Politics & Policy

Sowing a Civil War

Aftermath of a car-bomb attack in Baghdad, October 12, 2014 (Getty Images)
The Islamic State’s strategy: destroy Iraq by blowing up its fragile political unions

Last year, before its territorial conquests shot it onto the front pages, the Islamic State of Iraq (as it was then called) was laying its groundwork by blowing up Iraqi civilians with car bombs. It was in this rubble of broken lives that the Islamic State was born.

But today, using President Obama’s strategic hesitation and the Iraqi government’s ineptitude, the Islamic State has its black flag flying from Kobani, Syria, down the Euphrates, to just outside Baghdad. Denied assistance, Iraq’s key strategic province of Anbar may soon fall. And if that happens, Iraq’s prime minister will probably make a deal with the Middle East’s other sectarian mafia: Iran.

It gets worse. Now the Islamic State has decided to throw its suicide-bombing cells back into action.

On Saturday, three separate attacks killed 50 civilians in Baghdad. Most of the murdered were targeted for their Shiite religious affiliation. On Sunday, further attacks killed at least 29 members of the Kurdish security forces and Anbar’s police chief. On Friday, the Islamic State also decided to hang police officers from Fallujah overpasses. As I explained yesterday, the Islamic State, via these acts, intends to force Sunnis into quiet acquiescence to its rule.

None of this is surprising. It’s just the Islamic State’s evolving strategy. Aware that Iraq’s elite military units protect Baghdad, the Islamic State knows it won’t be able to capture the city. Instead, the group is pursuing a classic urban terrorist campaign: controlling the periphery and destabilizing the center.

In the Islamic State’s case, “the center” is Baghdad and Iraq’s Kurdish and Shiite heartlands. Using its territory as a launch pad for attacks, the Islamic State wants to fracture the tenuous political unions between Iraq’s various political sects. Just as the Islamic State’s predecessor, al-Qaeda in Iraq, tried to destroy Iraq by defining Sunni-vs.-Shiite identity politics within sectarian bloodletting, the Islamic State hopes to do the same. Correspondingly, in the days ahead, we should expect sustained Islamic State attacks against Shiite civilians and their religious institutions and leaders. That’s because, while the Islamic State claims to defend Sunni interests, it desperately wants Shiite terrorist groups (also brutal murderers) to respond to its atrocities with their own. Then, it hopes, Iraq’s cross-sectarian democracy will burn in a maelstrom of civil war.

Regardless, the Islamic State’s advance puts the U.S. coalition in a very bad place. As I noted last week, the U.S. military can barely contain its frustration with President Obama’s patently defective strategy. General Dempsey’s latest comments on ground forces prove he knows that the Islamic State won’t be defeated by the present reliance on air power alone.

Still, absent the president’s acceptance of this reality, the Islamic State will continue its push toward catastrophe. Led by a psychopath, defined by massacres and sexual slavery, and driven to purge the world of individual freedom, these zealots will not rest until they are dead or victorious.

With urgent expediency, America must narrow their options to the former.

Tom Rogan is a columnist for the Daily Telegraph and a contributor to The McLaughlin Group. He holds the Tony Blankley Chair at the Steamboat Institute, is based in Washington, D.C., and tweets @TomRtweets.

Tom Rogan is a columnist for National Review Online, a contributor to the Washington Examiner, and a former panelist on The McLaughlin Group. Email him at TRogan@McLaughlin.com

Most Popular


Angela Rye Knows You’re Racist

The political philosopher Michael Oakeshott said that the “rationalist” is hopelessly lost in ideology, captivated by the world of self-contained coherence he has woven from strands of human experience. He concocts a narrative about narratives, a story about stories, and adheres to the “large outline which ... Read More

What the Viral Border-Patrol Video Leaves Out

In an attempt to justify Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s absurd comparison of American detention facilities to Holocaust-era concentration camps, many figures within the media have shared a viral video clip of a legal hearing in which a Department of Justice attorney debates a panel of judges as to what constitutes ... Read More
Politics & Policy

Pro-Abortion Nonsense from John Irving

The novelist has put up a lot of easy targets in his New York Times op-ed. I am going to take aim at six of his points, starting with his strongest one. First: Irving asserts that abortion was legal in our country from Puritan times until the 1840s, at least before “quickening.” That’s an overstatement. ... Read More
Film & TV

Murder Mystery: An Old Comedy Genre Gets Polished Up

I  like Adam Sandler, and yet you may share the sense of trepidation I get when I see that another of his movies is out. He made some very funny manboy comedies (Billy Madison, Happy Gilmore, The Waterboy) followed by some not-so-funny manboy comedies, and when he went dark, in Reign over Me and Funny People, ... Read More