Politics & Policy

The Oil-and-Gas Cure

An energy reset could save Obama's foreign and domestic policies.

EDITORS’ NOTE: This article has been updated since its initial publication.

Obama’s Russian “reset” was the first fatality in this week’s Crimean crisis. But another reset could transform Obama’s failed and forgettable administration into a foreign- and domestic-policy success. Liberating America’s energy potential could cure the multiple ailments that lately have fatigued and enfeebled the U.S.

• Obama immediately should approve TransCanada’s privately funded Keystone XL Pipeline and speed permits for other fuel conduits. For lack of pipelines, natural gas from North Dakota’s oil fields must be burned upon capture. Instead, it should be transported and harnessed.

#ad#• He should authorize oil production in a corner of Alaska’s 19-million-acre Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. This abundant 2,000-acre parcel is the size of Washington’s Dulles Airport.

• Obama should boost fossil-fuel development on federal lands. This does not mean oil derricks in Yellowstone National Park. It does mean environmentally responsible oil-and-gas extraction from, perhaps, a fraction of 1 percent of the 42.3 percent of Wyoming or 84.5 percent of Nevada that the federal government owns.

This “drill, baby, drill” approach will increase oil and gas supplies and decrease their domestic and world prices. Merely announcing these steps will cut prices on futures markets. Delivering the goods will slash them even further.

This means sliding revenues for Russia as the value of its chief products — oil and gas — plunges. The Kremlin’s imploding income will become the leash that Vladimir Putin lacked around his neck as he invaded Georgia and Ukraine. U.S. gas exports also would reduce Europe’s dependence on Russia’s pipelines and curb Putin’s capacity to blackmail his neighbors.

“Our allies in Europe are eager for a reliable partner to enter the marketplace as a stable, secure source of natural gas,” said the American Petroleum Institute’s Erik Milito. “America is now the world’s leading producer of natural gas, which means that our liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports could significantly strengthen the global energy market against crisis and manipulation. . . . Unfortunately, the slow pace of federal approval for U.S. LNG export facilities has stalled the construction of infrastructure, weakening our competitive position. Accelerating that regulatory process would not only reduce our trade deficit and create jobs here in the U.S., it would bolster the geopolitical power of the U.S. and provide security to our allies.”

Also, as prices drop, Iran will have fewer petrodollars to finance atomic weapons. Saudi Arabia will have less cash to fund Wahhabi mosques and radical textbooks worldwide. Nigeria will have limited resources to jail people for homosexuality. And Venezuela’s hemispheric-subversion budget will shrivel as Citgo’s cash registers ring more quietly.

This energy bonanza also would have enormous domestic benefits.

• According to Deutsche Bank, every one-cent cut in the gasoline price leaves $1 billion in the wallets of American drivers and fleet owners. This money can be saved, invested, or spent on products and personnel.

• Cut-rate natural gas lowers electricity bills for homeowners and factory managers, also freeing cash for other purposes.

“The idea that energy costs in North America would always be more expensive no longer holds true,” said former Siemens CEO Peter Loescher. “The new reality is that natural gas has turned that equation on its head.”


• Inexpensive energy will help America reindustrialize: U.S. factory owners will stay here, manufacturers will return from China and other low-cost countries, and foreign companies will commence or expand operations from sea to shining sea.

In May 2012, the American Chemistry Council estimated low-cost natural gas’s impact on eight major industries, including paper, glass, plastic, and steel. ACC projected that between 2015 and 2020, additional private-sector manufacturing and new-plant-and-equipment investment in these sectors alone would increase employment by 2,232,400 workers. They would earn $132.6 billion and produce $549.2 billion in new output.

#ad#• A manufacturing renaissance would be welcome news for Americans whom government schools have left ill-prepared for careers in, say, finance, software, consulting, or real estate. Not every American will land a corner office, and many have no interest in white-collar work. Rather than a future of frustration and food stamps, a cheap-energy-fueled industrial boom would put opportunity and higher incomes within reach of those with the least. And this entire beleaguered republic would blossom amid robust economic growth.

With more Americans working and paying taxes, public-assistance outlays would fall, government revenues would rise, and budget deficits and the burgeoning national debt would decelerate or decrease. For the eight industries that it analyzed, ACC forecast a $20.9 billion one-time spike in federal, state, and local tax revenues from new, natural-gas-driven manufacturing investment. These ongoing operations, ACC calculates, would yield $26.2 billion in new tax proceeds annually.

Obama simultaneously could ruin Putin’s day and brighten the lives of millions of Americans. All Obama needs is the courage to tell the environmental Left to let him do the right thing.

— Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a media fellow with the Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace at Stanford University.

Deroy Murdock — Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News contributor and a contributing editor of National Review Online.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Why We Can’t Have Wakanda

SPOILERS AHEAD Black Panther is a really good movie that lives up to the hype in just about every way. Surely someone at Marvel Studios had an early doubt, reading the script and thinking: “Wait, we’re going to have hundreds of African warriors in brightly colored tribal garb, using ancient weapons, ... Read More
Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More