Politics & Policy

Major Hasan’s Death Spree

Engraved names of the fallen at a Fort Hood memorial.
Political correctness has trumped truth in the Fort Hood massacre.

Finally. Four years after Major Nidal Malik Hasan walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center at Fort Hood, Texas, and perpetrated the bloodiest massacre ever on an American military base, the self-confessed jihadist’s court-martial proceedings began this week. Had you forgotten?

Americans obsessed over the O. J. Simpson, Casey Anthony, and Jodi Arias trials. Gun-control lobbyists turned Newtown, Aurora, and Tucson into national awareness-raising, fundraising, and legislation-promoting campaigns. But where are the celebrity lobbyists and high-profile advocates for the victims of the bloodthirsty Muslim vigilante Nidal Hasan?

The White House, which downplayed the terrorist mass murder as “workplace violence,” encouraged national apathy about his evil acts. Our soldiers deserve better. Here are three facts you’ve probably forgotten — or never knew — about the Fort Hood terror spree.

1. Fourteen victims fell on November 5, 2009, not 13. Thirteen of our U.S. military personnel died in cold blood at the deployment center. But the death toll was actually 14. Private Francheska Velez, 21, was pregnant when Hasan shot her during the first round of gunfire. At a military Article 32 hearing in 2010 (analogous to a civilian grand-jury hearing), a survivor of the Fort Hood shootings testified that Velez cried out, “My baby! My baby!”

#ad#In his opening statement on Tuesday, Hasan (acting as his own lawyer) apologized to his fellow jihadists for not destroying more innocent life.

2. The victims were all unarmed. Soldiers inside the deployment center were and are forbidden to carry weapons — either government-issued weapons or personal arms. When Hasan commenced his shooting spree by shouting, “Allahu Akbar,” several brave men and women in uniform used chairs, tables, and their own bodies to try to stop him. But it wasn’t until a courageous, armed civilian police officer, Sergeant Kimberley Munley, arrived on the scene with her 9mm Beretta that Hasan’s rampage was interrupted.

In a gunfight outside the deployment center, Munley wounded Hasan — who was still able to return fire and shoot her in the hand, thigh, and knee. While she lay on the ground, Hasan kicked away her weapon. Another armed civilian police officer, Senior Sergeant Mark Todd, was able to fire at Hasan five times and brought him down.

Gun-control zealots, led by the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, exploited Fort Hood to argue for even tighter gun restrictions. But it was a 1993 Clinton-administration gun-control directive banning most military personnel from carrying their arms except under very limited circumstances for personal protection that facilitated Hasan’s massacre. Despite the death of 13 soldiers and the wounding of more than 30 at Fort Hood by a jihadist who had warned his superiors that Muslim soldiers posed a specific threat, gun-free-military-base policies remain in place.

3. Hasan’s military colleagues and superiors were more concerned with being accused of discrimination than with ridding our military of this known deranged Islamist radical. In 2007, two years before he carried out his homicidal plan, Hasan laid out his murderous means, motives, and Koranic inspiration for all to see.

His PowerPoint slide presentation to fellow Army doctors was titled: “The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military.” Hasan warned: “It’s getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims.” And: “We love death more then [sic] you love life!” As first reported by Pamela Geller, Hasan carried an official calling card with the designation “SoA (SWT)” — for “Soldier of Allah” and “Subhanahu Wa Ta’ala” (Arabic for “Glory to Him, the Exalted”).

Hasan told his superiors he was not alone among Muslim soldiers who believed they “should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly.”

He reminded the Army of the fatal 2003 fragging attack on American soldiers in Kuwait by Seargent Hasan Akbar (who was sentenced to death but remains alive while his case drags on in appeal) and the desertion case of Lebanon-born Muslim Marine Wassef Ali Hassoun.

A Joint Terrorism Task Force had been monitoring Hasan’s communications with jihadist spiritual leader Anwar al-Awlaki all along. But the military was not notified. Even without that information, military officers expressed concerns privately that Hasan might leak classified information to terror groups if he were deployed and that he was capable of committing a fragging.

Yet, they were prepared to deploy him anyway and did nothing to remove him from his job. One e-mail from an Army investigator before the Fort Hood massacre fretted: “Had we launched an investigation of Hasan we’d have been crucified.”

Instead, 13 soldiers and one unborn child paid with their lives for our country’s reckless political correctness and bureaucratic fecklessness.

— Michelle Malkin is the author of Culture of Corruption: Obama and His Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies. Her e-mail address is malkinblog@gmail.com. Copyright © 2013 Creators.Com.

Most Popular

White House

Democrats in Peril

I will just make a prediction and try to keep out of the swamp of Trump-obsession as the weeks unfold. The anti-Trump movement is now in inexorable decline; it is a little like the Nixon defense forces after the Saturday Night drama in October 1973, with the departure of the attorney general, his deputy, and ... Read More
World

Canada Is Attacked Again

Media coverage of yesterday’s monstrous van attack in Toronto, which as of this writing is responsible for ten deaths and more than a dozen other casualties, was punctuated by political press conferences of the sort that are now an inescapable part of the dark theater of public tragedies. At his first ... Read More
World

Trump and the North Korean Tipping Point

The world has been stunned by North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un’s announcement last week that he was suspending his country’s nuclear tests in preparation for the impending meeting with President Trump. Even critics have had to concede that Trump’s bellicose rhetoric since last summer regarding the North ... Read More
Politics & Policy

E Pluribus . . . Gridlock

A mantra we hear everywhere these days is that diversity is a good thing. And no doubt, it is. Diversity facilitates an exchange of ideas and opinions, and it promotes economic growth. Moreover, the alternative to diversity is to suppress the views and opinions of some subset of citizens, which is completely ... Read More
Economy & Business

Trade Misunderstandings

I was distracted by other policy topics last week but not enough not to notice Peter Navarro’s article in the Wall Street Journal, headlined “China’s Faux Comparative Advantage.” Considering Navarro’s position in the White House, it is unfortunate that it demonstrates some serious misunderstandings ... Read More