Politics & Policy

Repeal Davis-Bacon

An American icon
Give taxpayers — and non-union construction workers — a break.

This month, I joined Senator Mike Lee of Utah in calling for repeal of a law governing federal construction projects that is giving unions the upper hand and costing taxpayers billions.

The Davis-Bacon Act, which became law in 1931, requires all contractors and subcontractors working on federal construction projects worth more than $2,000 to pay their workers the local “prevailing wage,” as determined by the Department of Labor.

This Depression-era law means that instead of getting the job done for the lowest possible cost, contractors are forced to pay artificially inflated wages on everything from building bridges to repairing roofs to painting line dividers on our roads.

In 1995, when I was a candidate for president of the United States, I urged the repeal of legislation that extended Davis-Bacon provisions to school construction and renovation, saying: “That means a principal in Moline who wants to hire a contractor to rewire his school for new computers must pay the prevailing union wage rather than getting the job done for the lowest cost. It’s a big favor for the unions, but no favor at all for schools, efficiency, or economy.”

I said this nearly 20 years ago, but these words remain just as true today. Davis-Bacon is a disservice to workers in the construction industry, and a burden to taxpayers, who ultimately foot the bill for this wage subsidy.

First, Davis-Bacon robs unskilled workers of a fair shot at getting hired, instead tilting the scales in favor of big labor unions. If employers know they must pay a predetermined wage, there is no incentive for them to hire inexperienced workers over experienced, unionized workers, even for a job that would require minimal training. Because only 13.2 percent of the private construction workforce is unionized nationally, Davis-Bacon has the effect of discriminating against 86.8 percent of construction workers. 

Second, in addition to harming non-unionized workers, the Davis-Bacon Act sends an annual bill to taxpayers to the tune of $8.6 billion, according to a 2008 Suffolk University study.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) reports that Davis-Bacon requirements increase construction costs not only by raising wages on federal projects and requiring labor to be used inefficiently, but also by imposing reporting and paperwork requirements on contractors. The CBO estimates that repeal would save $12.7 billion over ten years.

In 1979, our congressional watchdog, the General Accounting Office (now renamed the Government Accountability Office), issued a report titled “The Davis-Bacon Act Should Be Repealed.” This report called the law “unnecessary” and pointed out that the Department of Labor had yet to conceive of a program to issue accurate wage determinations.

Still, today, data on prevailing wages are expensive to collect and subject to error, bias, and fraud. Even after millions of dollars have been spent in an attempt to improve data collection, the department’s inspector general has found that these problems are still prevalent.

Senator Lee’s bill to repeal this law, the Davis-Bacon Repeal Act, is co-sponsored by Senators Ted Cruz (R., Texas), Tim Scott (R., S.C.), Jeff Sessions (R., Ala.), Tom Coburn (R., Okla.), Ron Johnson (R., Wis.), John Cornyn (R., Texas), Marco Rubio (R., Fla.), and David Vitter (R., La.).

There is overwhelming evidence to support eliminating this law, and I hope our colleagues will join us in calling for its repeal. Let’s move away from bureaucracy and union favoritism and toward fairness for American construction workers and taxpayers alike.

— Lamar Alexander represents Tennessee in the U.S. Senate, where he is the ranking Republican on the Senate labor committee.

Most Popular

World

Trump’s Disgraceful Press Conference in Helsinki

On Monday, President Trump gave a deeply disgraceful press conference with Russian dictator Vladimir Putin. The presser began with Trump announcing that although the Russia–U.S. relationship has “never been worse than it is now,” all of that “changed as of about four hours ago.” It was downhill from ... Read More
Culture

Questions for Al Franken

1)Al, as you were posting on social media a list of proposed questions for Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, did it occur to you that your opinion on the matter is no more relevant than Harvey Weinstein’s? 2) Al, is it appropriate for a disgraced former U.S. senator to use the Twitter cognomen “U.S. ... Read More
White House

The President’s Do-Over

I agree with Jonah on all counts: On net, President Trump’s do-over of his Helsinki remarks is a good thing; regrettably, it is not sincere; and while I hope the revised version is the one he sticks to, I don’t have confidence that will be the case -- as posited in my column Tuesday on the folly of having the ... Read More
National Security & Defense

Trump’s Helsinki Discord

Donald Trump is not, and never will be, the Moscow correspondent for The Nation magazine, and he shouldn’t sound like it. The left-wing publication is prone to extend sympathetic understanding to adversaries of the United States and find some reason, any reason, to blame ourselves for their external ... Read More