deal strategy.

How can that be? Consider just a few of FDR’s policies. The New Deal tripled federal taxes between 1933 and 1940 — excise taxes, personal income taxes, inheritance taxes, corporate income taxes, dividend taxes, and excess profits taxes all went up — and FDR introduced an undistributed profits tax. A number of New Deal laws, including some 700 industrial cartel codes, made it more expensive for employers to hire people, and this fed unemployment.

Frequent changes in the tax laws, plus FDR’s anti-business rhetoric (“economic royalists”), discouraged people from making investments essential for growth and job creation. New Deal securities laws made it harder for employers to raise capital. FDR issued antitrust lawsuits against some 150 employers and companies, making it harder for them to focus on business. He also signed a law ordering the breakup of America’s strongest banks with the lowest failure rates. New Deal farm policies destroyed food — 10 million acres of crops and 6 million farm animals — thereby wiping out farm jobs and forcing food prices above market levels for 100 million American consumers. (FDR’s Folly spells out much more in detail.)

Robert Bartley, who edited the Wall Street Journal for three decades, called for a fresh debate about the New Deal. Newspaper publisher Conrad Black, author of Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Champion of Freedom, responded by claiming that if “workfare” recipients were included among the “employed,” then New Deal unemployment rates were lower than the U.S. Department of Labor has reported for decades. Those tempted to agree with Black might listen to jazz great Louis Armstrong’s 1940 tune “The WPA,” referring to FDR’s biggest “workfare” program, the Works Progress Administration. Among the memorable lines: “Sleep while you work, rest while you play, lean on your shovel to pass the time away, at the WPA.”

There’s a fascinating split between economists and political historians about the New Deal. The idea that FDR cured high unemployment, wrote Thomas Sowell in a recent column, “was never pervasive among economists, and even J.M. Keynes — a liberal icon — criticized some of FDR’s policies as hindering recovery from the depression.”

Meanwhile, pro-FDR political historians such as James MacGregor Burns, Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr., Frank Freidel, William Leuchtenburg, and Kenneth S. Davis, have focused on the personalities, elections, speeches, “Fireside Chats,” and other aspects of the New Deal’s political story, disregarding evidence about its economic consequences. This continues to be the case with younger political historians like Alan Brinkley, author of The End of Reform: New Deal Liberalism in Recession and War , who called the New Deal “a bright moment.” Disregarding the economic consequences, too, are children’s book authors like Joy Hakim, whose recent bestseller Freedom: A History of US includes a glowing account of New Deal heroics.

In addition to FDR’s Folly, the only major work mentioning evidence about the economic consequences of the New Deal is by Stanford University political historian David M. Kennedy: his 1999 book Freedom from Fear won the Pulitzer Prize. “Whatever it was,” he wrote, the New Deal “was not a recovery program.” The New Deal might be gone, but the debate goes on.

– Jim Powell is a senior fellow at the Cato Institute and the author of FDR’s Folly.

Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

Most Popular

White House

Another Warning Sign

The Mueller report is of course about Russian interference in the 2016 election and about the White House's interference in the resulting investigation. But I couldn’t help also reading the report as a window into the manner of administration that characterizes the Trump era, and therefore as another warning ... Read More
U.S.

Supreme Court Mulls Citizenship Question for Census

Washington -- The oral arguments the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday will be more decorous than the gusts of judicial testiness that blew the case up to the nation’s highest tribunal. The case, which raises arcane questions of administrative law but could have widely radiating political and policy ... Read More
Film & TV

Jesus Is Not the Joker

Actors love to think they can play anything, but the job of any half-decent filmmaker is to tell them when they’re not right for a part. If the Rock wants to play Kurt Cobain, try to talk him out of it. Adam Sandler as King Lear is not a great match. And then there’s Joaquin Phoenix. He’s playing Jesus ... Read More