Politics & Policy

Making Sense of The Census

The truth about the latest income-distribution report.

The Census Bureau released its annual income-distribution report late last week. The good news is that the distribution of income has been essentially unchanged for the last three years. The bad news is that this is because every income group is worse off to about the same degree.

#ad# Between 2000 and 2003, the share of total income going to the top quintile (20 percent of households) was exactly unchanged at 49.8 percent. The middle three quintiles — the middle class — were slightly better off, raising their share of aggregate income from 46.7 percent to 46.9 percent. The bottom quintile was slightly worse off, falling from 3.6 percent to 3.4 percent.

However, the real income of every group is down significantly since 2000, including those at the top. Their income is down almost $5,000 (in 2003 dollars), about the same as the lower 80 percent of households in total.

Needless to say, there is no reason to cry for those in the top quintile — often characterized as the “rich.” They are still doing very well, with an average income of $147,078 in 2003. However, it is doubtful that very many people view this as a rich-family’s income, especially when both spouses work.

This fact is even clearer when looking at the income needed to get into the top quintile, which is a mere $86,867. Almost any couple that has both spouses working full time is going to be close to this level. According to the Census Bureau, the median earnings for a male working full time last year were $40,668; for females the median earnings were $30,724. That adds up to a combined income of $71,393.

In short, all it takes to be relatively well-to-do in America today is to work full time and be married to someone else who also works full time.

Of course, it is still appalling that there are so many people who must scrape by on a mere pittance — the average income of those in the bottom quintile was just $9,996 last year. But this figure is deceptive for many reasons.

First of all, it excludes almost everything we do as a society to help the poor. The Census data count money income only and exclude in-kind benefits, such as food stamps, Medicare, Medicaid, and public housing. The poverty data also have this same limitation.

In years past, the Census Bureau has simultaneously released estimates of how the inclusion of in-kind benefits affect income levels and the poverty rate. For some reason, these data were left out of this report.

Another factor that is excluded is wealth. There are many people in this country — mainly the elderly — who have low incomes, but in fact are well off because they may own their homes free and clear and also have other assets.

Finally, these Census data tend to imply that people are stuck in the same income group year after year, when in reality there is substantial upward mobility. Almost everyone spends some time in the bottom quintile when they are starting out in life, and other times because they have suffered a temporary loss. But they move up the income ladder and rebound from setbacks.

In previous years, the Census Bureau has simultaneously released income-mobility data, but has not done so this year. Earlier data have shown that a large fraction of those who were in poverty or a low income quintile one year were out of poverty or in a higher quintile within a year or two.

Most people know this even if the Census Bureau doesn’t say it. A 2003 Gallup poll found that 31 percent of the population believes that it is very likely, or somewhat likely, that they will become rich. No doubt, an even higher fraction believes that their children have a good shot at it.

Indeed, almost every generation of families is better off than the earlier one. Not only have real incomes risen sharply over time, but most people are well aware that they are better off than their parents. A 1996 Reader’s Digest poll found that while 18 percent of people consider themselves to be in the lower class as children, only 6 percent put themselves in that class as adults.

These Census data will probably be grist for the campaign trail, as Democrats charge that Republican tax cuts have worsened the distribution of income. But voters should be aware that these data tell us nothing whatsoever about how taxes affect incomes because taxes are another item excluded from the calculations. All the figures are before taxes.

Thus, not only does the Census Bureau exclude most of what we do to help the poor, it also excludes everything we do to bring down the rich and equalize incomes. In truth, the Census Bureau tells us very little about wealth and poverty in America.

– Bruce Bartlett is senior fellow for the National Center for Policy Analysis. Write to him here.

Most Popular

Film & TV

In Unsane, Aetna Meets Kafka

Unsane doesn’t take the form of a horror film; at first, it appears to be a Hitchcockian thriller about mistaken identity or perhaps getting ensnared in a web of bureaucracy. Yet with clinical detachment it develops into a nerve-flaying story almost too agonizing to endure. Unlike most horror movies, it isn’t ... Read More
Science & Tech

The Real Deal With the Tech Giants

A bit of dialogue from the old television series Person of Interest, where a reclusive billionaire programmer and a former CIA agent use a giant supercomputer to predict crimes and save people: FINCH: Hester's living off the grid. No photos online and nothing on the social networking sites. REESE: I've never ... Read More

Viva l’Italia?

Italy has just had elections, with very interesting results. I wanted to talk with Alberto Mingardi, which I have. He is one of the leading classical liberals in Italy -- the director general of the Bruno Leoni Institute, in Milan. (Mingardi himself is Milanese.) He is also an authority in arts and letters. In ... Read More

Putin and the Cult of Leadership

On Sunday, Russian dictator Vladimir Putin won an unsurprising reelection-campaign victory against Communist Party candidate Pavel Grudinin, by a margin of 76.7 percent to 11.8 percent. The results were unsurprising because Putin is a tyrant who murders or imprisons political rivals, and who isn’t afraid to use ... Read More

Trump and Brexit Derangement Syndrome

I am not one of those Brexiteers who believe that Brexit and Trumpism are essentially the same phenomenon in two different countries. To be sure, they both draw on some of the same political trends, notably a distrust of elites and an upsurge of popular anger over evident failures of public policy such as illegal ... Read More

Stand Up to Putin

President Putin’s landslide victory in Russia’s presidential election was achieved against the lackluster competition of a group of mediocre candidates from which the sole serious opponent had been excluded; amid plausible allegations that his security services had tried to poison two Russians in England by ... Read More