Politics & Policy

NPR Confronts Its Own Tea Party

For the first time in living memory, NPR is getting blowback.

I appeared on the public-radio program On Point this week with National Public Radio ombudsman, Alicia Shepherd, and listened to her defend NPR’s firing of Juan Williams. NPR, the listener is invited to conclude, has no bias, but Juan Williams, a liberal with occasionally heterodox views, is too conservative for NPR.

Ms. Shepherd was in an impossible position and seemed to know it. Right out of the box, she acknowledged that the “manner” of Williams’s firing — a phone call with no face-to-face discussion permitted — was wrong. The actual termination, she went on to assert, was completely justified. It wasn’t just what Juan Williams said on The O’Reilly Factor but a “pattern” of comments over the years. This was the “last straw.”

#ad#But Mr. Williams’s comments were not a “straw” at all. He was acknowledging a feeling that is universal and not irrational in light of scores of attacks (accomplished and attempted) over the past several decades. Williams introduced his comments (which included a caution against regarding all Muslims as potential terrorists) with the warning that “political correctness” can “lead to some kind of paralysis where you don’t address reality.” To maintain, as NPR does, that this was beyond the pale of civilized discussion amounts to authoritarianism — and completely lives down to Juan Williams’s prediction.

Challenged to identify the other departures from NPR standards of which Williams was guilty — any employer who terminates someone should have a file — Shepherd promised that those would be forthcoming. In the meantime, she could assure listeners that Williams’s offending comments were inconsistent with (wait for it) NPR’s “impartiality” and “neutrality.” NPR and Fox News are “two different worlds,” she continued, the former representing the dispassionate search for truth and the latter representing “yelling” and extreme partisanship.

Yes, they really are that parochial. Vivian Schiller, NPR’s CEO, betrayed the surpassing arrogance of the subsidized by suggesting, after peremptorily canning Williams, that he discuss his feelings with “his psychiatrist or his publicist.” Ah, the dispassionate search for truth!

Schiller later felt constrained to apologize, saying “I stand by my decision to end NPR’s relationship with Juan Williams but deeply regret the way I handled and explained it.”

Well, okay, we’ve known for decades that the liberals who run major networks, universities, foundations, and newspapers do not recognize their own tendentiousness. Diane Rehm and Terry Gross and Garrison Keillor and Nina Totenberg and Daniel Schorr are down-the-middle moderates, whereas you are a right-wing ideologue. (I have complained in the past, after appearing on NPR programs, that I was labeled a “conservative columnist” whereas my fellow guests, liberals all, went unlabeled.) But something is afoot this time that is new.

#page#Embedded in Ms. Schiller’s apology is an acknowledgment that NPR is reeling from unexpected and vehement public anger. “I regret that we did not take the time to prepare our program partners and provide you with the tools to cope with the fallout from this episode. I know you all felt the reverberations and are on the front lines every day responding to your listeners and talking to the public.” Translation: For the first time in living memory, NPR is getting blowback. Ombudsman Alicia Shepherd confirmed this, noting that the Williams firing unfortunately coincided with “pledge week” and that volunteers manning the phones to take donations had been deluged with complaints instead. It seems that NPR has been hit with its own little Tea Party.

Here’s the way to think about public radio and public television: They are testimony to the power of special interests. The taxpayers are subsidizing programming for a minority of left-leaning Americans. A June Pew Center study found that 61 percent of NPR’s audience calls itself “progressive” compared with 41 percent of the overall radio audience (and, according to a Gallup survey, only 12 percent of Americans generally). Fourteen percent of NPR listeners call themselves Republicans, whereas 40 percent self-identify as Democrats, and 41 percent as independents. Why in the world is the government using your taxes to subsidize the radio preferences of your liberal neighbors?

#ad#In the 1990s, Republicans made pathetic stabs at defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, PBS, and NPR. They retreated — which told you pretty much all you needed to know about the last Republican majority. A new Republican majority is rumored to be in the making. Its handling of this special-interest subsidy will be equally revealing.

Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist. © 2010 Creators Syndicate.

Most Popular


‘Epstein Didn’t Kill Himself’

It was just one more segment to fill out the hour, and thereby fill the long 24 hours of Saturday’s cable news on November 2. Or so it seemed. Navy SEAL Mike Ritland was on the Fox News program Watters World to talk to Jesse Watters about trained German shepherds like the one used in the raid that found ... Read More

A Defining Statement of Modern Conservatism

The greatest documents in American history never lose their ability to astonish. They deserve, and repay, careful study, and inevitably have contemporary resonances no matter how long ago they were written or uttered. There’s no doubt that Ronald Reagan’s “A Time for Choosing” belongs in the top ranks ... Read More
White House

Impeachment Theater of Trolls

As a boy, I used to watch a television show with a weekly gag titled “MasterJoke Theatre.” A pompous egghead smoked a pipe in a leather-bound chair in a richly appointed library, told a joke, and got a pie in the face for his trouble. What the Democrats launched on the Hill this week is their own variant, ... Read More
White House

The Russian Conspiracy That Won’t Die

The Mueller report accomplished nothing. Whether you thought that the two-year, $32 million investigation was warranted or not, the report promised to establish a factual record that both sides could accept, especially on the explosive charge that Donald Trump had conspired with the Russians to win the ... Read More