# A National Sales Tax No Vote

The rates would be vastly higher than what you might suspect.

House Speaker Dennis Hastert created a flurry of excitement in Republican circles the other day when it was reported that he is proposing the abolition of the Internal Revenue Service in his new book. This would be accomplished by eliminating all existing federal taxes and replacing them with a national retail sales tax.

There is no indication of what tax rate Speaker Hastert thinks would be necessary to replace all federal revenue. A current proposal by Rep. John Linder (R., Ga.) says that a 23 percent rate would be adequate. But such a low rate can only be sustained by making completely absurd assumptions about what would be taxed. Every serious economist who has ever looked at this question has concluded that a vastly higher rate would in fact be needed.

An unstated assumption is that the 23 percent rate proposed by Linder is comparable to existing state and local sales taxes, where the tax comes on top of the purchase price. Thus, a 5 percent sales tax on a \$1 purchase comes to \$1.05.

But that’s not the way the Linder plan works. He deceptively calculates the rate as if the tax is part of the purchase price. He calls this the tax-inclusive rate. Calculating the rate the normal way people are accustomed to with state and local sales taxes would require a 30 percent tax rate, not 23 percent.

When Congress’s Joint Committee on Taxation scored the Linder proposal four years ago it estimated that it would actually require a tax-inclusive rate of 36 percent, not 23 percent, to equal current federal revenues. Calculating the rate in a normal, tax-exclusive manner would mean a 57 percent rate.

Economist Bill Gale of the Brookings Institution notes that supporters of the sales tax assume that there will be no tax evasion under their proposal and that the size of government will not grow, even though they would send a large annual check to every American in order to offset the regressivity of the tax. Making realistic assumptions, Gale estimates that the tax-inclusive rate, comparable to Linder’s proposed 23 percent rate, would actually have to be about 50 percent. A rate comparable to existing sales taxes would be close to 100 percent.

And let us not forget that state and local sales taxes would come on top of the federal sales tax, pushing the total rate even higher.

Obviously, the federal government is not going to impose tax rates this high, nor would anyone pay them if it did. There would be a massive tax revolt.

The Linder bill (H.R. 25) is also deceptive in its basic assumption that all consumption of goods and services in the U.S. would be taxed. Implicitly, Americans would be taxed on, among other things, all medical care, purchases of new homes, and services provided by state and local governments if Linder’s bill became law.

This means that if you are sick and have large doctor bills, you are going to pay 30 percent on top to the federal government. (Alternatively, you would pay 30 percent more for health insurance.) If you buy a new house listed for \$150,000, your actual purchase price is going to be \$195,000, including the sales tax. (Alternatively, there could be a tax on the imputed rent homeowners pay themselves for living in their own homes.) And if your children receive \$20,000 worth of education each year from the local public schools, somehow or other you are going to have to pay an additional \$6,000 to the federal government.

Of course, it is completely idiotic to think that the American people will ever allow this to happen. The idea of taxing all consumption sounds nice in theory until you realize just how broad the definition of “consumption” would be under Linder’s plan.

Economist Evan Koenig of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas makes the point that any new sales tax is going to raise prices by that amount. If the Federal Reserve accommodates it, we are going to have 30 percent inflation the year the tax is introduced. If it is not accommodated, then producer prices are going to have to fall by 30 percent, which will cause a severe recession and greatly reduce the tax yield.

Somehow or other, Linder has gotten 54 House members to co-sponsor his proposal. They should all pray that their opponents overlook their poor judgment. When last the national retail sales tax was a major campaign issue — in the 1996 senate race in Louisiana — the Republican sales tax supporter was crushed by his anti-sales-tax Democratic opponent. That may explain why only two senators support Linder’s plan, one of whom is retiring this year.

With all due respect to Speaker Hastert, trying to eliminate the IRS by adopting a national retail sales tax is a very dumb idea.

– Bruce Bartlett is senior fellow for the National Center for Policy Analysis. Write to him here.

## Biden’s ‘Double Death Tax’

The White House is proposing what would amount to a second estate tax. The one we already have is bad enough.

## American Men Suffer a Friendship Recession

American men have fewer friends than in decades past. We should dedicate time to fostering friendships. They provide an immediate and enduring reward.

## Is COVID China’s Chernobyl?

As we experience the pandemic’s toll on the world, we can speculate about its implications for the Chinese regime.

## Lindsey Graham Is an Idiot

Democrats are treating the infrastructure and reconciliation bills as linked, and so should Republicans and everybody else.

## The Navy’s Debauchery Problem: An Enlisted Perspective

Senator Tom Cotton’s report on the service branch gets a lot right about the upper ranks, but the enlisted side remains in dire need of attention.

## The Kids Are Not Alright: Chaos at the College Republican National Committee

College Republican chapters all over the country claim they are being disenfranchised by a president seeking to consolidate power.

## Texas Governor Threatens Fines for Local Officials Who Enforce Mask Mandates

Also, governmental agencies and private entities that receive public funding cannot require proof of vaccination as a condition of receiving services.

## Biden Admin Not Ruling Out Further Lockdowns If Scientists Recommend Them

‘We listen to the experts. This is a public-health situation; this is not about politics at all,’ a White House spokeswoman said.

## House Democrats Vote for Unlimited Taxpayer Funding of Abortion for Medicaid Recipients

Until Thursday, every appropriations bill to fund Medicaid included the Hyde amendment, which prohibits funding of abortion except in limited circumstances.

## Americans, Not Government, Are the Arbiters of Truth

Don’t let the government dragoon Big Tech into censorship.

## Conservatives Take Aim at Democrats’ Anemic China Bills

Disappointed with Democratic efforts to confront Beijing, congressional Republicans propose a comprehensive alternative.

## Biden Orders Plans for Mandatory COVID Vaccination for Military Personnel

Biden also announced that federal employees will be required to be vaccinated or face testing as well as mask and distancing rules.