Politics & Policy

From Russia with Lies

Must-See Putin TV
Its media work overtime to attack Ukraine and the U.S. in the aftermath of the Malaysian-airliner crash.

It has been two weeks since Malaysia Airlines flight 17 was shot down over eastern Ukraine, and the Russian media continue to paint a picture of the horrific crash almost completely at odds with that of their Western counterparts. Rejecting any theory that lays responsibility at the feet of eastern Ukrainian separatists and their Russian sponsors, Kremlin-controlled outlets have instead opted to push stories disputing any and all evidence pointing to such a conclusion, all the while portraying Kiev and Washington as working nefariously together to damage Russia’s international standing.

True, some of the more farcical conspiracy theories — MH 17 was actually the vanished MH 370, the plane was full of corpses before it was shot down, it was all the work of the CIA — are no longer reported with the same gravitas and frequency as they were in the immediate aftermath of the crash. Some reports have even been deleted from state-controlled sites. Nevertheless, most of coverage devoted to MH 17 continues to center on what is portrayed as an American–Ukrainian disinformation campaign, one intent on blaming Russia at all costs.

Typical of the Russian media’s treatment of the crash was a long report run by Channel 1, a state-owned television network and news site similar in scale to the U.S.’s CBS or NBC. The report, which aired on Sunday, presents itself not as an opinion piece but as a straight-news examination of how “Kiev and Washington, not waiting for the results of the investigation of the Malaysian Boeing catastrophe, are trying to convince the whole world that only Russia is guilty.” All Ukrainian and American evidence pointing to pro-Russian separatists’ having shot down the plane is dismissed as little more than unfounded Internet rumors that “clash with the facts.” The report goes on to quote Leonid Reshetnikov, the director of the Russian Institute for Strategic Studies, established “to provide information support to the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation.” “When you lie,” Reshetnikov explains, “it’s necessary to do so energetically, aggressively, and without abandon. The Ukrainian authorities continually demonstrate this.”

In the version of the report aired on television, Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko is shown speaking only English in a CNN interview. This has long been a tactic employed by the Russian media to paint pro-Western or opposition leaders as American stooges or puppets. To the extent that they are ever covered by the state-controlled outlets, prominent oppositionists such as Garry Kasparov have been for the most part shown speaking English as well. In turn, Kremlin-controlled channels are careful to never show President Putin or former president Dmitri Medvedev in such a “compromising” situation.

Coverage such as Channel 1’s is par for the course. Another report published Tuesday by the Kremlin-controlled outlet Russia Today (RT) cited the “expert” commentary of former Soviet minister of civil aviation Oleg Smirnov, who contends that the investigation is being hindered not by pro-Russian separatists but by Ukrainian forces. Even though it is the separatists who currently control the crash site, it is in fact Ukraine that is deliberately delaying the investigation and destroying evidence — because they already know who shot down the plane. (Hint: In Smirnov’s telling, it wasn’t the Russian-sponsored separatists.)

To the extent that possible repercussions for Russia following the catastrophe are reported, it has also been through the context of an anti-Western, pro-Russian angle. Sanctions against Russia in the wake of the crash, for example, seem to be covered exclusively in the context of American and Western European bankers and businessmen fearing adverse economic effects from any potential lack of clarity in their wording.

This is not to say that the Russian media portray all Americans in a negative light. On the contrary, RT, Channel 1, and other state-controlled outlets and news sites have approvingly quoted director Oliver Stone, who recently took to his Facebook page to promote two articles offering “alternative” theories of the crash, saying that they “probe deeper than [America’s] propagandizing fourth estate.”

No word yet on whether Putin will mandate Stone’s Untold History of the United States as required reading for high-school students.

— Nat Brown is an associate editor of National Review Online.

Nat Brown — Nat Brown is a former deputy managing editor of National Review Online.

Most Popular

Law & the Courts

Obstruction Confusions

In his Lawfare critique of one of my several columns about the purported obstruction case against President Trump, Gabriel Schoenfeld loses me — as I suspect he will lose others — when he says of himself, “I do not think I am Trump-deranged.” Gabe graciously expresses fondness for me, and the feeling is ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More