Politics & Policy

Obama’s New Red Line

(President Obama: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Why the Iran deadline extension is a terrible mistake

There is always more than one story in the Middle East. On Saturday, amidst news about flight MH17 and Israel’s operation against Gaza, the Obama administration agreed to a four-month extension of nuclear negotiations with Iran.

The administration’s other “P5+1” negotiating partners (China, Russia, France, the U.K., and Germany) support this move. Nevertheless, it was a terrible mistake.

At a basic level, the decision will greatly reinforce Iran’s perception of the P5+1’s negotiating malleability. After all, the rhetorical and functional meaning of a “deadline” is that it is unqualified and unmovable, and thus urgent. This extension trashes that understanding. It encourages Ayatollah Khamenei (who holds “supreme” authority over Iran’s foreign policy) to believe that he can play for more concessions and more time. And time is a big concern, because thousands of Iranian centrifuges are spinning — and those centrifuges are not pursuing medical isotopes. Instead, the Iranian enrichment program is about nuclear weapons, which the ayatollahs believe will guarantee their theological project in the Middle East.

Some will say that there was no alternative to this extension: that diplomacy must be given every chance. I have some sympathy for that position. Indeed, I supported the original six-month deadline for that very reason. But this extension isn’t strategic diplomacy; it’s simple delusion. Authoritarians centered in “ordained” absolutism, Iran’s hardliners make strategy with specific regard to what they can get away with (just consider Iran’s terrorism campaigns). Believing, as they now surely do, that the P5+1 are unwilling to introduce tougher sanctions, they’ll embrace their delaying tactics as far as possible. And Iran’s negotiators are superb manipulators: They’ve been playing this game since 2003.

Of course, many analysts also claim that new sanctions would simply empower the hardliners and weaken Iran’s president, Hassan Rouhani. These arguments can’t just be ignored. As I’ve noted before, Obama’s outreach to Rouhani is partly designed to exploit regime factionalism — it’s an effort likely rooted in a judgment that Khamenei is vulnerable. In short, the administration’s policy is about a longer-term strategy toward a more conciliatory regime in Tehran.

On paper, very sensible. But in reality, the urgency of the nuclear issue means that the “long game” has its limitations. Although assessments of Iran’s nuclear program diverge, time is clearly running out. Ignoring this truth, the administration and its supporters are enabling Iran’s nuclear development.

This is not to say that there are easy alternatives. Any military operation against Iran’s nuclear infrastructure would be profoundly complex and risky. Still, Khamenei is ultimately a thug. In order to facilitate his taste for the carrots of American diplomacy, he must feel the escalating pain of America’s stick. The present extension — with its echoes of America’s previous “red line” credibility crisis — will only foster Khamenei’s belief that he holds all the cards. Why concede, his advisers will ask him, when the only consequence of intransigence is a deadline without temporal character?

I continue to believe that diplomacy with Iran can succeed. But to achieve that result, we’ll first have to recognize reality. The six-month deal has failed. The time has come for a far tougher approach.

— Tom Rogan is a blogger and a columnist for the Daily Telegraph. He is based in Washington, D.C., and tweets @TomRtweets.

Tom Rogan is a columnist for National Review Online, a contributor to the Washington Examiner, and a former panelist on The McLaughlin Group. Email him at TRogan@McLaughlin.com

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More