Politics & Policy

Your Life with NRO

We’ve been here for you; be here for us.

Believe it or not, National Review Online has been online bringing you dedicated daily — hourly, minute-by-minute — commentary and news for the better part of two decades now. If you’re one of NRO’s charter readers, so to speak, you remember Jonah Goldberg’s bachelor days of tissue-box shoes and the first time he reminded us that someone somewhere in the country has a job as a spellchecker at an M&M factory.

It is a beautiful country.

Nostalgia has its blessings.

Some of you have grown up with NRO at this point! Some of you have shared with us some of the milestones in your lives. Some of you have been loyal National Review readers since our founding days in the 1950s. Or, as so many of you told me when our beloved William F. Buckley Jr. died, you were, like I was, raised a bit on WFB, a respected presence in your family life in print and on Firing Line. You can’t imagine a world without NR online or on dead tree, as we say, and in the culture and even your family life.

At whatever point you came in — and maybe it’s fairly recently on an iPad: welcome! — you probably found yourself here because you have respect for the freedoms that the American experiment has existed to preserve and protect and help flourish. You probably love your country and want to be a part of the renewal of its soul.

And when you wake up each morning and look to the future, you do worry. Especially if you have children — or have a sense of good stewardship — you are concerned.

Democracy flourishes when we wake up each morning and want to make a contribution, when we want to do well by those we love and are not indifferent to our brother in need. Beauty and excellence in culture is restored in new and creative ways when we think about excellence and what’s good and true.

If you clicked on this plea and have read on this long, you are grateful National Review Online is here. It’s not a given that any of us will be here tomorrow. And it’s certainly not a given that National Review Online will be here, doing what you have known us to do: keeping you informed, keeping you “sane” — or so you’ve told us year after year — keeping you entertained and inspired.

I meet NRO readers all across the country, and even throughout the world (Hi, Togo!). You tell me time after time about the news story you could not have made it through without NRO. You tell me NRO has been here for you. NRO has been here for you, so please be here for us. Believe it or not, we have readers now who don’t really know who WFB was. And don’t even remember a time when Americans beamed with pride and love for our country, optimistic about its future. Whatever you are seeing when you look ahead, don’t despair, don’t disengage, don’t go offline. Do support National Review Online. It takes money to be creative, to improve, to keep everything running and working, to bring you excellent on-the-scene and under-the-radar, even investigatory news and commentary. If National Review Online has been a welcome part of your life in any way, please consider supporting us today.

Donate to National Review Online’s future — and yours — and America’s — here.

— Kathryn Jean Lopez is editor-at-large of National Review Online.

Most Popular

Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
Film & TV

Knives Out Takes On the Anti-Immigration Crowd

Since the beginning of the Obama era, the Left has broadcast two contradictory messages on the subjects of race and immigration. The first is that a so-called Coalition of the Ascendant will inevitably displace white Americans as the dominant force in the country’s politics and culture. The second is that ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
From left: Harvard University's Noah Feldman, Stanford University's Pamela Karlan, University of North Carolina's Michael Gerhardt, and George Washington University's Jonathan Turley testify before the House Judiciary Committee hearing on the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, December 4, 2019.

The Impeachment Eye Test

To put it mildly, the 1960s were not notorious for juridical modesty. They might compare favorably, though, to Wednesday’s episode of “The Lawyer Left Does Impeachment” at the House Judiciary Committee. Oh, I have no doubt that the three progressive constitutional scholars spotlighted by Democrats yearn in ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
Culture

The Absurd Crusade against the Salvation Army

We all know some individuals who are so obviously good and kind that we are certain if anyone were to dislike them, that's all we would need to know about the person. We would immediately assume he or she is a bad person. To hate the manifestly good is a sure sign of being bad. Such is the case regarding the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More
White House

Nancy Pelosi’s Case

Further to the post below, a couple of thoughts on Nancy Pelosi’s statement yesterday. She said this near the beginning: During the constitutional convention, James Madison, the architect of the Constitution, warned that a president might betray his trust to foreign powers which might prove fatal to the ... Read More