Politics & Policy

D.C. Democrats: Clueless, Condescending, and Costly

The political class not only wastes trillions of our money, it adds insult to injury with each condescending statement.

Why are Americans enraged? As this moribund economy limps through its third year of doldrums, Americans are sick of having their hard-earned money swiped by the Democrat-dominated political class in Washington, D.C., which is clueless, condescending, and invariably costly.

Could anything but cluelessness explain what happened when Harv’s Metro Car Wash in Sacramento owed the federal government precisely four pennies because of a mistake in its tax return? Rather than shrug at a four-cent error, the IRS dispatched two agents to deliver a letter by hand to inform the owner of his tax debt.

“They were deadly serious, very aggressive,” Harv’s proprietor, Aaron Zeff, told the Sacramento Bee. That was the first time he had heard that his account was amiss. Indeed, Zeff had received an official letter last October saying that his business had “filed all required returns and addressed any balances due.”

Even more clueless, if that is possible, is the Obama administration’s War on Kindles. As the Washington Examiner’s Byron York reported, several universities collaborated with Amazon to offer Kindles to students in a purely voluntary program to see if the electronic devices were a worthy alternative to traditional, tree-killing textbooks.

“Unfair!” screamed the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. It investigated Arizona State, Case Western, and other universities for possible discrimination against the blind. After all, division chief Tom Perez told a House hearing, “We must remain vigilant to ensure that as new devices are introduced, people with disabilities are not left behind.”

Have Perez and Justice’s other geniuses noticed that blind people cannot read regular books, either? Perhaps fairness should require universities to close their libraries, lest sighted students enjoy a serious advantage over their blind colleagues.

For that matter, is it equitable that sighted students can see their professors while blind scholars only can hear them? Perhaps DOJ should sue every university until it forces teachers to lecture behind dark curtains. That way, professors could be heard, but not seen, equally by all students.

Meanwhile, blind people now can activate Kindle’s newest model, which can read books aloud.

Crisis averted.

As for condescension, consider President Obama’s August 5 speech at a Chicago Ford plant. Obama praised federal bailouts for the auto industry, including a new, $250 million loan guarantee for Ford from the Export-Import Bank.

“I refuse to walk away from this industry and American jobs,” Obama thundered. “I have put my money on the American worker.” 

“My money?” Really? Does Obama think we are that stupid?

Obama’s middle initials should be O.P.M., as in “Other People’s Money.” He spends trillions relentlessly. And none of it is his money.

Washington is costly, too. Obama loves federal assistance for alternative energy projects. Supposedly they create jobs. The August 9 Newsweek compared the taxpayer costs against the employment benefits of several such initiatives. U.S. Geothermal received a $102.2 million loan guarantee for a project that employed ten people. Cost per job: $10.2 million. Brightsource Energy’s $1.37 billion guarantee funded a program that yielded 86 positions at $15.9 million apiece. Abengoa Solar’s $1.45 billion guarantee produced 85 jobs at $17 million each.

Well, at least the feds who perpetrate this nonsense work cheaply.

Yeah, right.

As the Bureau of Economic Analysis recently concluded, in 2009, average private-sector compensation (salary and benefits) was $61,051. Among federal civilians, however, the equivalent figure was $123,049 — slightly more than double. Since 2000, inflation-adjusted private-sector pay has grown 8.8 percent. Among federal civilians, compensation is up 36.9 percent — more than quadruple the private-sector growth rate.

Watching Democrats champion tax increases amid such staggering federal greed is obscene, bordering on pornographic.

If federal employees were spending the Great Recession tightening their belts, skipping meals, and wearing their old shoes thin while walking to job interviews, most Americans would think, “Well, we and the feds are all in this together.”

Instead, this differential in private versus government compensation looks less like “all for one and one for all” and more like the contrasting scenes inside and outside the gates of Versailles in April 1789.

Not surprisingly, in a Rasmussen survey released Wednesday, 28 percent of likely voters polled believe the U.S. is on the right track, while 67 percent think this republic is on the wrong track. Also, 65 percent are at least “somewhat angry,” while 40 percent are “very angry.”

Come November, Americans should take this justified fury and fire it like catapults at the Washington Democrats who demolish this beautiful country just a little more each day they go to work.

– Deroy Murdock is a nationally syndicated columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University.

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor of National Review Online, and a senior fellow with the London Center for Policy Research.


The Latest