Politics & Policy

Seventeen Trillion Reasons to Repeal Obamacare

The problems with the law just keep adding up.

Several brand-new reasons lately have emerged for repealing Obamacare. Like proper, government-designed straitjackets, they come in three sizes: hefty, huge, and humongous.

The hefty reason to repeal Obamacare arrived just as Americans struggled to file their taxes on Tuesday. As Sam Baker reported April 9 in The Hill, “The Obama administration is quietly diverting roughly $500 million to the IRS to help implement the president’s health-care law.”

That’s right. Team Obama is handing the Internal Revenue Service one half of a $1 billion Obamacare-implementation fund that’s supervised by the Department of Health and Human Services. This money will help the IRS hire 300 employees to oversee the individual mandate currently before the Supreme Court. These new IRS agents also would handle Obamacare’s $22.2 billion in new taxes on drug companies and $60.1 billion in new taxes on health insurers. The IRS also has asked Congress to finance 537 other new staffers to administer Obamacare’s subsidies for those with low incomes.

The huge reason to repeal Obamacare arose April 10 in a study called “Fiscal Consequences of the Affordable Care Act.” As I recently proposed, Obamacare should be redubbed the Unaffordable Care Act. This 2,801-page law continues to threaten individual liberty and America’s wobbly finances.

“I will not sign it if it adds one dime to the deficit, now or in the future, period,” Obama promised a joint session of Congress on September 9, 2009. Alas, this is yet another tattered banner in Obama’s disappointing parade of shattered promises:

Over the years 2012–21, the ACA [Obamacare] is expected to add at least $340 billion and as much as $530 billion to federal deficits while increasing federal spending by more than $1.15 trillion over the same period and by increasing amounts thereafter.

So concludes Charles Blahous in his fastidious 52-page monograph for the free-market Mercatus Center. Blahous, who earned a Ph.D. in computational quantum chemistry at U.C. Berkeley, is a veteran entitlements expert. In October 2009, Obama appointed Blahous to the board of the Social Security Trust Fund.

“The enactment of the ACA has seriously worsened a federal fiscal outlook that was already untenable over the long term,” Blahous found. “The ACA both increases a federal commitment to health-care spending that was already unsustainable under prior law and would exacerbate projected federal deficits relative to prior law. This is an unambiguous conclusion.”

The humongous reason to repeal Obamacare is that it engorges America’s unfunded liabilities.

Senator Jeff Sessions, the Senate Budget Committee’s top Republican, asked his staff to calculate Obamacare’s long-term unfunded liability. Please be seated. That figure is $17 trillion. This surpasses today’s $15.7 trillion national debt by 9 percent!

Sessions’s analysts did not hallucinate this number. As the Alabaman explained on March 29 on the Senate floor, “My staff used the models that are used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and worked diligently to come up with a figure.” They spent three months to determine how much more “money we don’t have but that we are committed to spend” there is, and relied on “the administration’s own optimistic assumptions and claims about the cost of the law.”

“I was floored by what we discovered,” Sessions said. “This health law adds an entirely new obligation — one we cannot pay for — and puts the entire financing of the United States government in jeopardy. We don’t have the money. We don’t have another $17 trillion in unfunded liabilities that we can add to our account.”

From Solicitor General Donald Verrilli’s tongue-tied defense of the Unaffordable Care Act before the Supreme Court, to Obama’s chilling slap at the Court’s power of judicial review over his signature law, to its rocket-like cost curve, Obamacare increasingly deserves to be unplugged. If the Court does not drop-kick Obamacare into the Potomac, the American people need to drop-kick Obama back to Chicago and elect a new president and members of Congress who will speed Obamacare the way of the iron lung.

New York commentator Deroy Murdock is a nationally syndicated columnist with the Scripps Howard News Service, a Fox News contributor, and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University.

Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor of National Review Online.

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More