Politics & Policy

Welfare Reform Made Interesting

Work Over Welfare is an amusingly told story of an important reform.

The dramatic reduction in welfare dependency and child poverty that we have witnessed over the last ten years is remarkable; even more remarkable, perhaps, is a recently published book recounting the reform of federal policy, the most sweeping in decades, that led to these improvements. In providing a lively account of the personalities, policies, and politics that shaped the landmark welfare-reform legislation, Ron Haskins has produced an engaging primer on the complicated and arcane legislative process. In Work Over Welfare: The Inside Story of the 1996 Welfare Reform Law, the account of how a bill becomes a law receives a remarkably entertaining treatment, and the book should find an appreciative audience well beyond his fellow academics.

Ron Haskins, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, spent 14 years on Capitol Hill as the Republicans’ resident expert on social welfare policy. As would be expected, he has a thorough command of profuse research findings and a detailed knowledge of the intricacies of scores of federal welfare programs. More remarkable is how he is able to make his specialized knowledge accessible and interesting to non-experts, a group that included the members of Congress who had to be instructed, inspired, and corralled in order to deliver “a truly radical policy.”

The Republican welfare reform bill that finally passed and was signed by President Clinton in 1996 overturned thirty years of failed national welfare policy that subsidized persistent poverty and rising rates of illegitimacy. Haskins’ detailed account of how reformers changed the terms of debate, marshaled their arguments, recruited allies, overcame obstacles, and withstood presidential vetoes and demagogic attacks in order to successfully challenge an entrenched welfare establishment has heroes and villains, humor and suspense. At odds in the high stakes battle were Republicans and Democrats, governors and Congress, Capitol Hill and the White House, Bob Dole and Bill Clinton. The chances of passing a controversial and complicated reform were slim.

#ad#Haskins reminds us that years of preparation preceded a 1994 GOP majority that was not only in a position to implement reform, but was also committed to a reform that would demand an end to an open-ended entitlement and would require work in exchange for welfare. Because Haskins was intimately involved in every stage of the reform, his readers are treated to an insider’s candid account of the contentious meetings behind closed doors and the careful choreography that played out in congressional hearings.

The bill ultimately passed Congress with large bipartisan majorities (328 to 101 in the House), but it frequently seemed a hopeless enterprise. Success has many fathers, and Haskins gives credit to a number of them; he acknowledges the indispensable intellectual groundwork done by conservative foundations and policy experts like Charles Murray and Robert Rector and liberals like Daniel Patrick Moynihan, and he  also gives credit to President Clinton, who was willing to buck his congressional allies and some of his own appointees in order to “end welfare as we know it.” The two champions of reform, though, who can most claim responsibility for the reform are Representative Clay Shaw and Senator Jim Talent — and here is    another reminder of why the defeat of these talented and committed legislators this November was so regrettable.

Over the past ten years, welfare rolls have been cut by more than half. Today, a record number of single mothers are gainfully employed, and black child poverty is at an historic low. Ron Haskins deserves plenty of credit for the improved prospects of our nation’s poor; he also deserves praise for capturing so well the fascinating and important story of how meaningful welfare reform finally happened.

— Kate O’Beirne is the author of Women Who Make the World Worse: and How Their Radical Feminist Assault Is Ruining Our Schools, Families, Military, and Sports, now in paperback.

<em>Work Over Welfare</em>, by Ron Haskins



Most Popular

White House

The Mueller Report Should Shock Our Conscience

I've finished reading the entire Mueller report, and I must confess that even as a longtime, quite open critic of Donald Trump, I was surprised at the sheer scope, scale, and brazenness of the lies, falsehoods, and misdirections detailed by the Special Counsel's Office. We've become accustomed to Trump making up ... Read More

What’s So Great about Western Civilization

EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is Jonah Goldberg’s weekly “news”letter, the G-File. Subscribe here to get the G-File delivered to your inbox on Fridays. Dear Reader (Redacted: Harm to Ongoing Matter), One of the things I tell new parents is something that was told to me when my daughter still had that ... Read More
Film & TV

Jesus Is Not the Joker

Actors love to think they can play anything, but the job of any half-decent filmmaker is to tell them when they’re not right for a part. If the Rock wants to play Kurt Cobain, try to talk him out of it. Adam Sandler as King Lear is not a great match. And then there’s Joaquin Phoenix. He’s playing Jesus ... Read More

Screw York Yankees

You are dead to me. You are a collection of Fredos. The cock has crowed, you pathetic sniveling jerks. The team I have rooted for since 1965, when I first visited the House that Ruth Built, where I hawked peanuts and ice cream a lifetime ago, watched countless games (Guidry striking out 18!), has gotten so ... Read More
White House

The Problem with the Mueller Report

So much for collusion. The media conversation has now officially moved on from the obsession of the last two years to obstruction of justice. That’s because the first volume of the voluminous Mueller report, the half devoted to what was supposed to be the underlying crime of a Trump conspiracy with Russia, ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Trump Can’t Cry ‘No Fair’

If I may jump in, I take Charlie’s point and I think he’s largely correct. I also think David is correct. There’s not that much of a contradiction in that because I think to some extent they’re talking about different things. And this reflects a larger frustration I have with many of the ... Read More