Politics & Policy

GOP Can Win by Waiting

Make Democrats clean up their own mess.

Democrats are pleading for help, in the face of the implosion of Obamacare. House Republicans confronted with these pleas should listen to those who say: “Don’t do something; just stand there.”

It was Obama and the Democratic Senate who caused the disaster now unfolding. Specifically, Democratic red- or swing-state senators such as Mary Landrieu (La.), Kay Hagan (N.C.), Mark Begich (Alaska), Mark Pryor (Ark.), and even Al Franken (Minn.) provided key votes to adopt the monstrosity without a single ballot to spare. Let them face the music; let them reap the consequences. And let them try to fix what’s utterly unfixable.

If they want to delay the individual mandate, fine: They can go first. If they want to fix the grandfathering rules so that people who want to keep their plans really can do so, fine: They can go first on that, too. Let them figure out the details. Let them try to make it work. The House can always vote to add its assent once the Senate has acted — all while noting, accurately, that even the delay or the grandfathering fix won’t make the whole of Obamacare successful or popular.

#ad#But with each fruitless effort to correct the uncorrectable, the vulnerable Senate Democrats effectively will be acknowledging that they were wrong to begin with.

The likelihood is that the Senate won’t act. It’s likely that the White House won’t let it happen. It’s likely that the vulnerable senators won’t even be able to get the more liberal members of the Senate Democratic caucus to go along with them. It’s likely that the Hagans and Pryors will be left to look both wrongheaded for having passed Obamacare and ineffectual for being unable to convince their leaders to try to improve it.

In politics, there’s not much worse than being wrong and weak at the same time.

But even if the Democrats act to delay disaster, they won’t get the credit — for two reasons. First, Obamacare is such a flawed vessel that even the short-term correctives won’t make the whole program work, and thus won’t get the Democrats off the hook for having created it. Second, even a usually inattentive public is, by now, so aware that Republicans firmly oppose Obamacare that Republicans will get at least as much credit as any Democrats, if not more, for delaying it or letting people keep their current plans.

In short, politically speaking, waiting for the Democrats to act first is the proverbial “win-win” for Republicans. At least for now, letting the lefties stew in their own juices is the best way to stop being blamed for the current toxicity of American politics.

To be clear, this isn’t to say that Republicans in either the House or the Senate should obstruct efforts to delay, fix the grandfathering, or otherwise take action. Far from it. Republicans should welcome and help with this effort. It is, however, to say that the GOP should not take the lead. Let the Dems do the heavy lifting. Let them try to explain what they are doing and why they need to do it. The Democrats will end up tying themselves in knots.

Meanwhile, Republican strategists should be using the time to create an understandable, politically saleable proposal, to be unveiled early next year, to replace Obamacare with a better way forward for American health care. Of course such a plan won’t pass with Harry Reid and Barack Obama in power, but Republicans need to convince the public that they are sincere problem solvers rather than just obstructionists. The plan should not be complicated, and it need not be comprehensive. Indeed, it should be sold not as a grand scheme to solve all ills, but rather as a solid, sober step in the right direction.

The content of that plan must be a focus of a later column; what’s important now is that the “just stand there” position for the next two months should buy conservatives the time and political space to revise their strategies, tactics, and legislative proposals for 2014. In the meantime, to slightly amend the wisdom of the Paul Newman character, sometimes doing nothing shows a real “cool hand.”

— Quin Hillyer is a contributing editor of National Review and a senior fellow at the Center for Individual Freedom.

Quin Hillyer — In addition to National Review, Quin Hillyer has written for the Wall Street Journal, the Washington Post, the New Republic, The Guardian (UK), and Investor’s Business Daily.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More