Politics & Policy

Hamas’s Suicidal Tendencies

(Getty Images)
Its rejection of the Egyptian ceasefire shows how it has a crazy ideology, not a strategy.

Hamas is an acronym for the Arabic translation of “Islamic resistance movement.” Its logo blends Palestinian nationalism (flags) with the total destruction of Israel (painted green) and the physical-theological liberation of Jerusalem (the Dome of the Rock).

The intended narrative is clear: valiant nationalism, geographic liberation, and Islamic purity.

But in reality, Hamas is a movement of totalitarian zealots. After winning elected power in 2006, Hamas proceeded to destroy Palestinian democracy by massacring its Fatah opponents.

Since then, it has allowed Gaza to drown in raw sewage and economic collapse. And now, a slave to its own ideological idiocy, Hamas is burying its people in blood. Over a week ago, Hamas had an opportunity to avoid this conflict. It could have stopped firing rockets into Israel and avoided Israeli military reprisals. Instead, it celebrated the murder of Israeli teenagers, ignored political pressures on Netanyahu, and persisted in its rocket attacks on Israeli civilians.

Unsurprisingly, Israel responded with force.

Hamas has now doubled down on this strategic stupidity: Yesterday, after hundreds of punishing air strikes, the group rejected a cease-fire accord brokered by Egypt. Its military wing, made up of the group’s most fanatical followers, promised an “increase in ferocity.” Netanyahu had quickly and publicly accepted that cease-fire, doing so against significant pressure in his own cabinet.

The consequence of Hamas’s intransigence? Israel has responded with even greater force. Netanyahu has made it clear that his patience is exhausted and a limited ground incursion is more likely than ever. And if that happens, Netanyahu knows the IDF is likely to suffer casualties, so he’ll want to do more than confront Hamas’s military infrastructure in northern Gaza — he may drive Hamas out of power entirely. His olive branch spurned, Netanyahu will see force as his only option.

And for now, IDF air sorties are continuing at a furious pace. Israeli intelligence drones are circling Gaza, hunting for Hamas rocket teams and commanders. In response, Hamas fighters are doing what they do best: firing back from behind civilians.

But it can’t do so forever: Egypt has restricted the border crossings and smuggling tunnels through which Hamas gets resupplied. Egypt was already annoyed by Hamas’s support for extremism in the Sinai, but now, with Sisi’s ceasefire rejected, Hamas will find it even more difficult to replenish its limited rocket supplies.

To make matters worse, traditional Hamas allies are staying silent. Iran is focused on avoiding Western ire in order to keep at its weapons program, and, along with the Lebanese Hezbollah, consolidating Assad. Meanwhile, the sectarianism of the Syrian civil war has complicated Hamas’s deeper relationship with these actors. And while the Sunni Arab monarchies still do finance Hamas, they have little interest in a showdown with Israel.

Why is Hamas pursuing such a self-destructive strategy? Ideology.

With the raison d’être of Israel’s destruction, Hamas’s political strategy is fundamentally disconnected from its military efforts. Hamas exists for an impossible purpose, so the group cannot govern as a logical actor.

Were Hamas to accept serious compromise with Israel, by embracing the peace process, it would fracture and empower its increasingly powerful rival, the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.

So instead, Hamas pushes on in an endless war against Israel and reality — risking its destruction all the same.

— Tom Rogan is a blogger and a columnist for the Daily Telegraph. He is based in Washington, D.C., and tweets @TomRtweets.

Tom Rogan is a columnist for National Review Online, a contributor to the Washington Examiner, and a former panelist on The McLaughlin Group. Email him at TRogan@McLaughlin.com

Most Popular

White House

The Trivialization of Impeachment

We have a serious governance problem. Our system is based on separation of powers, because liberty depends on preventing any component of the state from accumulating too much authority -- that’s how tyrants are born. For the system to work, the components have to be able to check each other: The federal and ... Read More
U.S.

‘Texodus’ Bodes Badly for Republicans

‘I am a classically trained engineer," says Representative Will Hurd, a Texas Republican, "and I firmly believe in regression to the mean." Applying a concept from statistics to the randomness of today's politics is problematic. In any case, Hurd, 42, is not waiting for the regression of our politics from the ... Read More
Culture

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
Culture

Not Less Religion, Just Different Religion

The Pew Poll tells us that society is secularizing -- particularly among the young -- and who can deny it? That is one reason that the free expression of religion is under such intense pressure in the West. But it seems to me that we aren't really becoming less religious. Rather, many are merely changing that ... Read More