On Wednesday, writer Catherine Seipp lost a long battle with cancer. Colleagues and friends remember her fondly.
Cathy Seipp was a very important person to me. She wrote the review in the Wall Street Journal of my book Spin Sisters which came out just about three years ago this week. I e-mailed to thank her for the great review and she said she was pleased because it was the first review she had done for the Journal. We met in Los Angeles when I was there a couple of months later, and had lunch and talked about all the stuff women talk about when they feel comfortable with each other — – raising kids, the differences between women in L.A. and New York, and how we had each grown more and more conservative. She started sending me her smart, witty, always original column. I was so sorry to hear about her illness and so sorry to hear she is gone. But I’m glad that even briefly I had the chance to meet, appreciate, and admire Miss Seipp.
– Myrna Blyth is co-author of How to Raise an American: 1776 Fun and Easy Tools, Tips, and Activities to Help Your Child Love This Country.
Cathy Seipp was the social, spiritual, and pugilistic core of the Los Angeles media scene. We’re all now wondering: What next?
Before I met Cathy, I knew no one. After, I knew everyone. And her group of friends came in every shape, size and ideology. Rich, poor, journalist, blogger, controversy starters and stoppers, rainbow- headed film reviewers, a sex goddess, a babe named “Moxie,” and even the occasional literate Orthodox Jew porn connoisseur. As a pronounced conservative she was quite liberal in that regard. And her bohemian Silverlake aesthetic only added to the package of joyful contradiction. Thank God she had a kid.
– Andrew Breitbart is publisher of Breitbart.com.
Cathy was the perfect combination: lovely in person and wicked in print. I talked to her for the first time after she wrote a side splittingly funny piece on Maureen Dowd for the Washingtonian. Not only was it a great read, it made all the right people furious. “It should never have been published,” a Dowd admirer hissed. That was it — I absolutely had to get Cathy to do something for the Independent Women’s Forum’s newly-created website. The result was Cathy’s regular “MoDo Watch,” which, as Charlotte Allen noted was “worth its weight in diamonds.” This evolved into a more general media column that was always fresh, funny, and fearless. Cathy never shied away from icons — or their sons. Her last post was about Ben Ehrenreich, pampered son of Barbara, and the quintessential liberal whiner. Cathy didn’t like whining. I suppose that is why, when Charlotte Allen and I had drinks with her last year at the Mayflower, I would never have guessed that this gifted writer was not long for this world. How sad that someone so decent and so funny has left so soon. My heart goes out to Maia and the many, many people who loved Cathy and I count myself fortunate to have known — and read — her.
– Charlotte Hays is a senior editor at the Independent Women’s Forum.
Cathy Seipp’sattracted many people — I met a bigtime writer on the East Coast who knew all about obscure L.A. blogspats because he liked to go to Cathy’s site and look at her picture. Cathy was also smart and generous and raised a strong, lovely daughter. But I liked her for another reason: She was so grouchy! She just wouldn’t take any s**t at all. Smiling people who always have a nice word are a dime a dozen! The people to prize — especially in laid back, liberal L.A. — tend to be those who are almost constantly annoyed, which Cathy seemed to be. In large part she was annoyed by the mediocrity and cant of the Los Angeles Times, a large, slow-moving, profusely bleeding target. But there were smaller targets too, like people who brought babies into bars, or who announced “I’m going to treat myself” to something or other. Her crankiness revealed a powerful moral sense, plus a sensitivity to detail, plus a ferocious energy — all of which made for terrific writing (and mothering, now that I think of it). It also made her open minded, in a way, because new experiences brought new annoyances. When she decided her local public school was better for her daughter than the private school she’d been attending, a whole chunk of conservative education theory came under a cloud. Whatever didn’t annoy her just had to be near perfect. A conversation with her was a cleansing acid bath.
At a monthly party for local journalists, shortly after she was diagnosed, Cathy told me “you know, I might not be here next month.” I didn’t quite believe her (and in fact she held off the disease, quietly and bravely, for several more years, long enough to see her daughter Maia off to college). At a subsequent party to celebrate her remission,, Cathy stood up and said “I just want to let everyone know having cancer hasn’t made me a better person.” That would have been hard to do.
I loved Cathy Seipp’s writing, even though much of it was in areas I usually avoid like the plague:
1) She wrote media criticism, which is almost always the province of the indestructible ethics bores;
2) She wrote about hanging out in a glamorous city with a bunch of vaguely cool people you’ve never heard of, which grates very quickly on those of us who live in obscure zip codes where nothing ever happens;
3) She wrote droll observational scenes of everyday life, like all those leaden officially designated “humorists” in every newspaper across the land trying to wring 600 words out of the amusing aspects of barcode scanners;
4) And she wrote about the funny things her kid said, which is the kind of perilous terrain that leaves even the most well-disposed reader feeling like W. C. Fields.
But Cathy was the exception to the rule in all the above and many other areas. The media criticism was much needed in her home state, where she was a welcome disruption to the entertainment capital’s industrial production line of the world’s dullest journalists. Her analyses of the Los Angeles Times-servers were dead right, but my favorite moments were when some stylistic quirk caught her eye:
I almost didn’t finish reading Lopez’s column today because in the opening graph he wrote that he “motored about” L.A. to hear what people were saying about yesterday’s protests. Motored about? What is he now — Jeeves?
As for the hanging-out-in-LA stuff, Cathy wrote with a very unforced warmth that could make almost any of her pals sound like someone you’d like to meet, even when (as with my Spectator colleague Toby Young) you already have and wish you hadn’t. The observational humor usually turned up as an odd digression, as if she’d been motoring about and turned down a winding side street. A few years back, some guy sent her an e-mail to say half-an-hour earlier he’d just recognized her driving a gray Volvo east on Beverly Boulevard:
At least I didn’t attract his attention because I was picking my nose in the car, which people often do while for some reason assuming they’re invisible.
Sudden, horrible thought….or did I?
And, as for the kids-say-the-darnedest-things stuff, while trying to run down the above passage, I stumbled across this mother/daughter exchange after Maia somehow manages to get the wrong end of the stick on Hitchcock’s Rear Window :
“What a stupid movie! That’s the most terrible ending I’ve ever seen!”
“It’s a perfectly happy ending,” I sighed.
“It’s happy now that Grace Kelly’s leg is amputated?”
Which is surreal. Although she was happy to describe herself as a Republican, I assumed at first she was a “conservative” mainly in the sense that there was a limit to the amount of solemn PC codswallop she was prepared to swallow. But in the end she was a more morally serious person than her Governor and most other prominent “moderate” GOP-ers. For example:
Well, as they used to say in gay circles, Silence=Death, and that’s been pretty much the official gay party line about the dangers of Islamofascism. (As it is also with feminist groups like Not in Our Name et al.) Here’s a typical post 9/11 news release from GLAAD: “Survey Finds LGBT Muslims Were Scared And Harassed After 9/11.”
Not scared or harassed in Iraq or Afghanistan or Egypt, but in the U.S. and Canada and Britain. Because compared to life under George Bush or Tony Blair, it’s all kite-flying fun and sales at Barneys in the average Islamist person-of-color dictatorship.
I’ve quoted her a lot here because I love the great brio of her writing. She was naturally funny, and so she had the confidence never to fake it. But she also communicated a great joy and relish in writing, and you’d be surprised how few writers do that. I also liked the way you never quite knew where the next paragraph would lead. She starts off in a doctor’s waiting room watching President Bush give a speech on Iraq while her fellow female patients hurl ever more demented insults at the screen, and she somehow winds up with:
The other constant refrain I’ve been hearing lately is from Lewis, who’s become obsessed with what he imagines is my father’s kinky and overly active sex life ever since he heard him moving furniture around downstairs one night and insisted it was the sound of…something else. So now every time he leaves a phone message, it’s “I guess you’re out buying your dad condoms,” or “Shopping for sheets?” Etc.
Occasionally he lays off for a while, but that’s only so he can hit me with it again when I least expect it. “Did you feel the earthquake last night?” Lewis asked a few days ago, when I made the mistake of picking up the phone.
“I don’t think there was an earthquake last night.”
“Well, you’re right, there wasn’t, but I thought there was. So I called the U.S. Geological Survey and they said, ‘No, no, it’s just that Harvey Seipp was having sex last night. We’ve been getting these calls all day.’”
Great writing is all about rhythm, and Cathy’s was beautiful. I shall miss her enormously.
– Mark Steyn is author of America Alone: The End of the World as We Know It.
What Cathy had was verve. You started her columns or her posts and you couldn’t stop. She had smarts, yes; she had insight; she had common sense. But many journalists have that. Few could write as she did, with her vigor, force, style, wit. You talked to her and you felt the same: a liveliness of intellect, tongue, and manner that you couldn’t resist.
Maybe I shouldn’t focus so much on her work — we aren’t our jobs, or even our careers. But to me, writing was such a big part of who she was. Why would someone who wrote for money start a blog on which she wrote for free? Maybe because she couldn’t help it, because that’s what mattered to her. She had an uncommon talent, whether innate or laboriously cultivated I can’t tell, but a talent that made all of us richer. It couldn’t be bottled up. It couldn’t even be sold just for money. It had to be let out, spilling out as a river, vital and vigorous, which is how I’ll always remember her.
All of us lost a rare gift today. And as I write this, I can’t help thinking: Cathy could have written it so much better.
– Eugene Volokh is Gary T. Schwartz Professor of Law at UCLA School of Law, and a coauthor of The Volokh Conspiracy blog.