Politics & Policy

What’s an Unbound Delegate?

A view of the 1976 GOP convention in Kansas City, Mo.
It depends what state you’re in.

After Rick Santorum won the Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri contests on February 7, his supporters were disappointed to learn he hadn’t gained any pledged delegates to the Republican national convention. In fact, it is highly likely none of Colorado’s 36 delegates will be bound to a candidate. Just three days before, however, Mitt Romney had won the Nevada caucuses — and 14 pledged delegates with them.

What gives? The rules regarding delegates’ voting responsibilities vary state by state. “There are 50 states,” notes Bill Crocker, Republican national committeeman for Texas. “And so there are probably 53 answers” to this question, he jokes.

#ad#In short: Bound delegates must vote for a certain candidate, while unbound delegates are free to vote their preference. Complicating this picture, however, are rules on the length of the delegates’ stipulated commitment and the lack of enforcement mechanisms.

Each state receives three types of delegates: automatic delegates (the state-party chairman, state committeeman, and state committeewoman), congressional-district delegates, and at-large delegates. In some states, such as Iowa, state law and party rules are silent on their distribution. The state’s delegates are elected at a convention in June, and they’re free to vote for whichever candidate they prefer. But in other states, such as New Hampshire, state law requires that the party allocate its delegates proportionally according to the statewide vote.

And in some states, state-party rules reign. In Texas, for instance, GOP rules require the 155 delegates to vote proportionally according to the state-primary vote. “The delegates are bound for three ballots and can only be released [before then] by the candidate withdrawing,” Crocker says. “Then for our purposes down here, the votes for that candidate will be reapportioned among the remaining candidates according to their proportion of the primary-ballot vote.”

Delaware, meanwhile, is a winner-take-all contest, and all delegates are bound to the victor — though for only the first ballot. And unlike in some states, in which the candidates themselves select their delegates, in Delaware, the delegates run on their own. Of Delaware’s 17 delegates, five of them are elected as representatives of the state’s five political districts by the state-committee members within those districts. Nine others are chosen by state-party officers.

Wisconsin is a whole other ballgame. In the Badger State, the 15 at-large delegates will go to whoever wins the statewide primary, but the 24 congressional-district delegates will go to whoever wins their respective districts. In other words, it’s possible for a candidate to win all the at-large delegates, but lose some of the congressional-district delegates.

And in West Virginia, it’s even more complicated. Voters elect 28 delegates directly, and each voter makes 22 choices (19 for the at-large candidates and three for the congressional-district candidates). On May 8, the primary day, a voter will go into the voting booth, and on the primary ballot he’ll see each of the candidates’ names with a list of delegates pledged to that candidate underneath. That voter then will be able to distribute his votes any way he likes: say, ten for Santorum, four for Mitt Romney, four for Newt Gingrich, and one for Ron Paul.

Unfortunately for Santorum, because the state’s filing deadline passed in January, he won’t have the maximum amount of delegates who could run in his name. “In one of the congressional districts, he doesn’t have anybody,” reports Donna Gosney, Republican national committeewoman for West Virginia (who is supporting Romney). And in another twist, Republicans can even vote for uncommitted delegates in West Virginia.

#page#Fine, some delegates can show up to the convention with no commitments whatsoever. But how bound are the bound delegates? With no clear enforcement mechanism, they may be freer than people think.

In Wisconsin, for instance, state-party officials (namely, the governor’s office) pick the state’s at-large delegates. But though the state party requires the congressional-district delegates to vote for whichever candidate wins their districts, it doesn’t handpick them itself. In fact, Republican voters elect those delegates directly at district caucuses. Although it’s unlikely to occur, it’s possible that a delegate pledged to vote for a candidate who didn’t win the district could win a seat at the national convention.

#ad#There’s even historical precedent for last-minute vote switching. In 1976, for instance, Delaware was pledged for Gerald Ford, but a few renegades voted for Ronald Reagan on the first ballot. One rebel, three-term congressman Pete du Pont, “went on to run for governor,” remembers Priscilla Rakestraw, Republican national committeewoman for Delaware. Because Ford won anyway, Rakestraw adds, “There were no penalties.”

With direct election of delegates and no clear penalties for vote switching, the national convention could prove lively if no candidate wins on the first ballot. What’s to stop delegates from voting their preference?

“I think the social stigma is the greatest deterrent,” says Crocker.

Not the harshest punishment for a wayward delegate.

— Brian Bolduc is an editorial associate for National Review.

Most Popular

U.S.

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More
Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More