Politics & Policy

Justice in Ferguson

A Ferguson fireman surveys a building destroyed during Monday’s rioting. (Scott Olson/Getty)

A St. Louis County grand jury has chosen not to indict Ferguson, Mo., police officer Darren Wilson in the August shooting death of Michael Brown. From the evidence available, and the careful, long statement of St. Louis prosecutor Robert P. McCulloch, that seems to have been the proper decision.

By mid October the progressive narrative of Brown’s death — that he was murdered by a white police officer, yet another victim of the systemic racism that renders black Americans de facto second-class citizens — had collapsed. Forensic analysis, testimony from several (African-American) eyewitnesses, and testimony from Wilson himself suggested that the shooting was not the “execution” that Brown family attorney Benjamin Crump and Ferguson’s many protesters have claimed. The official court autopsy report found that Brown probably did not have his hands raised in the iconic “hands up, don’t shoot” position that has come to symbolize the events in Ferguson.

According to McCulloch, the witnesses whose testimony was most damaging to Officer Wilson contradicted themselves and the forensic evidence, while the exculpatory witnesses did not. Taken together, the grand jury could not find probable cause that a crime took place.

Ferguson protesters and a not-insignificant part of the liberal media will no doubt argue that the grand jury made its decision for reasons of race, or from a bias toward law enforcement. But there is no indication that these, or any other alternative explanations, are the case. Indeed, prosecutors usually dismiss weak cases on their own; they do not bring to a grand jury cases in which evidence is insufficient to convict under the higher “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard of proof that applies at trial. In this instance, however, Mr. McCullough made an exhaustive presentation to the grand jury, thus providing representatives of the community the opportunity to indict. Upon hearing all the evidence, the grand jury declined to file charges. There is no indication that the system worked otherwise than as it should.

Nonetheless, almost immediately protesters — soon become looters — were throwing rocks at the police and then setting ablaze police cars and local businesses. The owners of those local establishments obviously did nothing except attempt to serve the community, and have gotten burned out for their trouble. Ferguson demonstrators say they live in fear, but the evidence of the last several months suggests that the unrest they instigated and have perpetuated — from the week-long riots that followed Brown’s death to the civic disruption that has had the St. Louis area, from symphony-goers to football fans, on edge for the last months, to the latest mayhem — has spread more fear in the community than any malfeasance among local law enforcement. There is clearly significant racial tension in Ferguson. But the best way to resolve it is not by enkindling local establishments, but by working peacefully through the available democratic mechanisms.

The grand-jury verdict does not mean Officer Wilson is in the clear. He remains the subject of a federal civil-rights investigation (although it is unlikely to go anywhere), and the Brown family retains the option of filing a civil suit. But the grand jury resisted the mammoth political pressure to indict strictly to assuage racial grievances, instead opting to follow the evidence. When it comes to justice, that is as much as any American can hope for. Peace, on the other hand, won’t come to Ferguson until the arsonists and looters are stopped.

The Editors — The Editors comprise the senior editorial staff of the National Review magazine and website.

Most Popular

Politics & Policy

Students’ Anti-Gun Views

Are children innocents or are they leaders? Are teenagers fully autonomous decision-makers, or are they lumps of mental clay, still being molded by unfolding brain development? The Left seems to have a particularly hard time deciding these days. Take, for example, the high-school students from Parkland, ... Read More
PC Culture

Kill Chic

We live in a society in which gratuitous violence is the trademark of video games, movies, and popular music. Kill this, shoot that in repugnant detail becomes a race to the visual and spoken bottom. We have gone from Sam Peckinpah’s realistic portrayal of violent death to a gory ritual of metal ripping ... Read More

Romney Is a Misfit for America

Mitt’s back. The former governor of Massachusetts and occasional native son of Michigan has a new persona: Mr. Utah. He’s going to bring Utah conservatism to the whole Republican party and to the country at large. Wholesome, efficient, industrious, faithful. “Utah has a lot to teach the politicians in ... Read More
Law & the Courts

What the Second Amendment Means Today

The horrifying school massacre in Parkland, Fla., has prompted another national debate about guns. Unfortunately, it seems that these conversations are never terribly constructive — they are too often dominated by screeching extremists on both sides of the aisle and armchair pundits who offer sweeping opinions ... Read More

Fire the FBI Chief

American government is supposed to look and sound like George Washington. What it actually looks and sounds like is Henry Hill from Goodfellas: bad suit, hand out, intoning the eternal mantra: “F*** you, pay me.” American government mostly works by interposition, standing between us, the free people at ... Read More
Film & TV

Black Panther’s Circle of Hype

The Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) first infantilizes its audience, then banalizes it, and, finally, controls it through marketing. This commercial strategy, geared toward adolescents of all ages, resembles the Democratic party’s political manipulation of black Americans, targeting that audience through its ... Read More