Politics & Policy

Sheldon Adelson vs. the Left

Sheldon Adelson

The surest evidence that Sheldon Adelson is doing something good with his life is the fact that he is driving the Left bonkers. The billionaire casino operator is at the moment the largest private donor in U.S. politics, and has pledged to invest as much as $100 million of his own money in independent groups dedicated to ensuring the defeat of President Barack Obama this November.

The New York Times undertook an act of characteristic journalistic misdirection when it wrote that President Obama’s partisans, unlike this year’s Republicans, are having trouble raising that kind of independent-group money “because many of them object to the existence of super PACs in the first place.” Those are the Democrats we know and love: too good, too pure, too upstanding to grub for money with the riff-raff. Apparently George Soros and the unions did not receive sufficient instruction in the Reverend Obama’s Sunday school.

#ad#One of those too-good-for-this-world Democrats is Bill Burton, who charges that “these multimillion-dollar investments are small pittances compared to the return they will make when their industries are deregulated and their [taxes cut] even more than President Bush prescribed.” Mr. Burton, who is not a seminarian but rather the spokesman for a Democratic super PAC called Priorities USA, fails here to appreciate that Mr. Adelson’s issues are not those most relevant to his own business interests. His main area of concern is maintaining a robust U.S. security policy in the Middle East, including close cooperation with our only ally in that snake pit. To the best of our knowledge, Mr. Adelson does not intend to build casinos in Gaza, although his firm does operate one in Bethlehem (Pa.). Mr. Adelson also has expressed deep concerns about the federal government’s deepening role in the U.S. economy under the Obama administration, which is in the process of imposing an unprecedented degree of regimentation on the health-care industry and hatches new central-planning schemes for the energy industry practically on the hour.

While we have not always agreed with Mr. Adelson’s politics — we did not share his earlier enthusiasm for the primary candidacy of Newt Gingrich — his civic-mindedness here is commendable, even if it gives New York Times editors the vapors. 

The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular

White House

Another Warning Sign

The Mueller report is of course about Russian interference in the 2016 election and about the White House's interference in the resulting investigation. But I couldn’t help also reading the report as a window into the manner of administration that characterizes the Trump era, and therefore as another warning ... Read More

Supreme Court Mulls Citizenship Question for Census

Washington -- The oral arguments the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday will be more decorous than the gusts of judicial testiness that blew the case up to the nation’s highest tribunal. The case, which raises arcane questions of administrative law but could have widely radiating political and policy ... Read More
Film & TV

Jesus Is Not the Joker

Actors love to think they can play anything, but the job of any half-decent filmmaker is to tell them when they’re not right for a part. If the Rock wants to play Kurt Cobain, try to talk him out of it. Adam Sandler as King Lear is not a great match. And then there’s Joaquin Phoenix. He’s playing Jesus ... Read More