Politics & Policy

Gas Relief

A federal solution for a federal problem.

Here we go again. Gas prices are climbing and Americans want to know why.

Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano, New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson, and eight other Democratic governors have written a letter concerning rising gas prices and are demanding answers from federal officials. The letter asks President Bush and Attorney General Ashcroft to launch a federal investigation into rising gas prices.

Napolitano and the other governors are correct to seek answers from the federal government, because America’s high gas prices have their roots in federal policies. However, bringing down prices doesn’t require federal investigations. Instead, they should be asking Congress to take three steps to provide immediate relief for gas consumers in Arizona and in other parts of the country.

First, Congress should rescind the federal gas tax, which amounts to 18.4 cents a gallon. The tax was originally enacted in 1956 to support construction of the interstate highway system, but has long outlived its usefulness. The highway system is complete, and funds are now used to support various pork-barrel-spending projects throughout the country. If Arizona’s elected officials want to conduct an investigation, they should demand to know why taxpayers in places like Arizona and California are paying for local projects in places like West Virginia and Massachusetts. Eliminating the gas tax would save the average driver hundreds of dollars each year, and maintenance of the highway system could be turned over to the states, where we can keep a better eye on spending.

Second, Congress should eliminate federal rules and regulations mandating the use of specialized fuels in the Phoenix area. The Environmental Protection Agency, backed by the threat of withheld transportation funding, forces Arizona to use reformulated blends of gasoline. These reformulated fuels are scarcer than other kinds of gasoline and therefore more expensive. As Goddard wrote in his letter to Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham, fuel prices rise each year as refineries are forced to switch over from winter blends to reformulated summer blends.

Instead of mandating the use of special fuels, Congress and the EPA should let Arizona solve its air quality problems. One way is to target the relatively few super-emitting automobiles that cause the most pollution. Options include a vehicle license surcharge for high-polluting vehicles, modified emissions fees, retrofitting of older vehicles with catalytic converters, accelerated retirement of older vehicles, and mobile emissions enforcement.

Third, as a long-term measure, Congress should consider legislation allowing drilling for oil in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). In accordance with the laws of supply and demand, gas prices rise when there is a disruption in supply or an increase in demand. Production of more oil would result in an increased supply of gasoline and lower gas prices for consumers. Increased domestic production would also serve to insulate Americans against supply disruptions initiated by the Oil Producing and Exporting Countries (OPEC). Of course, precautions should be taken to ensure that drilling produces a minimal environmental impact on ANWR, but as drilling and oil exploration in other parts of Alaska have proven, there are environmentally safe ways to increase oil production.

Unfortunately, the letter by the Democratic governors to President Bush doesn’t address the real causes of high gas prices. The letters reflect an attitude that only further federal government intervention can solve local problems. Rather than asking for federal investigations, we should be demanding that Congress take positive steps to free up the gas supply. As President Ronald Reagan reminded us just over 20 years ago, government is not the answer to our problems. Government is the problem.

Mark Brnovich is director of the Goldwater Institute’s Center for Constitutional Government.

Most Popular

Elections

Hell, No

Editor’s Note: If you would like to read more pros and cons on voting for President Trump, further essays on the subject, each from a different perspective, can be found here, here, and here. These articles, and the one below, reflect the views of the individual authors, not of the National Review editorial ... Read More
Elections

Hell, No

Editor’s Note: If you would like to read more pros and cons on voting for President Trump, further essays on the subject, each from a different perspective, can be found here, here, and here. These articles, and the one below, reflect the views of the individual authors, not of the National Review editorial ... Read More
Music

Stevie Nicks, Like Springsteen, Preaches and Preens

In the 1970s, Stevie Nicks and Bruce Springsteen made impressions on pop-music culture with romantic rock landmarks, Fleetwood Mac’s Rumours album and Springsteen’s Born to Run. But their new 2020 releases, Nicks’s single “Show Them the Way” and Springsteen’s Letter to You film and album, make the ... Read More
Music

Stevie Nicks, Like Springsteen, Preaches and Preens

In the 1970s, Stevie Nicks and Bruce Springsteen made impressions on pop-music culture with romantic rock landmarks, Fleetwood Mac’s Rumours album and Springsteen’s Born to Run. But their new 2020 releases, Nicks’s single “Show Them the Way” and Springsteen’s Letter to You film and album, make the ... Read More