Politics & Policy

Alliance For Justice

We thank NRO Contributing Editor Roger Clegg for pointing out one minor inaccuracy in our 108-page report, which a Los Angeles Times editorialist–who doesn’t oppose Judge Roberts–has called “impressively thorough and … restrained…” We have corrected the report to remove any suggestion that it was unusual for a deputy solicitor general like Judge Roberts not to be on a reply brief.

We also thank NRO for pointing out that the White House ordered the Solicitor General’s Office to withdraw its argument that Mississippi had no constitutional obligation to provide historically black colleges with increased funding in order to remedy a long history of discrimination. The White House’s order only underscores our original point that Judge Roberts supervised and co-signed a brief that took an unduly restrictive position on desegregation remedies. Mr. Clegg says he agrees with the initial argument that Ken Starr and Judge Roberts made. But the George H.W. Bush White House didn’t. Neither did eight justices on the Supreme Court.

Nan Aron

President

Alliance for Justice

Washington, D.C.

Roger Clegg responds: It’s good that Nan Aron has corrected two of the report’s “inaccurac[ies]“–which were hardly “minor”–but I don’t want to leave her with the impression that, in writing about this one section of the report, there weren’t problems elsewhere. Here are a couple more (and, no, these are not meant to be exhaustive either).

On page 10, the report asserts that Roberts was a “member” of the National Legal Center for the Public Interest. This is not true; I used to be general counsel of NLCPI, and it is not a membership organization. It is true, as the report also goes on to say, that Roberts “served on the Legal Advisory Council” of NLCPI, and the report ominously footnotes this: “Other Board Members and Legal Advisors of the Center include prominent conservatives, such as Douglas Kmiec, C. Boyden Gray and Kenneth Starr.” That’s also true enough, but the report conveniently ignores the bipartisan membership of the Center’s Board and Council, which has also included former Democratic officials like Clifford Sloan, Walter Dellinger, Seth Waxman, Griffin Bell, and Robert Strauss.

On page 92, the report describes the vote in Withrow v. Williams as 6-3, “with Justices Rehnquist, Scalia and Thomas in dissent.” In fact, it was 5-4, with Justice O’Connor writing the opinion–the lead dissent, actually–that Chief Justice Rehnquist joined. It is, of course, most inconvenient for the report that Justice O’Connor–the Left’s gold standard for an acceptable Republican justice–would have voted for Roberts’s position, but indeed she did.

What’s disturbing is that the more you know about something, the likelier it appears to be that you’ll find an error about it in the report. I worked on the Mississippi higher education case when I served at the Justice Department, and I found mistakes in that part of the report. I also used to work at the National Legal Center for the Public Interest, and I found mistakes about it in the report, too. A couple of weeks ago, for another NRO piece, I looked at Withrow v. Williams, and, sure enough, it turns out that the report made a mistake in discussing it as well.

On a lighter note, here are two more: On page 51, the report snidely puts a “sic” next to the word “signalled” in one of Roberts’s memos. But that’s an acceptable spelling.

And, by the way: Aron begins her letter by proudly quoting an editorialist in the Los Angeles Times as calling her report “impressively thorough and … restrained ….” Well, here’s the editorialist’s full sentence: “In fairness, the alliance’s analysis of Roberts’ record is impressively thorough, and it’s restrained by the shrill standards of most advocacy propaganda.” Being “restrained” is hardly the same thing as being “restrained by the shrill standards of most advocacy propaganda.”

It’s understandable that Aron would not want to quote the phrase “advocacy propaganda.” That is, of course, the most charitable way to describe the Alliance for Justice’s report–and everyone knows it. That is why the report is unlikely to be taken seriously–and shouldn’t be.

NR Staff — Members of the National Review editorial and operational teams are included under the umbrella “NR Staff.”

Most Popular

PC Culture

Hate-Crime Hoaxes Reflect America’s Sickness

On January 29, tabloid news site TMZ broke the shocking story that Jussie Smollett, a gay black entertainer and progressive activist, had been viciously attacked in Chicago. Two racist white men had fractured his rib, poured bleach on him, and tied a noose around his neck. As they were leaving, they shouted ... Read More
U.S.

White Progressives Are Polarizing America

To understand how far left (and how quickly) the Democratic party has moved, let’s cycle back a very short 20 years. If 1998 Bill Clinton ran in the Democratic primary today, he’d be instantaneously labeled a far-right bigot. His support for the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the Defense of Marriage Act, ... Read More
Politics & Policy

The Strange Paradoxes of Our Age

Modern prophets often say one thing and do another. Worse, they often advocate in the abstract as a way of justifying their doing the opposite in the concrete. The result is that contemporary culture abounds with the inexplicable — mostly because modern progressivism makes all sorts of race, class, and ... Read More
PC Culture

Fake Newspeople

This week, the story of the Jussie Smollett hoax gripped the national media. The story, for those who missed it, went something like this: The Empire actor, who is both black and gay, stated that on a freezing January night in Chicago, in the middle of the polar vortex, he went to a local Subway store to buy a ... Read More
Elections

One Last Grift for Bernie Sanders

Bernie Sanders, the antique Brooklyn socialist who represents Vermont in the Senate, is not quite ready to retire to his lakeside dacha and so once again is running for the presidential nomination of a party to which he does not belong with an agenda about which he cannot be quite entirely ... Read More
Film & TV

A Sublime Christian Masterpiece of a Film

‘There are two ways through life -- the way of nature and the way of grace,” remarks the saintly mother at the outset of The Tree of Life, one of the most awe-inspiring films of the 21st century. She continues: Grace doesn’t try please itself. It accepts being slighted, forgotten, disliked, accepts insults ... Read More
PC Culture

Changing Reality with Words

The reinvention of vocabulary can often be more effective than any social protest movement. Malarial swamps can become healthy “wetlands.” Fetid “dumps” are often rebranded as green “landfills.” Global warming was once a worry about too much heat. It implied that man-made carbon emissions had so ... Read More