Politics & Policy

Do Liberals Want a Fed or Not?

They asked for it. They gor it. And now it's doing what they created it to do.

 One of the reasons why I go on talk radio shows is to get a sense of how people are reacting to market events. I spend the vast majority of my reading time immersed in data. LIBOR rates, TED spreads, Treasury yields, and durable-goods orders are my daily breakfast. Sometimes these indicators spill out of the charts and onto the front pages, and talk-radio invitations tell me when and how.

I learned a lot during a recent conversation with Jerry Doyle on his syndicated radio program. Jerry, before becoming a talk-show host, was among many things a Wall Street trader. He’s smart and he knows markets. Jerry told me that his callers were very concerned about the Federal Reserve “bailing out” big banks. This was even before the Fed opened its discount window to Bear Stearns. I’ve heard similar complaints from both the left and the populist right. And I’m far more sympathetic to the latter’s complaints than the formers’. That’s because the Fed was the liberals’ idea in the first place.

During the panic of 1907, J. P. Morgan stepped in and created a consortium of investors, and by so doing ended the panic and saved the banking system. Yet instead of showing gratitude to a great financier who put his own capital at risk in a time of panic, the chattering classes of the day reacted with bitterness. “Isn’t this too much power for one man to have?” they asked. “Shouldn’t the people themselves have an institution that can step in to be the lender of last resort?” “Wouldn’t a public entity more fully serve the public interest?”

And so the Fed was born. Yes, conspiracy mongers, some Wall Street players participated in its creation, but that was more in the cause of minimizing the damage. The Fed was much more the brainchild of academic scribblers and progressive dreamers than of the debits-and-credits crowd. The bankers had to be sold on the idea. Yes, they would have to submit to more regulation. But as compensation they would get a true lender of last resort in a time of need.

That’s why I don’t get socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders. (That’s no right-wing epithet; he really is a socialist.) And that’s why I don’t get complaints about a “bailout for big banks” coming from the left. The liberals wanted a Fed and they got one. And as the chart above illustrates, it’s doing exactly what they created it to do: step in temporarily in times of turmoil.

Reasonable men can differ as to the utility of a central bank. Hamilton was for it; Jefferson against it. I tend to agree with Hamilton, but who am I to judge between such giants? The Jeffersonians among us, such as Ron Paul, have a point to make. A central bank is a very powerful institution, and power is dangerous. The Hamiltonians among us have a point, too. Panics also are dangerous, and we need institutions to minimize them.

The Left, however, has no real point. It’s silly to create an institution and compel banks to participate, only to issue class-warfare calls when it does what they told it to do in the first place.


The Dossier Deceit

The Dossier Deceit

John Durham’s latest indictment reinforces that the Russian collusion conspiracy was built on a preposterous foundation.

The Latest