Politics & Policy

Eggheads in The White House

The role of the intellectual: an interview with author Tevi Troy.

EDITOR’S NOTE: Tevi Troy is author of Intellectuals and the American Presidency: Philosophers, Jesters, or Technicians?. He talked to NRO last year about his book and what he’s learned about eggheads in the White House. Intellectuals and the American Presidency has recently been released in paperback.

Kathryn Jean Lopez:

In a nutshell, what is your book about?

Tevi Troy: It’s

about the strategies presidents use to appeal to intellectuals. It is a history

of how each White House since 1960, from Kennedy through Clinton, has dealt

with the American intellectual community. Some, as you can imagine, deal better

than others.

Lopez: Is there

a message?

Troy: “Intellectuals

matter.” Intellectuals help shape the perception of elected officials,

both short term in the media, and long term in the history books. As a result,

it is in politicians’ interests to woo the intellectuals. Intellectuals, however,

often fail to realize this. As a result, the other key lesson is that intellectuals

should not sell themselves too easily to the presidents who look to them.

Lopez: What is an

intellectual?

Troy: When I talk

about intellectuals, I’m generally talking about public intellectuals, relatively

well-known generalists who speak or write for a living, are comfortable talking

about most subjects, but always inject their own worldviews into their various

endeavors. But there is something that David Brooks calls the “intellectual

continuum,” which starts at the top with public intellectuals, then widens

to writers for highbrow magazines — The New Yorker, the Atlantic,

Commentary — then widens to the professorate, then finally reaches

down to the general educated reader, who reads the product of the public intellectuals

and the highbrow magazines. So when presidents reach out to the people at the

top of the continuum, they are hoping to get positive feedback that reaches

those at the bottom of the continuum.

Lopez: What presidents

have been intellectuals?

Troy: I don’t think

we’ve had an intellectual as president since Woodrow Wilson, who was a college

professor and then president of Princeton before getting elected as governor

of New Jersey and then president. But we’ve had some presidents who were very

smart, and other who were very comfortable with intellectuals. John F. Kennedy,

obviously, was very comfortable with intellectuals, Bill Clinton was quite at

home with intellectuals and loved having long bull sessions with them. Ronald

Reagan, although he’s frequently derided as someone not very academically oriented,

was very comfortable with intellectuals, and liked having idea people around

him and staffing his administration.

Lopez: Who is the

book written for?

Troy: It’s for the

general educated reader. Library Journal recommended my book for “those

interested in the presidency and the history of ideas.” Ben Wattenberg

was more expansive, recommending it for “intellectuals, presidents, and

the rest of us.”

Lopez: Who are some

of the heroes of your book?

Troy: People who

come off well in my book are the presidents who have known how to deal with

intellectuals — John F. Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan. Arthur Schlesinger,

Jr., who served under Kennedy is not a hero so much as a model of intellectual

ambassador that other administration have tried to emulate. Another hero is

Gerald Ford, who came into office under very difficult circumstances following

Richard Nixon’s resignation. Ford hired political scientist Bob Goldwin to hold

idea seminars with top scholars. These idea seminars helped anchor the Ford

administration and, even though Ford lost his 1976 election bid, he came far

closer than anyone expected him to. He also helped hold the country together

during a very difficult period.

Lopez: Are there

any villains in your book?

Troy: There are

no villains per se, but a number of people come off poorly. Eric Goldman, who

worked for Lyndon Johnson, could never decide whether his loyalties lay with

the administration he worked for or his friends in the intellectual community.

These two groups diverged at the White House Festival on the Arts, which Goldman

organized, but became an albatross after numerous intellectuals boycotted the

event in protest of the Vietnam War. Even worse, some of the attendees protested

the war at the festival, circulating an anti-war petition. Unsurprisingly, Goldman

left the White House a scant 10 weeks after the festival fiasco and then wrote

a bitter memoir of his time in the Johnson White House.

Jimmy Carter also comes

off poorly. Although he was very smart — he was one of the highest IQ presidents

last century — he had a rough time defining what he stood for, and refused

to reach out to the intellectuals who could help him refine his message. Mix

that with a recession and a hostage crisis and you get a one-term presidency.

Lopez: Do Republicans

or Democrats make out better in your book?

Troy: While Democrats

have certain natural advantages among the intellectuals, I don’t think one party

comes off better than the other. I think that Bill Clinton and John F. Kennedy

were the most successful presidents with intellectuals of the last 40 years,

but I think part of the reason for that is that they were willing to use the

intellectuals when it suited them, and ignore them when it was convenient as

well. Among Republicans , Ronald Reagan probably set the gold standard. Nixon

was fascinated by intellectuals but just had terrible relations with them.

Lopez: Who are your

favorite White House intellectuals?

Troy: Martin Anderson,

who served as Ronald Reagan’s “one man think tank,” set up the model

for conservatives to get involved in an administration. He collected lists of

intellectuals who backed the Reagan campaigns in 1976 and 1980, and helped get

many of them jobs in the Reagan administration. He also had no love for working

in the government and returned to Hoover Institution and wrote a great book

about his experiences. Plus, he’s a great guy who

blurbed my book.

Lopez: Any funny

intellectual stories?

Troy: Richard Nixon

selected Daniel Patrick Moynihan as his ambassador to the intellectuals. Moynihan

was a Democrat who served in the Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon administrations,

making him the David Gergen of the 1960s.

Nixon chose Moynihan largely

because of the dearth of conservative intellectuals who could fill such a position.

In addition, Moynihan was disliked by most liberals for his critique of liberal

excesses in the 1960s.

Moynihan felt strongly

that old-line Democrats had no home in elite institutions increasingly populated

by radicals. For example, Moynihan told Nixon that New York Times editor

Abe Rosenthal oversaw “[a news room] still predominantly made up of old

time liberal Democrats who can be counted on to report a story in a straight-forward

manner.” Unfortunately, Moynihan reported, “every time one of [the

veterans] goes and is replaced by a new recruit from the Harvard Crimson or

whatever, the Maoist faction on West 43d Street gets one more vote. No one else

applies.”

Lopez: How’s this

administration doing with the intellectuals?

Troy: In my book,

I assess each administration in retrospect, often looking at internal documents

or memoirs that are not available until after the administration, so I guess

we’ll have to wait and see before making any judgments.

Lopez: Having gotten

to know so many of these intellectual/president relationships, have you any

advice for presidents?

Troy: Yes. Actually,

I’ve put together a “dos and don’ts” list.

Don’t:

‐Don’t

ignore intellectuals, as it can come back to haunt you.

‐Don’t

be an intellectual — the American people might like their politicians to

consult intellectuals, but they won’t vote for eggheads.

‐Don’t

use an intellectual without a reputation as an intellectual — It’s like

sending a man to be the White House representative on women’s issues.

‐Don’t

forget your friends. If you rely heavily on an academic adviser in the campaign,

make sure they’re taken care of in the administration. Carter and Clinton made

this mistake to some degree; Clinton got away with it, Carter did not.

‐Don’t

make meetings of intellectuals public or reveal what was said in such meetings

in any official way.

‐Don’t

underestimate the capacity for flattery among intellectuals.

‐Don’t

try to latch on to a cutting edge concept developed by a prominent intellectual

work, especially if the concept is alarmist or disconcerting, a la malaise.

‐Don’t

feel obligated to provide your aides with the same loyalty you demand from them.

‐Don’t

confuse intellectual advisers with policy advisers, and vice versa.

Do:

‐Do

use intellectuals to express your vision. Having a group of thinkers affiliated

with an idea — New Democrats, Compassionate Conservatism, even Supply-siders,

is far more preferable to flailing about searching for the “vision thing.”

‐Do

use the president’s meal times liberally as a way to garner intellectual support.

Even if you don’t back their policies, few people refuse a free meal at the

White House.

‐Do

call intellectuals and tell them you have read their works.

‐Do

work with prominent think tanks and seek their guidance on issues in the campaign,

their personnel during transition. Do not publicly rely on think tank guidance

as president.

‐Do

leak the existence of meetings with intellectuals, including the guest lists,

and any amusing anecdotes that reflect favorably upon one or more of the attendees.

‐Do

let it be known when the president is reading a popular work by a well-known

scholar, so long as it is not a Swedish planning text, a la Michael Dukakis.

‐Do

make sure that any intellectuals brought into the White House are loyal to the

president above all else. Loyalty is the most important characteristic for an

intellectual in the White House.

‐Do

expect that any public intellectual in the White House will produce a book describing

their experiences. Do your best to ensure that this is a positive book, as it

will help shape your legacy. As Forrest McDonald wrote: “By and large,

works by former White House aides are good sources of information on the subject.

Presidents, in their memoirs, are less helpful.”

‐Do

seek out advice from intellectuals, but do not rely on that advice

Most Popular

Elections

Biden Lies Again and Again

Joe Biden is a career liar and he lied some more in the debate, for instance when he dismissed the now well-supported New York Post story about Hunter Biden's business dealing as "a Russian plant." There is zero evidence for this. He offered this line: There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said ... Read More
Elections

Biden Lies Again and Again

Joe Biden is a career liar and he lied some more in the debate, for instance when he dismissed the now well-supported New York Post story about Hunter Biden's business dealing as "a Russian plant." There is zero evidence for this. He offered this line: There are 50 former national intelligence folks who said ... Read More
U.S.

FBI to Interview Hunter Biden Business Partner

The FBI has asked Tony Bobulinski, former business partner of Hunter Biden, to sit for an interview on Friday, Senator Ron Johnson (R., Wis.) told reporters. Bobulinski was initially scheduled to give an interview on Friday to members of various Senate committees regarding his knowledge of business deals ... Read More
U.S.

FBI to Interview Hunter Biden Business Partner

The FBI has asked Tony Bobulinski, former business partner of Hunter Biden, to sit for an interview on Friday, Senator Ron Johnson (R., Wis.) told reporters. Bobulinski was initially scheduled to give an interview on Friday to members of various Senate committees regarding his knowledge of business deals ... Read More
Elections

Biden Dusts Off Obama’s Most Famous Lie

"If you like your health care plan, you can keep it," was a promise President Barack Obama often made when selling the Affordable Care Act. It was one of the most significant political lies in recent history, leveled during one of our most contentious policy debates. If Americans knew they might lose their ... Read More
Elections

Biden Dusts Off Obama’s Most Famous Lie

"If you like your health care plan, you can keep it," was a promise President Barack Obama often made when selling the Affordable Care Act. It was one of the most significant political lies in recent history, leveled during one of our most contentious policy debates. If Americans knew they might lose their ... Read More
Elections

Biden Wants It Both Ways

This week felt like a month. On the menu today: After President Trump asked, “Would you close down the oil industry?” Biden responded, “I have a transition from the old industry, yes,” and now Biden’s campaign insists the candidate didn’t mean it. Biden also insisted that he “never said I oppose ... Read More
Elections

Biden Wants It Both Ways

This week felt like a month. On the menu today: After President Trump asked, “Would you close down the oil industry?” Biden responded, “I have a transition from the old industry, yes,” and now Biden’s campaign insists the candidate didn’t mean it. Biden also insisted that he “never said I oppose ... Read More