Politics & Policy

Preventing the Next Gosnell

Representative Trent Franks (R., Ariz.) has introduced a bill that would ban abortions performed after the 20th week of pregnancy. In the wake of the horrific trial of abortionist/murderer of newborns Kermit Gosnell, that bill has passed out of subcommittee — with every Democrat opposed — and is being sent to the Judiciary Committee. It deserves to become law.

To be sure, the bill is at odds with current Supreme Court jurisprudence, and it is certain to be challenged. The Court should welcome the opportunity to revisit its rulings on the subject, which have been by any measure extreme, to say nothing of their fundamental lack of constitutional merit.

#ad#The Fourteenth Amendment commands that no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws,” and directs Congress to enforce the guarantee. In many cases, under current law, the newborns butchered in Kermit Gosnell’s Philadelphia abattoir would have been denied the protection of the law had Gosnell stabbed and dismembered them a few inches away from where he did, or had he done so a few minutes before he did. The distinction between an unborn child a few moments (or a few weeks) away from delivery and an infant is a judicial creation with no basis in moral logic. The horror with which the American public regarded the evidence in the Gosnell trial suggests that this is, despite four decades of indoctrination, understood at a level deeper than politics. While Americans still support access to abortion in particular circumstances, they favor many restrictions on abortion and especially on late-term abortions. Republicans need not be meek on the subject of late-term abortions; if the Democrats want to be the party of Kermit Gosnell, they are welcome to it.

There is an additional political reason not to shy away from this issue. If 2012 taught us anything, it is that when Republicans do not have an abortion agenda of their own, the Democrats will invent one for them — one that is sure to be less popular than banning late-term abortions. The Democrats invented a “War on Women” out of whole cloth the last time around; 2014 is unlikely to be any different. Better to be on offense pressing for good policies than on defense explaining away imaginary ones.

The Supreme Court is wrong about abortion, and it has been for 40 years. It has been constitutionally wrong, morally wrong, and politically wrong. Congress and the state legislatures have the constitutional power to restrict abortion, and they have a moral obligation to see to it, at the very least, that the crimes of Kermit Gosnell are not endlessly replicated across the country. And while the electorate may not be entirely in the pro-life camp, it is not so extreme in its embrace of abortion as the Emily’s List faction imagines. Even if restricting late-term abortions were a guaranteed losing proposition, it would be a fight worth having and losing. But it would be better to have that fight and win, and this is the time for it.

The Editors — The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular


Courage: The Greatest of Virtues

Dear Reader (Or Listener), As the reporter assigned the job of writing the article about all of Sidney Blumenthal’s friends and supporters told his editor, I’m going to have to keep this short. I’ve spent most of every day this week in a studio recording the audiobook version of my dead-tree/pixel ... Read More

My American Dream

This morning, at 8 a.m., I did something I’ve wanted to do for as long as I can remember: I became an American. I first applied for a visa in early 2011, and since then I have slowly worked my way through the system — first as a visa-holder, then as a permanent resident (green card), and, finally, as a ... Read More

The Gun-Control Debate Could Break America

Last night, the nation witnessed what looked a lot like an extended version of the famous “two minutes hate” from George Orwell’s novel 1984. During a CNN town hall on gun control, a furious crowd of Americans jeered at two conservatives, Marco Rubio and Dana Loesch, who stood in defense of the Second ... Read More

Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian

Asked in 1972 if he believed in miracles, Billy Graham answered: Yes, Jesus performed some and there are many "miracles around us today, including television and airplanes." Graham was no theologian. Neither was he a prophet. Jesus said "a prophet hath no honor in his own country." Prophets take adversarial ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More