Politics & Policy

It’s Not Just about Hamas

An Israeli Merkava tank on maneuvers (IDF)
In Gaza, Netanyahu is demonstrating Israel’s capabilities — and its determination.

Middle Eastern politics is a toxic blend of reality and paranoia, an ecosystem in which one situation has many ripples.

Take Gaza.

At present, Israeli forces are trying to degrade Hamas infrastructure and deter continued rocket strikes. But Operation Protective Edge is also about sending a message to Iran.

After all, for Netanyahu, the prospect of a nuclear Iran poses a terrible threat to Israel’s security. His fear, in my view a well-founded one, is that Iran seeks nuclear weapons as a defining strategic objective. Iran’s possession of such weapons would drive the Middle East deeper into the abyss of chaos. Iran would use its newfound power to threaten democratic movements in Iraq, Lebanon, and Yemen and to intimidate Europe and the Sunni Arab monarchies. In turn, these states would probably develop their own nuclear weapons. Iran would also significantly expand its support for groups like Hamas, the Lebanese Hezbollah, and the Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), using a strategy of nuclear blackmail against the states in the region to encourage extremism among these Islamist groups.

And a nuclear-armed Iran is increasingly likely. While international negotiators are currently meeting with their Iranian counterparts to pursue a long-term nuclear deal, the prospects don’t look good. First off, Iran is refusing to dismantle its existing nuclear infrastructure. Indeed, Supreme Leader Khamenei claimed yesterday that Iran had an “absolute need” for 19 times the enrichment capacity that Western diplomats believe the country can (somewhat) safely be allowed. Put simply, there’s a vast diplomatic chasm obstructing any deal. But while the Obama administration believes that President Rouhani might be able to persuade the aging and ill Khamenei to accept a deal, Netanyahu’s cabinet is far more skeptical. Recognizing Khamenei’s literal supreme power over foreign policy, and keenly aware of his pathological hatred for their very being (check out his twitter feed), Israeli officials believe Khamenei is fixated on obtaining nuclear weapons.

Moreover, the rise of ISIS and the meltdown of Syria have forced Netanyahu to take a far sharper view of Israel’s regional security interests. Not since the early 1980s has Israel faced such a diverse spectrum of threats.

This truth takes us back to Gaza.

Meeting Hamas and PIJ rocket teams with decisive force, Netanyahu hopes to signal Israel’s unwillingness to cede its traditional security supremacy. This intent is encapsulated in Israel’s mobilization of ground-force deployments: Netanyahu seems determined to take major risks in pursuit of grand strategic objectives (in this case, the military dismemberment of Hamas). Nevertheless, Israeli operations in Gaza aren’t solely about damaging Hamas. They’re also about broadcasting specific capabilities. In this regard, the scale of Israel Defense Forces air sorties in Gaza has been notable. Advertising its conducting of hundreds of missions each night, the IDF is demonstrating its capability for large-scale operations: the kind of air campaign necessary to attack Iran’s nuclear infrastructure. Here, Netanyahu wants Iran to understand his willingness to gamble — even at potentially high cost. By extension, Netanyahu is also warning U.S., European, and Russian diplomats that he won’t accept any deal with Iran that he regards as weak.

In all strategy, the use of military force is as much about psychology as physical impact. But nowhere is this truth more evident than in the Middle East. Put another way, in Gaza, Israel is now drawing a red line for Tehran. While most Western leaders seem to believe that a nuclear-armed Iran can ultimately be tolerated, Israel, as I’ve long suggested,  believes the opposite. Correspondingly, only a strong nuclear deal will suffice.

Tom Rogan is a blogger and a columnist for the Daily Telegraph. He is based in Washington, D.C., and tweets @TomRtweets.

 

Tom Rogan is a columnist for National Review Online, a contributor to the Washington Examiner, and a former panelist on The McLaughlin Group. Email him at TRogan@McLaughlin.com

Most Popular

Elections

Put Up or Shut Up on These Accusations, Hillary

Look, one 2016 candidate being prone to wild and baseless accusations is enough. Appearing on Obama campaign manager David Plouffe’s podcast, Hillary Clinton suggested that 2016 Green Party candidate Jill Stein was a “Russian asset,” that Republicans and Russians were promoting the Green Party, and ... Read More
Culture

Feminists Have Turned on Pornography

Since the sexual revolution of the 1960s, the feminist movement has sought to condemn traditional sexual ethics as repressive, misogynistic, and intolerant. As the 2010s come to a close, it might be fair to say that mainstream culture has reached the logical endpoint of this philosophy. Whereas older Americans ... Read More
White House

The Impeachment Defense That Doesn’t Work

If we’ve learned anything from the last couple of weeks, it’s that the “perfect phone call” defense of Trump and Ukraine doesn’t work. As Andy and I discussed on his podcast this week, the “perfect” defense allows the Democrats to score easy points by establishing that people in the administration ... Read More
PC Culture

Defiant Dave Chappelle

When Dave Chappelle’s Netflix special Sticks & Stones came out in August, the overwhelming response from critics was that it was offensive, unacceptable garbage. Inkoo Kang of Slate declared that Chappelle’s “jokes make you wince.” Garrett Martin, in the online magazine Paste, maintained that the ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Elizabeth Warren Is Not Honest

If you want to run for office, political consultants will hammer away at one point: Tell stories. People respond to stories. We’ve been a story-telling species since our fur-clad ancestors gathered around campfires. Don’t cite statistics. No one can remember statistics. Make it human. Make it relatable. ... Read More
National Review

Farewell

Today is my last day at National Review. It's an incredibly bittersweet moment. While I've only worked full-time since May, 2015, I've contributed posts and pieces for over fifteen years. NR was the first national platform to publish my work, and now -- thousands of posts and more than a million words later -- I ... Read More